Is science a religion?

[supine]

While many in main stream science claim to be atheist and believe in the Big Bang and the eventual Deep Freeze due to entropy. Is it not curious to consider that the very underpinnings of this belief is based on mathematics, was it too created in the big bang? if so how was it constructed? one digit at a time?

I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.         

Well, I don't think Science is a religion. In religion, there is no proof needed to everything. Perhaps there are parts of religion that has proof. However, this is not acceptable in Science, because in Science everthing should have a proof and explanation.

[Lukas Tarantas]

The real scientist lives his work. Therefore, we can say that for him, science is a religion. But there are very few such scientists now.

[trako]

I think science is not a religion. If there was religion, everyone would mock. because science can continuously improve itself by decaying itself. for example they say it is harmful to some foods. then they say they are useful. there are now people who say that the world is not round.

[emalithcrypto]

Actually , Science has no definition. I think science is something like we can not understand. it is changing every second.Religion is a just like a doctrine, we can understand. however, because of the science technology world has become a nice place.

[Daniel91]

Actually , Science has no definition. I think science is something like we can not understand. it is changing every second.Religion is a just like a doctrine, we can understand. however, because of the science technology world has become a nice place.

In my opinion, science should research external truth, physical world, and religion should research internal truth, spiritual reality.
In fact, science and religion have no conflict 
Obviously, science is very different from religion.

[moshiul13]

No, science is just a logical way which prove what is right or wrong.

[ttbd]

The ranks of science martyrdom may be thin, yet its members are revered as far greater scientists they actually were. Take Galileo Galilei, for example, the patron saint of all scientists persecuted by religious orders. He actually contributed very little to science: most of his achievements were technical, such as tampering with telescopes. Heliocentricity was known since the 4th century BC.

[bobq]

It is a religion, but of a kind which evolves its models of reality faster than others. I guess the only way to avoid having a religion is to have a computer thinking instead of you. But I may be wrong. After all also its operative system is a religion.

[david_019]

Religion is a man made which is full of different beliefs that cause some people to be foolish while science is discovering what is truth.

[popcorn1]

No ..
Idiots like MIKE PENCE or 5 PENCE i call him..

He made out that the attack on the church was someone who hated religion
BASICALLY made out it was some religious hater I.E an ATHEIST ..

What a lying TOAD mike pence is..

He done it because is mother and law..

Texas Church Shooter Had 'a Purpose and a Mission' in Family Feud ...
https://www.nbcnews.com/.../texas-church-shooting/texas-church-shooter-may-have-b...
3 days ago - Texas church shooter Devin Patrick Kelley had threatened his mother-in-law, who attended First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, .

And 5 PENCE made out it was an ATHEIST who hated religion..
LYING TWAT..

You RELIGIOUS FUCKERS ARE BORN LYING CUNTS ..
You would ROB the eye balls out of each others faces to suit yourselves ..

Now just like Donna Brazile he changed his STORY..
Like all POLITICIANS lying scum bags..

Say anything to get you to vote for him..

And just think USA you TRAINED him to kill ..

Pence blames Air Force, 'evil' gunman for church massacre | New York ...
nypost.com/2017/11/08/pence-blames-air-force-evil-gunman-for-church-massacre/
1 day ago - Vice President Mike Pence says he blames the Air Force, in addition to the ... Texas church shooter reportedly executed some of his victims ..

Pastor: Texas church that was attacked will be demolished - ABC News
abcnews.go.com/US/.../pence-abbott-attend-vigil-victims-church-shooting-51031441
9 hours ago - Pastor: Texas church that was attacked will be demolished. ... On Wednesday, Vice President Mike Pence joined Texas Gov. Greg Abbott at a .

[galvan jean]

While many in main stream science claim to be atheist and believe in the Big Bang and the eventual Deep Freeze due to entropy. Is it not curious to consider that the very underpinnings of this belief is based on mathematics, was it too created in the big bang? if so how was it constructed? one digit at a time?

I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.         

Within the definition of science as it is defined among scientists, is science theory. Science theory might seem to be fact, it might have lots of evidence, but it is not fact necessarily. When science theory is heralded and believed to be fact, when it is known that it might not be fact, it becomes religion. And in that way science is religion.

[popoypalaboy03]

Many people think that science is just another religion, no better than their own. Their reasoning is apparently something along these lines: Beliefs about the unseen world are based entirely on received truth,truth that is known to be right because it is felt to be right. All and only religions offer an opinion about the unseen world. Science offers such an opinion. So science is a religion. For those interested in the technical, this argument is valid, so if its premises are true, so is its conclusion. The second premise is false.

[Cils05]

Saince is not a religion, although he has many things related to religion, but open means worth obeying

[congresowoman]

If I am to put this into simplest of words, I say Science is the pursuit of knowledge and Religion is the pursuit of God. Science feeds the mind, on the other hand religion feeds the heart.

[ichsan ardi]

While many in main stream science claim to be atheist and believe in the Big Bang and the eventual Deep Freeze due to entropy. Is it not curious to consider that the very underpinnings of this belief is based on mathematics, was it too created in the big bang? if so how was it constructed? one digit at a time?

I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.         

[ichsan ardi]

I have read a couple of the responses and I would like to give my 2 cents on the matter.

I think science is creeping into the role of a religion more and more. One hears the engineers at GoogleTalks talk about AI and uploading their mind to a computer. If you really think about that as their answer to the age old questions of life, then yes, science is a religion since it more and more tries to solve these oldest of questions. They want to avoid death, want to explore the universe and prevent age degradation and biological limitations. These are exactly the same things religion has been trying to give to people for thousands of years. The main difference in my opinion, is that science might give it to them while they are still alive in a technical sense.

science is a part off the religion. in religion there are still many things that are incompatible with knowledge, but that doesnt prove that science is a religion. everything in the religion that we've not yet known is caused by our intellect not been able to digest everything that is in religion. our brains still need time to grow and understand everything that seems illogical in religion.

[Xember]

Definitely not. In the world of Science, everything must have a proof in order for it to be scientifically proven. Everything has orgins and theory. Therefore, making it only as a subject or a form of study. Religion is the generalization of belief and faith, so Science cannot be a form of faith.

[mirror001]

All things considered, science is not a religion and it does not simply come down to confidence. Despite the fact that it has a large number of religion's ideals, it has none of its indecencies. Science depends on evident confirmation. Religious confidence not just needs confirms, its autonomy from proving is its pride and happiness, yelled from the housetops.

With the exception of a certain something. The meaning of "science." Inside the meaning of science as it is characterized among researchers, is science hypothesis. Science hypothesis may appear to be true, it may have loads of confirmation, yet it is not reality essentially. At the point when science hypothesis are proclaimed and accepted to be actualized, when it is realized that it would not be a certainty, it progresses toward becoming a religion. Also, in that way science is religion.

[trickee]

While many in main stream science claim to be atheist and believe in the Big Bang and the eventual Deep Freeze due to entropy. Is it not curious to consider that the very underpinnings of this belief is based on mathematics, was it too created in the big bang? if so how was it constructed? one digit at a time?

I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.         

well,science is not a religion and it doesnt just come down to faith.although it has many religion's virtues it has none of its  vices.Science is based upon verifiable evidence.Religious faith not only lacks evidence,its independence  from evidence is it pride and joy,shouted from the rooftops.

[popcorn1]

It could be i suppose because if your doing science every day your religiously doing it ..

I religiously watch the TV ..

But what ever in science you need to prove it to be FACT .
How long as people been trying to prove gods a fact?..

I give up when i was about 10 years old about 3 years after i found out father Christmas was not real ..