Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[AriesIV10]

IS GPY  allready dead for this coin
http://www.ufominers.com/zcash-equinox

looks like bs to me.
also do the calculations - 900H/s = 5*rx480, 120W*5 = 600W, 250$*5 = 1250$...
WHY?

A single Radeon Pro Duo produce 1000 H/s and uses 300W

It cost about 1200 USD here in Denmark

Any proof of that?

Here is a better...REAL...Rig:  http://mintmining.com/mining-equipment

Why would anyone that knows anything about mining build  a mining rig with 256 GB SSD and a Quad core?

Are you asking or insinuating?  If you are asking, the quad core is used for mining in conjunction with your gpu's.  Maybe this is a new technique for you to maximize your equipment.

No. The speed or size of your hard drive does absolutely zero for mining speed. And a Quad core is entirely unnecessary as well. That's not a question, that's based on everything we know about mining, period.

Based upon your groups experience and knowledge, you would know that you can mine with the CPU.  The hard drive is a perk that I get at a great price and pass this along to you (resale value).  

[1715420358]

1715420358

[1715420358]

1715420358

[1715420358]

1715420358

[manoe]

I have a chance to buy some extra miners, but what will be the best choise for the future? I have seen the results on the wikki but there is a r9 290x with the 390x bios mod is it worth the chance for further future? I think the 390x maybe have some more profit in the future but i'm not so sure between this two. I can buy for the moment for the same price 3x - 290x 4gb or 2x - 390x 8 gb? The 390 is also the same price for me as the 390x. Any suggestions? it is the intention to build up even further in the future. The wattage will be not such a problem after 8 months. I just will to be sure for the best choise for evolutions in the future for hashrates and share founds.

If they are of the same price. It is better to buy the 390x or 290x. They are about 10% faster in the ZEC mining.

Ok, thanks! And between the 290x and the 390x is there a suggestion? Have they both always done well in maybe other currencies to? Or is there one of them that shoots out? Sorry for this maybe off topic reply!! I just want to make an assessment for possible further future to, after that zcash maybe gets to difficult in a couple of years

There is no fundamental difference between the 390x and 290x. The only difference is the 390X has higher stockk frequency, 1500 MHz instead of 1250.

Thank you for confirmation

[powerstr]

computeruniverse

[d57heinz]

Well its time to leave dwarfpool.  the payouts per block along with the amount of shares submitted jus dont add up.  Guess ill giving mining pool hub a shot while i get my solo setup running.  What a waste of time on dwarfpool.


16-11-30, 14:59:59 (22 minutes ago)   838528   0.591   0.11486252 precalc.*   immature blocks
16-11-30, 13:59:59 (1 hour ago)   2527808   0.691   0.06697083 precalc.*   immature blocks
16-11-30, 10:59:59 (4 hours ago)   812160   0.737   0.07121396    ✓
16-11-30, 09:59:59 (5 hours ago)   2525312   0.886   0.08536035    ✓
16-11-30, 06:59:59 (8 hours ago)   1742784   0.991   0.19053779    ✓
16-11-30, 04:59:59 (10 hours ago)   897856   0.924   0.08854736    ✓
16-11-30, 03:59:59 (11 hours ago)   8415744   0.674   0.06451753    ✓

BR

[QuintLeo]

I have a chance to buy some extra miners, but what will be the best choise for the future? I have seen the results on the wikki but there is a r9 290x with the 390x bios mod is it worth the chance for further future? I think the 390x maybe have some more profit in the future but i'm not so sure between this two. I can buy for the moment for the same price 3x - 290x 4gb or 2x - 390x 8 gb? The 390 is also the same price for me as the 390x. Any suggestions? it is the intention to build up even further in the future. The wattage will be not such a problem after 8 months. I just will to be sure for the best choise for evolutions in the future for hashrates and share founds.

If they are of the same price. It is better to buy the 390x or 290x. They are about 10% faster in the ZEC mining.

Ok, thanks! And between the 290x and the 390x is there a suggestion? Have they both always done well in maybe other currencies to? Or is there one of them that shoots out? Sorry for this maybe off topic reply!! I just want to make an assessment for possible further future to, after that zcash maybe gets to difficult in a couple of years

There is no fundamental difference between the 390x and 290x. The only difference is the 390X has higher stockk frequency, 1500 MHz instead of 1250.

 There is ONE fundimental difference between the 290x and the 390x - faster memory.
 Ditto most of the 2xx line vs the 3xx line.

 The BIOS usually has a bit of a refresh too, but that's minor.

[QuintLeo]

But why is difficulty go up??

 1) Profitability. Quite a few folks chase the most profitable coin.
 2) ETH seems to have finally hit the "2GB cards can't handle the DAG file size" barrier, which probably forced some of those rigs into something else - like ZEC - that doesn't have that limit.
 3) People keep building more and more new rigs, since there are a few GPU mineable coins with good profitability right now - and ZEC is one of those.
     ETH difficulty has ALSO been climbing a fair bit this past week despite 2) above and the sliding ETH price.

[pacolito]

is anyone else not receiving payments from flypool the past 2-3 hours?
Sorry for posting this here but I figured many are using flypool in here.

[QuintLeo]

IS GPY  allready dead for this coin
http://www.ufominers.com/zcash-equinox

 UFO miners are known scammers. Ignore them.

[QuintLeo]

is anyone else not receiving payments from flypool the past 2-3 hours?
Sorry for posting this here but I figured many are using flypool in here.

 Just got a payout from them about 35 minutes ago.

[pacolito]

is anyone else not receiving payments from flypool the past 2-3 hours?
Sorry for posting this here but I figured many are using flypool in here.

 Just got a payout from them about 35 minutes ago.

mmmm ... then for some reason I'm having issues receiving them on poloniex.

[QuintLeo]

if i am correct pro duo should be 2 x FURY X if i am correct... i guess they can be pushed to 6 -700 sols not more... but there is this rumor ... so i am just asking

 Somewhat less, as they can't be clocked as high (or quite as high as the Nano, which is a closer comparison) due to limits of heat dissipation.

[QuintLeo]

And I think Vega that will be released next year will be based on R9 Nano + 14/16nm process, it will be so kickass, especially for mining.

 Kinda - HBM 2 instead of HBM 1 for RAM, and the same sort of tweeks that got applied to the archetecture of the RX series so far.

[citronick]

is anyone else not receiving payments from flypool the past 2-3 hours?
Sorry for posting this here but I figured many are using flypool in here.

Flypool is paying as usual, but if you are sending to Poloniex.... they have some delays and they are fixing it.

[Antalla]

I am getting
0,125 ZEC on flypool (average over 2 days)
0,12 ZEC on dwarfpool (average over 1,5 days -- perhaps just bad luck)
standardized to 1000sol/s (displayed on pool not miner) in 24h average
whattomine says I can expect 0.1188 ZEC

[citronick]

if i am correct pro duo should be 2 x FURY X if i am correct... i guess they can be pushed to 6 -700 sols not more... but there is this rumor ... so i am just asking

Somewhat less, as they can't be clocked as high (or quite as high as the Nano, which is a closer comparison) due to limits of heat dissipation.

any suggestions to overcome those physical restraints? thermal grease, water cooling, additional copper plate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXOaCkbt4lI

goto 8:30, water cooling R9-Nanos..... 7 of them!

[d57heinz]

I am getting
0,125 ZEC on flypool (average over 2 days)
0,12 ZEC on dwarfpool (average over 1,5 days -- perhaps just bad luck)
standardized to 1000sol/s (displayed on pool not miner) in 24h average
whattomine says I can expect 0.1188 ZEC

Well I'm going to wait one more day. But what bothers me on dwarf is the discrepancy on payouts/share ratio. Maybe I don't fully understand hbpps that well.  Thanks for letting me know    According to calc I should be getting .89 ish per day. Diff is going up really fast.  Almost 25% overnight!!! Ouch

BR

[pacolito]

is anyone else not receiving payments from flypool the past 2-3 hours?
Sorry for posting this here but I figured many are using flypool in here.

Flypool is paying as usual, but if you are sending to Poloniex.... they have some delays and they are fixing it.

Thanks for clearing that out for me.

[Selsonblue]

I am getting
0,125 ZEC on flypool (average over 2 days)
0,12 ZEC on dwarfpool (average over 1,5 days -- perhaps just bad luck)
standardized to 1000sol/s (displayed on pool not miner) in 24h average
whattomine says I can expect 0.1188 ZEC

I am getting about the same on Flypool. Havent seen anything better advertised so no need to switch. 

1 kh/s - .125 ish daily payout.

[AriesIV10]

I am getting
0,125 ZEC on flypool (average over 2 days)
0,12 ZEC on dwarfpool (average over 1,5 days -- perhaps just bad luck)
standardized to 1000sol/s (displayed on pool not miner) in 24h average
whattomine says I can expect 0.1188 ZEC

Well I'm going to wait one more day. But what bothers me on dwarf is the discrepancy on payouts/share ratio. Maybe I don't fully understand hbpps that well.  Thanks for letting me know    According to calc I should be getting .89 ish per day. Diff is going up really fast.  Almost 25% overnight!!! Ouch

BR

After 1 day, I am all out of Dwarfpool and back to Flypool.  Keep us informed about the type of payout system for Dwarfpool.

[sorry2xs]

we need a miner refresh