Is science a religion?

[christabits]

science is “a set of methods designed to describe and interpret observed or inferred phenomena, past or present, aimed at building a testable body of knowledge open to rejection or confirmation." while religion is made up of some combination of belief in one or more deities, sacred, or supernatural beings, a faith-based worldview, worship, and ritual. Some people say that through religion, we human beings find a place in the universe, along with a purpose. 

Science is riddled with doubt, and religion is completely founded on faith. Rely on faith, and the scientific method falls apart. Insert doubt, and religious certainty quickly dwindles. Something tells me that the fundamentalist religious folks who want to add “creation-science” to state mandated science curricula don’t really understand what the hell the word science actually means. Because let’s face it, once intelligent design squeezes its way into the pages following evolution in our biology books, we might as well add astrology to our astrophysics lectures and toss some alchemy education into the chemistry lab. therefore i believe that science is a religion.

[Crazygreek]

Science is the way for people to understand what happening around and become better. Religion is strange thing that making people believe in something supernatural. So scinence is not religion.

[Fappanu]

While many in main stream science claim to be atheist and believe in the Big Bang and the eventual Deep Freeze due to entropy. Is it not curious to consider that the very underpinnings of this belief is based on mathematics, was it too created in the big bang? if so how was it constructed? one digit at a time?

I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.         

sci·ence
/ˈsīəns/
noun
the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.

If you thing it is, then what happened in big bang, why aren't the scientists capable to track it down? There's your definition of science now think again.

[BADecker]

While many in main stream science claim to be atheist and believe in the Big Bang and the eventual Deep Freeze due to entropy. Is it not curious to consider that the very underpinnings of this belief is based on mathematics, was it too created in the big bang? if so how was it constructed? one digit at a time?

I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.          

sci·ence
/ˈsīəns/
noun
the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.

If you thing it is, then what happened in big bang, why aren't the scientists capable to track it down? There's your definition of science now think again.

Science isn't a religion, just like a tree isn't a religion... until somebody treats it as a religion.

Most science is applied through the language of math. Here is what I mean. There isn't any 1. Everything that we call 1, is really made up of at least several component parts. The closest we can come to 1 is, 1 group.

Because of this, there isn't any 2. Nothing is the same as something else. No grouping is the same as any other grouping. So, at best, there is only 1 grouping of every grouping. Math does not apply to nature and science.

Math is a language that we use to bring complexity into a realm of understanding. But math is all virtual. The more complex the math, the more virtual it becomes. And when people believe complex math things (like big bang) to be real, they have made a religion out of the virtual.

[popcorn1]

While many in main stream science claim to be atheist and believe in the Big Bang and the eventual Deep Freeze due to entropy. Is it not curious to consider that the very underpinnings of this belief is based on mathematics, was it too created in the big bang? if so how was it constructed? one digit at a time?

I think not it has always been there and will always remain its an eternal masterpiece that permeates every conceivable facet or reality yet in its self it is purely abstract. Without it nothing would exist, but it in itself it is nonexistent and existent at the same time. It is the language of the living universe. Its permutations are infinite, yet it did not grow, it has always been complete and eternal.          

sci·ence
/ˈsīəns/
noun
the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.

If you thing it is, then what happened in big bang, why aren't the scientists capable to track it down? There's your definition of science now think again.

Science isn't a religion, just like a tree isn't a religion... until somebody treats it as a religion.

Most science is applied through the language of math. Here is what I mean. There isn't any 1. Everything that we call 1, is really made up of at least several component parts. The closest we can come to 1 is, 1 group.

Because of this, there isn't any 2. Nothing is the same as something else. No grouping is the same as any other grouping. So, at best, there is only 1 grouping of every grouping. Math does not apply to nature and science.

Math is a language that we use to bring complexity into a realm of understanding. But math is all virtual. The more complex the math, the more virtual it becomes. And when people believe complex math things (like big bang) to be real, they have made a religion out of the virtual.

Please send me some of the same stuff your smoking please

Math does not apply to nature and science. WRONG ..    Divided = maths

Nature divides  = maths = science

How much money you got = maths = money makes the world go around = maths

big bang is real ..FACT study the bang and all shall be revealed ..

Evolved from an explosion     then over time the earth   then the earth created humans amongst many other living species END OF STORY  for now..WHY? because we need to know what caused the BIG BANG ..

SOME ADVICE TO YOU ALL ..

I am waiting on a coin called TEZOS you have a voice  ..

THE LAST BLOCK CHAIN EVER ..No need for anymore block chains they are all DOOMED..

TEZOS is way way advanced and will never ever fork the block chain

So BADECKER my buddy buy 10 any amount just to hold ..

You like people power TEZOS is it ..

Not been released yet ..But buy some don't go over board

[Pier7]

Science is factual while religion is based on faith. There are many things that is true to religion but debatable to science. But somehow, they are connected. There are things that science discovered through faith.

[zhanghoqi5]

Science as a religion is regarded as a few exceptions.

They are mentally unprepared to face anything.

Rather than inventing and researching.

[Festusk]

It doesn't just come down to faith

[GentelMe]

science comes to improve or to refute religions

[Cryptotango]

No, science is not a religion cause it can't give easy answers to everything like all the religions do. But there are people who trust blindly in science and it's almighty just like it's god.

[Terriblethingss]

Science and religion were exactly different. Science is of true facts which has got evidence. Science is something innovative which is been developed and in some cases go in search of proof.

[Nathan_Weymouth]

To some definitions of a religion, science can be considered a religion. Science is clearly not, the service and worship of God or the supernatural. But, another definition of religion is a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith.
One can show that the adherents of science put their faith in it to reveal the Truth about the (observable) universe. But, there is also a faith and orthodoxy in accepting some unproven or unprovable theories, especially in the realms of cosmology. Is it a system of beliefs? Yes. Is it held to with ardor? Yes. Is there a component of faith in the unproven? Yes.

[kamasino]

Never, these two categories are separated, and not attached to each other.

[tominobo12]

As far as i am concern most people nowadays worship science. It doesn't really matter about those things besides it is your own beliefs, lets just respect one another's ideology.

[anksoleh29]

Science isn't a religion, beleving on various scietfiic stuff is weak, I am certain that numerous scientits are skeptics and it's imply that they don't bolster any religion.

[tajak200]

Medicine is the science which contradicts the existence of God. Religious people believe that everything is in the hands of God, but doctors save a lot more lives than God.

[Masterkai]

No, science is not a religion . We have not created it . Is simply there, the physics, the chemistry, the biology . Is not something created  by humans like religion.

[mansilkroad]

Science tries to answer the questions religions don't have an answer for. I don't see any other correlation.

[glaszy]

I think religion and science are something completely different. Both can not be put together.

[Ninamuze]

I may not be sure if science is religion but I think our religion is based under the bible which is not part of science. Most of the time science always do not believe on what religion always say like there is God and there is salvation, heaven and hell.