bigjme
|
|
August 28, 2014, 05:23:03 PM |
|
Ok, well the website will be going down for about 20 minutes while i remove some cards sooo yeh, be right back
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
Travis9x
|
|
August 28, 2014, 06:43:51 PM |
|
that's because you don't know where to search and don't read the thread (and also that I am to lazzy to update bigjme website)
Read the thread…1004 pages…yeah… -_-
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
August 28, 2014, 06:49:00 PM |
|
that's because you don't know where to search and don't read the thread (and also that I am to lazzy to update bigjme website)
Read the thread…1004 pages…yeah… -_- especially when you could find the info on the last 5 pages.... I know that the crypto market isn't going well, but this is still about making money, so it makes me wonder why people can't make the effort to search the information they need.
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
August 28, 2014, 07:06:45 PM |
|
Which values of gpu and mem frequencys 😊
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
August 28, 2014, 07:14:40 PM |
|
Lol , its pritty good work. I wish the price didnt crash so much. Hope there'll be some more interest for rising it...
|
|
|
|
|
polanskiman
|
|
August 29, 2014, 01:51:25 AM |
|
rather cool the new version of msi AB, it is now possible to arrange the graph on several columns (mask half of the screen... but hey...)
Hey dude, ccminer is fairly basic on the data, is there something similar to sgminer for nvidia? Look at splitscreen. Basic data but more data than ccminer/nvminer.
|
|
|
|
polanskiman
|
|
August 29, 2014, 01:53:26 AM |
|
that's because you don't know where to search and don't read the thread (and also that I am to lazzy to update bigjme website)
Read the thread…1004 pages…yeah… -_- There is a search function you know, at the top right hand corner....
|
|
|
|
Ignition75
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
|
|
August 29, 2014, 06:29:28 AM |
|
So I converted my first AMD rig to Nvidia Went from this:To this, so cute lol :Each card, GA Black, is sitting on circa 2.6 Mh/s x11, time to ramp things up a little What's my best plan of attack for NVIDIA? I've flashed a new bios with edited high watermarks of 65500 for power, went +100 Core and +650 Mem, each card hovered around 2.8 Mh/s then I got instability. Is there a better way to approach it? Here's what I'm playing with: Cheers lads.
|
The new generation have arrived and they brought their own currency...
|
|
|
polanskiman
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:06:55 AM Last edit: August 29, 2014, 07:19:03 AM by polanskiman |
|
So I converted my first AMD rig to Nvidia Each card, GA Black, is sitting on circa 2.6 Mh/s x11, time to ramp things up a little What's my best plan of attack for NVIDIA? I've flashed a new bios with edited high watermarks of 65500 for power, went +100 Core and +650 Mem, each card hovered around 2.8 Mh/s then I got instability. Is there a better way to approach it? Cheers lads. You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.6 released by djm34 - Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your cards to their default factory values. The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card so it's to you to find the sweet spot. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change. Here is my hash: I really don't understand why people try flashing their cards before trying the basics first and then complain about low hashrates.
|
|
|
|
Ignition75
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:15:42 AM |
|
You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.5 of djm34 - Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your card to their default factory values. The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change. Look at djm having her own miner and not giving it me when she knew my cards landed yesterday! I'll take that one offline lol. OK I'll reflash the stock bios and hunt around for djm's miner. Thanks
|
The new generation have arrived and they brought their own currency...
|
|
|
yellowduck2
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:17:33 AM |
|
You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.5 of djm34 - Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your card to their default factory values. The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change. Look at djm having her own miner and not giving it me when she knew my cards landed yesterday! I'll take that one offline lol. OK I'll reflash the stock bios and hunt around for djm's miner. Thanks Her ?
|
|
|
|
polanskiman
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:25:04 AM |
|
You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.5 of djm34 - Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your card to their default factory values. The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change. Look at djm having her own miner and not giving it me when she knew my cards landed yesterday! I'll take that one offline lol. OK I'll reflash the stock bios and hunt around for djm's miner. Thanks I just realised you were mining X11. Sorry I assumed it was XCN. I think your hashrate is about right. Perhaps others could confirm.
|
|
|
|
polanskiman
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:25:41 AM |
|
You actually didn't need to flash anything to start with. You could have simply OCed your cards and without excessive OCing easily reach 5 Mh/s with the latest ccminer v.5 of djm34 - Look a few pages back, you will find it. I recommend you re-flashing your card to their default factory values. The +100 core seems right, although it could even be a bit more (+130 or +140) but that depends on each card. The +650 mem is way too much I believe and anyway it's not the mem that will make your hash-rate change significantly. I use + 200 mem. It could even be less that I wouldn't see much change. Look at djm having her own miner and not giving it me when she knew my cards landed yesterday! I'll take that one offline lol. OK I'll reflash the stock bios and hunt around for djm's miner. Thanks Her ? He went through a tough operation lately
|
|
|
|
polanskiman
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:26:44 AM |
|
Memclock matters a LOT when mining other algos like CryptoNight, though. I have mine at 1450/7000, usually.
I wrongly assumed it was XCN. He is mining X11.
|
|
|
|
GES
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:39:49 AM |
|
i would say the 2cm is the issue, i have over 5cm between my cards, and here are my temps from no card infront, to 2 cards infront
40'c
45'c
55'c
38'c your tamb? it make the big difference what is such tamb? I from Russia, not understand everything
|
|
|
|
Ignition75
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
www.dashpay.io
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:43:34 AM |
|
Memclock matters a LOT when mining other algos like CryptoNight, though. I have mine at 1450/7000, usually.
I wrongly assumed it was XCN. He is mining X11. Yes I realised that, it's all good brother. I went + 650 memclock because I was following a guide: http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoinmining/comments/20734u/5x_nvidia_750_ti_evga_rig_with_mods/I got stability with +125/+200, but it's an uninspiring 2.75 Mh/s. Is that it? Tweak over? No staying up until 5am for the next week playing with thread count/thread concurrency/lookup gap/core/mem/vddc combinations
|
The new generation have arrived and they brought their own currency...
|
|
|
GES
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:47:45 AM |
|
i would say the 2cm is the issue, i have over 5cm between my cards, and here are my temps from no card infront, to 2 cards infront
40'c
45'c
55'c
38'c your tamb? it make the big difference I'm between 45-50°c on my 750ti, It works great for 4 months PS : I sold all my 7950 (x7) to buy 750ti no i mean ambient temperature= tamb 15-20'c
|
|
|
|
polanskiman
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:50:37 AM |
|
Memclock matters a LOT when mining other algos like CryptoNight, though. I have mine at 1450/7000, usually.
I wrongly assumed it was XCN. He is mining X11. Yes I realised that, it's all good brother. I went + 650 memclock because I was following a guide: http://www.reddit.com/r/litecoinmining/comments/20734u/5x_nvidia_750_ti_evga_rig_with_mods/I got stability with +125/+200, but it's an uninspiring 2.75 Mh/s. Is that it? Tweak over? No staying up until 5am for the next week playing with thread count/thread concurrency/lookup gap/core/mem/vddc combinations Yes that's about it on NVIDIA. No need for all that shit TC, LG bla bla bla. 2.75 Mh/s seems about right for X11. Don't forget though you are only pumping 60w / card. Here is my hash for x11. I launched an instance just for the sake of it:
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
August 29, 2014, 07:51:30 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|