MrSpace
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
July 29, 2015, 09:34:45 AM |
|
Fake thread of a dead scam coin~ so, why do you think its a scam coin? second, why do you think its a fake thread? first of all original developer disapeared, so community took over, and started a new thread.. if your just here to troll, then you will be known as bump bitch nr.2 Hey friend, you & I know what is going on but they sure as hell don't
|
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
|
July 29, 2015, 10:44:19 AM |
|
Could someone share the ports for config file?And working nodes..
|
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97
|
|
|
|
dominuspro
|
|
July 29, 2015, 05:51:46 PM |
|
Hi! Good job guys with everything Could someone share the ports for config file?And working nodes..
What do You mean for config file ports? If You are talking about rpcport, You can use any free port that suits You. I have those nodes in the config: addnode=5.35.253.206 addnode=94.23.23.194 addnode=52.17.253.8 addnode=37.59.18.108 If You need more You can see the network status in the cryptoid block explorer: addnode=104.238.131.91 addnode=108.61.167.163 addnode=109.2.205.18 addnode=121.121.112.116 addnode=125.73.84.13 addnode=174.21.38.69 addnode=178.219.90.233 addnode=188.162.41.52 addnode=188.166.108.107 addnode=188.230.216.149 addnode=188.3.198.24 addnode=193.41.188.210 addnode=209.173.116.72 addnode=219.77.109.138 addnode=45.37.227.196 addnode=45.58.49.15 addnode=5.9.56.229 addnode=52.17.253.8 addnode=58.96.104.161 addnode=62.197.207.85 addnode=67.237.43.160 addnode=67.8.38.82 addnode=71.62.31.72 addnode=73.142.206.88 addnode=76.185.12.92 addnode=85.214.85.135 addnode=86.195.213.164 addnode=86.6.154.105 addnode=94.23.23.194 addnode=94.230.240.55 addnode=98.193.2.154
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 29, 2015, 08:09:39 PM |
|
Well.... SPR was launched....but in March 2015 it was born Headline targets are 3,000 Bitcoin Full nodes, p2p exchange, automated escrow and start on APIs by July 2016 - plus some other great stuff in the works
|
|
|
|
georgem (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
|
|
July 29, 2015, 08:26:55 PM |
|
Well.... SPR was launched....but in March 2015 it was born Headline targets are 3,000 Bitcoin Full nodes, p2p exchange, automated escrow and start on APIs by July 2016 - plus some other great stuff in the works Congratulations everybody! Yep, this is just the start.... a lot of mindblowing things ahead of us! Stay tuned...
|
|
|
|
stonehedge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1002
Decentralize Everything
|
|
July 29, 2015, 09:05:54 PM |
|
Well.... SPR was launched....but in March 2015 it was born Headline targets are 3,000 Bitcoin Full nodes, p2p exchange, automated escrow and start on APIs by July 2016 - plus some other great stuff in the works Congratulations everybody! Yep, this is just the start.... a lot of mindblowing things ahead of us! Stay tuned... You've got a lot of people behind you who believe in the vision mate, looking forward to the journey.
|
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
|
July 29, 2015, 10:08:15 PM |
|
|
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 30, 2015, 09:03:02 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
AnotherNode
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Nodes That Serve
|
|
July 31, 2015, 08:37:47 AM |
|
Dump: Bittrex: 07/30/2015 08:30:14 PM SELL 0.00005602 10929.96789629 0.61229680 Accumulate: Explorer: 504659 2015-07-30 23:14:51 + 10,929.76789629 SPR 291,688.45376404 SPR
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 01, 2015, 09:06:44 AM Last edit: August 01, 2015, 09:17:35 AM by coins101 |
|
I would like to propose a $1m reward for finding Satoshi. Specifically, finding SatoshiNakamoto vanity gen. It looks like it would take one thread 380,000,000,000 years to find this vanity gen. With 8 threads that period drops by quite a few million years. I was thinking that the chances of finding Satoshi are lower than the odds of winning the lottery, much worse odds. So we should be confident in providing a $100k, or $1m reward bounty for the first person to find this vanity gen. Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
August 01, 2015, 10:04:26 AM |
|
I would like to propose a $1m reward for finding Satoshi. Specifically, finding SatoshiNakamoto vanity gen. It looks like it would take one thread 380,000,000,000 years to find this vanity gen. With 8 threads that period drops by quite a few million years. I was thinking that the chances of finding Satoshi are lower than the odds of winning the lottery, much worse odds. So we should be confident in providing a $100k, or $1m reward bounty for the first person to find this vanity gen. Any thoughts? in the famous words used by many ... SHOW ME THE MONEY !!! ... ahem - now back to work ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 01, 2015, 11:48:47 AM Last edit: August 01, 2015, 12:05:32 PM by coins101 |
|
.... in the famous words used by many ... SHOW ME THE MONEY !!! ... ahem - now back to work ... #crysx Well, that wasn't what I was thinking, but if we can all define some rules and a proper campaign, I might consider backing it if needed. I'd certainly think about liquidating one of my trading accounts into an escrow or something. If needed, the fiat could be transferred into BTC and held in escrow. First it would be useful to work on some rules, check gaming laws, think about ways the system could be gamed (bots), etc. Ideally, for example, anyone participating would need to have a consistent balance of say 500 or 1,000 SPR and only use a maximum of 4 threads or something like that. Using supercomputers would be uneconomical in terms of power costs for just $100k. I'd rather figure out a way that we could offer $1m and for funds to go from the network into our p2p exchange and held in BTC. I know its stupid and risky to show things like this, but so many people just doubt and need to see the money before giving any credence to ideas. Sad, but that's life I guess. edits
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 01, 2015, 12:03:21 PM |
|
Perhaps $100k for SatoshiNakamoto and $1m for SatoshiNakamoto1 ?
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
August 01, 2015, 12:04:26 PM |
|
.... in the famous words used by many ... SHOW ME THE MONEY !!! ... ahem - now back to work ... #crysx Well, that wasn't what I was thinking, but if we can all define some rules and a proper campaign, I might consider backing it if needed. I'd certainly think about liquidating one of my trading accounts into an escrow or something. If needed, the fiat could be transferred into BTC and held in escrow. First it would be useful to work on some rules, check gaming laws, think about ways the system could be gamed, etc. Ideally, for example, anyone participating would need to have a consistent balance of say 500 or 1,000 SPR and only use a maximum of 4 threads or something like that. Using supercomputers would be uneconomical in terms of power costs for just $100k. I'd rather figure out a way that we could offer $1m and for funds to go from the network into our p2p exchange and held in BTC. I know its stupid and risky to show things like this, but so many people just doubt and need to see the money before giving any credence to ideas. Sad, but that's life I guess. i actually didnt think you were serious ... not because of the money ... but because it is almost an impossibility to get an address that EXACT - even with a hoard of supercomputers - in any short period of time ... i would get a 4core vps and have it running 24 / 7 ... maybe 70 of them ... seriously ... that vanitygen address is SO difficult - but would be highly prized i guess ... im not that interested in vanity addresses and such - but would be worth having a go ... this will be interesting ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 01, 2015, 12:11:31 PM |
|
.... i actually didnt think you were serious ... not because of the money ... but because it is almost an impossibility to get an address that EXACT - even with a hoard of supercomputers - in any short period of time ... i would get a 4core vps and have it running 24 / 7 ... maybe 70 of them ... seriously ... that vanitygen address is SO difficult - but would be highly prized i guess ... im not that interested in vanity addresses and such - but would be worth having a go ... this will be interesting ... #crysx Its actually not a bad way to show the security of the public / private key cryptography to average Joe public. edit The winner would also have to transfer the keys to verify, which would make the address a collectible that could never be used. It could therefore have lots of collector / trade value, but zero utility value.
|
|
|
|
AnotherNode
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Nodes That Serve
|
|
August 01, 2015, 12:19:47 PM |
|
.... in the famous words used by many ... SHOW ME THE MONEY !!! ... ahem - now back to work ... #crysx Well, that wasn't what I was thinking, but if we can all define some rules and a proper campaign, I might consider backing it if needed. I'd certainly think about liquidating one of my trading accounts into an escrow or something. If needed, the fiat could be transferred into BTC and held in escrow. First it would be useful to work on some rules, check gaming laws, think about ways the system could be gamed, etc. Ideally, for example, anyone participating would need to have a consistent balance of say 500 or 1,000 SPR and only use a maximum of 4 threads or something like that. Using supercomputers would be uneconomical in terms of power costs for just $100k. I'd rather figure out a way that we could offer $1m and for funds to go from the network into our p2p exchange and held in BTC. I know its stupid and risky to show things like this, but so many people just doubt and need to see the money before giving any credence to ideas. Sad, but that's life I guess. i actually didnt think you were serious ... not because of the money ... but because it is almost an impossibility to get an address that EXACT - even with a hoard of supercomputers - in any short period of time ... i would get a 4core vps and have it running 24 / 7 ... maybe 70 of them ... seriously ... that vanitygen address is SO difficult - but would be highly prized i guess ... im not that interested in vanity addresses and such - but would be worth having a go ... this will be interesting ... #crysx Fuck me, when do we start? Well, just in case, I'm on it already.
|
|
|
|
pokeytex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
|
|
August 01, 2015, 01:15:23 PM |
|
A promotion like that would definitely generate interest and buzz in the SPR community like we have never seen before!
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 01, 2015, 01:29:36 PM Last edit: August 01, 2015, 02:02:52 PM by coins101 |
|
Perhaps $100k for SatoshiNakamoto and $1m for SatoshiNakamoto1 ? So lets think about this before moving ahead. * To prevent bots being created, 500 SPR is required in your wallet. * Adding 500 SPR to your wallet after you find SatoshiNakamoto invalidates payouts. * You have to send 1 SPR to the successful vanity gen address soon after it is created and provide details of the block that the transaction enters * The protocol should be allowed to send some SPR to the SPR p2p exchange until $1m worth of BTC is created. Perhaps we should just maintain the funding, even if the fund reaches $100m, or $1bn. * I'm not going to keep $100k guarantee indefinitely, so when the p2p exchange has $100k of BTC, then I'll remove the guarantee. This will be on a sliding scale, so that as the funds are built up, the guarantee is reduced. * I'm preferring SatoshiNakamoto1, as it seems there are only 9 iterations on the network 1, 2,....9
|
|
|
|
georgem (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1007
spreadcoin.info
|
|
August 01, 2015, 03:02:04 PM |
|
I would like to propose a $1m reward for finding Satoshi. Specifically, finding SatoshiNakamoto vanity gen. By offering 1 Million $ it suddenly becomes attractive to create a specific ASIC that doesn't hash POW but rather SPR addresses. And doesn't this mean that those insane numbers of trillions of years (based on CPU hashing) will be reduced by a factor of maybe 10^6 or more.... ? And all of a sudden* this might start awholenother* ASIC race! *
|
|
|
|
|