[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]

[bigjme]

Ok, well the website will be going down for about 20 minutes while i remove some cards sooo yeh, be right back

[1714709416]

1714709416

[1714709416]

1714709416

[1714709416]

1714709416

[Travis9x]

that's because you don't know where to search and don't read the thread (and also that I am to lazzy to update bigjme website)

Read the thread…1004 pages…yeah…  -_-

[djm34]

that's because you don't know where to search and don't read the thread (and also that I am to lazzy to update bigjme website)

Read the thread…1004 pages…yeah…  -_-

especially when you could find the info on the last 5 pages....  

I know that the crypto market isn't going well, but this is still about making money, so it makes me wonder why people can't make the effort to search the information they need. 

[go6ooo1212]

xcn with 780ti 13.4MH/s

Cracked 5.5MH/s average on 750Ti, but not 5.5 at lowest point yet: https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/xcnwolf750ti12.png

Which values of gpu and mem frequencys 😊

[go6ooo1212]

Lol , its pritty good work. I wish the price didnt crash so much. Hope there'll be some more interest for rising it...

[jk_14]

So how do I keep an eye on all the things I'm used to with sgminer?  Or do I have to dump windows for something like PiMP to get the same level of stats?

try this:

https://i.imgur.com/kIdDdS3.png
https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=16800.0

[polanskiman]

rather cool the new version of msi AB, it is now possible to arrange the graph on several columns (mask half of the screen... but hey...)

Hey dude, ccminer is fairly basic on the data, is there something similar to sgminer for nvidia?

Look at splitscreen. Basic data but more data than ccminer/nvminer.

[polanskiman]

that's because you don't know where to search and don't read the thread (and also that I am to lazzy to update bigjme website)

Read the thread…1004 pages…yeah…  -_-

There is a search function you know, at the top right hand corner....

[Ignition75]

So I converted my first AMD rig to Nvidia  


Went from this:




To this, so cute lol  :




Each card, GA Black, is sitting on circa 2.6 Mh/s x11, time to ramp things up a little  

What's my best plan of attack for NVIDIA?

I've flashed a new bios with edited high watermarks of 65500 for power, went +100 Core and +650 Mem, each card hovered around 2.8 Mh/s then I got instability.

Is there a better way to approach it?


Here's what I'm playing with:





Cheers lads.

[polanskiman]

So I converted my first AMD rig to Nvidia 

Each card, GA Black, is sitting on circa 2.6 Mh/s x11, time to ramp things up a little 

What's my best plan of attack for NVIDIA?

I've flashed a new bios with edited high watermarks of 65500 for power, went +100 Core and +650 Mem, each card hovered around 2.8 Mh/s then I got instability.

Is there a better way to approach it?

Cheers lads.

You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.6 released by djm34 - Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your cards to their default factory values.

The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card so it's to you to find the sweet spot. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change.

Here is my hash:



I really don't understand why people try flashing their cards before trying the basics first and then complain about low hashrates.

[Ignition75]

You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.5 of djm34 - Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your card to their default factory values.

The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change.

Look at djm having her own miner and not giving it me when she knew my cards landed yesterday!  I'll take that one offline lol.

OK I'll reflash the stock bios and hunt around for djm's miner.  Thanks 

[yellowduck2]

You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.5 of djm34 - Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your card to their default factory values.

The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change.

Look at djm having her own miner and not giving it me when she knew my cards landed yesterday!  I'll take that one offline lol.

OK I'll reflash the stock bios and hunt around for djm's miner.  Thanks 

Her ?

[polanskiman]

You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.5 of djm34 - Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your card to their default factory values.

The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change.

Look at djm having her own miner and not giving it me when she knew my cards landed yesterday!  I'll take that one offline lol.

OK I'll reflash the stock bios and hunt around for djm's miner.  Thanks 

I just realised you were mining X11. Sorry I assumed it was XCN. I think your hashrate is about right. Perhaps others could confirm.

[polanskiman]

You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.5 of djm34 - Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your card to their default factory values.

The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change.

Look at djm having her own miner and not giving it me when she knew my cards landed yesterday!  I'll take that one offline lol.

OK I'll reflash the stock bios and hunt around for djm's miner.  Thanks 

Her ?

He went through a tough operation lately   

[polanskiman]

Memclock matters a LOT when mining other algos like CryptoNight, though. I have mine at 1450/7000, usually.

I wrongly assumed it was XCN. He is mining X11.

[GES]

i would say the 2cm is the issue, i have over 5cm between my cards, and here are my temps from no card infront, to 2 cards infront

40'c

45'c

55'c

38'c

your tamb? it make the big difference

what is such tamb?
I from Russia, not understand everything

[Ignition75]

Memclock matters a LOT when mining other algos like CryptoNight, though. I have mine at 1450/7000, usually.

I wrongly assumed it was XCN. He is mining X11.

Yes I realised that, it's all good brother.  I went + 650 memclock because I was following a guide: http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoinmining/comments/20734u/5x_nvidia_750_ti_evga_rig_with_mods/

I got stability with +125/+200, but it's an uninspiring 2.75 Mh/s.

Is that it?  Tweak over?

No staying up until 5am for the next week playing with thread count/thread concurrency/lookup gap/core/mem/vddc combinations

[GES]

i would say the 2cm is the issue, i have over 5cm between my cards, and here are my temps from no card infront, to 2 cards infront

40'c

45'c

55'c

38'c

your tamb? it make the big difference

I'm between 45-50°c on my 750ti, It works great for 4 months
PS : I sold all my 7950 (x7) to buy 750ti

no i mean ambient temperature= tamb  

15-20'c

[polanskiman]

Memclock matters a LOT when mining other algos like CryptoNight, though. I have mine at 1450/7000, usually.

I wrongly assumed it was XCN. He is mining X11.

Yes I realised that, it's all good brother.  I went + 650 memclock because I was following a guide: http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoinmining/comments/20734u/5x_nvidia_750_ti_evga_rig_with_mods/

I got stability with +125/+200, but it's an uninspiring 2.75 Mh/s.

Is that it?  Tweak over?

No staying up until 5am for the next week playing with thread count/thread concurrency/lookup gap/core/mem/vddc combinations

Yes that's about it on NVIDIA. No need for all that shit TC, LG bla bla bla.

2.75 Mh/s seems about right for X11. Don't forget though you are only pumping 60w / card.

Here is my hash for x11. I launched an instance just for the sake of it:

[Amph]

http://videocardz.com/51426/nvidia-to-skip-geforce-800-series-geforce-gtx-980-and-gtx-970-mid-september

sell your shitty 750ti asap lmao