|
ffthomas
|
 |
December 30, 2016, 05:47:17 PM |
|
NOTE: v9.3 is not performance release, in this version I improved compatibility/stability in GPU code and fixed Linux-related issues. You can use older versions if they are good and stable for you. thank you!
@claymore:
"- added support for round robin DNS"
I'm not a network specialist, so I ask what that means and why is that feature good for us?
I red about round robin but I didn't find the answer. Sorry if it's a dummy question.
In theory, pools can balance servers load with this feature. Nicehash pool asked me about this feature so I added it. If a pool has several IPs and first IP fails, miner will try to connect to the second IP, etc. Claymore, Is there any room for further hash improvement for RX cards or that's it?
I think it's possible to get better speed, but not too much. Thank you for the answer. And also thanks for m1n1ngP4d4w4n  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
osnwt
|
|
December 30, 2016, 06:21:14 PM |
|
when you will make new miner for monero???
The old miner is already very efficient. Not a right thread for it, but I'd like Monero miner supports reboot.bat. |
|
|
|
|
|
Zorky
|
|
December 30, 2016, 06:26:27 PM |
|
Just tried it out and it gave me some small performance improvements. But lets see how it does in the long run  pool.northernminers.com <--- putting 1 ZEC additional to the winning prize. |
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
December 30, 2016, 07:01:09 PM |
|
NOTE: v9.3 is not performance release, in this version I improved compatibility/stability in GPU code and fixed Linux-related issues. You can use older versions if they are good and stable for you. thank you!
@claymore:
"- added support for round robin DNS"
I'm not a network specialist, so I ask what that means and why is that feature good for us?
I red about round robin but I didn't find the answer. Sorry if it's a dummy question.
In theory, pools can balance servers load with this feature. Nicehash pool asked me about this feature so I added it. If a pool has several IPs and first IP fails, miner will try to connect to the second IP, etc. Claymore, Is there any room for further hash improvement for RX cards or that's it?
I think it's possible to get better speed, but not too much. Thank you for the answer. And also thanks for m1n1ngP4d4w4n Ahah my pleasure, i wasn't expecting sir claymore to answer this promptly, he's always on top of things isn't he ;-) |
|
|
|
|
DrX
Member
Offline
Activity: 233
Merit: 20
|
|
December 30, 2016, 07:20:37 PM |
|
Thanks claymore... 320 sols on 290x stock and 290 sols on 290 stock  Try 1100 core and 1125 mem on your 290s.. I'm getting 320ish each Crashed on stock bios |
|
|
|
|
tjeldik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
December 30, 2016, 07:29:32 PM |
|
what is a the moment the best pool for mining ZEC
I am at the moment using dwarfpool but they are finding less blocks then others
thanks for your help
|
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
December 30, 2016, 07:31:51 PM |
|
what is a the moment the best pool for mining ZEC
I am at the moment using dwarfpool but they are finding less blocks then others
How many cards your rigs have ? there is multiple ports for difficulty on dwarfpool, need to use the proper one to get maximum shares (i find the default vardiff one to be less efficient) |
|
|
|
|
|
Knepala
|
|
December 30, 2016, 07:45:21 PM |
|
Can someone please explain to me how to get amd adl library to work with Claymore?
It's the last thing I'm still trying to figure out.
|
|
|
|
mettalmag
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1084
Merit: 1003
≡v≡
|
|
December 30, 2016, 07:48:56 PM |
|
Hi Claymore,
At first, I appreciate to your work.
About miner monitor, is it possible to implement encrypted traffic between miner and monitoring software, also I think it is a good to shown the local clock and date on a web page UI.
I wish you much success in the coming year!
that would be great! |
|
|
|
|
tjeldik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
December 30, 2016, 08:14:01 PM |
|
what is a the moment the best pool for mining ZEC
I am at the moment using dwarfpool but they are finding less blocks then others
How many cards your rigs have ? there is multiple ports for difficulty on dwarfpool, need to use the proper one to get maximum shares (i find the default vardiff one to be less efficient) I have one rig with 3x 7950 and one with 2x 280x building a thirt one using the 3333 at dwarfpool thanks for the help |
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
December 30, 2016, 08:16:18 PM |
|
what is a the moment the best pool for mining ZEC
I am at the moment using dwarfpool but they are finding less blocks then others
How many cards your rigs have ? there is multiple ports for difficulty on dwarfpool, need to use the proper one to get maximum shares (i find the default vardiff one to be less efficient) I have one rig with 3x 7950 and one with 2x 280x building a thirt one using the 3333 at dwarfpool thanks for the help Ok 3333 is the basic vardiff one, following the zcash page @ dwarfpool Main-Port (vardiff): 3333 Stratum-Port (dwarf=8,miner=256): 3334 for CPU Stratum-Port (dwarf=128,miner=4096): 3335 for one videocard Stratum-Port (dwarf=512,miner=16384): 3336 for rigs with 2-4 cards Stratum-Port (dwarf=1024,miner=32768): 3337 for rigs with >=5 cards try following this, and in 24h compare |
|
|
|
|
|
Etherion
|
|
December 30, 2016, 08:34:58 PM |
|
@claymore I have noticed that my reported sol/s is alot higher than what flypool shows.  I have just updated the miners to 9.3 but that was quick. I am using ssl and the rejects have always been low. Less than 1% 3.9k vs 3.4k is a huge gap. |
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
December 30, 2016, 08:42:26 PM |
|
@claymore I have noticed that my reported sol/s is alot higher than what flypool shows. I have just updated the miners to 9.3 but that was quick. I am using ssl and the rejects have always been low. Less than 1% 3.9k vs 3.4k is a huge gap. Let at least 12h stats adjustements especially on flypool |
|
|
|
|
Gambler8899
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
December 30, 2016, 09:05:03 PM |
|
Thanks claymore... 320 sols on 290x stock and 290 sols on 290 stock Try 1100 core and 1125 mem on your 290s.. I'm getting 320ish each Agree . Nice. And 290x ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Golku
|
|
December 30, 2016, 09:06:52 PM |
|
Thinking about going back to 9.2
Its much faster dan 9.3
|
|
|
|
|
KrokoTill
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
December 30, 2016, 09:28:20 PM |
|
Thanks claymore... 320 sols on 290x stock and 290 sols on 290 stock Try 1100 core and 1125 mem on your 290s.. I'm getting 320ish each 290 - 1050/1250 - 320 280 - 1000/1500 - 195 |
|
|
|
|
Zoryk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
December 30, 2016, 09:43:42 PM |
|
390X 1120/1500-350
390X 1110/1500-345
390 1120/1500-335
v.9.3 15.12
|
|
|
|
|
thehit101
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
December 30, 2016, 11:32:50 PM |
|
does the miner store data on the hard drive? something is eating up my storage.
TIA!
|
|
|
|
|
igorsantos
Member
Offline
Activity: 179
Merit: 10
|
|
December 30, 2016, 11:36:09 PM |
|
Thanks claymore... 320 sols on 290x stock and 290 sols on 290 stock Try 1100 core and 1125 mem on your 290s.. I'm getting 320ish each 290 - 1050/1250 - 320 280 - 1000/1500 - 195 How did you get it? I have a xfx r9 290 = 295 h / s |
|
|
|
|
maxmad_x
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
It takes a lot to build but not much to lose
|
|
December 30, 2016, 11:38:43 PM |
|
does the miner store data on the hard drive? something is eating up my storage.
TIA!
Nope.. nothing more than the log files.. |
|
|
|
|
|
