▄■▀■▄ 🌟BITVEST.io🌟 💰WIN BY 🔶PLAY 📈INVEST➡🔺🎲🎰🔲 | BET CONTEST ▄■▀■▄

[Taskford]

-

But I believe Cryptopreneurbrainboss is good manager and he will not tolerate his participants will post anything random just for the sake to increasing their post count.

I agree on this. The concern is not about the manager handling this since post quality can’t be improve if the participants that applying are shit posters. I will not be surprised if the manager will frequently remove user on this campaign or tolerate a medium quality post just to have an active participants.

It’s very hard to find a decent poster for that pay rate while the average campaign gives that payment for a 25 post max. Even Stake that offers much higher pay per post with high post quota fails to full their campaign until now.

In as much as I know that cryptopreneurbrainboss is someone that give fair verdict in his campaign, this credit can be confirmed in his trust feedback.

I believe that shit posters or low quality posters will be removed from this campaign as cryptopreneurbrainsboss is of reputable character and would not allow anything that will jeopardize his managerial role in the course of this campaign

He handle a lot of campaigns already then been part on those spamming discussion in this forum so provably he really know his job here so there's nothing to worry about those spamming since he can handle it well. We can only speculate negative things surround in this campaign if the manager gotten by lightlord is  just a random person since for sure we cannot expect anything good to be done and might rampant spamming might really happen on their campaign. We already see there past campaign went very well and how much more now that they rise up the intended payments each post made for sure all will exert some effort to look good when manager is reviewing so that they can retain their spot on the campaign.

Also it seems that lightlords campaign launching is effective since many people got curious and now many people discuss about their latest actions.

[Shamm]

-

But I believe Cryptopreneurbrainboss is good manager and he will not tolerate his participants will post anything random just for the sake to increasing their post count.

I agree on this. The concern is not about the manager handling this since post quality can’t be improve if the participants that applying are shit posters. I will not be surprised if the manager will frequently remove user on this campaign or tolerate a medium quality post just to have an active participants.

It’s very hard to find a decent poster for that pay rate while the average campaign gives that payment for a 25 post max. Even Stake that offers much higher pay per post with high post quota fails to full their campaign until now.

In as much as I know that cryptopreneurbrainboss is someone that give fair verdict in his campaign, this credit can be confirmed in his trust feedback.

I believe that shit posters or low quality posters will be removed from this campaign as cryptopreneurbrainsboss is of reputable character and would not allow anything that will jeopardize his managerial role in the course of this campaign

Cryptopreneurbrainboss is one of the best managers here in this community and he is the one who manage in this campaign before so for sure he already know what he want to do about those users like what you said shitposter or spammer. We can trust brainboss for this as we all know that he is a good and reputable signature campaign manager. And I think once he caught those sitposter and spammer he will terminate those users.

[Wiwo]

He handle a lot of campaigns already then been part on those spamming discussion in this forum so provably he really know his job here so there's nothing to worry about the spamming

I have to struggle so hard to bring out your true intention on this comment,  most especially this part and I will suggest you edit this part not to make your comment being read out of context by those newbies who may not have their own opinion or experience in the forum,  because leaving this part of your comment at it original shape it make it look as if you are saying that the manager is among those spamming the forum.

Meanwhile, while you intend that he had long-term experience and involvement on the job to spot signature spammers or other spammers around the forum because I also have the same confidence in the manager that he will do a great job of bringing the best participants on board the signature even though the weekly budget is really low.

[Mate2237]

He is no go area. Brainboss is a discipline manager and I also believe that all the managers in the forum are good and discipline. As others are good likewise Brainboss. One thing in any campaign is to achieve the short term aims and the lao g term goal and I believed Brainboss will achieve that, all the campaign managers I have worked with are all wonderful people. Bitvest.io is not a new site, I was thinking it is a new site but when I visit the ANN thread today and saw the launched date, I discovered that it was since 2015 which means they have been running in the campaign and paused along the way and decided to relaunched it again.

Bitvest.io you are welcome back. You were one of the early sites in the forum.

[Oilacris]

He handle a lot of campaigns already then been part on those spamming discussion in this forum so provably he really know his job here so there's nothing to worry about the spamming

I have to struggle so hard to bring out your true intention on this comment,  most especially this part and I will suggest you edit this part not to make your comment being read out of context by those newbies who may not have their own opinion or experience in the forum,  because leaving this part of your comment at it original shape it make it look as if you are saying that the manager is among those spamming the forum.

Meanwhile, while you intend that he had long-term experience and involvement on the job to spot signature spammers or other spammers around the forum because I also have the same confidence in the manager that he will do a great job of bringing the best participants on board the signature even though the weekly budget is really low.

Not really that hard to understand on which even if you are a newbie then its impossible that you wont really be able to understand the context or on the response that he had said which it is obviously that spamming discussions do really pertaining about that having the experience on distinguishing those spams from good quality post and we know that this manager is really that having that experience on dealing with spammers and this is why even the campaign isnt really that paying that high but having this kind of manager would really be still able to maintain that quality and standard.
Spots are already been filled and there are already chosen participants of the campaign.

Isnt really just that right that we should really be stopping on talking or making discussion about signature campaign and its manager?
Whether we do really bash up the payment rates then its their budget and there's nothing we can do about that.

[pawel7777]

@LL seemed to have health issues so he can't continue to be active which resulted in a piling of unpaid weeks so brainboss decided to put the campaign on hold, now things changed the payment funds are in the hands of the manager so there will be payout every week just like any other campaign.

I wasn't involved in that campaign, but reading LL's trust ratings and reputation thread, it doesn't look like it was a single case of delay (possibly caused by health issues), but rather multiple issues with payment delays lasting weeks. But that's why it's good to have a trusted manager holding funds in escrow.

Also, it is good to see the increased payout which is still low compared to other campaigns

Yup, if I'm not mistaken, even after the increase, it's still max $1/post (and only for the top-tier), which makes it the lowest-paying campaign among the currently active ones. But still, if there are takers, then why not? Offering low payments and adjusting it up later, if needed, is a pretty sensible way of making sure the campaign organiser is getting the most of their money. But again, it could backfire if the manager is not active in fighting low quality spam.

[jrrsparkles]

Isnt really just that right that we should really be stopping on talking or making discussion about signature campaign and its manager?
Whether we do really bash up the payment rates then its their budget and there's nothing we can do about that.

Yes, I don't think we need to discuss the campaign further, it started when Lightlord announced when the payment was low LL addressed it and increased it to a considerable amount so those who wish to join then it's their choice, and if someone feels they are spamming then use the report to moderator button and @CryptopreneurBrainboss is capable of identifying them as well cause he managed both bitvest and 777 at the same time in the past.

Now let the ANN thread serve its actual purpose and if you still want to discuss further then I suggest you create a separate thread somewhere appropriate.

[pawel7777]

Yes, I don't think we need to discuss the campaign further, it started when Lightlord announced when the payment was low LL addressed it and increased it to a considerable amount so those who wish to join then it's their choice, and if someone feels they are spamming then use the report to moderator button and @CryptopreneurBrainboss is capable of identifying them as well cause he managed both bitvest and 777 at the same time in the past.

Now let the ANN thread serve its actual purpose and if you still want to discuss further then I suggest you create a separate thread somewhere appropriate.

What's the ANN's actual purpose in your opinion?
There is absolutely nothing wrong in discussing the signature campaign (or any other marketing actions) in this thread. That's what ANN threads are for - discussing anything related to the business. The signature campaign thread is meant for the manager and participants (and is self-moderated) and not for general discussion. And the idea that we should be starting a separate topic for each type of discussion relating to Bitvest is, softly saying, bizarre.

And I don't think LL minds having his thread boosted up to the top of the Gambling board.

[Bitinity]

Yes, I don't think we need to discuss the campaign further, it started when Lightlord announced when the payment was low LL addressed it and increased it to a considerable amount so those who wish to join then it's their choice, and if someone feels they are spamming then use the report to moderator button and @CryptopreneurBrainboss is capable of identifying them as well cause he managed both bitvest and 777 at the same time in the past.

Now let the ANN thread serve its actual purpose and if you still want to discuss further then I suggest you create a separate thread somewhere appropriate.

What's the ANN's actual purpose in your opinion?
There is absolutely nothing wrong in discussing the signature campaign (or any other marketing actions) in this thread. That's what ANN threads are for - discussing anything related to the business. The signature campaign thread is meant for the manager and participants (and is self-moderated) and not for general discussion. And the idea that we should be starting a separate topic for each type of discussion relating to Bitvest is, softly saying, bizarre.

And I don't think LL minds having his thread boosted up to the top of the Gambling board.

In general you are absolutely correct that ANN thread is to discuss anything related to the business, there is also no specific rule that we are not allowed to talk about it but it is just rare to see ANN thread is being used to discuss about the payrate of the signature campaign too much/further. At least I do not see people talk about the payrate of the signature campaign in other ANN threads. In my point view, ANN thread is better to be used to discuss more about internal things that we can find on the casino's site, such as promotion, games, deposit/withdrawal etc.

[jrrsparkles]

Yes, I don't think we need to discuss the campaign further, it started when Lightlord announced when the payment was low LL addressed it and increased it to a considerable amount so those who wish to join then it's their choice, and if someone feels they are spamming then use the report to moderator button and @CryptopreneurBrainboss is capable of identifying them as well cause he managed both bitvest and 777 at the same time in the past.

Now let the ANN thread serve its actual purpose and if you still want to discuss further then I suggest you create a separate thread somewhere appropriate.

What's the ANN's actual purpose in your opinion?
There is absolutely nothing wrong in discussing the signature campaign (or any other marketing actions) in this thread. That's what ANN threads are for - discussing anything related to the business. The signature campaign thread is meant for the manager and participants (and is self-moderated) and not for general discussion. And the idea that we should be starting a separate topic for each type of discussion relating to Bitvest is, softly saying, bizarre.

And I don't think LL minds having his thread boosted up to the top of the Gambling board.

I am the one who actually said that the pay rate is low which expected to be different but now ANN is filled with discussing campaign pay rate for multiple pages which isn't necessary nor going to help the casino in any way if still, the Payrate is a concern then it should be discussed in the campaign thread, not in their ANN which is supposed to discuss casino related issues, promotions, any updates, contest.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Yes, I don't think we need to discuss the campaign further, it started when Lightlord announced when the payment was low LL addressed it and increased it to a considerable amount so those who wish to join then it's their choice, and if someone feels they are spamming then use the report to moderator button and @CryptopreneurBrainboss is capable of identifying them as well cause he managed both bitvest and 777 at the same time in the past.

Now let the ANN thread serve its actual purpose and if you still want to discuss further then I suggest you create a separate thread somewhere appropriate.

What's the ANN's actual purpose in your opinion?
There is absolutely nothing wrong in discussing the signature campaign (or any other marketing actions) in this thread. That's what ANN threads are for - discussing anything related to the business. The signature campaign thread is meant for the manager and participants (and is self-moderated) and not for general discussion. And the idea that we should be starting a separate topic for each type of discussion relating to Bitvest is, softly saying, bizarre.

And I don't think LL minds having his thread boosted up to the top of the Gambling board.

You spoke really well to be honest, makes no sense to carry topic related to Bitvest to another thread meanwhile the main Ann is here and needs boosting, as much as I know, Lightlord will like this thread to always be on the first page of this board, as this is also advertising the casino to those visiting this board, and just like you have said, LL doesn't mind whatever is being discussed here as long as it is related to Bitvest, so no need for any other thread except a user of the casino encounter a problem related to anything like scam or some sort.

By the way, speaking of users, have any of you started playing on Bitvest already? What is the experience like, please share to encourage some of us that are still sitting on the fense.

[jrrsparkles]

~
You spoke really well to be honest, makes no sense to carry topic related to Bitvest to another thread meanwhile the main Ann is here and needs boosting, as much as I know, Lightlord will like this thread to always be on the first page of this board, as this is also advertising the casino to those visiting this board, and just like you have said, LL doesn't mind whatever is being discussed here as long as it is related to Bitvest, so no need for any other thread except a user of the casino encounter a problem related to anything like scam or some sort.

By the way, speaking of users, have any of you started playing on Bitvest already? What is the experience like, please share to encourage some of us that are still sitting on the fense.

Did I say, create a separate one there? I said the discussion about the campaign is getting longer and merely useless since the campaign pay rate is fixed already and people are accepted by the campaign manager so if still someone wants to make a comment on the pay rate then it should be in the signature campaign thread not in the ANN.

Bitvest never went offline, if I am not wrong so it's just back into the promotion business nothing different.

[pawel7777]

In general you are absolutely correct that ANN thread is to discuss anything related to the business, there is also no specific rule that we are not allowed to talk about it but it is just rare to see ANN thread is being used to discuss about the payrate of the signature campaign too much/further. At least I do not see people talk about the payrate of the signature campaign in other ANN threads. In my point view, ANN thread is better to be used to discuss more about internal things that we can find on the casino's site, such as promotion, games, deposit/withdrawal etc.

So what if certain discussion is or isn't rare? People tend to talk about what's interesting to them at the moment, that's what natural conversations look like. And right now, the return of LL and the signature campaign are the most interesting topic. If anyone has something more interesting to say - feel free.
As with any other type of discussion, it will die its natural death, so need to panic.

Did I say, create a separate one there?

Yup, you did:

Now let the ANN thread serve its actual purpose and if you still want to discuss further then I suggest you create a separate thread somewhere appropriate.

[Odusko]

ANN thread is the best place to discuss every issue related to the project because we don't expect a discussion that concerns the project to be taken to another topic or create a new thread from such discussion unless for the case that you need to open a scam accusation where you have to open thread for that in reputation board.
But if it discussion is related to reviews, complaints, and feedback about the project the ANN thread becomes the best place to do that, soni not see anything wrong with discussions as regards to signature pay rate since such discussions are not allowed in the service section where the signature campaign is announced, and beside, since LL is now active he will easily read comments here on the ANN as feedbacks.

[ultrloa]

In general you are absolutely correct that ANN thread is to discuss anything related to the business, there is also no specific rule that we are not allowed to talk about it but it is just rare to see ANN thread is being used to discuss about the payrate of the signature campaign too much/further. At least I do not see people talk about the payrate of the signature campaign in other ANN threads. In my point view, ANN thread is better to be used to discuss more about internal things that we can find on the casino's site, such as promotion, games, deposit/withdrawal etc.

So what if certain discussion is or isn't rare? People tend to talk about what's interesting to them at the moment, that's what natural conversations look like. And right now, the return of LL and the signature campaign are the most interesting topic. If anyone has something more interesting to say - feel free.
As with any other type of discussion, it will die its natural death, so need to panic.

Actually there's no rules set regarding on what topic a user should discuss on the ann thread and I think what currently happening to them is relevant to the discussion and since lightlord's comeback is good news to other people especially he brought up his signature again then expect that this will be a hot topic on their thread since there's no other thread created for this discussion so users could go there. I think even if discussion of that matters happen I guess casino owners still like that since they want their thread to bump up by those discussion since it adds exposure to them. For soon those discussion will fade out and people will talk about those gambling activities they experience so we don't need to get anxious on situation which is currently happening here since its pretty normal.

[livingfree]

Bitvest never went offline, if I am not wrong so it's just back into the promotion business nothing different.

Yeah, they didn't but has got some issues just about the withdrawals before and then it was resolved as well.

Other than that, I can't think of other issues that they got into aside from all of your discussions about the campaign and not to the website and its operation.

And whether LL is present or not, IIRC, there are his staff that can manage the business continuously.

[Hamphser]

In general you are absolutely correct that ANN thread is to discuss anything related to the business, there is also no specific rule that we are not allowed to talk about it but it is just rare to see ANN thread is being used to discuss about the payrate of the signature campaign too much/further. At least I do not see people talk about the payrate of the signature campaign in other ANN threads. In my point view, ANN thread is better to be used to discuss more about internal things that we can find on the casino's site, such as promotion, games, deposit/withdrawal etc.

So what if certain discussion is or isn't rare? People tend to talk about what's interesting to them at the moment, that's what natural conversations look like. And right now, the return of LL and the signature campaign are the most interesting topic. If anyone has something more interesting to say - feel free.
As with any other type of discussion, it will die its natural death, so need to panic.

Actually there's no rules set regarding on what topic a user should discuss on the ann thread and I think what currently happening to them is relevant to the discussion and since lightlord's comeback is good news to other people especially he brought up his signature again then expect that this will be a hot topic on their thread since there's no other thread created for this discussion so users could go there. I think even if discussion of that matters happen I guess casino owners still like that since they want their thread to bump up by those discussion since it adds exposure to them. For soon those discussion will fade out and people will talk about those gambling activities they experience so we don't need to get anxious on situation which is currently happening here since its pretty normal.

You do really got a point on which it is really that indeed true that any related topic could really be post up on their ANN thread on which it cant be possible nor really that the right place for these type of discussions would really be place or posted up on that Campaign thread on services section which it would really be that relevant that this would really be that posted on their ANN thread instead.
Its true that even OP or thread creator wont really be trying out to disrupt on whatever discussions made yet this would really be bumping out their thread on which means that it would really be added up exposure compared into those kind of rules on which tending out to post only on what are those gambling site concerns or whatsoever.

Is there such rule about bumping up ANN threads or prohibits campaign discussions on this place or thread or theres none?
Seems like too much discussion about such topic but well we cant stop people on trying out to elaborate it.

[pawel7777]

(...) For soon those discussion will fade out and people will talk about those gambling activities they experience

To be fair, people hardly ever talk just about their gambling experience, because, usually, there's not much to talk about. There needs to be something interesting to spark any discussion, i.e. some huge win or loss, some special event etc. So if we were to limit the discussion purely to gambling, this thread would hardly ever be bumped to the top page.

Bitvest never went offline, if I am not wrong so it's just back into the promotion business nothing different.

Yeah, they didn't but has got some issues just about the withdrawals before and then it was resolved as well.
Other than that, I can't think of other issues that they got into aside from all of your discussions about the campaign and not to the website and its operation.
And whether LL is present or not, IIRC, there are his staff that can manage the business continuously.

Some people have been reporting in this thread some issues with hot wallet being empty, but those were rare instances and that's somewhat expected to happen from time to time in these types of sites.
The most of drama was related to people declaring the site dead (or dying) solely because LL was not active on bitcointalk.

[Latviand]

To be fair, people hardly ever talk just about their gambling experience, because, usually, there's not much to talk about. There needs to be something interesting to spark any discussion, i.e. some huge win or loss, some special event etc. So if we were to limit the discussion purely to gambling, this thread would hardly ever be bumped to the top page.

I mean if the campaign really is inactive, there's really nothing to talk about and it's insane to bump the thread just to remind people that the casino is inactive. Totally agree that if we want to spark any interest or discussion in the gambling thread, the said gambling thread should consider promotions or bonuses but it's Bitvest.io, they've been on this platform for a long time, no need for bonuses to spark discussions, just coming back from a long slumber would definitely be enough.

[xSkylarx]

To be fair, people hardly ever talk just about their gambling experience, because, usually, there's not much to talk about. There needs to be something interesting to spark any discussion, i.e. some huge win or loss, some special event etc. So if we were to limit the discussion purely to gambling, this thread would hardly ever be bumped to the top page.

I mean if the campaign really is inactive, there's really nothing to talk about and it's insane to bump the thread just to remind people that the casino is inactive. Totally agree that if we want to spark any interest or discussion in the gambling thread, the said gambling thread should consider promotions or bonuses but it's Bitvest.io, they've been on this platform for a long time, no need for bonuses to spark discussions, just coming back from a long slumber would definitely be enough.

Probably weekly events or like tournaments like others casinos do, they tend to have weekly tournaments that make the thread bump as well as lots of people talking on it which also leads other gamblers to join the fun and gamble. Unless they are pretty good at what we are doing right now and there is no need for promotional aspects then it will stay where it is but for sure they are cooking something probably events and bonuses exclusive to us, so let's just see.