[ANN] Peerplays - First Ever Blockchain-Based Gaming Platform

[Tripjammer]

OK so I received my peerplays tokens on freedomledger.com so what do I have to wait on next?

Read the white papers....think December 2016

[1715142235]

1715142235

[DM0000]

OK so I received my peerplays tokens on freedomledger.com so what do I have to wait on next?

Read the white papers....think December 2016

Thanks!

[bitoc2015]

BunkerChain.Labs.Inc. Read you PM, please

[Tripjammer]

OK so I received my peerplays tokens on freedomledger.com so what do I have to wait on next?

Read the white papers....think December 2016

Thanks!

A lot is gonna happen in the next 6 months get read for a great ride!

Is there any official slack channel for peerplays? We need one...

[Tripjammer]

BunkerChain.Labs.Inc. Read you PM, please

Yeah people just don't read anymore...

[Tripjammer]

I keep reading people claim this project is an "overvalued idea". What they must not realize is that Peerplays is already 80% developed, since they are using Graphine as their platform.

It's like they have a jet engine (Graphine), and they are going to put wings on it. And every other crypto group is tinkering with the steam engine. Just my 2-cents.

Cool, its almost developed. Where are there users/how much money are they generating? Oh right.

$4MM is absurd for a crypto start-up in the gambling space that has absolutely 0 traction. The market is not nearly as big as you think it is, yes it is growing, but customer acquisition in the gaming industry is incredibly difficult... Players rarely leave casinos they are already a part of.

How is there $4 million into this? Only 200k tokens have been offered up...even if all of them were sold for $3 each that's only $600k!

This is a platform not a coin...

Some people don't even read the documentation before they invest...

[Relaxedsense]

I keep reading people claim this project is an "overvalued idea". What they must not realize is that Peerplays is already 80% developed, since they are using Graphine as their platform.

It's like they have a jet engine (Graphine), and they are going to put wings on it. And every other crypto group is tinkering with the steam engine. Just my 2-cents.

Cool, its almost developed. Where are there users/how much money are they generating? Oh right.

$4MM is absurd for a crypto start-up in the gambling space that has absolutely 0 traction. The market is not nearly as big as you think it is, yes it is growing, but customer acquisition in the gaming industry is incredibly difficult... Players rarely leave casinos they are already a part of.

How is there $4 million into this? Only 200k tokens have been offered up...even if all of them were sold for $3 each that's only $600k!

This is a platform not a coin...

Some people don't even read the documentation before they invest...

Seems to me that you are the one that doesnt understand whats going on.

There are 1 million coins offered, with a price of $3 during contribution phase. Assuming the price stays the same upon launch the overall project would be valued at 3 mio dollars.

[fedmahnkassad]

I keep reading people claim this project is an "overvalued idea". What they must not realize is that Peerplays is already 80% developed, since they are using Graphine as their platform.

It's like they have a jet engine (Graphine), and they are going to put wings on it. And every other crypto group is tinkering with the steam engine. Just my 2-cents.

Cool, its almost developed. Where are there users/how much money are they generating? Oh right.

$4MM is absurd for a crypto start-up in the gambling space that has absolutely 0 traction. The market is not nearly as big as you think it is, yes it is growing, but customer acquisition in the gaming industry is incredibly difficult... Players rarely leave casinos they are already a part of.

How is there $4 million into this? Only 200k tokens have been offered up...even if all of them were sold for $3 each that's only $600k!

This is a platform not a coin...

Some people don't even read the documentation before they invest...

Seems to me that you are the one that doesnt understand whats going on.

There are 1 million coins offered, with a price of $3 during contribution phase. Assuming the price stays the same upon launch the overall project would be valued at 3 mio dollars.

He's wrong and you are wrong too. The final number is not know until the auction style crowd sale ends. People who bought during the $2 sale were buying as if the valuation was $2mil, people who are buying now for $3 are buying as if the valuation is $3 mil, however what is going to happen if the auction crowdsale puts the final token price at $0.5 or at $10?

All we can say for certain at the moment is that 20% were offered in first round of funding for a total of $500,000 which should put the initial valuation of the project at $2,500,000.

[AcoinL.L.C]

Fools and their money are easily parted.

This is even worse than the GBT ICO I warned people about. People that don't know how the gambling industry works should not be investing in platforms that do not stand a chance.

The only reason people started investing in this is because they mentioned the DAO. The DAO is another joke. The U.S. (and other countries) have accredited investing laws because of bullshit like this.

[Relaxedsense]

I keep reading people claim this project is an "overvalued idea". What they must not realize is that Peerplays is already 80% developed, since they are using Graphine as their platform.

It's like they have a jet engine (Graphine), and they are going to put wings on it. And every other crypto group is tinkering with the steam engine. Just my 2-cents.

Cool, its almost developed. Where are there users/how much money are they generating? Oh right.

$4MM is absurd for a crypto start-up in the gambling space that has absolutely 0 traction. The market is not nearly as big as you think it is, yes it is growing, but customer acquisition in the gaming industry is incredibly difficult... Players rarely leave casinos they are already a part of.

How is there $4 million into this? Only 200k tokens have been offered up...even if all of them were sold for $3 each that's only $600k!

This is a platform not a coin...

Some people don't even read the documentation before they invest...

Seems to me that you are the one that doesnt understand whats going on.

There are 1 million coins offered, with a price of $3 during contribution phase. Assuming the price stays the same upon launch the overall project would be valued at 3 mio dollars.

He's wrong and you are wrong too. The final number is not know until the auction style crowd sale ends. People who bought during the $2 sale were buying as if the valuation was $2mil, people who are buying now for $3 are buying as if the valuation is $3 mil, however what is going to happen if the auction crowdsale puts the final token price at $0.5 or at $10?

All we can say for certain at the moment is that 20% were offered in first round of funding for a total of $500,000 which should put the initial valuation of the project at $2,500,000.

As far as I know the market cap is the amount of coins x the latest exchange price.

[Relaxedsense]

Fools and their money are easily parted.

This is even worse than the GBT ICO I warned people about. People that don't know how the gambling industry works should not be investing in platforms that do not stand a chance.

The only reason people started investing in this is because they mentioned the DAO. The DAO is another joke. The U.S. (and other countries) have accredited investing laws because of bullshit like this.

You can say what you want but I earned from the GBT ICO, thats a win in my book.

[increaser]

Neil Haran,

It is still not clear which game(s) will be presented first. Is it some poker, social game or what?  
This is really important to understand, because it will reflect many important things of the project and will help people to understand the project and developers vision.

My personal opinion that the best choise is gambling as it is will take attention of large number of peoples and commercial companies on the market. I think this is the only kind of games that will attract people outside of crypto community.

Hi increaser,

The official Position of the Peerplays team is that we will not be releasing the name of the first game until the test net goes live. I posted a few days ago with answers to some other questions about the game, so you might want to check that out if you haven't already: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1462351.msg15129796#msg15129796

Neil is working to put together an overview of the gaming development vision, which I believe will be available in a week or two.

Yes, I've  already saw your question that you have posted few days ago. But for me is very very strange that dev team can't say which kind of game it will be. Not even the name, just a niche/type. It is not affect on something, but most likely it says that they don't even have an answer for that question. It is sad and bad, because do not build any trust.

[HomoHenning]

Fools and their money are easily parted.

This is even worse than the GBT ICO I warned people about. People that don't know how the gambling industry works should not be investing in platforms that do not stand a chance.

The only reason people started investing in this is because they mentioned the DAO. The DAO is another joke. The U.S. (and other countries) have accredited investing laws because of bullshit like this.

You can say what you want but I earned from the GBT ICO, thats a win in my book.

mee too
And GBT is not comparable with peerplays imo. peerplays have a huge potential but they have to deliver now. lets wait
I just hope they can get better people for the front end than for freedom ledger, this is pure crap (design, User Experience, performance etc). The front end is also very important here.

[HomoHenning]

I keep reading people claim this project is an "overvalued idea". What they must not realize is that Peerplays is already 80% developed, since they are using Graphine as their platform.

It's like they have a jet engine (Graphine), and they are going to put wings on it. And every other crypto group is tinkering with the steam engine. Just my 2-cents.

Cool, its almost developed. Where are there users/how much money are they generating? Oh right.

$4MM is absurd for a crypto start-up in the gambling space that has absolutely 0 traction. The market is not nearly as big as you think it is, yes it is growing, but customer acquisition in the gaming industry is incredibly difficult... Players rarely leave casinos they are already a part of.

How is there $4 million into this? Only 200k tokens have been offered up...even if all of them were sold for $3 each that's only $600k!

This is a platform not a coin...

Some people don't even read the documentation before they invest...

Seems to me that you are the one that doesnt understand whats going on.

There are 1 million coins offered, with a price of $3 during contribution phase. Assuming the price stays the same upon launch the overall project would be valued at 3 mio dollars.

He's wrong and you are wrong too. The final number is not know until the auction style crowd sale ends. People who bought during the $2 sale were buying as if the valuation was $2mil, people who are buying now for $3 are buying as if the valuation is $3 mil, however what is going to happen if the auction crowdsale puts the final token price at $0.5 or at $10?

All we can say for certain at the moment is that 20% were offered in first round of funding for a total of $500,000 which should put the initial valuation of the project at $2,500,000.

As far as I know the market cap is the amount of coins x the latest exchange price.

this is true when all coins are distributed, which is not the case here. I think you have no clue about valuation and investments and should inform yourself more

[Captain_Ahab]

Casinos aren't the be all end all of gambling by a mile.  Gambling is huge.  I live in an area where unmarked backrooms and mobile homes are filled all hours of the day by some jokers playing rigged "sweep stakes" machines.  Acoin's casino loyalty inferences are BS. 

[Relaxedsense]

I keep reading people claim this project is an "overvalued idea". What they must not realize is that Peerplays is already 80% developed, since they are using Graphine as their platform.

It's like they have a jet engine (Graphine), and they are going to put wings on it. And every other crypto group is tinkering with the steam engine. Just my 2-cents.

Cool, its almost developed. Where are there users/how much money are they generating? Oh right.

$4MM is absurd for a crypto start-up in the gambling space that has absolutely 0 traction. The market is not nearly as big as you think it is, yes it is growing, but customer acquisition in the gaming industry is incredibly difficult... Players rarely leave casinos they are already a part of.

How is there $4 million into this? Only 200k tokens have been offered up...even if all of them were sold for $3 each that's only $600k!

This is a platform not a coin...

Some people don't even read the documentation before they invest...

Seems to me that you are the one that doesnt understand whats going on.

There are 1 million coins offered, with a price of $3 during contribution phase. Assuming the price stays the same upon launch the overall project would be valued at 3 mio dollars.

He's wrong and you are wrong too. The final number is not know until the auction style crowd sale ends. People who bought during the $2 sale were buying as if the valuation was $2mil, people who are buying now for $3 are buying as if the valuation is $3 mil, however what is going to happen if the auction crowdsale puts the final token price at $0.5 or at $10?

All we can say for certain at the moment is that 20% were offered in first round of funding for a total of $500,000 which should put the initial valuation of the project at $2,500,000.

As far as I know the market cap is the amount of coins x the latest exchange price.

this is true when all coins are distributed, which is not the case here. I think you have no clue about valuation and investments and should inform yourself more

Lol, says the guys that was bitching and moaning from the start and is now waiting for the "correct" moment to invest. Listen, the only thing I am saying is the fact that when assuming the price is the same as it was during the last stage of the current contribution stage the valuation would be 3 mio. Thats it.

Go home and make up your mind HomoHenning

[favdesu]

Casinos aren't the be all end all of gambling by a mile.  Gambling is huge.  I live in an area where unmarked backrooms and mobile homes are filled all hours of the day by some jokers playing rigged "sweep stakes" machines.  Acoin's casino loyalty inferences are BS. 

I wonder if the website in his signature is his. would explain the agenda here

[fedmahnkassad]

I keep reading people claim this project is an "overvalued idea". What they must not realize is that Peerplays is already 80% developed, since they are using Graphine as their platform.

It's like they have a jet engine (Graphine), and they are going to put wings on it. And every other crypto group is tinkering with the steam engine. Just my 2-cents.

Cool, its almost developed. Where are there users/how much money are they generating? Oh right.

$4MM is absurd for a crypto start-up in the gambling space that has absolutely 0 traction. The market is not nearly as big as you think it is, yes it is growing, but customer acquisition in the gaming industry is incredibly difficult... Players rarely leave casinos they are already a part of.

How is there $4 million into this? Only 200k tokens have been offered up...even if all of them were sold for $3 each that's only $600k!

This is a platform not a coin...

Some people don't even read the documentation before they invest...

Seems to me that you are the one that doesnt understand whats going on.

There are 1 million coins offered, with a price of $3 during contribution phase. Assuming the price stays the same upon launch the overall project would be valued at 3 mio dollars.

He's wrong and you are wrong too. The final number is not know until the auction style crowd sale ends. People who bought during the $2 sale were buying as if the valuation was $2mil, people who are buying now for $3 are buying as if the valuation is $3 mil, however what is going to happen if the auction crowdsale puts the final token price at $0.5 or at $10?

All we can say for certain at the moment is that 20% were offered in first round of funding for a total of $500,000 which should put the initial valuation of the project at $2,500,000.

As far as I know the market cap is the amount of coins x the latest exchange price.

Current market cap and funding valuation are 2 completely different things. People are debating whether $2-$3 per token is too much based on the total amount of available tokens and the fixed sale price for the first 200,000 tokens. I just pointed out that neither $4 mil nor $3 mil was accurate.

[Relaxedsense]

I keep reading people claim this project is an "overvalued idea". What they must not realize is that Peerplays is already 80% developed, since they are using Graphine as their platform.

It's like they have a jet engine (Graphine), and they are going to put wings on it. And every other crypto group is tinkering with the steam engine. Just my 2-cents.

Cool, its almost developed. Where are there users/how much money are they generating? Oh right.

$4MM is absurd for a crypto start-up in the gambling space that has absolutely 0 traction. The market is not nearly as big as you think it is, yes it is growing, but customer acquisition in the gaming industry is incredibly difficult... Players rarely leave casinos they are already a part of.

How is there $4 million into this? Only 200k tokens have been offered up...even if all of them were sold for $3 each that's only $600k!

This is a platform not a coin...

Some people don't even read the documentation before they invest...

Seems to me that you are the one that doesnt understand whats going on.

There are 1 million coins offered, with a price of $3 during contribution phase. Assuming the price stays the same upon launch the overall project would be valued at 3 mio dollars.

He's wrong and you are wrong too. The final number is not know until the auction style crowd sale ends. People who bought during the $2 sale were buying as if the valuation was $2mil, people who are buying now for $3 are buying as if the valuation is $3 mil, however what is going to happen if the auction crowdsale puts the final token price at $0.5 or at $10?

All we can say for certain at the moment is that 20% were offered in first round of funding for a total of $500,000 which should put the initial valuation of the project at $2,500,000.

As far as I know the market cap is the amount of coins x the latest exchange price.

Current market cap and funding valuation are 2 completely different things. People are debating whether $2-$3 per token is too much based on the total amount of available tokens and the fixed sale price for the first 200,000 tokens. I just pointed out that neither $4 mil nor $3 mil was accurate.

Ok, as it currently stands you are correct.

I just hope they change their mind about not telling anything regarding the first game they are going to release because this could potentially mean that the price during auction period might drop below $2, screwing all those who contributed during the $2 and $3 phases.

[HomoHenning]

I keep reading people claim this project is an "overvalued idea". What they must not realize is that Peerplays is already 80% developed, since they are using Graphine as their platform.

It's like they have a jet engine (Graphine), and they are going to put wings on it. And every other crypto group is tinkering with the steam engine. Just my 2-cents.

Cool, its almost developed. Where are there users/how much money are they generating? Oh right.

$4MM is absurd for a crypto start-up in the gambling space that has absolutely 0 traction. The market is not nearly as big as you think it is, yes it is growing, but customer acquisition in the gaming industry is incredibly difficult... Players rarely leave casinos they are already a part of.

How is there $4 million into this? Only 200k tokens have been offered up...even if all of them were sold for $3 each that's only $600k!

This is a platform not a coin...

Some people don't even read the documentation before they invest...

Seems to me that you are the one that doesnt understand whats going on.

There are 1 million coins offered, with a price of $3 during contribution phase. Assuming the price stays the same upon launch the overall project would be valued at 3 mio dollars.

He's wrong and you are wrong too. The final number is not know until the auction style crowd sale ends. People who bought during the $2 sale were buying as if the valuation was $2mil, people who are buying now for $3 are buying as if the valuation is $3 mil, however what is going to happen if the auction crowdsale puts the final token price at $0.5 or at $10?

All we can say for certain at the moment is that 20% were offered in first round of funding for a total of $500,000 which should put the initial valuation of the project at $2,500,000.

As far as I know the market cap is the amount of coins x the latest exchange price.

Current market cap and funding valuation are 2 completely different things. People are debating whether $2-$3 per token is too much based on the total amount of available tokens and the fixed sale price for the first 200,000 tokens. I just pointed out that neither $4 mil nor $3 mil was accurate.

Ok, as it currently stands you are correct.

I just hope they change their mind about not telling anything regarding the first game they are going to release because this could potentially mean that the price during auction period might drop below $2, screwing all those who contributed during the $2 and $3 phases.

dude auction will be after test net. and test net will include this game