tamara163
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1027
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 16, 2016, 11:17:10 AM |
|
and who's the boss?I do not understand!!!!
Who are you asking for? effectsToCause is the dev for the coin. testbug is the owner of the pool. Send them a PM if you need to contact them about something. I wrote Testbug,he's not answering
|
|
|
|
testbug
|
|
September 16, 2016, 11:52:09 AM |
|
and who's the boss?I do not understand!!!!
Who are you asking for? effectsToCause is the dev for the coin. testbug is the owner of the pool. Send them a PM if you need to contact them about something. I wrote Testbug,he's not answering Sorry I messaged you the pool url. After my change on the proxy settings we have done almost 100% If we don't find a block within the next few hours and you want to definitely find a block please switch your miners back to your solo mining wallets so you don't waste hashing powers.
|
|
|
|
tamara163
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1027
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 16, 2016, 12:04:41 PM |
|
and who's the boss?I do not understand!!!!
Who are you asking for? effectsToCause is the dev for the coin. testbug is the owner of the pool. Send them a PM if you need to contact them about something. I wrote Testbug,he's not answering Sorry I messaged you the pool url. After my change on the proxy settings we have done almost 100% If we don't find a block within the next few hours and you want to definitely find a block please switch your miners back to your solo mining wallets so you don't waste hashing powers. well, thank you
|
|
|
|
ExcelThroughKnowledge
|
|
September 16, 2016, 02:08:28 PM |
|
hmm, windows wallet bugged or something? I used the same cpu and tried out Windows and Linux, windows gives me 600-750 odd h/m but linux gave me like 1500-1900 h/m.. Somehow both of them gave the same estimated block hit hours.. Anything wrong here? I thought more hashes would lower down the time needed to farm a block?
|
|
|
|
aamarket
|
|
September 16, 2016, 02:29:16 PM |
|
there may be a problem with Windows - version 10 ?
|
IMPORTANT:http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=177133.0,Tips welcome BTC:1AAMARKETmJvfjDwEFmhyYYwfre7ZFVseP RIC:RGnX6LcJrsVEuYeySDDxkmH7AjRqoprcKt
|
|
|
effectsToCause (OP)
|
|
September 16, 2016, 02:48:58 PM |
|
We are currently trying to figure out why certain hardware gives a lower hashrate on windows compared to linux. We will be releasing 1.0.4 in next couple days or so which minimizes the number of memory allocations while mining and will improves hashrate a bit for all. Curious to see how that effects certain hardware on windows and linux. The hardware I've tested on there is no significant difference in speed between the two.
|
|
|
|
testbug
|
|
September 16, 2016, 03:18:13 PM |
|
Pool testers:We are hashing with more than 8kh/m for almost 20h now. Over the night we had an even bigger farmer. Sadly we didn't hit a block yet, so i think this can't just be bad luck. I will change the stratum sittings this evening to some other values, safeing the changes the verium devs did for me. If we didn't find a block by tomorrow i will have a deep look into the logfiles/sql and stratum settings. This weekend, my girlfriend is comeing back so please understand that i want to spend the weekend with my girlfriend I will invest much time on this sunday evening. So please: If we didn't find a block until tomorrow please move your miners to your local wallets, because there wont be any changes from this evening untill sunday evening/afternoon.
|
|
|
|
ExcelThroughKnowledge
|
|
September 16, 2016, 05:46:56 PM |
|
We are currently trying to figure out why certain hardware gives a lower hashrate on windows compared to linux. We will be releasing 1.0.4 in next couple days or so which minimizes the number of memory allocations while mining and will improves hashrate a bit for all. Curious to see how that effects certain hardware on windows and linux. The hardware I've tested on there is no significant difference in speed between the two.
are there 64 bit for windows coming?
|
|
|
|
effectsToCause (OP)
|
|
September 16, 2016, 05:51:28 PM |
|
There are no stupid questions I checked the pools wallet and I can confirmed didn't find a block yet. Seems like the settings are not correct. I will keep my miner there and try to have a look on stratum this evening. I am useing combination of mpos for front end and unomp proxy. We have many many shares in the sql database so the shares are getting collected correctly. If you want to find blocks i suggest you move your miners back to your wallets until i figured out why we didn't find a block. Maybe it is just very very bad luck. There are no stupid questions I checked the pools wallet and I can confirmed didn't find a block yet. Seems like the settings are not correct. I will keep my miner there and try to have a look on stratum this evening. I am useing combination of mpos for front end and unomp proxy. We have many many shares in the sql database so the shares are getting collected correctly. If you want to find blocks i suggest you move your miners back to your wallets until i figured out why we didn't find a block. Maybe it is just very very bad luck. I've had a Coinium pool running for last 2 days with no luck Same issue as you valid shares but no blocks found even tried removing the difficulty check at the pool level but still didn't find any. Setup a UNOMP pool 1hour ago shares are submitting so will leave it for a bit but guessing ill have the same issue again. Just been watching the difficulty of my submit's compared to the block difficulty and it looks within range that it could get one. Only time will tell Testnet.... guys.. Use testnet.. it's not so hard and you'll find lots of blocks instantly I added testnet genesis hash on 1.0.3 so you can just add testnet=1 to conf, don't need to have connections to mine on testnet if you just want to test mining
|
|
|
|
effectsToCause (OP)
|
|
September 16, 2016, 06:16:57 PM |
|
Verium 1.0.4 is released. This is a recommended update that optimizes the built in cpu-miner to minimize the number of memory allocations for scrypt² and improves hashrates a bit (credit to Rlmic on vericoinforums.com). Get it here: http://www.vericoin.info/veriumlaunch.html or Check for update in wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
thesilex
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
September 16, 2016, 07:51:49 PM |
|
Is there any way to run verium-qt headless, without GUI? I tried building from source, but if it is possible, being able to run pre-compiled wallet as headless would be quicker approach.
|
|
|
|
Crypt0bull
|
|
September 16, 2016, 08:06:32 PM Last edit: September 16, 2016, 08:21:18 PM by Crypt0bull |
|
Verium 1.0.4 is released. This is a recommended update that optimizes the built in cpu-miner to minimize the number of memory allocations for scrypt² and improves hashrates a bit (credit to Rlmic on vericoinforums.com). Get it here: http://www.vericoin.info/veriumlaunch.html or Check for update in wallet. jumped from 870 to 1300 with this (7/8 processors) 870 to 1500 (8/8 processors)
|
|
|
|
effectsToCause (OP)
|
|
September 16, 2016, 08:48:02 PM |
|
Verium 1.0.4 is released. This is a recommended update that optimizes the built in cpu-miner to minimize the number of memory allocations for scrypt² and improves hashrates a bit (credit to Rlmic on vericoinforums.com). Get it here: http://www.vericoin.info/veriumlaunch.html or Check for update in wallet. jumped from 870 to 1300 with this (7/8 processors) 870 to 1500 (8/8 processors) Wow, Nice! Depending on hardware and especially better in Windows, because it apparently doesn't handle heavy memory allocation very well. This solves that by minimizing the memory allocations necessary.
|
|
|
|
birty555
|
|
September 16, 2016, 08:56:40 PM |
|
Verium 1.0.4 is released. This is a recommended update that optimizes the built in cpu-miner to minimize the number of memory allocations for scrypt² and improves hashrates a bit (credit to Rlmic on vericoinforums.com). Get it here: http://www.vericoin.info/veriumlaunch.html or Check for update in wallet. jumped from 870 to 1300 with this (7/8 processors) 870 to 1500 (8/8 processors) Wow, Nice! Depending on hardware and especially better in Windows, because it apparently doesn't handle heavy memory allocation very well. This solves that by minimizing the memory allocations necessary. had similar jump as well
|
|
|
|
monsanto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1241
Merit: 1005
..like bright metal on a sullen ground.
|
|
September 16, 2016, 10:21:22 PM |
|
So is bittrex price (~75k sats) now lower than round 1 ico price in terms of usd?
|
|
|
|
|
Kazadar
|
|
September 16, 2016, 10:47:37 PM |
|
Verium 1.0.4 is released. This is a recommended update that optimizes the built in cpu-miner to minimize the number of memory allocations for scrypt² and improves hashrates a bit (credit to Rlmic on vericoinforums.com). Get it here: http://www.vericoin.info/veriumlaunch.html or Check for update in wallet. jumped from 870 to 1300 with this (7/8 processors) 870 to 1500 (8/8 processors) Wow, Nice! Depending on hardware and especially better in Windows, because it apparently doesn't handle heavy memory allocation very well. This solves that by minimizing the memory allocations necessary. had similar jump as well Mine only jumped from 800 to 1050 but with the standalone miner on the pool I was running 1800 h/m.
|
|
|
|
iwasneverhere
|
|
September 16, 2016, 10:50:09 PM |
|
wow a growing number of exchanges for VRM, hoping the price will also increase
|
|
|
|
effectsToCause (OP)
|
|
September 17, 2016, 12:55:08 AM |
|
Verium 1.0.4 is released. This is a recommended update that optimizes the built in cpu-miner to minimize the number of memory allocations for scrypt² and improves hashrates a bit (credit to Rlmic on vericoinforums.com). Get it here: http://www.vericoin.info/veriumlaunch.html or Check for update in wallet. jumped from 870 to 1300 with this (7/8 processors) 870 to 1500 (8/8 processors) Wow, Nice! Depending on hardware and especially better in Windows, because it apparently doesn't handle heavy memory allocation very well. This solves that by minimizing the memory allocations necessary. had similar jump as well Mine only jumped from 800 to 1050 but with the standalone miner on the pool I was running 1800 h/m. Not sure those numbers were real because it seems seems difficulty schedule may have been problem with pool.
|
|
|
|
|