Flat Earth

[sirazimuth]

Bonus video and a lesson for knucklehead no.1(vod) and no.2(sirazimuth)

Being a knucklehead in the eyes of a loony..that's fine by me.. I'd actually be worried if he agreed with me tbh.
I'm a little disappointed I'm relegated to no. 2 though. I'm no match for vod I guess...

Hey are all the vids "bonus" now or what? That actually means none are bonus you silly fool.
Well whatever, I don't bother clicking on them anyway... The 1st one was funny, now they just bore the phuck outta me....

[notbatman]

EXPERIMENTAL SETUP:

a. standing at the shore,
b. (preferably) a modded Nikon P1000 infrared camera in hand, a tripod in the other,
c. photographing a lighthouse at a known distance of ten (10) miles,
d. all of the water in-between including the shore and the base of the lighthouse visible in the viewfinder,
e. the horizon line also visible above and behind the base of the lighthouse.



CONCLUSIONS:

1. The distance to the horizon on a globe is about three (~3) miles,
2. on a globe you know ships sail up, over and behind a curved horizon of water about three (~3) miles away,
3. NASA shows us "images" of a globe Earth and curved water from "outer space",
4. the Sun and Moon are round,
5. the shadows on the Moon and from sticks in the ground prove your ancestors were flying monkeys that hatched from dinosaur eggs if you don't check your assumptions.

[suchmoon]

d. all of the water in-between including the shore and the base of the lighthouse visible in the viewfinder,

Speaking of which, why do lighthouses tend to be built on tall cliffs/rocks and tend to be tall towers? Doesn't make sense on flat earth.

[notbatman]

d. all of the water in-between including the shore and the base of the lighthouse visible in the viewfinder,

Speaking of which, why do lighthouses tend to be built on tall cliffs/rocks and tend to be tall towers? Doesn't make sense on flat earth.

So the confusion in your mind (implied but not established) about how perspective works somehow discredits a horizon greater than ten miles away, when it can only be three on a globe?

A lighthouses height makes sense if you understand perspective on a plane. The globe theorist knowingly conflates perspective, convergence and a litany of atmospheric effects with the theorized effects from curvature because, the optical effects in mathematical terms are a close (but not perfect) match. After doing this the theorists who know they are in error, start a gas-lighting campaign and go "Duhhh, what's perspective?", "Of-coarse objects get smaller as they go father away!", "You could see London from New York if it were flat!", "Refraction causes the horizon to rise!", "Boats sail over the curve!", "NASA proves images from space on TV!".

On a plane,



the ground is perpendicular to the viewer,



however it rises optically to the vanishing point,



at eye level,



and objects traverse a vertical distance optically,



as they physically move away horizontally,
to converge at the optical vanishing point.



If you raise the viewers eye level, then it takes more physical horizontal ground to traverse the optical vertical distance to the higher level and thus, the viewer can see farther.

If you're too stupid to learn about perspective on a plane (or are just a liar) and insist on error, then you need to find a gas oven and get the fuck inside.

[suchmoon]

d. all of the water in-between including the shore and the base of the lighthouse visible in the viewfinder,

Speaking of which, why do lighthouses tend to be built on tall cliffs/rocks and tend to be tall towers? Doesn't make sense on flat earth.

So the confusion in your mind (implied but not established) about how perspective works somehow discredits a horizon greater than ten miles away, when it can only be three on a globe?

None of this perspective bullshit matters for a lighthouse. On flat earth you would have a direct line of sight to the light on top of the lighthouse whether it's placed right on the beach or 100 feet above sea level.

Seems like people hundreds of years ago figured out something that you still can't grasp today. Yes, I know, oven, rope, etc. Can I jump off a cliff next to a lighthouse?

[Last of the V8s]

Can I jump off a cliff next to a lighthouse?

dun do it bro. what would become of Mrs moon and the little moons?

[BADecker]

Can I jump off a cliff next to a lighthouse?

dun do it bro. what would become of Mrs moon and the little moons?

If he could make it look like he was pushed, they would get the insurance.

 

[diegodog]

d. all of the water in-between including the shore and the base of the lighthouse visible in the viewfinder,

Speaking of which, why do lighthouses tend to be built on tall cliffs/rocks and tend to be tall towers? Doesn't make sense on flat earth.

So the confusion in your mind (implied but not established) about how perspective works somehow discredits a horizon greater than ten miles away, when it can only be three on a globe?

None of this perspective bullshit matters for a lighthouse. On flat earth you would have a direct line of sight to the light on top of the lighthouse whether it's placed right on the beach or 100 feet above sea level.

Seems like people hundreds of years ago figured out something that you still can't grasp today. Yes, I know, oven, rope, etc. Can I jump off a cliff next to a lighthouse?

Would you not want the light house to be up high no matter if you were on the globe or plane?  For example, take a light pole in the distance, it appears to shrink and the light at top would get nearer and nearer the ground the further away you were from it.  This happens on a ball or a plane.  With water swells, waves and such would it not be an advantage for the lighthouse to be high in both situations?  You would also be able to see the lighthouse from further out in both situations the higher it is. 

[notbatman]

d. all of the water in-between including the shore and the base of the lighthouse visible in the viewfinder,

Speaking of which, why do lighthouses tend to be built on tall cliffs/rocks and tend to be tall towers? Doesn't make sense on flat earth.

So the confusion in your mind (implied but not established) about how perspective works somehow discredits a horizon greater than ten miles away, when it can only be three on a globe?

None of this perspective bullshit matters for a lighthouse. On flat earth you would have a direct line of sight to the light on top of the lighthouse whether it's placed right on the beach or 100 feet above sea level.

Seems like people hundreds of years ago figured out something that you still can't grasp today. Yes, I know, oven, rope, etc. Can I jump off a cliff next to a lighthouse?

You're a fucking retarded idiot (or more likely a liar) that can't/won't understand perspective (and convergence) on a plane.

It should be fucking obvious to anybody that you've change the quoted subject from proof and distance to the horizon to another topic in an attempt to derail and confuse the situation. You really need to go kill yourself for being a retarded idiot or an intellectually dishonest sack of shit whatever the case may be.







All these fucking people claiming the globe, their response to proof the earth is flat is changing the subject and gas-lighting the shit out of you.

[Astargath]

d. all of the water in-between including the shore and the base of the lighthouse visible in the viewfinder,

Speaking of which, why do lighthouses tend to be built on tall cliffs/rocks and tend to be tall towers? Doesn't make sense on flat earth.

So the confusion in your mind (implied but not established) about how perspective works somehow discredits a horizon greater than ten miles away, when it can only be three on a globe?

None of this perspective bullshit matters for a lighthouse. On flat earth you would have a direct line of sight to the light on top of the lighthouse whether it's placed right on the beach or 100 feet above sea level.

Seems like people hundreds of years ago figured out something that you still can't grasp today. Yes, I know, oven, rope, etc. Can I jump off a cliff next to a lighthouse?

You're a fucking retarded idiot (or more likely a liar) that can't/won't understand perspective (and convergence) on a plane.

It should be fucking obvious to anybody that you've change the quoted subject from proof and distance to the horizon to another topic in an attempt to derail and confuse the situation. You really need to go kill yourself for being a retarded idiot or an intellectually dishonest sack of shit whatever the case may be.







All these fucking people claiming the globe, their response to proof the earth is flat is changing the subject and gas-lighting the shit out of you.

You realize you spend way too much time in here instead of real life and you are not even getting anything from it.

[notbatman]

The Earth is flat and motionless.




Source: https://youtu.be/-7M107rgdmM

[BADecker]

The Earth is flat and motionless.



https://i.imgur.com/DIWBEiz.jpg
Source: https://youtu.be/-7M107rgdmM

You still haven't come to grips with the fact that there isn't any flat. Don't you ever look at the mountains? Are they flat? What about the mountainous ridges you see in objects under a microscope? What about the fact that graphene atoms are humps in the graphene sheet?

Nothing flat whatsoever. Flat is simply a figment of peoples' imaginations that help simple people work with simple life.

[Flying Hellfish]

As you can see, the earth is not flat, but very well-rounded. qed

Some folks might look at this map and call Norway a shit hole country!

[Vod]

No, they have not measured it.  They rely on what they read. 

We do not need to, because we see with our own eyes.

Consider the ant.  He believes the entire world is made of grass, because he sees it with his eyes.

A more intelligent animal, being able to see further than the ant, knows the world is not all grass.

It will be the same for you when you finally travel.  Take a cross ocean flight and observe the curvature of the earth instead of listening to creatures with less intelligence telling you it is flat.   Or tape a phone to a balloon and record footage of the curvature yourself.

Or do anything of the dozens of experiments we have suggested in this thread.

Now the ignorant ant (like anyone brainwashed to believe in sky fairies) will still claim the earth is all grass, even when I am looking at pavement.

 

[Sunnyla]

Ever heard of what Kyrie Irving said about the Earth being flat? He wants people to question whether or not something is true for themselves and not straight up believe what everyone says.

[Vod]

Ever heard of what Kyrie Irving said about the Earth being flat? He wants people to question whether or not something is true for themselves and not straight up believe what everyone says.

Why do you think everyone is suggesting many different experiments?

They want to straight up believe what they are told.  They don't want to question it.

:/

[notbatman]

... "we" ...

Kill yourself.

[HardyGoodsLtd]

personally I dont care, my world it what I can see around me, wherever I go, there I am! the world is whatever you want in your heart, its pointless to try and change peoples minds, there is however a confounding point I would like to make, according to maths, there is a 8 inches drop per 3.16 miles of land, there was an experiment done in one of englands canals that is 6 miles dead straight, they set up a laser and proved there was no drop in 5.2 miles (the limit of the laser) so I have not a clue as to what is going on there.

another one was the bedford level experiment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUjMytEgLyw

things like this need more explaining, there is no point fighting NASA unless you can afford to build a rocket and satellite for your own experiments, otherwise its like describing the outside of a tin from the inside!! lol

[BADecker]

If the curvature of the earth is 8 inches in 3.16 miles, what is the drop across the top of a glass of water?

Calculate it out. The change in the altitude of water across one inch is 0.00000499 inches. How do you measure that?

All this FE nonsense about water finding its own level, isn't something that is accurately measured. You can't measure it in simple ways, because there simply is no way to do it. It's the reason why the sextant can't measure astronomical units... because it isn't precise enough. Such measuring isn't the job the sextant was designed for.

[notbatman]

Fact: parallel lines never meet.
Fact: the parallel railroad tracks (lines) depicted in the above photograph meet at a point.

Does the train really go up, over and behind the curve?

Are you confused?