V_I_T_A_L_Y
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2017, 09:15:36 PM |
|
6*390=2160-2190 salt optiminer . CLAYMORE loses in speed and remains behind
|
|
|
|
786sam
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2017, 09:17:45 PM |
|
I'm still working on new version, already got good improvements but still a lot of work is required. I plan to release an update in 1-2 days.
Great work bro. Take your time and lets make sure these other miners take longer to catch up this time ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
V_I_T_A_L_Y
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2017, 09:25:20 PM |
|
CLAYMORE you better add speed , and that your miner becomes interesting. I your miner always considered the best , but at the moment alas it is not
|
|
|
|
V_I_T_A_L_Y
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2017, 09:33:38 PM |
|
Optiminer ahead
|
|
|
|
ykzaneo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2017, 09:57:55 PM |
|
I have a problem my Miner indicates that I am generating 440H / s but the pool says that only 300H / s and it happens to me with Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v10.0 instead with version 9.3 it indicates 420H / s and the pool says 420 H / s , it's wrong ?
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2017, 10:32:31 PM |
|
Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.
|
|
|
|
jstefanop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2151
Merit: 1400
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2017, 10:50:57 PM |
|
Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.
His speedups don't really matter with the shitty stratum code he has compared to claymore...wont run more than a few hours before it loses connection and just stops mining and needs a manual restart.
|
|
|
|
Eliovp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2017, 11:05:47 PM |
|
Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.
His speedups don't really matter with the shitty stratum code he has compared to claymore...wont run more than a few hours before it loses connection and just stops mining and needs a manual restart. True, it's not that stable as Claymore's, but everything is easy to solve isn't it? Manual restart ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) crash=$(watch tail -n 100 ../optiminer-zec/log.log | grep "Share") if ($crash -ge "0");then kill -9 $(pgrep optiminer) sleep 5 ./optiminer-zec/start.sh fi ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
Mitja1998
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2017, 11:13:43 PM |
|
I have 2x rx470 4gb and 1x hd7950. With claymore I get 670 h/s at 415w at the wall. But with optiminer I get 590 h/s. I am using Windows 10 and 16.9.2 drivers. A lot of you are saying that optiminer is currently better but not for me. Is it because I am not using Linux?
|
|
|
|
Jjohnwick
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 10, 2017, 12:07:30 AM |
|
Sapphire rx 480 8gb nitro + Claymore zcash v10. i get 290sol (bios mod. gpu clock 1352 memoryclock 2100 110volt.) -i 8 -a 2 http://i.hizliresim.com/PnayX5.png
|
|
|
|
mafaz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 10, 2017, 01:13:36 AM |
|
Damn, the increase speed is awesome but my rig is getting more and more heat and its summer here lol. Anyone did a comparison between mining zec and eth too see which one consume more energy?
I think both are nearly the same. It depends how much undervolting can take each algorithm. For me zcash is by a tiny bit less power consuming. Currently here is a winter with -20 C outside. Inside it is +25 C because I have rigs in each room ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) . Excellent solution for heating the appartment ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) . But for the summer it is a hell. Two AC 1200 are not enough. I will need a third AC or have to figure out some way of channelling the heat outside. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) how do you fight dry air if its + 25 inside? I was thinking to use these for heating.... but it would be just too dry inside.
|
|
|
|
sorry2xs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 10, 2017, 01:33:33 AM |
|
|
Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
|
|
|
zzzzzzzzzz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 10, 2017, 02:12:18 AM |
|
Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.
His speedups don't really matter with the shitty stratum code he has compared to claymore...wont run more than a few hours before it loses connection and just stops mining and needs a manual restart. Really? I have 20 6-GPU (Nano) rigs and a couple smaller ones running optiminer v1.3 on linux. I have no dropped connection problems, very, very low stale share rate, and I'm getting 400+ sols/sec per GPU. Not every issue we have as miners is the fault of the mining software itself.
|
|
|
|
zzzzzzzzzz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 10, 2017, 02:22:13 AM |
|
I have 2x rx470 4gb and 1x hd7950. With claymore I get 670 h/s at 415w at the wall. But with optiminer I get 590 h/s. I am using Windows 10 and 16.9.2 drivers. A lot of you are saying that optiminer is currently better but not for me. Is it because I am not using Linux?
Optiminer specifically says that R9 Nano/Fury and RX GPUs perform best, at this point, with linux on his v1.3.
|
|
|
|
arielbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1059
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 10, 2017, 02:31:31 AM |
|
Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.
His speedups don't really matter with the shitty stratum code he has compared to claymore...wont run more than a few hours before it loses connection and just stops mining and needs a manual restart. True, it's not that stable as Claymore's, but everything is easy to solve isn't it? Manual restart ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) crash=$(watch tail -n 100 ../optiminer-zec/log.log | grep "Share") if ($crash -ge "0");then kill -9 $(pgrep optiminer) sleep 5 ./optiminer-zec/start.sh fi ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) not in my case, optiminer is stable for me, my 390's and 290x's are running for more than a day now windows x64, 16.10.3 driver, dwarfpool.
|
|
|
|
forzendiablo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
the grandpa of cryptos
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 10, 2017, 02:46:46 AM |
|
480x shows 266 sols now
i like this
|
yolo
|
|
|
Mrjangoss
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 10, 2017, 02:58:33 AM |
|
I have two rx 480 of 8 and 4 gb I have to lower the memory clock to 1750 to the one of 8 gb because if I leave it in 2000 it freezes the pc, I have not been able to get the best yielding to the one of 8 gb that can be the problem ? My hardware is corsair 650 atx, 12 gb ram amd fx 6300 msi 970 mobo , win 10 pro crimson 16.12.1 my has 250 h/s 8gb 254h/s 4gb, I hope your help many thanks and good night.
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 10, 2017, 03:13:56 AM |
|
I have 2x rx470 4gb and 1x hd7950. With claymore I get 670 h/s at 415w at the wall. But with optiminer I get 590 h/s. I am using Windows 10 and 16.9.2 drivers. A lot of you are saying that optiminer is currently better but not for me. Is it because I am not using Linux?
Optiminer specifically says that R9 Nano/Fury and RX GPUs perform best, at this point, with linux on his v1.3. MY RX480 runs at 283 v10 (= 277 after fee) while on optiminer runs at 260. the 7950 runs at 240 on v10 (235 after fee) and 190 on optiminer. havent tested the 290x
|
|
|
|
_AnT_
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 10, 2017, 03:16:15 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
golden0707
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 10, 2017, 04:25:38 AM |
|
So what is regular speed with 280x with 1100/1500 clocks ?
Im getting 211-221 H/s on ver.10
Is it ok ?
So for single r9 280x hashspeed is okey ? Can i do more with it ? Best I've gotten is 222 so far so I'd say your good. Thanks for the answer man.
|
|
|
|
|