[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]

[djm34]

I managed to optimize (ccminer v1.2) x11 around 4%. on a Gainward GeForce® GTX 750 Ti base clock.

from 2400-2450 to 2500-2550 MHASH.

All I did was to replace code that didn't use funnelshift and perm.

actually the current version (at least mine...) is doing already 2,5MHash/s on stock (2.7MH OC)
(same card)

actually there might a factor 2 to win on blake (compared to290x performance...) but It isn't obvious if this is entirely related to the code

on an unrelated topic... I might have leaked a new algo   (don't remember actually)
If for some reason -a nist5 doesn't work anymore on nist5 in my last m7 release, you might want to try on Joincoin pentablake.
(highly unprofitable but hey...  )

[1714735000]

1714735000

[1714735000]

1714735000

[AizenSou]

Just wanted to post some 750 NON TI hashrates:
-on djm's cryptonitev3  3850 khash
-quark                        4100 khash

They are from gigabyte and overclock like hell. I have them stable on +213 core and +454 mem with +12mv. I cant get my ti's over +86core.

Did you have a problem with the non ti and cryptonite, I received a PM yesterday from a guy who didn't want to post on the thread reporting problem

I found 750 not ti get  error like

Code:

[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:733
3
[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
[2014-08-18 03:02:08] Stratum detected new block
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #4: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 0 46821563 1 17bce19a
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #0: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 2 f3c15d68 3 7c1e6957
data 4 0b88b2f4 5 69efdc6a
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #3: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 6 013e4601 7 00000000
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 8 3add2f57 9 f74fbab8
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #5: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 10 b862e28b 11 312407e7
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #2: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 12 f1540588 13 dec4ce03
data 14 ddf8cef2 15 d3461964
data 16 9164c6c3 17 37db7ab4
data 18 86c7511c 19 62aa516d
data 20 701b4110 21 3ed2a7ff
data 22 14882437 23 0f0da1d1
data 24 53f0fc19 25 00000000
data 26 0000840e 27 00000000
data 28 00c0000a 29 00000000
data 30 00200001 31 009eea40
pdata 0 00000000 1 00200001
pdata 2 009eea40 3 00000002
pdata 4 009eeb00 5 00200150
pdata 6 0000000f 7 003327d0
pdata 8 00000000 9 0000000f
pdata 10 04cbf808 11 0000000d
pdata 12 009eea80 13 00000001
pdata 14 00000000 15 0020f8c8
pdata 16 00000001 17 00000000
pdata 18 0020f8d8 19 00000001
pdata 20 00000000 21 0020f8e8
pdata 22 00000001 23 00000000
pdata 24 0020f8f8 25 00000001
pdata 26 00000000 27 0020f908
pdata 28 00000001 29 00000000
pdata 30 0020f918 31 00000001
sha256[0]=2e dd 8b 27 sha512[0]=db bc 5a 93 keccak[0]=96 70 6d cb whirlpool[2][0
]=e3 13 69 22 haval[0]=cc b9 9c 34 tiger[0]=75 de aa 98 ripemd[0]=87 98 49 fe
sha256[1]=85 51 b7 f7 sha512[1]=69 01 05 91 keccak[1]=3a 88 b8 ae whirlpool[2][1
]=ac 6f 12 8b haval[1]=56 07 42 95 tiger[1]=c3 2e 30 68 ripemd[1]=53 18 50 35
sha256[2]=53 42 36 77 sha512[2]=ab ec f6 c4 keccak[2]=7d 03 ca c5 whirlpool[2][2
]=50 57 54 92 haval[2]=69 48 a4 ff tiger[2]=3a f3 ef 57 ripemd[2]=a9 92 44 45
sha256[3]=42 27 16 65 sha512[3]=0c b5 4f 91 keccak[3]=09 cd 9b 9e whirlpool[2][3
]=00 1d a6 0a haval[3]=48 91 cc 50 tiger[3]=9f 5c fd ba ripemd[3]=02 99 21 ce
sha256[4]=8c bf b5 15 sha512[4]=f9 50 59 9e keccak[4]=76 66 d5 30 whirlpool[2][4
]=18 61 c4 70 haval[4]=84 7e 7c 87 tiger[4]=dc c0 e5 28 ripemd[4]=a1 a6 3b 30
sha256[5]=41 f3 70 01 sha512[5]=a3 2f 72 d6 keccak[5]=ac e8 9e ad whirlpool[2][5
]=66 c0 43 ec haval[5]=1b e1 21 b4 tiger[5]=44 14 24 61 ripemd[5]=00 00 00 00
sha256[6]=65 34 30 b4 sha512[6]=75 e5 4e 0e keccak[6]=6d c1 b9 05 whirlpool[2][6
]=0a 23 63 7f haval[6]=09 b7 67 f1 tiger[6]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[6]=00 00 00 00
sha256[7]=65 53 49 f2 sha512[7]=12 d1 87 73 keccak[7]=1d 85 3d 0d whirlpool[2][7
]=3b e4 4a c9 haval[7]=d4 ec 0f a9 tiger[7]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[7]=00 00 00 00
sha256[8]=00 00 00 00 sha512[8]=8e 2d 21 95 keccak[8]=c4 30 17 9c whirlpool[2][8
]=84 e7 59 4a haval[8]=00 00 00 00 tiger[8]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[8]=00 00 00 00
sha256[9]=00 00 00 00 sha512[9]=d9 5f 59 60 keccak[9]=77 28 79 da whirlpool[2][9
]=a5 79 90 c3 haval[9]=00 00 00 00 tiger[9]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[9]=00 00 00 00
sha256[10]=00 00 00 00 sha512[10]=14 cd bc 2a keccak[10]=1b 50 7d 24 whirlpool[2
][10]=d4 26 94 3f haval[10]=00 00 00 00 tiger[10]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[10]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[11]=00 00 00 00 sha512[11]=64 ea 82 37 keccak[11]=c8 52 21 9e whirlpool[2
][11]=73 cd 50 5f haval[11]=00 00 00 00 tiger[11]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[11]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[12]=00 00 00 00 sha512[12]=36 3a 83 49 keccak[12]=12 da b9 3a whirlpool[2
][12]=1b 4e 35 37 haval[12]=00 00 00 00 tiger[12]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[12]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[13]=00 00 00 00 sha512[13]=4d a6 66 b9 keccak[13]=0a c3 c7 f8 whirlpool[2
][13]=4c 42 6b 04 haval[13]=00 00 00 00 tiger[13]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[13]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[14]=00 00 00 00 sha512[14]=4d cd 2c d1 keccak[14]=24 be d1 1e whirlpool[2
][14]=3a 07 dc 0e haval[14]=00 00 00 00 tiger[14]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[14]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[15]=00 00 00 00 sha512[15]=e8 fd 35 56 keccak[15]=70 7c 65 1c whirlpool[2
][15]=33 82 9d 1b haval[15]=00 00 00 00 tiger[15]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[15]=00 00 0
0 00
data 0 46821563 1 17bce19a
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750, 975.37 khash/s
data 2 f3c15d68 3 7c1e6957
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #4: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 4 0b88b2f4 5 69efdc6a
data 6 013e4601 7 00000000
data 8 3add2f57 9 f74fbab8
data 10 b862e28b 11 312407e7
data 12 f1540588 13 dec4ce03
data 14 ddf8cef2 15 d3461964
data 16 9164c6c3 17 37db7ab4
data 18 86c7511c 19 62aa516d
data 20 701b4110 21 3ed2a7ff
data 22 14882437 23 0f0da1d1
data 24 53f0fc19 25 00000000
data 26 0000840e 27 00000000
data 28 00c0000a 29 00000000

Yes that looks like what i get too , just spamming it over and over

can you give the specification of your card ?
Same question to those who have one working.

It could be a problem of vram. I am running at the moment a 660 (oem) 1.5Gb, 750ti 2Gb and 780ti 3Gb,  ccminer use around 1200~1300MB of vram on every cards.  
So I don't know what could happen if the card has only 1Gb of vram (which I think it is the case for some 750 non-ti).

on an other note I am impressed by the 4.1MHash/s of my old 660 (oem non-ti).
obviously in terms of power, it is twice the power of the 750ti for more or less the same performance...

Here is a gpu-z of the 750's i have , all asus and yeah could be a vram problem , seem to be the only algo to eat up more than 1gb there.
Maybe the other miner i use is taking less ram. Every other alg are working fine otherway.

This is what happens when you do multiplications which results have 600 digits... and doing this over a million of threads...
that can take some space...

I probably request too much threads for your card, I will try to make a release which use less threads (or something adjustable)

djm34 this is exactly what I got in Linux. 780GTX

[djm34]

Just wanted to post some 750 NON TI hashrates:
-on djm's cryptonitev3  3850 khash
-quark                        4100 khash

They are from gigabyte and overclock like hell. I have them stable on +213 core and +454 mem with +12mv. I cant get my ti's over +86core.

Did you have a problem with the non ti and cryptonite, I received a PM yesterday from a guy who didn't want to post on the thread reporting problem

I found 750 not ti get  error like

Code:

[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:733
3
[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
[2014-08-18 03:02:08] Stratum detected new block
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #4: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 0 46821563 1 17bce19a
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #0: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 2 f3c15d68 3 7c1e6957
data 4 0b88b2f4 5 69efdc6a
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #3: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 6 013e4601 7 00000000
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 8 3add2f57 9 f74fbab8
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #5: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 10 b862e28b 11 312407e7
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #2: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 12 f1540588 13 dec4ce03
data 14 ddf8cef2 15 d3461964
data 16 9164c6c3 17 37db7ab4
data 18 86c7511c 19 62aa516d
data 20 701b4110 21 3ed2a7ff
data 22 14882437 23 0f0da1d1
data 24 53f0fc19 25 00000000
data 26 0000840e 27 00000000
data 28 00c0000a 29 00000000
data 30 00200001 31 009eea40
pdata 0 00000000 1 00200001
pdata 2 009eea40 3 00000002
pdata 4 009eeb00 5 00200150
pdata 6 0000000f 7 003327d0
pdata 8 00000000 9 0000000f
pdata 10 04cbf808 11 0000000d
pdata 12 009eea80 13 00000001
pdata 14 00000000 15 0020f8c8
pdata 16 00000001 17 00000000
pdata 18 0020f8d8 19 00000001
pdata 20 00000000 21 0020f8e8
pdata 22 00000001 23 00000000
pdata 24 0020f8f8 25 00000001
pdata 26 00000000 27 0020f908
pdata 28 00000001 29 00000000
pdata 30 0020f918 31 00000001
sha256[0]=2e dd 8b 27 sha512[0]=db bc 5a 93 keccak[0]=96 70 6d cb whirlpool[2][0
]=e3 13 69 22 haval[0]=cc b9 9c 34 tiger[0]=75 de aa 98 ripemd[0]=87 98 49 fe
sha256[1]=85 51 b7 f7 sha512[1]=69 01 05 91 keccak[1]=3a 88 b8 ae whirlpool[2][1
]=ac 6f 12 8b haval[1]=56 07 42 95 tiger[1]=c3 2e 30 68 ripemd[1]=53 18 50 35
sha256[2]=53 42 36 77 sha512[2]=ab ec f6 c4 keccak[2]=7d 03 ca c5 whirlpool[2][2
]=50 57 54 92 haval[2]=69 48 a4 ff tiger[2]=3a f3 ef 57 ripemd[2]=a9 92 44 45
sha256[3]=42 27 16 65 sha512[3]=0c b5 4f 91 keccak[3]=09 cd 9b 9e whirlpool[2][3
]=00 1d a6 0a haval[3]=48 91 cc 50 tiger[3]=9f 5c fd ba ripemd[3]=02 99 21 ce
sha256[4]=8c bf b5 15 sha512[4]=f9 50 59 9e keccak[4]=76 66 d5 30 whirlpool[2][4
]=18 61 c4 70 haval[4]=84 7e 7c 87 tiger[4]=dc c0 e5 28 ripemd[4]=a1 a6 3b 30
sha256[5]=41 f3 70 01 sha512[5]=a3 2f 72 d6 keccak[5]=ac e8 9e ad whirlpool[2][5
]=66 c0 43 ec haval[5]=1b e1 21 b4 tiger[5]=44 14 24 61 ripemd[5]=00 00 00 00
sha256[6]=65 34 30 b4 sha512[6]=75 e5 4e 0e keccak[6]=6d c1 b9 05 whirlpool[2][6
]=0a 23 63 7f haval[6]=09 b7 67 f1 tiger[6]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[6]=00 00 00 00
sha256[7]=65 53 49 f2 sha512[7]=12 d1 87 73 keccak[7]=1d 85 3d 0d whirlpool[2][7
]=3b e4 4a c9 haval[7]=d4 ec 0f a9 tiger[7]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[7]=00 00 00 00
sha256[8]=00 00 00 00 sha512[8]=8e 2d 21 95 keccak[8]=c4 30 17 9c whirlpool[2][8
]=84 e7 59 4a haval[8]=00 00 00 00 tiger[8]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[8]=00 00 00 00
sha256[9]=00 00 00 00 sha512[9]=d9 5f 59 60 keccak[9]=77 28 79 da whirlpool[2][9
]=a5 79 90 c3 haval[9]=00 00 00 00 tiger[9]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[9]=00 00 00 00
sha256[10]=00 00 00 00 sha512[10]=14 cd bc 2a keccak[10]=1b 50 7d 24 whirlpool[2
][10]=d4 26 94 3f haval[10]=00 00 00 00 tiger[10]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[10]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[11]=00 00 00 00 sha512[11]=64 ea 82 37 keccak[11]=c8 52 21 9e whirlpool[2
][11]=73 cd 50 5f haval[11]=00 00 00 00 tiger[11]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[11]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[12]=00 00 00 00 sha512[12]=36 3a 83 49 keccak[12]=12 da b9 3a whirlpool[2
][12]=1b 4e 35 37 haval[12]=00 00 00 00 tiger[12]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[12]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[13]=00 00 00 00 sha512[13]=4d a6 66 b9 keccak[13]=0a c3 c7 f8 whirlpool[2
][13]=4c 42 6b 04 haval[13]=00 00 00 00 tiger[13]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[13]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[14]=00 00 00 00 sha512[14]=4d cd 2c d1 keccak[14]=24 be d1 1e whirlpool[2
][14]=3a 07 dc 0e haval[14]=00 00 00 00 tiger[14]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[14]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[15]=00 00 00 00 sha512[15]=e8 fd 35 56 keccak[15]=70 7c 65 1c whirlpool[2
][15]=33 82 9d 1b haval[15]=00 00 00 00 tiger[15]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[15]=00 00 0
0 00
data 0 46821563 1 17bce19a
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750, 975.37 khash/s
data 2 f3c15d68 3 7c1e6957
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #4: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 4 0b88b2f4 5 69efdc6a
data 6 013e4601 7 00000000
data 8 3add2f57 9 f74fbab8
data 10 b862e28b 11 312407e7
data 12 f1540588 13 dec4ce03
data 14 ddf8cef2 15 d3461964
data 16 9164c6c3 17 37db7ab4
data 18 86c7511c 19 62aa516d
data 20 701b4110 21 3ed2a7ff
data 22 14882437 23 0f0da1d1
data 24 53f0fc19 25 00000000
data 26 0000840e 27 00000000
data 28 00c0000a 29 00000000

Yes that looks like what i get too , just spamming it over and over

can you give the specification of your card ?
Same question to those who have one working.

It could be a problem of vram. I am running at the moment a 660 (oem) 1.5Gb, 750ti 2Gb and 780ti 3Gb,  ccminer use around 1200~1300MB of vram on every cards. 
So I don't know what could happen if the card has only 1Gb of vram (which I think it is the case for some 750 non-ti).

on an other note I am impressed by the 4.1MHash/s of my old 660 (oem non-ti).
obviously in terms of power, it is twice the power of the 750ti for more or less the same performance...

Here is a gpu-z of the 750's i have , all asus and yeah could be a vram problem , seem to be the only algo to eat up more than 1gb there.
Maybe the other miner i use is taking less ram. Every other alg are working fine otherway.

This is what happens when you do multiplications which results have 600 digits... and doing this over a million of threads...
that can take some space...

I probably request too much threads for your card, I will try to make a release which use less threads (or something adjustable)

djm34 this is exactly what I got in Linux. 780GTX

how much memory ?

[Amph]

I managed to optimize (ccminer v1.2) x11 around 4%. on a Gainward GeForce® GTX 750 Ti base clock.

from 2400-2450 to 2500-2550 MHASH.

All I did was to replace code that didn't use funnelshift and perm.

actually the current version (at least mine...) is doing already 2,5MHash/s on stock (2.7MH OC)
(same card)

actually there might a factor 2 to win on blake (compared to290x performance...) but It isn't obvious if this is entirely related to the code

on an unrelated topic... I might have leaked a new algo   (don't remember actually)
If for some reason -a nist5 doesn't work anymore on nist5 in my last m7 release, you might want to try on Joincoin pentablake.
(highly unprofitable but hey...  )

i can't find m7 algo on your ccminer on github, there is another repository?

[djm34]

I managed to optimize (ccminer v1.2) x11 around 4%. on a Gainward GeForce® GTX 750 Ti base clock.

from 2400-2450 to 2500-2550 MHASH.

All I did was to replace code that didn't use funnelshift and perm.

actually the current version (at least mine...) is doing already 2,5MHash/s on stock (2.7MH OC)
(same card)

actually there might a factor 2 to win on blake (compared to290x performance...) but It isn't obvious if this is entirely related to the code

on an unrelated topic... I might have leaked a new algo  (don't remember actually)
If for some reason -a nist5 doesn't work anymore on nist5 in my last m7 release, you might want to try on Joincoin pentablake.
(highly unprofitable but hey...  )

i can't find m7 algo on your ccminer on github, there is another repository?

It hasn't been released yet, I am ironing things... (windows pre-released are available though...)

[Madychoux]

Any chance to get a Profitability Calculator By KBomba 0.6b or 0.7 ?

I can't use it at the moment because of saving problems, so I'm totally lost in the altmining world !

Please, upload a new release  .

I would be gladfull 

[djm34]

+300khash/s on the 750ti  
(something is wrong with sm_50 actually, it is again one of these weird problem with pragma unroll, the problem doesn't exist for the 780ti)

[wacko]

+300khash/s on the 750ti  

Gimme gimme gimme!!
That's very close to Wolf0 version, isn't it?

[Amph]

+300khash/s on the 750ti  
(something is wrong with sm_50 actually, it is again one of these weird problem with pragma unroll, the problem doesn't exist for the 780ti)

consumption rise also? the coin is a bit profitable with that would be a minable coin for sure

[djm34]

+300khash/s on the 750ti  
(something is wrong with sm_50 actually, it is again one of these weird problem with pragma unroll, the problem doesn't exist for the 780ti)

consumption rise also? the coin is a bit profitable with that would be a minable coin for sure

I didn't any see any difference (and my 750ti is capped at 35w.... which is less than a light bulb...).
Also it isn't a memory bottleneck,  the card is calculating as much now than it was before...

[Amph]

+300khash/s on the 750ti  
(something is wrong with sm_50 actually, it is again one of these weird problem with pragma unroll, the problem doesn't exist for the 780ti)

consumption rise also? the coin is a bit profitable with that would be a minable coin for sure

I didn't any see any difference (and my 750ti is capped at 35w.... which is less than a light bulb...).
Also it isn't a memory bottleneck,  the card is calculating as much now than it was before...

they work at 35w in oc? mine are at 55w

btw light bulb consume 11w now or less  , we are not using anymore those beastly bulb with 60w

[djm34]

+300khash/s on the 750ti 
(something is wrong with sm_50 actually, it is again one of these weird problem with pragma unroll, the problem doesn't exist for the 780ti)

consumption rise also? the coin is a bit profitable with that would be a minable coin for sure

I didn't any see any difference (and my 750ti is capped at 35w.... which is less than a light bulb...).
Also it isn't a memory bottleneck,  the card is calculating as much now than it was before...

they work at 35w in oc? mine are at 55w

btw light bulb consume 11w now or less  , we are not using anymore those beastly bulb with 60w

me neither, but I usually use the most powerful of the low consumption light bulb.
Actually my last "standard" light bulb (100W so good so bright  ) died recently...
However, I still don't understand why it is still possible to find halogen light bulb rated 150W 

Regarding my card, it is a non OC gainward card...

[tc61]

djm34, what are you getting in the way of hash on your 750ti for m7?

[GarlukKY]

Running m7 on my 750 TIs, it says 1228mb used on cards that are NOT my primary display card. The primary display card shows a minimum of 1355mb used. This would explain why a 1GB non-TI card would have issues.  For comparison, running jackpot the numbers are 525ish and 635ish (display).

[BigSnapples]

Curious which algorithim people mining and if they've calculated ROI recently?  It seems to me at .12cents kwh, there is no coin that can pay for electricity at the current BTC levels of sub $500.

[Madychoux]

Curious which algorithim people mining and if they've calculated ROI recently?  It seems to me at .12cents kwh, there is no coin that can pay for electricity at the current BTC levels of sub $500.

Indeed.... 

[fredeq]

Curious which algorithim people mining and if they've calculated ROI recently?  It seems to me at .12cents kwh, there is no coin that can pay for electricity at the current BTC levels of sub $500.

Cryptonote and chacha14 only. Keep in mind that cachecoin has very long block confirmation time.

[Trololo2060]

the first release of GUI Miner Scrypt-N.
Contain special cgminer version - vertcoin 0.5.2 and Cudaminer release 2014-02-28

GUIMiner Scrypt-N for Windows x64

[Amph]

Curious which algorithim people mining and if they've calculated ROI recently?  It seems to me at .12cents kwh, there is no coin that can pay for electricity at the current BTC levels of sub $500.

Cryptonote and chacha14 only. Keep in mind that cachecoin has very long block confirmation time.

cryptonote isn't profitable anymore since the monero crash, i'm mining m7 is not that bad right now

[yellowduck2]

Curious which algorithim people mining and if they've calculated ROI recently?  It seems to me at .12cents kwh, there is no coin that can pay for electricity at the current BTC levels of sub $500.

Cryptonote and chacha14 only. Keep in mind that cachecoin has very long block confirmation time.

cryptonote isn't profitable anymore since the monero crash, i'm mining m7 is not that bad right now

Once AMD is online, u have to look somewhere else.