Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[V_I_T_A_L_Y]

6*390=2160-2190 salt optiminer .
CLAYMORE loses in speed and remains behind

[786sam]

I'm still working on new version, already got good improvements but still a lot of work is required. I plan to release an update in 1-2 days.

Great work bro. Take your time and lets make sure these other miners take longer to catch up this time

[V_I_T_A_L_Y]

CLAYMORE you better add speed , and that your miner becomes interesting. I your miner always considered the best , but at the moment alas it is not

[V_I_T_A_L_Y]

Optiminer ahead

[ykzaneo]

I have a problem my Miner indicates that I am generating 440H / s but the pool says that only 300H / s and it happens to me with Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v10.0 instead with version 9.3 it indicates 420H / s and the pool says 420 H / s , it's wrong ?

[IOTUSA]

Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.

[jstefanop]

Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.

His speedups don't really matter with the shitty stratum code he has compared to claymore...wont run more than a few hours before it loses connection and just stops mining and needs a manual restart.

[Eliovp]

Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.

His speedups don't really matter with the shitty stratum code he has compared to claymore...wont run more than a few hours before it loses connection and just stops mining and needs a manual restart.

True, it's not that stable as Claymore's, but everything is easy to solve isn't it?

Manual restart 

crash=$(watch tail -n 100 ../optiminer-zec/log.log | grep "Share")
if ($crash -ge "0");then
   kill -9 $(pgrep optiminer)
   sleep 5
   ./optiminer-zec/start.sh
fi

[Mitja1998]

I have 2x rx470 4gb and 1x hd7950. With claymore I get 670 h/s at 415w at the wall. But with optiminer I get 590 h/s. I am using Windows 10 and 16.9.2 drivers. A lot of you are saying that optiminer is currently better but not for me. Is it because I am not using Linux?

[Jjohnwick]

Sapphire rx 480 8gb nitro +
Claymore zcash v10. i get 290sol (bios mod. gpu clock 1352  memoryclock 2100  110volt.) -i 8 -a 2
http://i.hizliresim.com/PnayX5.png

[mafaz]

Damn, the increase speed is awesome but my rig is getting more and more heat and its summer here lol. Anyone did a comparison between mining zec and eth too see which one consume more energy?

I think both are nearly the same. It depends how much undervolting can take each algorithm. For me zcash is by a tiny bit less power consuming.
Currently here is a winter with -20 C outside. Inside it is +25 C because I have rigs in each room  . Excellent solution for heating the appartment  . But for the summer it is a hell. Two AC 1200 are not enough. I will need a third AC or have to figure out some way of channelling  the heat outside.

how do you fight dry air if its + 25 inside? I was thinking to use these for heating.... but it would be just too dry inside.

[sorry2xs]

Damn, the increase speed is awesome but my rig is getting more and more heat and its summer here lol. Anyone did a comparison between mining zec and eth too see which one consume more energy?

I think both are nearly the same. It depends how much undervolting can take each algorithm. For me zcash is by a tiny bit less power consuming.
Currently here is a winter with -20 C outside. Inside it is +25 C because I have rigs in each room  . Excellent solution for heating the appartment  . But for the summer it is a hell. Two AC 1200 are not enough. I will need a third AC or have to figure out some way of channelling  the heat outside.

how do you fight dry air if its + 25 inside? I was thinking to use these for heating.... but it would be just too dry inside.

buckets of water strategically placed  with a fan blowing air across the top of the water

[zzzzzzzzzz]

Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.

His speedups don't really matter with the shitty stratum code he has compared to claymore...wont run more than a few hours before it loses connection and just stops mining and needs a manual restart.

Really? I have 20 6-GPU (Nano) rigs and a couple smaller ones running optiminer v1.3 on linux. I have no dropped connection problems, very, very low stale share rate, and I'm getting 400+ sols/sec per GPU. Not every issue we have as miners is the fault of the mining software itself.

[zzzzzzzzzz]

I have 2x rx470 4gb and 1x hd7950. With claymore I get 670 h/s at 415w at the wall. But with optiminer I get 590 h/s. I am using Windows 10 and 16.9.2 drivers. A lot of you are saying that optiminer is currently better but not for me. Is it because I am not using Linux?

Optiminer specifically says that R9 Nano/Fury and RX GPUs perform best, at this point, with linux on his v1.3.

[arielbit]

Wow, Optiminer really pulled ahead on this release.

His speedups don't really matter with the shitty stratum code he has compared to claymore...wont run more than a few hours before it loses connection and just stops mining and needs a manual restart.

True, it's not that stable as Claymore's, but everything is easy to solve isn't it?

Manual restart  

crash=$(watch tail -n 100 ../optiminer-zec/log.log | grep "Share")
if ($crash -ge "0");then
   kill -9 $(pgrep optiminer)
   sleep 5
   ./optiminer-zec/start.sh
fi

not in my case, optiminer is stable for me, my 390's and 290x's are running for more than a day now

windows x64, 16.10.3 driver, dwarfpool.

[forzendiablo]

480x shows 266 sols now

i like this

[Mrjangoss]

I have two rx 480 of 8 and 4 gb I have to lower the memory clock to 1750 to the one of 8 gb because if I leave it in 2000 it freezes the pc, I have not been able to get the best yielding to the one of 8 gb that can be the problem ? My hardware is corsair 650 atx, 12 gb ram amd fx 6300 msi 970 mobo , win 10 pro crimson 16.12.1 my has 250 h/s 8gb 254h/s 4gb, I hope your help many thanks and good night.

[rpg]

I have 2x rx470 4gb and 1x hd7950. With claymore I get 670 h/s at 415w at the wall. But with optiminer I get 590 h/s. I am using Windows 10 and 16.9.2 drivers. A lot of you are saying that optiminer is currently better but not for me. Is it because I am not using Linux?

Optiminer specifically says that R9 Nano/Fury and RX GPUs perform best, at this point, with linux on his v1.3.

MY RX480 runs at 283 v10 (= 277 after fee) while on optiminer runs at 260. the 7950 runs at 240 on v10 (235 after fee) and 190 on optiminer. havent tested the 290x

[_AnT_]

Hello !

Is is normal speed for Windows 7 64 / Clymore's 10.0 V   ?

3X R9 280X XFX

https://s24.postimg.org/3xvt5t7s5/image.png
https://s23.postimg.org/yakuvfjxn/image.png

[golden0707]

So what is regular speed with 280x with 1100/1500 clocks ?

Im getting 211-221 H/s on ver.10

Is it ok ?

So for single r9 280x hashspeed is okey ? Can i do more with it ?

Best I've gotten is 222 so far so I'd say your good.

Thanks for the answer man.