[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]

[Bombadil]

Bombadil are you getting heavy stats from WTM? Nice tool

Yep You're the only having so many algos, thanks a lot for that! ;-) I hope it's OK that I use your api, and have it set as default. It's the best one out there IMHO

Ofc its ok, I have made it free of charge API for a reason. I am glad someone is using it in other application!

Anyway I was asking cause you said HVC has big difficulty swings. Maybe get stats from difficulty24 only? Or program a switch for a user to choose from.
I can add other difficulties (3 and 7 days) as well.

I will add the switcher, but I was postponing that because I had in mind to keep historic data in the app itself. But there are other ideas that need to be implemented first!

[1714717132]

1714717132

[1714717132]

1714717132

[1714717132]

1714717132

[1714717132]

1714717132

[mordecai779]

Just wanted to post some 750 NON TI hashrates:
-on djm's cryptonitev3  3850 khash
-quark                        4100 khash

They are from gigabyte and overclock like hell. I have them stable on +213 core and +454 mem with +12mv. I cant get my ti's over +86core.

[yellowduck2]

Nvidia GTX Titan II Flagship with GM200 Core Is Launching Sooner Than Expected

http://wccftech.com/nvidia-gm200-core-titan-ii-soon/

[djm34]

Just wanted to post some 750 NON TI hashrates:
-on djm's cryptonitev3  3850 khash
-quark                        4100 khash

They are from gigabyte and overclock like hell. I have them stable on +213 core and +454 mem with +12mv. I cant get my ti's over +86core.

Did you have a problem with the non ti and cryptonite, I received a PM yesterday from a guy who didn't want to post on the thread reporting problem

[djm34]

Nvidia GTX Titan II Flagship with GM200 Core Is Launching Sooner Than Expected

http://wccftech.com/nvidia-gm200-core-titan-ii-soon/

right... rumor over a shipment invoice 

[Amph]

it's not like the mining will be profitable with those new nvidia cards, if they have the same H/w ratio....maybe the big farm can take advantage of the density thing...

[MCMK]

it's not like the mining will be profitable with those new nvidia cards, if they have the same H/w ratio....maybe the big farm can take advantage of the density thing...

Can't find the source but I remember reading that the new cards will be Maxwell 2.0, so there may be a difference. 

[mordecai779]

Just wanted to post some 750 NON TI hashrates:
-on djm's cryptonitev3  3850 khash
-quark                        4100 khash

They are from gigabyte and overclock like hell. I have them stable on +213 core and +454 mem with +12mv. I cant get my ti's over +86core.

Did you have a problem with the non ti and cryptonite, I received a PM yesterday from a guy who didn't want to post on the thread reporting problem

No, no problems, mining XCN right now.

[wacko]

Interestingly, XCN required the lowest overclock out of all the algos I've tried so far (and that was a lot of algos), it seems to be the most demanding algo out there. Most of my Gigabyte 750 Ti are stable at ~ +200-225 core and +500 memory with every coin, but I had to downclock them to +100/+300 for XCN.

[dav1199]

Just wanted to post some 750 NON TI hashrates:
-on djm's cryptonitev3  3850 khash
-quark                        4100 khash

They are from gigabyte and overclock like hell. I have them stable on +213 core and +454 mem with +12mv. I cant get my ti's over +86core.

Did you have a problem with the non ti and cryptonite, I received a PM yesterday from a guy who didn't want to post on the thread reporting problem

No, no problems, mining XCN right now.

Its not that i didn't want to post in the thread it is just i don't think it interest many ppl with my issue .
I tried again and my two rigs ( 6x 750's asus on each ) doesn't want to work with the m7 algo with the newer drivers/miners for xcn.
Getting spammed out in nonsense stuff when i start the miners.
Tried different drivers and version of ccminer from djm and its a no go. Tried adding more ram to the computer , underclocking / overclocking and so on ..
The only miner that work for me is the one that was posted on cryptomining blog and only with 337.50 drivers. Getting 3000 per card.
And i don't see what else i can do.

[Amph]

it's not like the mining will be profitable with those new nvidia cards, if they have the same H/w ratio....maybe the big farm can take advantage of the density thing...

Can't find the source but I remember reading that the new cards will be Maxwell 2.0, so there may be a difference. 

i'm really curious about the h/w ratio, can't be much less than 750ti and you will lose something when selling old cards and buy the new

[mordecai779]

Don't know how to help, it works like a charm for me. If it's any help my specs are:

i7  860 @3,6 ghz
p7p55d evo
8gb ram
2x MSI 750 Ti
2x Gygabite 750 oc
gtx 670
Corsair hx850

+latest drivers
+pciex 16 to 1x risers, powered

The 750's have a pciex power of their own while the powered risers don't do anything for my Ti's. They are just plain rotten.

[dav1199]

Don't know how to help, it works like a charm for me. If it's any help my specs are:

i7  860 @3,6 ghz
p7p55d evo
8gb ram
2x MSI 750 Ti
2x Gygabite 750 oc
gtx 670
Corsair hx850

+latest drivers
+pciex 16 to 1x risers, powered

The 750's have a pciex power of their own while the powered risers don't do anything for my Ti's. They are just plain rotten.

Yeah my setup is pretty different.
Got three rigs with the same motherboard ( h61 pro btc ) , same processor ( cheap celeron ) ,4gb ram ,some old junk 40gb HD on each of them. Same power supply and risers.
Only difference is one of the rig is 6x 750ti's , the other two are 6x 750's.

The new miner work just fine on the ti's , and not on the 750's and it is the only difference between the rigs.

[bigjme]

ok everyone so the new website is up and running, but i want everyone to give it a test
http://www.cudamining.co.uk/

Right now no one can submit configurations, this is because no one did before so its been turned off
The functionality of the website is the same and just needs testing to see if anyone can cause any errors + maybe a stress test

[RavenXBR]

Interestingly, XCN required the lowest overclock out of all the algos I've tried so far (and that was a lot of algos), it seems to be the most demanding algo out there. Most of my Gigabyte 750 Ti are stable at ~ +200-225 core and +500 memory with every coin, but I had to downclock them to +100/+300 for XCN.

Same here...

- JPC: +135/+350
- SCR(Quark): +135/+300
- XCN: +135/+250 (+350 or +300 eventually crashes the cards) (270W at wall).

Gigabyte 750TIs on a 4 gpu rig.

[RavenXBR]

Don't know how to help, it works like a charm for me. If it's any help my specs are:

i7  860 @3,6 ghz
p7p55d evo
8gb ram
2x MSI 750 Ti
2x Gygabite 750 oc
gtx 670
Corsair hx850

+latest drivers
+pciex 16 to 1x risers, powered

The 750's have a pciex power of their own while the powered risers don't do anything for my Ti's. They are just plain rotten.

Yeah my setup is pretty different.
Got three rigs with the same motherboard ( h61 pro btc ) , same processor ( cheap celeron ) ,4gb ram ,some old junk 40gb HD on each of them. Same power supply and risers.
Only difference is one of the rig is 6x 750ti's , the other two are 6x 750's.

The new miner work just fine on the ti's , and not on the 750's and it is the only difference between the rigs.

I've got a 4 Gigabyte 750Ti rig running 4.0~4.2Mhs per card on XCN with almost the same setup:
- H61 Pro BTC
- Celeron
- 4Mb RAM
- old PS3 40Gb HDD
- 750W OCZ PSU
- Ribbon unpowered risers
- all latest drivers and related stuff

I'm using the ccminer, not crypto-mining-blog cudaminer.

It works like a charm.

 

[dav1199]

Don't know how to help, it works like a charm for me. If it's any help my specs are:

i7  860 @3,6 ghz
p7p55d evo
8gb ram
2x MSI 750 Ti
2x Gygabite 750 oc
gtx 670
Corsair hx850

+latest drivers
+pciex 16 to 1x risers, powered

The 750's have a pciex power of their own while the powered risers don't do anything for my Ti's. They are just plain rotten.

Yeah my setup is pretty different.
Got three rigs with the same motherboard ( h61 pro btc ) , same processor ( cheap celeron ) ,4gb ram ,some old junk 40gb HD on each of them. Same power supply and risers.
Only difference is one of the rig is 6x 750ti's , the other two are 6x 750's.

The new miner work just fine on the ti's , and not on the 750's and it is the only difference between the rigs.

I've got a 4 Gigabyte 750Ti rig running 4.0~4.2Mhs per card on XCN with almost the same setup:
- H61 Pro BTC
- Celeron
- 4Mb RAM
- old PS3 40Gb HDD
- 750W OCZ PSU
- Ribbon unpowered risers
- all latest drivers and related stuff

I'm using the ccminer, not crypto-mining-blog cudaminer.

It works like a charm.

 

Yes my rig with the 6x750ti's work just fine with the latest drivers and cryptonite v4 too. It is just the rigs with the non ti's that do not want to .. Everything is the same expect the cards.

[fredeq]

Someone was wondering what would be his/her hashrate for different algo with 750ti. I have added adapt function for that card to my site.

Defaults are still for 280x. Remember to adjust power usage, about 300W per 1000kh/s of scrypt.

[bathrobehero]

Interestingly, XCN required the lowest overclock out of all the algos I've tried so far (and that was a lot of algos), it seems to be the most demanding algo out there. Most of my Gigabyte 750 Ti are stable at ~ +200-225 core and +500 memory with every coin, but I had to downclock them to +100/+300 for XCN.

Which is why it would be so awesome if we could pass overclocks as command line arguments in ccminer. I always end up crashing half the cards between switching algos and nvidia inspector is refusing to work for me.

[whyyk7]

Just wanted to post some 750 NON TI hashrates:
-on djm's cryptonitev3  3850 khash
-quark                        4100 khash

They are from gigabyte and overclock like hell. I have them stable on +213 core and +454 mem with +12mv. I cant get my ti's over +86core.

Did you have a problem with the non ti and cryptonite, I received a PM yesterday from a guy who didn't want to post on the thread reporting problem

I found 750 not ti get  error like

Code:

[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:733
3
[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0
[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1
[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5
[2014-08-18 03:02:07] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2
[2014-08-18 03:02:08] Stratum detected new block
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #4: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 0 46821563 1 17bce19a
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #0: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 2 f3c15d68 3 7c1e6957
data 4 0b88b2f4 5 69efdc6a
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #3: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 6 013e4601 7 00000000
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #1: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 8 3add2f57 9 f74fbab8
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #5: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 10 b862e28b 11 312407e7
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #2: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 12 f1540588 13 dec4ce03
data 14 ddf8cef2 15 d3461964
data 16 9164c6c3 17 37db7ab4
data 18 86c7511c 19 62aa516d
data 20 701b4110 21 3ed2a7ff
data 22 14882437 23 0f0da1d1
data 24 53f0fc19 25 00000000
data 26 0000840e 27 00000000
data 28 00c0000a 29 00000000
data 30 00200001 31 009eea40
pdata 0 00000000 1 00200001
pdata 2 009eea40 3 00000002
pdata 4 009eeb00 5 00200150
pdata 6 0000000f 7 003327d0
pdata 8 00000000 9 0000000f
pdata 10 04cbf808 11 0000000d
pdata 12 009eea80 13 00000001
pdata 14 00000000 15 0020f8c8
pdata 16 00000001 17 00000000
pdata 18 0020f8d8 19 00000001
pdata 20 00000000 21 0020f8e8
pdata 22 00000001 23 00000000
pdata 24 0020f8f8 25 00000001
pdata 26 00000000 27 0020f908
pdata 28 00000001 29 00000000
pdata 30 0020f918 31 00000001
sha256[0]=2e dd 8b 27 sha512[0]=db bc 5a 93 keccak[0]=96 70 6d cb whirlpool[2][0
]=e3 13 69 22 haval[0]=cc b9 9c 34 tiger[0]=75 de aa 98 ripemd[0]=87 98 49 fe
sha256[1]=85 51 b7 f7 sha512[1]=69 01 05 91 keccak[1]=3a 88 b8 ae whirlpool[2][1
]=ac 6f 12 8b haval[1]=56 07 42 95 tiger[1]=c3 2e 30 68 ripemd[1]=53 18 50 35
sha256[2]=53 42 36 77 sha512[2]=ab ec f6 c4 keccak[2]=7d 03 ca c5 whirlpool[2][2
]=50 57 54 92 haval[2]=69 48 a4 ff tiger[2]=3a f3 ef 57 ripemd[2]=a9 92 44 45
sha256[3]=42 27 16 65 sha512[3]=0c b5 4f 91 keccak[3]=09 cd 9b 9e whirlpool[2][3
]=00 1d a6 0a haval[3]=48 91 cc 50 tiger[3]=9f 5c fd ba ripemd[3]=02 99 21 ce
sha256[4]=8c bf b5 15 sha512[4]=f9 50 59 9e keccak[4]=76 66 d5 30 whirlpool[2][4
]=18 61 c4 70 haval[4]=84 7e 7c 87 tiger[4]=dc c0 e5 28 ripemd[4]=a1 a6 3b 30
sha256[5]=41 f3 70 01 sha512[5]=a3 2f 72 d6 keccak[5]=ac e8 9e ad whirlpool[2][5
]=66 c0 43 ec haval[5]=1b e1 21 b4 tiger[5]=44 14 24 61 ripemd[5]=00 00 00 00
sha256[6]=65 34 30 b4 sha512[6]=75 e5 4e 0e keccak[6]=6d c1 b9 05 whirlpool[2][6
]=0a 23 63 7f haval[6]=09 b7 67 f1 tiger[6]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[6]=00 00 00 00
sha256[7]=65 53 49 f2 sha512[7]=12 d1 87 73 keccak[7]=1d 85 3d 0d whirlpool[2][7
]=3b e4 4a c9 haval[7]=d4 ec 0f a9 tiger[7]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[7]=00 00 00 00
sha256[8]=00 00 00 00 sha512[8]=8e 2d 21 95 keccak[8]=c4 30 17 9c whirlpool[2][8
]=84 e7 59 4a haval[8]=00 00 00 00 tiger[8]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[8]=00 00 00 00
sha256[9]=00 00 00 00 sha512[9]=d9 5f 59 60 keccak[9]=77 28 79 da whirlpool[2][9
]=a5 79 90 c3 haval[9]=00 00 00 00 tiger[9]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[9]=00 00 00 00
sha256[10]=00 00 00 00 sha512[10]=14 cd bc 2a keccak[10]=1b 50 7d 24 whirlpool[2
][10]=d4 26 94 3f haval[10]=00 00 00 00 tiger[10]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[10]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[11]=00 00 00 00 sha512[11]=64 ea 82 37 keccak[11]=c8 52 21 9e whirlpool[2
][11]=73 cd 50 5f haval[11]=00 00 00 00 tiger[11]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[11]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[12]=00 00 00 00 sha512[12]=36 3a 83 49 keccak[12]=12 da b9 3a whirlpool[2
][12]=1b 4e 35 37 haval[12]=00 00 00 00 tiger[12]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[12]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[13]=00 00 00 00 sha512[13]=4d a6 66 b9 keccak[13]=0a c3 c7 f8 whirlpool[2
][13]=4c 42 6b 04 haval[13]=00 00 00 00 tiger[13]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[13]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[14]=00 00 00 00 sha512[14]=4d cd 2c d1 keccak[14]=24 be d1 1e whirlpool[2
][14]=3a 07 dc 0e haval[14]=00 00 00 00 tiger[14]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[14]=00 00 0
0 00
sha256[15]=00 00 00 00 sha512[15]=e8 fd 35 56 keccak[15]=70 7c 65 1c whirlpool[2
][15]=33 82 9d 1b haval[15]=00 00 00 00 tiger[15]=00 00 00 00 ripemd[15]=00 00 0
0 00
data 0 46821563 1 17bce19a
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750, 975.37 khash/s
data 2 f3c15d68 3 7c1e6957
[2014-08-18 03:02:10] GPU #4: result for nonce $00000000 does not validate on CP
U! vhash64 47aac607 and htarg 00000dcc
data 4 0b88b2f4 5 69efdc6a
data 6 013e4601 7 00000000
data 8 3add2f57 9 f74fbab8
data 10 b862e28b 11 312407e7
data 12 f1540588 13 dec4ce03
data 14 ddf8cef2 15 d3461964
data 16 9164c6c3 17 37db7ab4
data 18 86c7511c 19 62aa516d
data 20 701b4110 21 3ed2a7ff
data 22 14882437 23 0f0da1d1
data 24 53f0fc19 25 00000000
data 26 0000840e 27 00000000
data 28 00c0000a 29 00000000