Bitcoin Forum
April 30, 2024, 03:10:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 [443] 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 ... 760 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839038 times)
carlo_0000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 01:08:23 AM
 #8841

Quote
My R9 290 cards never left ETH as ZEC profitability on them was never enough higher to go through the hassle of moving those machines to WinDoze from LINUX.

strange is 390 faster than 290 on zec  or eth slower?
mine 390 is running nicehash  and it s 90% time on zec , it s more profitable on zec than ether (i discount the fees for zec in setting)
 
 
Quote
My HD 78xx cards are on ZEC as they're 2GB or less cards that don't handle ETH DAG size any more.

maybe not the 2GB problem   because my 380's are 2G too and running fine on ether
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
alesx.onfire
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


It's Not Enough


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 01:37:53 AM
 #8842

7950 running fine (here)

voidwalker
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 01:46:25 AM
 #8843

I am planning on building a mining rig with more than 8 gpus. I've bought 1 to 4 pci express splitters but I had no luck getting the motherboards to boot with more gpus than the number of its actual physical pcie ports. (tried z87, h97, h81, b150). The person who sold these to me said he heard ASROCK X99 EXTREME supports up to 32 GPUS.
Now I've seen somewhere on the ethereum dual miner thread that somebody managed to use around 18?, i think, amd cards on linux, but I cannot find that post anymore.
Anyone have any info on this? Will a motherboard with X79 chipset be just as good, as they have the same number of lanes? Or it depends more on the bios ?They are rather expensive and I want to hear some opinions before I throw my money.
forzendiablo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000


the grandpa of cryptos


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 02:59:32 AM
 #8844

claymore lets do 250 on 280x. i know u can do this!

yolo
fmz89
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1766
Merit: 1002



View Profile
December 19, 2016, 05:32:50 AM
 #8845

claymore lets do 250 on 280x. i know u can do this!
lets forget it for tahiti, there is no speed up anymore, its meant back to the grave
hahahaha
long live rx

  ▄█▀                       ▀█▄
 ██           ▄▄ ▄▄           ██
███       ▄ ▄███ ███▄ ▄       ███
████▄   ███ ████ ████ ███   ▄████
 ██████████ ███▀ ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄ ▄██████
  ▀▀███████  ▀▄█████████ ████▀▀
       ███▀▄ ██████▀▀▀ ▄▄
       █▀▄██ ████▄▄█▀▄████
        ████ ▀█████▄▀██▀
        ████ █▄▀█████▄
        ████  ▀▀ █████▀
         ▀▀█      ▀█▀
.REXX.|||
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
███████████▀    ▐███████
███████████    ▄▄█████████
▐██████████▀    ▀▀█████████▌
▐█████████▌       █████████▌
▐███████████    ███████████▌
███████████    ███████████
██████████    ██████████
▀████████▄  ▄████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀  █████
████████████▀▀      ██████
▐████████▀▀   ▄▄     ██████▌
▐████▀▀    ▄█▀▀     ███████▌
▐████████ █▀        ███████▌
████████ █ ▄███▄   ███████
████████████████▄▄██████
▀████████████████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
▄▄████████▄▄
▄████████████████▄
▄████████████████████▄
████ ▄▀██████████  █████
██████▄▀▄▀██████  ████████
▐████████▄▀▄▀██  ██████████▌
▐██████████▄▀▄ ████████████▌
▐██████████  ▄▀▄▀██████████▌
████████  ████▄▀▄▀████████
█████  ████████▄▀ ██████
▀████████████████████▀
▀████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
|.BUY REXX.
Hotmetal
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 07:31:26 AM
 #8846

I am planning on building a mining rig with more than 8 gpus. I've bought 1 to 4 pci express splitters but I had no luck getting the motherboards to boot with more gpus than the number of its actual physical pcie ports. (tried z87, h97, h81, b150). The person who sold these to me said he heard ASROCK X99 EXTREME supports up to 32 GPUS.
Now I've seen somewhere on the ethereum dual miner thread that somebody managed to use around 18?, i think, amd cards on linux, but I cannot find that post anymore.
Anyone have any info on this? Will a motherboard with X79 chipset be just as good, as they have the same number of lanes? Or it depends more on the bios ?They are rather expensive and I want to hear some opinions before I throw my money.

You are wasting your time, money and putting your entire system at risk both in terms of failure and ROI.
Bitbit017
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 08:18:37 AM
 #8847

claymore lets do 250 on 280x. i know u can do this!
lets forget it for tahiti, there is no speed up anymore, its meant back to the grave
hahahaha
long live rx

I don't have Tahiti....but we realize what kind of person you are!!!
Long "live" your brain
rozsada
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 105
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 08:26:21 AM
 #8848

does Nanopool support ssl?
sp_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087

Team Black developer


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 08:26:30 AM
 #8849

I am planning on building a mining rig with more than 8 gpus. I've bought 1 to 4 pci express splitters but I had no luck getting the motherboards to boot with more gpus than the number of its actual physical pcie ports. (tried z87, h97, h81, b150). The person who sold these to me said he heard ASROCK X99 EXTREME supports up to 32 GPUS.
Now I've seen somewhere on the ethereum dual miner thread that somebody managed to use around 18?, i think, amd cards on linux, but I cannot find that post anymore.
Anyone have any info on this? Will a motherboard with X79 chipset be just as good, as they have the same number of lanes? Or it depends more on the bios ?They are rather expensive and I want to hear some opinions before I throw my money.

Most miner software doesn't support more than 8 cards. (hardcoded in the client). I ccminer sp-mod I support 32 cards, but NVIDIA only.

Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETH ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW MEOWPOW + dual mining + tripple mining.. https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner
omshree
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 270
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 08:42:00 AM
 #8850

I am planning on building a mining rig with more than 8 gpus. I've bought 1 to 4 pci express splitters but I had no luck getting the motherboards to boot with more gpus than the number of its actual physical pcie ports. (tried z87, h97, h81, b150). The person who sold these to me said he heard ASROCK X99 EXTREME supports up to 32 GPUS.
Now I've seen somewhere on the ethereum dual miner thread that somebody managed to use around 18?, i think, amd cards on linux, but I cannot find that post anymore.
Anyone have any info on this? Will a motherboard with X79 chipset be just as good, as they have the same number of lanes? Or it depends more on the bios ?They are rather expensive and I want to hear some opinions before I throw my money.

Most miner software doesn't support more than 8 cards. (hardcoded in the client). I ccminer sp-mod I support 32 cards, but NVIDIA only.

H81 can handle 7 gpus no problem, couldn't make it work w 8 in any way.

Donate if you like 1ANALSEXXGMd6HaN6CzQXtURLC5H9TjKoo
gaah
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 08:47:19 AM
 #8851

I will release new version in 1-2 days. Not all cards will get speedup, but at least Hawaii and Polaris will.



Today Cheesy ?
mistercashking
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1044
Merit: 1050


@MRCASHKING


View Profile WWW
December 19, 2016, 08:51:12 AM
 #8852

I will release new version in 1-2 days. Not all cards will get speedup, but at least Hawaii and Polaris will.



Today Cheesy ?

That would be cool, it's possible. Would love another speedup.
KrokoTill
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 09:03:19 AM
 #8853

I did some tweaks on both of my Tahiti (HD7950) cards and I get around 200H/s per card. Makes 400H/s in total. I'm pretty happy with these results.
Thanks Claymore for this great program. Keep up the good work!

can you post your tweaks?

I did some overclocking to make sure both cards would yield the same results in Catalyst 15.11. I increased the GPU and memory clock of one of the cards. As you can see this gives me 200H/s per card.
check :http://imgur.com/a/7D1Et

I've been thinking of trying two more things to increase the H/s:

- updating catalyst to the latest version
- Trying this:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1554360/tahiti-memory-timings-patch-for-hynix-vram
It seems there is a patch for the Tahiti Memory Timings which seems to increase the speed. Now, this is all a bit technical for me and I don't really know what it does exactly, but the results look promising. This only works for the Tahiti cards though (HD7950), like mine.



Yes, the mem timings patch does work indeed, but.. It depends on your card whether it is OK for you or not. This patch has different memory straps than my stock BIOS and Stilt timings that seem to be too much for my card.
I have re-branded 7950 i.e. R9 280 and I am running it at 1000/1500, undervolted. With timings patch it went from 185H/s to 195, but was not stable any more. Tried other clocks and voltages too, but no luck, it was able to mine couple of hours at best before stopping. Then I decided to do timings tweaks to my stock BIOS by myself and result is also 195H/s, but 100% stable. I was able to get 200 H/s with the same clocks and even tighter timings, but then it was again unstable. So I left it at 195, tested also other algos, real world apps and Furmark, all good. It would do over 200H/s with higher GPU clock, but I like to keep it cool and quiet. With 1000/1500 it works at ~65C with 36-39% fan speed.
With similar timings mod I was able to speed up R7 370 1175/1500 from 140H/s to 155 H/s and R9 290 1000/1250 from 275 H/s to 295 H/s.
I tested different driver versions with these mods and for me latest 16.12.1 drivers work the best. They are very slightly faster than 16.11.2 and 16.2.1 I used before, just 1-2 more H/s. Maybe it depends on BIOS mods, but for me 15.12 is 4-7 H/s per card slower than 16.12.1
jordanBG
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 09:04:00 AM
 #8854

Dwarfpool's  admins did't wake up. 12 hours nothing. No stats, no blocks. Back to flypool Sad
Xapodat
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 09:06:50 AM
 #8855

I am planning on building a mining rig with more than 8 gpus. I've bought 1 to 4 pci express splitters but I had no luck getting the motherboards to boot with more gpus than the number of its actual physical pcie ports. (tried z87, h97, h81, b150). The person who sold these to me said he heard ASROCK X99 EXTREME supports up to 32 GPUS.
Now I've seen somewhere on the ethereum dual miner thread that somebody managed to use around 18?, i think, amd cards on linux, but I cannot find that post anymore.
Anyone have any info on this? Will a motherboard with X79 chipset be just as good, as they have the same number of lanes? Or it depends more on the bios ?They are rather expensive and I want to hear some opinions before I throw my money.

Most miner software doesn't support more than 8 cards. (hardcoded in the client). I ccminer sp-mod I support 32 cards, but NVIDIA only.

H81 can handle 7 gpus no problem, couldn't make it work w 8 in any way.

You need PCIE expander to do that.
DeCrypterManiac
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 550
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 09:07:45 AM
 #8856

Never had problems at all on https://zec.suprnova.cc
GTCG
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 09:15:20 AM
 #8857

I did some tweaks on both of my Tahiti (HD7950) cards and I get around 200H/s per card. Makes 400H/s in total. I'm pretty happy with these results.
Thanks Claymore for this great program. Keep up the good work!

can you post your tweaks?

I did some overclocking to make sure both cards would yield the same results in Catalyst 15.11. I increased the GPU and memory clock of one of the cards. As you can see this gives me 200H/s per card.
check :http://imgur.com/a/7D1Et

I've been thinking of trying two more things to increase the H/s:

- updating catalyst to the latest version
- Trying this:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1554360/tahiti-memory-timings-patch-for-hynix-vram
It seems there is a patch for the Tahiti Memory Timings which seems to increase the speed. Now, this is all a bit technical for me and I don't really know what it does exactly, but the results look promising. This only works for the Tahiti cards though (HD7950), like mine.



Yes, the mem timings patch does work indeed, but.. It depends on your card whether it is OK for you or not. This patch has different memory straps than my stock BIOS and Stilt timings that seem to be too much for my card.
I have re-branded 7950 i.e. R9 280 and I am running it at 1000/1500, undervolted. With timings patch it went from 185H/s to 195, but was not stable any more. Tried other clocks and voltages too, but no luck, it was able to mine couple of hours at best before stopping. Then I decided to do timings tweaks to my stock BIOS by myself and result is also 195H/s, but 100% stable. I was able to get 200 H/s with the same clocks and even tighter timings, but then it was again unstable. So I left it at 195, tested also other algos, real world apps and Furmark, all good. It would do over 200H/s with higher GPU clock, but I like to keep it cool and quiet. With 1000/1500 it works at ~65C with 36-39% fan speed.
With similar timings mod I was able to speed up R7 370 1175/1500 from 140H/s to 155 H/s and R9 290 1000/1250 from 275 H/s to 295 H/s.
I tested different driver versions with these mods and for me latest 16.12.1 drivers work the best. They are very slightly faster than 16.11.2 and 16.2.1 I used before, just 1-2 more H/s. Maybe it depends on BIOS mods, but for me 15.12 is 4-7 H/s per card slower than 16.12.1


Great research. Thanks for that!

I will not take the risk for just a few more H/s. As I have read it seems as if 200H/s is a great speed, and I will let it be as it is. It's as stable as it can be atm, and I should be glad with such result, knowing these cards are second handed.

Eliovp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293

Huh?


View Profile WWW
December 19, 2016, 09:19:41 AM
 #8858

I did some tweaks on both of my Tahiti (HD7950) cards and I get around 200H/s per card. Makes 400H/s in total. I'm pretty happy with these results.
Thanks Claymore for this great program. Keep up the good work!

can you post your tweaks?

I did some overclocking to make sure both cards would yield the same results in Catalyst 15.11. I increased the GPU and memory clock of one of the cards. As you can see this gives me 200H/s per card.
check :http://imgur.com/a/7D1Et

I've been thinking of trying two more things to increase the H/s:

- updating catalyst to the latest version
- Trying this:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1554360/tahiti-memory-timings-patch-for-hynix-vram
It seems there is a patch for the Tahiti Memory Timings which seems to increase the speed. Now, this is all a bit technical for me and I don't really know what it does exactly, but the results look promising. This only works for the Tahiti cards though (HD7950), like mine.



Yes, the mem timings patch does work indeed, but.. It depends on your card whether it is OK for you or not. This patch has different memory straps than my stock BIOS and Stilt timings that seem to be too much for my card.
I have re-branded 7950 i.e. R9 280 and I am running it at 1000/1500, undervolted. With timings patch it went from 185H/s to 195, but was not stable any more. Tried other clocks and voltages too, but no luck, it was able to mine couple of hours at best before stopping. Then I decided to do timings tweaks to my stock BIOS by myself and result is also 195H/s, but 100% stable. I was able to get 200 H/s with the same clocks and even tighter timings, but then it was again unstable. So I left it at 195, tested also other algos, real world apps and Furmark, all good. It would do over 200H/s with higher GPU clock, but I like to keep it cool and quiet. With 1000/1500 it works at ~65C with 36-39% fan speed.
With similar timings mod I was able to speed up R7 370 1175/1500 from 140H/s to 155 H/s and R9 290 1000/1250 from 275 H/s to 295 H/s.
I tested different driver versions with these mods and for me latest 16.12.1 drivers work the best. They are very slightly faster than 16.11.2 and 16.2.1 I used before, just 1-2 more H/s. Maybe it depends on BIOS mods, but for me 15.12 is 4-7 H/s per card slower than 16.12.1


Great research. Thanks for that!

I will not take the risk for just a few more H/s. As I have read it seems as if 200H/s is a great speed, and I will let it be as it is. It's as stable as it can be atm, and I should be glad with such result, knowing these cards are second handed.



if you do it "good" you'll get a nice increase Smiley

Custom timing (thx to wolf for the assist) give me an increase of 10-15h and 30+Mh on a 470 4G. (clocks 1165/2050) <-- yeah..  Wink

Next phase, rop shedding.

ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240



View Profile WWW
December 19, 2016, 09:27:57 AM
 #8859

Never had problems at all on https://zec.suprnova.cc

The coin is really solid since 1.0.3 - it was a nightmare with the first releases though Smiley

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
GTCG
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 19, 2016, 09:32:17 AM
 #8860

I am planning on building a mining rig with more than 8 gpus. I've bought 1 to 4 pci express splitters but I had no luck getting the motherboards to boot with more gpus than the number of its actual physical pcie ports. (tried z87, h97, h81, b150). The person who sold these to me said he heard ASROCK X99 EXTREME supports up to 32 GPUS.
Now I've seen somewhere on the ethereum dual miner thread that somebody managed to use around 18?, i think, amd cards on linux, but I cannot find that post anymore.
Anyone have any info on this? Will a motherboard with X79 chipset be just as good, as they have the same number of lanes? Or it depends more on the bios ?They are rather expensive and I want to hear some opinions before I throw my money.

Most miner software doesn't support more than 8 cards. (hardcoded in the client). I ccminer sp-mod I support 32 cards, but NVIDIA only.

Looks like a great plan, but I'm wondering if you will manage to get your ROI back. Do you have a certain strategy for that? WIll you mine different coins from time to time like XMR or ETH?
Pages: « 1 ... 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 [443] 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 ... 760 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!