[ANN] Peerplays - First Ever Blockchain-Based Gaming Platform

[4theLOVEofCrypto]

statement before my post. can u read?

Motherfucker....it was true at the time of posting.   It's that some of the orders expired because of non-payment.    So now it's at 17k.  But at the time it was true, so stfu.

[Acidx]

Got my peerplays really quick, thanks!

So now we just wait for ICO to end and the tokens to be generated?

[Altprince]

Motherfucker....it was true at the time of posting.   It's that some of the orders expired because of non-payment.    So now it's at 17k.  But at the time it was true, so stfu.

https://secure.freedomledger.com/#/asset/PEERPLAYS

Current supply: 71,180.
That's nearly 30k left.

So I guess that's the reason for him to say "not true".
We both probably have missed some information, but what's with the hostility?
And if we have missed something, can you elaborate?

[4theLOVEofCrypto]

Motherfucker....it was true at the time of posting.   It's that some of the orders expired because of non-payment.    So now it's at 17k.  But at the time it was true, so stfu.

https://secure.freedomledger.com/#/asset/PEERPLAYS

Current supply: 71,180.
That's nearly 30k left.

So I guess that's the reason for him to say "not true".
We both probably have missed some information, but what's with the hostility?
And if we have missed something, can you elaborate?

Ok, my bad.  I was going by the number displayed on the peerplays site instead of the correct freedom ledger number.  He could have pointed that out instead of saying just "not true" then following that up with "can u read", thus the hostility. 

[Altprince]

Ok, my bad.  I was going by the number displayed on the peerplays site instead of the correct freedom ledger number.  He could have pointed that out instead of saying just "not true" then following that up with "can u read", thus the hostility. 

Oh, that explains it. But very true, he should have done that

[twostepsally]

Community hug.

Now lets capitalize on this great concept and help those that need help.

[4theLOVEofCrypto]

Community hug.

Now lets capitalize on this great concept and help those that need help.

Hugs  .  I am game for that.

[4theLOVEofCrypto]

By the way, is there an update on the status of the DAO proposal?  Is it being voted on and how long before something is known?

[HomoHenning]

where can I see my amount of tokens I bought?

[MickyCOB]

Looking good, I will keep my eyes on this one.

[Soul_eater_123]

By the way, is there an update on the status of the DAO proposal?  Is it being voted on and how long before something is known?

No and it didn't get a very favourable reception either.  They said they would come back with a better proposal.

[coinhugger]

By the way, is there an update on the status of the DAO proposal?  Is it being voted on and how long before something is known?

No and it didn't get a very favourable reception either.  They said they would come back with a better proposal.

I wonder what the feedback/negative comments were on the proposal. I read it and thought it was quite good.

[Soul_eater_123]

I wonder what the feedback/negative comments were on the proposal. I read it and thought it was quite good.

It wasn't really a normal business proposal.  It was asking the DAO to buy a heap of Peerplays tokens at the $3 rate and hold on to them.  Something that probably isn't good for either Peerplay token holders (as a huge amount would be in control of the DAO) or for DAO holders as they would be liquidating a whole lot of ether to build another network out.

[coinhugger]

I wonder what the feedback/negative comments were on the proposal. I read it and thought it was quite good.

It wasn't really a normal business proposal.  It was asking the DAO to buy a heap of Peerplays tokens at the $3 rate and hold on to them.  Something that probably isn't good for either Peerplay token holders (as a huge amount would be in control of the DAO) or for DAO holders as they would be liquidating a whole lot of ether to build another network out.

Ah ok, I see your point, that makes sense. Thanks for explaining.

[Soul_eater_123]

Ah ok, I see your point, that makes sense. Thanks for explaining.

Yeah I think the DAO would hold such a huge portion of the tokens that it just wouldn't be good for all the rest of us - what if they decided to dump.  I hold both and I think at this stage probably less risky to keep them separate.  Anyway let's see what the new proposal is.

[cryptodv]

This is an awesome project, it needs more traction. Don't know why more people are not investing. Maybe everyone is ICO'd out! This project has a lot of upside. 

[Soul_eater_123]

This is an awesome project, it needs more traction. Don't know why more people are not investing. Maybe everyone is ICO'd out! This project has a lot of upside. 

That's what I've been saying.  It needs more promotion.  Everyone has seen how big gambling is these days.  I think you have a point about ICO fatigue though.

[twostepsally]

I wonder what the feedback/negative comments were on the proposal. I read it and thought it was quite good.

It was a great marketing angle yo get the word out.

It wasn't really a normal business proposal.  It was asking the DAO to buy a heap of Peerplays tokens at the $3 rate and hold on to them.  Something that probably isn't good for either Peerplay token holders (as a huge amount would be in control of the DAO) or for DAO holders as they would be liquidating a whole lot of ether to build another network out.

[fedmahnkassad]

Hmm, sending 1 token from the freedomledger account costs 2.64174 tokens in fees?

[gravitate]

when you buy tokens can you trade straight away? i heard holders get a reward before launch you can trade. Any details on that?

I now have 910 90 off 1k