[PASC] PascalCoin: Induplicatable NFT

[xhomerx10]

Can someone give me an account please?
Here's my public key:
3Ghhbopx4jxWKoV2EiDBVRGw6bvuBVZCrK4nYEDsN7CPw7Hz9Fx1VhvmHs1npqS74swpQbiSswM7HsY Db2evXTmUS2sg2YherUBxo2

 Why do you need an account? If it's for research I might donate one otherwise

PASCAL COIN + ACCOUNT TRADING THREAD

 This is a better place to go.  

Well, I just want one to make tests and possibly buy some coins. But what's the point in having 99 useless more?

Not sure why you put a space in the public key, but I sent you an empty account you should get it in a bit.

He didn't put a space, the forum does that when formatting the posts.  

Edit:  I couldn't send you one as I'm not at home.

[toto31]

yeah, probably a forum thing.

Anyway, really cool from you guys. Thank you very much.

I think I want to buy some coins as well, if you have some propositions to do, sent them in PM, payment in BTC or USDT.

Edit: yes, I know there is a thread for that, and I might trade with people there too.

[Aetsen]

yeah, probably a forum thing.

Anyway, really cool from you guys. Thank you very much.

I think I want to buy some coins as well, if you have some propositions to do, sent them in PM, payment in BTC or USDT.

I have some coins, but not looking to sell sorry. Might try that thread where people are buying and selling.

[vibajajo64]

The buy and sell prices are totally out of whack.  The buyers want to buy for .00003 bitcoin which is under 2 cents and the legitimate sellers want to sell from .0001 to .00055 which is 6 cents to 35 cents.  Who will budge?

[mxhwr]

The buy and sell prices are totally out of whack.  The buyers want to buy for .00003 bitcoin which is under 2 cents and the legitimate sellers want to sell from .0001 to .00055 which is 6 cents to 35 cents.  Who will budge?

the best thing you can do is put a trade in and see what happens. lowest seller is at 0.000035. on a exchange we can see 0.0001 being a start but i think miners will sell between 5-10k then level up. remember not alot of people know about this and you know how much people like something different. 30-50k is the price it will go upto before development pushes it higher

[ICOcountdown.com]

The buy and sell prices are totally out of whack.  The buyers want to buy for .00003 bitcoin which is under 2 cents and the legitimate sellers want to sell from .0001 to .00055 which is 6 cents to 35 cents.  Who will budge?

the best thing you can do is put a trade in and see what happens. lowest seller is at 0.000035. on a exchange we can see 0.0001 being a start but i think miners will sell between 5-10k then level up. remember not alot of people know about this and you know how much people like something different. 30-50k is the price it will go upto before development pushes it higher

Interesting to see this data - I don't think many people are selling, everyone is holding I'm still trying to buy and I have had no offers.

[DaniellPlasmmer]

We need pascal on the Lykke, decentralized exchange immediately. Their will a estimated billion dollars of trading volume by the end of 2016. Poloniex trades at about 15 million a day. Come boys. Lets make something happen.

I tell you what. The pascal community is one the best communities in the entire blockchain space. True decentralization here.

I'll try using Lykke. Whats the diff between Lykke and ICONOMI?

[Arska]

Someone pointed out that the unneutered miner somehow lost the device parameter. Looks like when I reverted to the unneutered code, I reverted back too far and lost the argument. Anyhow, here's a new version of the unneutered miner which adds back in the device argument:

https://github.com/Vorksholk/PascalCoin-CUDA/releases/download/v1.01/CUDA_Pascal_v1.01.zip

You can just copy-paste the .exe file you want back to where your old .exe file was, and use it instead.

How to choose a device for mining in V4? It seems to always force device 0. On the V3 I made a bat file "miner.exe 1" and it mined with device 1 but doesn't work with V4.

[Vorksholk]

Oh my bad, the new miner takes an argument like "d0" for device 0, rather than just 0. Prepending it with a 'd' is preparing it to be able to accept multiple arguments (host, port, minername, etc.) in the future for the 1.0.7-compatible version.

[proletariat]

 
Is it really that hard for an exchange operator to handle this code?

[mxhwr]

Is it really that hard for an exchange operator to handle this code?

reminds me of monero days

[Vorksholk]

Is it really that hard for an exchange operator to handle this code?

It is currently, because the code doesn't yet support linux, and there is no RPC for coins, so you can't tell the wallet over a network "send x coins to y" or "have you received any coins on address z yet?" which are both features the dev is working on. Give the project some time--once the codebase matures, it'll be a lot easier for exchanges to work with.

[proletariat]

Is it really that hard for an exchange operator to handle this code?

It is currently, because the code doesn't yet support linux, and there is no RPC for coins, so you can't tell the wallet over a network "send x coins to y" or "have you received any coins on address z yet?" which are both features the dev is working on. Give the project some time--once the codebase matures, it'll be a lot easier for exchanges to work with.

Ah I see. Thanks for the explanation.

[DaniellPlasmmer]

I want to let you know a new crypto currency (yet, another one) that has some differences from previous.           Most important is that is designed to doesn't need historical operations to work and control double spend or check balance.           Please read the Pascal Coin concept at White Paper:           https://github.com/PascalCoin/PascalCoin/blob/master/PascalCoin%20White%20Paper%20-%20EN.pdf           It's name is "Pascal Coin" due it's written in Pascal language.           Full source code is available under the MIT license.

Hi, do you want portuguese translation?

[thedreamer]

Too many grammatical errors.

[DaniellPlasmmer]

Too many grammatical errors.

I've not wrote, its a quote. Its not mine errors. And, where you're seeing grammatical errors?

[proletariat]

Is it really that hard for an exchange operator to handle this code?

It is currently, because the code doesn't yet support linux, and there is no RPC for coins, so you can't tell the wallet over a network "send x coins to y" or "have you received any coins on address z yet?" which are both features the dev is working on. Give the project some time--once the codebase matures, it'll be a lot easier for exchanges to work with.

on that same note... does the code allow for a pool?

[jiggytom]

so is it easier to mine with multiple GPUs now or still need to run separate instances/users?

[oslak]

NO amd miner yet? anyone?

[thedreamer]

Too many grammatical errors.

I've not wrote, its a quote. Its not mine errors. And, where you're seeing grammatical errors?

All over, just like your reply.