Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?

[Spendulus]

For me, patient zero is Bill Clinton... It's a sicko in all sense of the term. A shame to the United States of America... For a reminder he was caught lying (I take something that low iqs can understand ).

Many politicians have lied to the public in history but the seriousness of it is different.

For those that are very young. The lie was about sex with a woman that he did not marry. He was in a very difficult position, he wanted to keep banging that woman and the presidential job. The choice he had was resigning and divorce or lie and pray. He chose the latter and that did not work out for him.
 
The Benghazi case of Hillary Clinton is far more disturbing. This is not about sex but about American citizens dying. That event was a real shame. 

Some men died there who deserve Congressional Medals of Honor.

Whether the secrets there were honorable we do not know.

Also the wannabe film maker deserves an apology and compensation for the abuse heaped on him.

[Berns]

Well there are no untrustworthy emails sent on her government email address .  Then again no emails were sent there.

On the other side thinking of computer security.  Each person having their own email server does make it hard to compromise everyone at once.  So she did add some security by doing it.

And You can imagine what the result of the election for President of the Trump. He whole of America will sell Russia ! Destroy everything created before him. He went bankrupt and decided to earn some money. Russia buys all the politicians.

[Dizaster2015]

For her masters yes she is.

She won the first debate. Trump do not say anything clever. Lied and so nervous. Have you seen how many times he drank water?

[Tyrantt]

Shy is really ill and possibly crazy, how could she be trusted?

yes, she can be ill but not as crazy as Trump. Her illness is curable.. i am sure that she will be completely healty soon.. but Trump's chauvinism and insanity cant not be cured so we can trust hillary but absolutely cant trust Trump.

ahahahh what? How old are you? 12? Do you know the history of clintons? the whole '90s era? it's insane how corrupted they are.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwkMfpge3gE You want Clintons to be in charge again?

[birareru1988]

Back in 2008 I was much more of a 'progressive' than I am now.  Although I did mark his name, I was not voting for Obama (who I knew nothing about) but rather voting against Clinton.  Obama has been a loathsome disaster, but for all his faults he has not tried to do Iran.  Yet.  I did not trust the either McCain or Clinton would not have done the same.  McCain because he is a blatant war-monger, and Clinton because she'll do anything the Zionist tell her to as far as I can tell.  I wrote someone for 2012, but in retrospect I do wish that Romney had won for a variety of reasons.

Here's another amusing vid about 'Ready for Hillary.'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYJ-yfnj-OE

Her reaction about Gaddafi shows me more than anything that she is not a normal human being and not someone we want making decisions about our lives.

In all countries there are clandestine operations. No one is when it does not recognize. Could removing Gaddafi was in America's interest to weaken Russia's positions in the region. We don't know, and she will not tell you this.

[zikaveleus]

iam trust hilary clinton

[Sponsoredby15]

Not at all because clinton is from oligrachs. So I guess he just doind in favor of his fellow subordinates. How about poor people who want their life becomes better what she can do to them?

[Tyrantt]

iam trust hilary clinton

Youre trust Hilary Clinton? Where are you from tho? Can you tell us why do you trust Hilary, I'm rather interested.

[Racey]

Hillary Should Be SHOT By Firing Squad Says Former FBI Asst. Director

Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom is not playing around, and he has harsh truths about Hillary Clinton and the one thing she did that warrants being shot by a firing squad. It’s one thing to commit white collar crimes, but Kallstrom is pointing out something that many Americans may not realize, which is the one thing Hillary did that warrants death by firing squad.

Most Americans do not realize the seriousness of the crimes Hillary Clinton has committed. Former FBI Asst. Director James Kallstrom equated what Hillary has done with treasonous acts committed during World War II, saying, “We shot people at firing squad for disclosing this information in World War II.”

What is he talking about? When Hillary put in a home-based, private server and intentionally used it, emailing out nationals’ most classified documents, this was a crime worthy of treason. Democrats will scoff at this, calling it ridiculous, but is it?

We know Hillary intended to keep off the “state dot gov” servers for one reason, and that was because she said she didn’t want her illegal activities subject to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. It should be noted that it was exactly FOIA requests into Benghazi by Judicial Watch that led to the discovery of her private server.

We also know she had no way to secure those classified documents, so when she made that decision, it was the same thing as turning over our national secrets to our enemies. That is treason, and all Kallstrom was saying is that people were shot for committing treason during World War II. He’s not the first person to go public with that thought either.

Al Baldasaro, who is also a New Hampshire state representative and Marine Corps veteran, condemned Hillary Clinton to death during an interview. Talking about Hillary’s screw-up in Benghazi, he said, “She dropped the ball on over 400 emails requesting backup security. Something’s wrong there. This whole thing disgusts me. Hillary Clinton should be put in the firing line and shot for treason.”

Treason was taken extremely seriously during World War II. French women who wined and dined the Nazis in France were badly beaten, their heads shaved, and made to march in parades to humiliated them after World War II — and they were the lucky ones. Real collaborators were shot by firing squad.

Hillary Clinton’s crimes were intentional, and she did it with no thought for the well-being of the American people. This is not a leader. This is just a well-connected criminal and traitor, and it’s time she retired and was never seen from again.

Start Video at 10:45

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_PFM0iR20M

[d-leit]

well, of course she is dishonest, she is a politician. she's still clear better choice to trump and i am wishing americans to see that next week.

[Racey]

well, of course she is dishonest, she is a politician. she's still clear better choice to trump and i am wishing americans to see that next week.

It’s ignorant to vote for Hillary Clinton without reading WikiLeaks

If you defend Clinton and ignore WikiLeaks, you have something in common with Sarah Palin. Let that sink in for a moment. Finished processing that? Now process this — if the journalists responsible for reporting on Watergate were labeled “Russian sympathizers,” charged by the media as “attempting to influence an election,” and banned from travel or communication access, how would history judge the event? This is exactly what has happened to Julian Assange, who has done more for journalism than any of these corporate-owned, brand-named media products have done this election cycle. Either you support access to information or you have a problem with an informed public. Which side are you on?

[20kevin20]

None of them should be trusted by us. They've all been liars and now America is choosing between two bad scenarios, trying to figure out which is worse. For how many decades have we been saying the same thing every 4 years? It will never change. The corruption will be present just anywhere around us like it is right now.

[d-leit]

well, of course she is dishonest, she is a politician. she's still clear better choice to trump and i am wishing americans to see that next week.

It’s ignorant to vote for Hillary Clinton without reading WikiLeaks

If you defend Clinton and ignore WikiLeaks, you have something in common with Sarah Palin. Let that sink in for a moment. Finished processing that? Now process this — if the journalists responsible for reporting on Watergate were labeled “Russian sympathizers,” charged by the media as “attempting to influence an election,” and banned from travel or communication access, how would history judge the event? This is exactly what has happened to Julian Assange, who has done more for journalism than any of these corporate-owned, brand-named media products have done this election cycle. Either you support access to information or you have a problem with an informed public. Which side are you on?

yes, i am supportive of wikileaks and do not believe them to be agents of russia. as i said, she is dishonest. it is probably that her advisors decided to lie and say russia is trying to get trump elected by using wikileaks.

and i also agree voters should be informed by reading the wikileaks material (i am not united states voter).

but even with all the bad information about clinton, the corruption, i look at trump and hear what he says about immigrants. trump i cannot support and cannot wish for the presidency. it is too bad the green partei does not have support in the united states.

[Racey]

well, of course she is dishonest, she is a politician. she's still clear better choice to trump and i am wishing americans to see that next week.

It’s ignorant to vote for Hillary Clinton without reading WikiLeaks

If you defend Clinton and ignore WikiLeaks, you have something in common with Sarah Palin. Let that sink in for a moment. Finished processing that? Now process this — if the journalists responsible for reporting on Watergate were labeled “Russian sympathizers,” charged by the media as “attempting to influence an election,” and banned from travel or communication access, how would history judge the event? This is exactly what has happened to Julian Assange, who has done more for journalism than any of these corporate-owned, brand-named media products have done this election cycle. Either you support access to information or you have a problem with an informed public. Which side are you on?

yes, i am supportive of wikileaks and do not believe them to be agents of russia. as i said, she is dishonest. it is probably that her advisors decided to lie and say russia is trying to get trump elected by using wikileaks.

and i also agree voters should be informed by reading the wikileaks material (i am not united states voter).

but even with all the bad information about clinton, the corruption, i look at trump and hear what he says about immigrants. trump i cannot support and cannot wish for the presidency. it is too bad the green partei does not have support in the united states.

I really was not expecting a reply, but I think Trumps stand on Muslims has changed see this page https://www.facebook.com/muslimsfordonaldtrump/ even the top picture of Trump

[CoolJakeB]

With all the information that we now know just days before the election, I can definitively say that Hillary Clinton is not trustworthy. She might become the 45th President of the United States but that will not change my stance that she is dishonest, based on all the leaked e-mail information. If she is elected by the majority of the American people, then so be it, but I would not feel comfortable with her as my president because of the possible actions she could take with countries such as Russia, that could result in a third World War.

[Spendulus]

Hillary Should Be SHOT By Firing Squad Says Former FBI Asst. Director

Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom is not playing around, and he has harsh truths about Hillary Clinton and the one thing she did that warrants being shot by a firing squad. It’s one thing to commit white collar crimes, but Kallstrom is pointing out something that many Americans may not realize, which is the one thing Hillary did that warrants death by firing squad.

Most Americans do not realize the seriousness of the crimes Hillary Clinton has committed. Former FBI Asst. Director James Kallstrom equated what Hillary has done with treasonous acts committed during World War II, saying, “We shot people at firing squad for disclosing this information in World War II.”

What is he talking about? When Hillary put in a home-based, private server and intentionally used it, emailing out nationals’ most classified documents, this was a crime worthy of treason. Democrats will scoff at this, calling it ridiculous, but is it?

We know Hillary intended to keep off the “state dot gov” servers for one reason, and that was because she said she didn’t want her illegal activities subject to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. It should be noted that it was exactly FOIA requests into Benghazi by Judicial Watch that led to the discovery of her private server.

We also know she had no way to secure those classified documents, so when she made that decision, it was the same thing as turning over our national secrets to our enemies. That is treason, and all Kallstrom was saying is that people were shot for committing treason during World War II. He’s not the first person to go public with that thought either.

Al Baldasaro, who is also a New Hampshire state representative and Marine Corps veteran, condemned Hillary Clinton to death during an interview. Talking about Hillary’s screw-up in Benghazi, he said, “She dropped the ball on over 400 emails requesting backup security. Something’s wrong there. This whole thing disgusts me. Hillary Clinton should be put in the firing line and shot for treason.”

Treason was taken extremely seriously during World War II. French women who wined and dined the Nazis in France were badly beaten, their heads shaved, and made to march in parades to humiliated them after World War II — and they were the lucky ones. Real collaborators were shot by firing squad.

Hillary Clinton’s crimes were intentional, and she did it with no thought for the well-being of the American people. This is not a leader. This is just a well-connected criminal and traitor, and it’s time she retired and was never seen from again.

Start Video at 10:45

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_PFM0iR20M

That is a very good set of statements.  I am going to simply repeat part of it.

We know Hillary intended to keep off the “state dot gov” servers for one reason, and that was because she said she didn’t want her illegal activities subject to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. It should be noted that it was exactly FOIA requests into Benghazi by Judicial Watch that led to the discovery of her private server.

We also know she had no way to secure those classified documents, so when she made that decision, it was the same thing as turning over our national secrets to our enemies. That is treason, and all Kallstrom was saying is that people were shot for committing treason during World War II. He’s not the first person to go public with that thought either.
.....
Hillary Clinton’s crimes were intentional, and she did it with no thought for the well-being of the American people. This is not a leader. This is just a well-connected criminal and traitor, and it’s time she retired and was never seen from again.

[Sithara007]

She might become the 45th President of the United States but that will not change my stance that she is dishonest, based on all the leaked e-mail information.

Hold on... according to the latest opinion polls, she is trailing in crucial states such as New Hampshire and Virginia. And also, the African American turnout was well below the average during the early voting.

[BADecker]

Latest WikiLeaks Dump Includes Full List Of Fees From Clinton Global Initiative Donors

The latest WikiLeaks dump from this morning includes a very detailed list of 2012/2013 donors to the Clinton Global Initiative.  Like the donors to the Clinton Foundation (which we reviewed here), the list is a who's who of wall street banks, giant energy corporations, chemical conglomerates and multi-national pharmas...you know, all the "shady" corporations that you've been told were in bed with the Republicans.



Of course, we're sure that Pfizer will be interested to learn of the following email from Neera Tanden in which she and John Podesta plot over how to attack the "drug companies" in order to rally enthusiasm  among Hillary's base....such a noble cause.  According to Neera, Hillary "hates (or at least used to hate) the drug companies."  Of course, we sympathize with Neera, it is difficult to keep up with Hillary's constantly changing views on public policy (aka: her donor list).



Of course, as we learned previously, Dow Chemical was also "spreading their wealth around" to all of the Clinton organizations.  For those not as familiar with the history between Dow Chemical and the Clintons, here is a refresher from our previous post:

The donations from Dow Chemical are particularly notable for several reasons.  First, because of other emails revealed by WikiLeaks and other FOIA requests, we now know that Dow Chemical CEO, Andrew Liveris, was granted special access to then Secretary Clinton back in July 2009 at the same time he was embroiled in ongoing litigation with another Clinton Foundation donor, Kuwait, over a failed joint-venture that would have netted Dow $9BN in cash.  As Band notes in his memo, 1 month after being granted special access to Secretary Clinton, Liveris invited President Clinton and Band out for a day of golf. Moreover, shortly after his meeting with Secretary Clinton and golf outing with President Clinton, Liveris decided to donate $500,000 to the Clinton Global Initiative...very convenient timing for all involved.

In August of 2009, Mr. Kelly invited Mr. Liveris to play golf with President Clinton and me.   Mr. Kelly subsequently asked Dow to become a CGI sponsor at the $500,000 level, which they did, as well as making a $150,000 donation to the Foundation for President Clinton to attend a Dow dinner in Davos.

The story gets even more bizarre when Band reveals in the following footnote that Liveris provided the Dow Chemical plane to fly President Clinton and his staff from New York to California and then California toNorth Korea for their golf outing.  We would assume this is a simple typo by Band and/or he's just geographically challenged...if not, this certainly raises a whole other set of questions for Bill.

Mr. Liveris provided the Dow plane to fly President Clinton and his staff to and from California for our trip to, and from, North Korea.  As a private trip, the Foundation had to pay the costs of airfare; Mr. Liveris' in kind contribution saved the Foundation in excess of $100,000.

According to the Dialy Caller, Dow Chemical paid Teneo $2.8 million in 2011 and $16 million in 2012 for a variety of "consultancy services".  Of course, Bill Clinton was an honorary chairman of Teneo and, as such, was set to be paid $3.5 million for that position even though he ultimately only kept $100,000 because of the scandals that erupted around the firm, including their advisory relationship with MF Global.



And a little extra money for CGI University as well.



And that's how "public servants" get wealthy off their $150,000 salaries.

Read more at http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-03/latest-wikileaks-dump-includes-full-list-clinton-global-initiative-donors. And look for the links in all the text, links which are not posed here.

[DonValenteeno]

What's the bitter and only choice? Vote for her then impeach her

[QuestionAuthority]

How is she any different than any other thieving lunatic POTUS?

Nixon was a crook that quit his job to keep from being jailed.

John F. Kennedy was responsible for a coup against Abdul Salam Arif in Iraq that placed Saddam Hussein in power.

Ronald Reagan was a senile old fool that let his wife Nancy make most of the important decisions. He used to fall asleep in his chair during important ceremonies. He called his wife Nancy "mommy" and acted like she was his mommy. Before running the country he was a stand up comic and an actor. Being an actor, playing a part, I guess qualifies you to bullshit the world.

Harry S. Truman nuked major cities in Japan, not once but twice, killing men, women and children and their descendants for generations. He said he did it to end the war faster and "save lives". If that's how he saves lives I'd hate to see how he likes to kill. 0-o

George H. W. Bush was a blithering idiot that said things like, "I'm not granting amnesty but the illegals that are here can stay". He was responsible for the middle-eastern war that made Muslems hate us so much they are still terrorizing us today. His Vice President, Dan Quayle, was so stupid he couldn't spell "potato".

President Grover Cleveland was a pedophile. When Cleveland’s law partner Oscar Folsom died, Cleveland became his daughters legal guardian. Frances Folsom was 11 years old at the time. He later married her at the White House. She remains the youngest First Lady in the history of the United States, having been just 21 when they married. They were "conjugal" when she was still an illegal teen girl. Oh well, I guess it's ok to fuck a little kid if you marry them when they grow up.

Jimmy Carter believes UFOs are real and has a fear of being abducted.