[ANN] Firo (FIRO) - Implementing ZKP privacy without trusted setup

[joblo]

@ocminer :

Check your pool offline more times .

Also a lot of "Stratum authorize answer id is not correct" and "Stratum authorization failed".

Yeah sorry some folks are attacking the pool the whole day, I'm trying to keep it up

Visions of the last soldier defending the fort.

[1714496957]

1714496957

[1714496957]

1714496957

[AizenSou]

Now why would the devs have a private optimized miner for the coin when we know they get a portion of everycoin mined plus a portion of whatever is sold on exchanges. If you want an optimized miner real badly talk to wolf0 he's selling an AMD optimized sgminer kernel for 0.25 btc a piece 

I know someone who has been unusually quiet in these forums lately who could have made a play with
private Cuda miners.  But I agree AWS users were the big winners.

I'm just speculating because I don't know how much lyra2 is left in Cuda after Nanashi doubled the
performance. I think the nature of the algo is the biggest impediment to GPU performance.

I've really enjoyed some of the new CPU algo development recently with multiple devs contributing to
optimize in the open. It seems to have motivated some others to give it a try. It's nice to see continued
interest in CPU mining.

My contribution is coming soon, maybe a little late but still significant.

Thanks for yours.

AFAIK Nanashi code was used in the current miner of djm34 too. Let's say it's quite optimized and I don't think another further crazy optimization (50-100%) could be done soon. But I might be wrong. Thanks for your cpuminer, joblo.

[linklinklink]

Now why would the devs have a private optimized miner for the coin when we know they get a portion of everycoin mined plus a portion of whatever is sold on exchanges. If you want an optimized miner real badly talk to wolf0 he's selling an AMD optimized sgminer kernel for 0.25 btc a piece 

I know someone who has been unusually quiet in these forums lately who could have made a play with
private Cuda miners.  But I agree AWS users were the big winners.

I'm just speculating because I don't know how much lyra2 is left in Cuda after Nanashi doubled the
performance. I think the nature of the algo is the biggest impediment to GPU performance.

I've really enjoyed some of the new CPU algo development recently with multiple devs contributing to
optimize in the open. It seems to have motivated some others to give it a try. It's nice to see continued
interest in CPU mining.

My contribution is coming soon, maybe a little late but still significant.

Thanks for yours.

AFAIK Nanashi code was used in the current miner of djm34 too. Let's say it's quite optimized and I don't think another further crazy optimization (50-100%) could be done soon. But I might be wrong. Thanks for your cpuminer, joblo.

Can anyone please walk me through the steps to setup the GPU miner with SuprNova?

[joblo]

Thanks for your cpuminer, joblo.

You're welcome. I always encourage users to verify my performance claims.

[bouren]

any cuda 2.1 supported ccminer for new algorithm ?

[joblo]

any cuda 2.1 supported ccminer for new algorithm ?

Not likely. The previously mentioned Nanashi optimizations were never supported on sm2.1.

[giagge]

@ocminer :

Check your pool offline more times .

Also a lot of "Stratum authorize answer id is not correct" and "Stratum authorization failed".

Yeah sorry some folks are attacking the pool the whole day, I'm trying to keep it up

Frontend out .

[dntm]

Can anyone please walk me through the steps to setup the GPU miner with SuprNova?

Suprnova -> help -> getting started.
Same goes for any pool

DNTM

[AizenSou]

Thanks for your cpuminer, joblo.

You're welcome. I always encourage users to verify my performance claims.

I confirmed that your CPUminer increased in some cases to a whoppy 20%. Amazing. Thanks again.

[joblo]

Thanks for your cpuminer, joblo.

You're welcome. I always encourage users to verify my performance claims.

I confirmed that your CPUminer increased in some cases to a whoppy 20%. Amazing. Thanks again.

What is your CPU? I didn't test speed on AVX, but it was behind AVX2 in optimizing so it may have
improved more. I should also note that CPUs without AVX or AVX2 will not likely see any improvement.

[linklinklink]

Can anyone please walk me through the steps to setup the GPU miner with SuprNova?

Suprnova -> help -> getting started.
Same goes for any pool

DNTM

I keep getting the error when I try to run it.

"The program can't start because VCRUNTIME140.dll is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem"

[dntm]

Can anyone please walk me through the steps to setup the GPU miner with SuprNova?

Suprnova -> help -> getting started.
Same goes for any pool

DNTM

I keep getting the error when I try to run it.

"The program can't start because VCRUNTIME140.dll is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem"

You should update your computer to fix most .dll's, or a faster method is to search another windows computer for the .dll file and paste it into the folder of your miner.
Alternatively, if you trust me, here is the file - again, just paste it in the folder.


DNTM

[Golku]

Can anyone please walk me through the steps to setup the GPU miner with SuprNova?

Suprnova -> help -> getting started.
Same goes for any pool

DNTM

I keep getting the error when I try to run it.

"The program can't start because VCRUNTIME140.dll is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem"

I got the same problem. Hope it will fixed soon

[fredeq]

Can anyone please walk me through the steps to setup the GPU miner with SuprNova?

Suprnova -> help -> getting started.
Same goes for any pool

DNTM

I keep getting the error when I try to run it.

"The program can't start because VCRUNTIME140.dll is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem"

Had the same thing, just install vcredist 2015 update from microsoft.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/download/details.aspx?id=48145

[krile]

This coin...
None of the reported network hashrates are correct (suprnova, mph, chainz), I can't make heads or tails of the difficulty trying to calculate how long would it take to find a block with my hashrate and at times the wallet syncs slower than the speed of  new blocks being found.

This...

250MHs reported by ccminer, not a single share accepted for hours. What is up with the numbers here, nothing is right

[linklinklink]

Can anyone please walk me through the steps to setup the GPU miner with SuprNova?

Suprnova -> help -> getting started.
Same goes for any pool

DNTM

I keep getting the error when I try to run it.

"The program can't start because VCRUNTIME140.dll is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem"

You should update your computer to fix most .dll's, or a faster method is to search another windows computer for the .dll file and paste it into the folder of your miner.
Alternatively, if you trust me, here is the file - again, just paste it in the folder.


DNTM

Thanks, copied the file over from Windows. Working great.

[linklinklink]

This coin...
None of the reported network hashrates are correct (suprnova, mph, chainz), I can't make heads or tails of the difficulty trying to calculate how long would it take to find a block with my hashrate and at times the wallet syncs slower than the speed of  new blocks being found.

This...

250MHs reported by ccminer, not a single share accepted for hours. What is up with the numbers here, nothing is right

I'm having the same problem, running 1,200khs and the website isn't registering my work on SuprNova

[krile]

This coin...
None of the reported network hashrates are correct (suprnova, mph, chainz), I can't make heads or tails of the difficulty trying to calculate how long would it take to find a block with my hashrate and at times the wallet syncs slower than the speed of  new blocks being found.

This...

250MHs reported by ccminer, not a single share accepted for hours. What is up with the numbers here, nothing is right

I'm having the same problem, running 1,200khs and the website isn't registering my work on SuprNova

This is all so sketchy. Reminds me of the weird zcash launch phenomenon, just here it happened at block 20500. And I just realized it also has a founders reward. Where is the zcoin classic fork??

[bathrobehero]

This coin...
None of the reported network hashrates are correct (suprnova, mph, chainz), I can't make heads or tails of the difficulty trying to calculate how long would it take to find a block with my hashrate and at times the wallet syncs slower than the speed of  new blocks being found.

This...

250MHs reported by ccminer, not a single share accepted for hours. What is up with the numbers here, nothing is right

250 Kh/s or 250 Mh/s with multiple rigs?

The default port for suprnova (1596/1569) has a difficulty of 32 which is huge, even for a 6 card rig (1.3 Mh/s per 1070). I'd argue that's way too high even for 10 minute blocktimes but Zcoin periodically have much faster blocks (closer to 1 minute). Blocks being found faster than you can send shares is wasted hash.

And if you use the lower difficulty port 1598 (difficulty 1) vardiff will soon kick the difficulty way up then way down which repeats over and over again.

Just did a test with 7.54 Mh/s and from diff 1 vardiff jumped to 7.5 > 20.83 > 5.68 > 1.16 > 2.27 > 16.28 > 8.88 > 2.22 > 1.28  > 8.64 in 10 minutes or 70 shares. That's way too much fluctuation.


As a completely different note, my wallet is still only at 13545 blocks after a bit over 3 days.

[goodminer]

Can someone help me please?
My r7 370 gpu gives me accepted shares, but huge number of hw errors. Is this normal or what??
Can you tell me what is wrong with my bat file?
Here it is:
sgminer -k lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:1596 -u xxx-p xxx -I 18 -w 256 -g 2
Thanx forward.