Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[Marvell1]

Been mining with v9.1 so far it is stable, i also order this baby from ebayto try out because my MB has only 4 pci-e slots. so i got this to add more GPU!



The device card also uses the United States Pericom Pericom PI7C9X bridge chip, for switching PCI-E, PCI-E between.
But even USB 3.0, but also the theoretical bandwidth 5Gbps (625MB / s), one Into four Then remove the loss would only 150MB / s, and even PCI-E 1.x single-channel bandwidth also has 250MB / s, So this stuff more than enough to give you the best slots, there will not be enough bandwidth, not only for the performance requirements of the place. Therefore, the transferred PCI-E slot is the best version above 2.0, the 3.0 version is better.

See installation or you can Order here ->    http://tinyurl.com/gmclx9n 

Which mobo are you using? Z170 chipset??

i have one of these things laying around i ordered it a while back
i got a board that also only allows four cards , do u have to supply power

to it cia the sata cable?

[1714465311]

1714465311

[1714465311]

1714465311

[1714465311]

1714465311

[1714465311]

1714465311

[1714465311]

1714465311

[1714465311]

1714465311

[fredeq]

How do I download Radeon software that is not the most current version.  When I go to their website, all I am able to find is the most current driver version.  I have google searched and found their webpage for 15.12, but there is no download link.

not supported by them anymore, use the 2nd match in google, or the 3rd or the 4th, its up to you.

Ahh gotcha, so is it just a download from a 3rd party then?

Yes, I'm afraid, but I got it from Guru3D if I remember well, and my card haven't exploded this far.

I use guru as well for old drivers

Been mining with v9.1 so far it is stable, i also order this baby from ebayto try out because my MB has only 4 pci-e slots. so i got this to add more GPU!



The device card also uses the United States Pericom Pericom PI7C9X bridge chip, for switching PCI-E, PCI-E between.
But even USB 3.0, but also the theoretical bandwidth 5Gbps (625MB / s), one Into four Then remove the loss would only 150MB / s, and even PCI-E 1.x single-channel bandwidth also has 250MB / s, So this stuff more than enough to give you the best slots, there will not be enough bandwidth, not only for the performance requirements of the place. Therefore, the transferred PCI-E slot is the best version above 2.0, the 3.0 version is better.

See installation or you can Order here ->    http://tinyurl.com/gmclx9n 

Please let us know how it went

[nevermind41]

all my stable 6 X 470 rigs become crazy with 9.2. Their gpu0 always hangs.

[Intutan]

9.2 is much more stable
Normally at 9.1 it got crashed after 24h
Now it is running 36h still no problem great job

Its same for me 9.0, 9.1, 9.2. Weird part is its still the same few rig who always crash. So I think my PC is old and some part is broken.

Just reduce the clock. It works for me.

[KrokoTill]

GPU - 9.1 -> 9.2
R7 370 - 155 -> 156
R9 280 - 195 -> 193
r9 290 - 295 -> 313

What's your settings for 290?

1050/1250, -i 8, modded 390X ROM, modded timings

1175mV core (just 69% ASIC) and 16.12.1 driver

 Try the 16.10.1 or 16.9.2 drivers, 16.12.1 COST me 5-10% hashrate on every card I tried it on when I was testing it.

Tested only with 9.1 @ R7 370:
16.9.2 - 153
16.10.1 - 154
16.12.2 - 155

[Golku]

Thinking about buying 2 more gpu's in my rig

I was thinking about 280x can get it for 80-90 euro's
and a 290 for 130 euro's

will it be wise to buy these cards or shall i look for a rx 470/480

[jenci]

all my stable 6 X 470 rigs become crazy with 9.2. Their gpu0 always hangs.

i have same problem 2 times after update to 9.2. increase core voltage from 973 to 1000 mV and after 28 hour work no more hangs.

[Zosinburg]

all my stable 6 X 470 rigs become crazy with 9.2. Their gpu0 always hangs.

i have same problem 2 times after update to 9.2. increase core voltage from 973 to 1000 mV and after 28 hour work no more hangs.

You can also reduce the intensity.

[master1]

All stock bios

3x Asus RX 480 4GB - ~231sol/s/ea (-100mV core) [+10sol/s vs 9.1]
2x Gigabyte RX 480 8GB - ~239sol/s/ea (-100mV core) [+15sol/s vs 9.1]
1x Sapphire Nitro R7 370 4GB - (+140 cc)  [+0sol/s vs 9.1]

Rig split between 1200w (80plus platinum) and 750w (80plus gold).. roughly at half max load each.

Total sol/s = 1315 [+67sol/s vs 9.1]
Total ATW = 928w [+25w vs 9.1]
Sols per watt = 1.417 [+0.035 sol/w vs 9.1]

Not a huge improvement but it is nonetheless. Thanks for the release Claymore!

Anyone know any bios mods for my cards?

I think using RX480s at core 1270 memory 1940 was optimum for me for Sol/watt. I am getting 240sol at 95W gpuz and 135W at wall

and voltage ?

[KartingProfi]

ClayMore, in Remote Manager/Options/Speed Units: MH/s / KH/s... Where H/s? Decimal Points are not saves at exit from program.

[Demarsac]

GPU - 9.1 -> 9.2
R7 370 - 155 -> 156
R9 280 - 195 -> 193
r9 290 - 295 -> 313

What's your settings for 290?

1050/1250, -i 8, modded 390X ROM, modded timings

1175mV core (just 69% ASIC) and 16.12.1 driver

 Try the 16.10.1 or 16.9.2 drivers, 16.12.1 COST me 5-10% hashrate on every card I tried it on when I was testing it.

Tested only with 9.1 @ R7 370:
16.9.2 - 153
16.10.1 - 154
16.12.2 - 155

Which R7 370 are u using?
I am getting 147 average from each
Are you using modded rom for them?

[KrokoTill]

GPU - 9.1 -> 9.2
R7 370 - 155 -> 156
R9 280 - 195 -> 193
r9 290 - 295 -> 313

What's your settings for 290?

1050/1250, -i 8, modded 390X ROM, modded timings

1175mV core (just 69% ASIC) and 16.12.1 driver

 Try the 16.10.1 or 16.9.2 drivers, 16.12.1 COST me 5-10% hashrate on every card I tried it on when I was testing it.

Tested only with 9.1 @ R7 370:
16.9.2 - 153
16.10.1 - 154
16.12.2 - 155

Which R7 370 are u using?
I am getting 147 average from each
Are you using modded rom for them?

It is MSI Gaming 4G, running at 1175/1500
And yes I modded the ROM, without modding it is about 15 H/s slower.

[Demarsac]

Thanks.. 5 x RX480's working with v9.2 without issues.

ZEC: GPU0 252.655 H/s, GPU1 250.847 H/s, GPU2 254.769 H/s, GPU3 253.092 H/s, GPU4 253.355

Same here with x6 RX480's 8Gb , average about 253 H/s

How  can you reach so high speed?
I have 6* rx480, but speed is max 245sol
Can you tell your command line and driver version?
Thanks.

For my Rx 480's Rig
I am using Claymore 9.2
i- 5  (although i can use bigger it gets unstable)
16.10.1 drivers

cclock 1350
mem 2000

undervolted -7

[Demarsac]

GPU - 9.1 -> 9.2
R7 370 - 155 -> 156
R9 280 - 195 -> 193
r9 290 - 295 -> 313

What's your settings for 290?

1050/1250, -i 8, modded 390X ROM, modded timings

1175mV core (just 69% ASIC) and 16.12.1 driver

 Try the 16.10.1 or 16.9.2 drivers, 16.12.1 COST me 5-10% hashrate on every card I tried it on when I was testing it.

Tested only with 9.1 @ R7 370:
16.9.2 - 153
16.10.1 - 154
16.12.2 - 155

Which R7 370 are u using?
I am getting 147 average from each
Are you using modded rom for them?

It is MSI Gaming 4G, running at 1175/1500
And yes I modded the ROM, without modding it is about 15 H/s slower.

Is it a custom mod? Any specific one? Eliovp or something?

I have the VaporX 4G running at 1200/1500
i-4 (if i increase it gets more unstable)
and still i get as i said around 147 H/s

Thanks

[KrokoTill]

GPU - 9.1 -> 9.2
R7 370 - 155 -> 156
R9 280 - 195 -> 193
r9 290 - 295 -> 313

What's your settings for 290?

1050/1250, -i 8, modded 390X ROM, modded timings

1175mV core (just 69% ASIC) and 16.12.1 driver

 Try the 16.10.1 or 16.9.2 drivers, 16.12.1 COST me 5-10% hashrate on every card I tried it on when I was testing it.

Tested only with 9.1 @ R7 370:
16.9.2 - 153
16.10.1 - 154
16.12.2 - 155

Which R7 370 are u using?
I am getting 147 average from each
Are you using modded rom for them?

It is MSI Gaming 4G, running at 1175/1500
And yes I modded the ROM, without modding it is about 15 H/s slower.

Is it a custom mod? Any specific one? Eliovp or something?

I have the VaporX 4G running at 1200/1500
i-4 (if i increase it gets more unstable)
and still i get as i said around 147 H/s

Thanks

As I said I modded it myself. I tried Eliovp mod too, but it was not stable with my card.
I tried 1200/1500 too, it runs but is slower than 1175. Try to decrease GPU to 1175 or 1150 and see if it is more stable and if you can use higher intensity then.
I use -i 8 and it is fully stable. Tried ver 9.2 too and initially it looked slightly faster than 9.1 but later hasrate stabilized at a little bit lower, so now I am back using 9.1.

[Densitymax]

Thanks.. 5 x RX480's working with v9.2 without issues.

ZEC: GPU0 252.655 H/s, GPU1 250.847 H/s, GPU2 254.769 H/s, GPU3 253.092 H/s, GPU4 253.355

Same here with x6 RX480's 8Gb , average about 253 H/s

How  can you reach so high speed?
I have 6* rx480, but speed is max 245sol
Can you tell your command line and driver version?
Thanks.

For my Rx 480's Rig
I am using Claymore 9.2
i- 5  (although i can use bigger it gets unstable)
16.10.1 drivers

cclock 1350
mem 2000

undervolted -7

Try to use the latest drivers, should be no problem with intensity -i 6

[Demarsac]

GPU - 9.1 -> 9.2
R7 370 - 155 -> 156
R9 280 - 195 -> 193
r9 290 - 295 -> 313

What's your settings for 290?

1050/1250, -i 8, modded 390X ROM, modded timings

1175mV core (just 69% ASIC) and 16.12.1 driver

 Try the 16.10.1 or 16.9.2 drivers, 16.12.1 COST me 5-10% hashrate on every card I tried it on when I was testing it.

Tested only with 9.1 @ R7 370:
16.9.2 - 153
16.10.1 - 154
16.12.2 - 155

Which R7 370 are u using?
I am getting 147 average from each
Are you using modded rom for them?

It is MSI Gaming 4G, running at 1175/1500
And yes I modded the ROM, without modding it is about 15 H/s slower.

Is it a custom mod? Any specific one? Eliovp or something?

I have the VaporX 4G running at 1200/1500
i-4 (if i increase it gets more unstable)
and still i get as i said around 147 H/s

Thanks

As I said I modded it myself. I tried Eliovp mod too, but it was not stable with my card.
I tried 1200/1500 too, it runs but is slower than 1175. Try to decrease GPU to 1175 or 1150 and see if it is more stable and if you can use higher intensity then.
I use -i 8 and it is fully stable. Tried ver 9.2 too and initially it looked slightly faster than 9.1 but later hasrate stabilized at a little bit lower, so now I am back using 9.1.

Thanks, i will try those and let you know

[Demarsac]

Thanks.. 5 x RX480's working with v9.2 without issues.

ZEC: GPU0 252.655 H/s, GPU1 250.847 H/s, GPU2 254.769 H/s, GPU3 253.092 H/s, GPU4 253.355

Same here with x6 RX480's 8Gb , average about 253 H/s

How  can you reach so high speed?
I have 6* rx480, but speed is max 245sol
Can you tell your command line and driver version?
Thanks.

For my Rx 480's Rig
I am using Claymore 9.2
i- 5  (although i can use bigger it gets unstable)
16.10.1 drivers

cclock 1350
mem 2000

undervolted -7

Try to use the latest drivers, should be no problem with intensity -i 6

What kind of an increase should i expect from i- 6?
I am currently averaging 253 H/s

[Densitymax]

Thanks.. 5 x RX480's working with v9.2 without issues.

ZEC: GPU0 252.655 H/s, GPU1 250.847 H/s, GPU2 254.769 H/s, GPU3 253.092 H/s, GPU4 253.355

Same here with x6 RX480's 8Gb , average about 253 H/s

How  can you reach so high speed?
I have 6* rx480, but speed is max 245sol
Can you tell your command line and driver version?
Thanks.

For my Rx 480's Rig
I am using Claymore 9.2
i- 5  (although i can use bigger it gets unstable)
16.10.1 drivers

cclock 1350
mem 2000

undervolted -7

Try to use the latest drivers, should be no problem with intensity -i 6

What kind of an increase should i expect from i- 6?
I am currently averaging 253 H/s

I did not see that you have such a great performance. Slight increase can be 1-2 h/s.

[vapourminer]

Whats the hashrate on a r9 380? Also is $110 usd or $140 cad good for one of these cards? I'm thinking about buying a bunch of them at this price.

i get 170 h/s on my 380x. 110 bucks for a 380 is god.

Is that stock and how many watts does that use? Also whats the difference between the x and none x?

i pull 175 on v9.2 on a 380 non x. 15.12 drivers on win7. -i 6. 1100/1500 (stock is 940/1400). stock bios, no undervolt. sapphire nitro 380itx 2gb

pulls about 200 watts at the wall