Bitcoin Forum
November 01, 2024, 08:09:49 AM *
News: Bitcoin Pumpkin Carving Contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 [511] 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426929 times)
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 30, 2014, 08:04:07 PM
 #10201

Making asics for SHA2 and 3 algos is easy, doesn't make sense. The ONLY way to go is variable N factor scrypt/scrypt-chacha. PERIOD
That's if you want asic proof, and lazy-ass miner proof coins.
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 08:13:51 PM
 #10202

Making asics for SHA2 and 3 algos is easy, doesn't make sense. The ONLY way to go is variable N factor scrypt/scrypt-chacha. PERIOD
That's if you want asic proof, and lazy-ass miner proof coins.

for the eleven algos of X11 you will need a lot of chip area, reducing the amount of hashing power you can get out of one chip. But still, such ASICs are very much possible.

The algo just needs to have a market share that is significant enough (i.e. 10% or more of the volume/market cap of the BTC market) before companies will start looking into this.

Christian

EtBIM
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 09:30:54 PM
 #10203

Making asics for SHA2 and 3 algos is easy, doesn't make sense. The ONLY way to go is variable N factor scrypt/scrypt-chacha. PERIOD
That's if you want asic proof, and lazy-ass miner proof coins.

My thoughts exactly.

BTC: 1PoM7Us1VwPAfULsyTcwjqAeZMjRwiokB4
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 30, 2014, 10:52:34 PM
 #10204

Yup, no algo is asic proof but economics get in the way of said developments.

Christian, for the nth time, you rock man. Cool
christian1980
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 11:13:07 PM
 #10205

@Christian:
HVC Difficulty growing. Youre still mining it too?
Whats the next Project?
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 11:20:32 PM
 #10206

@Christian:
HVC Difficulty growing. Youre still mining it too?
Whats the next Project?

I turned off my rigs a day ago.  Next project is top secret Wink

Found out all my 10 risers are missing a part, so I cannot yet start putting the rigs into their wooden cases.
Meh. But the ebay seller will send me the missing x1 pieces (those that plug into the PC mainboard).


sin242
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 11:23:39 PM
 #10207

@Christian:
HVC Difficulty growing. Youre still mining it too?
Whats the next Project?

I turned off my rigs a day ago.  Next project is top secret Wink


Tease

Dark:  Xk9BoVerBd41JCjWQEhnxoowP7YNUK439z
BTC:  1JzPN2h8WGSi7kQeY5wuP4PjVD2hxkHJQM
christian1980
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 30, 2014, 11:32:53 PM
 #10208

@Christian:
HVC Difficulty growing. Youre still mining it too?
Whats the next Project?

I turned off my rigs a day ago.  Next project is top secret Wink

Found out all my 10 risers are missing a part, so I cannot yet start putting the rigs into their wooden cases.
Meh. But the ebay seller will send me the missing x1 pieces (those that plug into the PC mainboard).



I dont like to turn it off now.
Do you think jumping back to groestl is better?
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 30, 2014, 11:34:21 PM
 #10209

Always keeping us on our toes...hey Christian, I gots a primecoin gpu miner dawg :p
cvax
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 31, 2014, 01:08:34 AM
 #10210

@Christian:
HVC Difficulty growing. Youre still mining it too?
Whats the next Project?

I turned off my rigs a day ago.  Next project is top secret Wink

Found out all my 10 risers are missing a part, so I cannot yet start putting the rigs into their wooden cases.
Meh. But the ebay seller will send me the missing x1 pieces (those that plug into the PC mainboard).



I dont like to turn it off now.
Do you think jumping back to groestl is better?
Thanks for both your work. You should stay on Heavy instead of Groestl. Nothing looking attractive at the moment. Nothing breaking the 0.02BTC daily intake benchmark.

I ran my calculations report on the coins and here are the results.

BTC: 15HAePieDjYge6LTG2HFRZEJseRYJJqmta    |     YAC: YMvBp1SpY2sZ8nUZgKFLTEx7neuUZ7APuM
8x 750Ti's, AsRock 970 Extreme 4, Athlon II 170u
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 31, 2014, 01:15:53 AM
 #10211

In your calculations your solo mining. Are you actually solo mining or pool mining?

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
Wipeout2097
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 255


SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes


View Profile
March 31, 2014, 01:25:17 AM
 #10212

@Christian:
HVC Difficulty growing. Youre still mining it too?
Whats the next Project?

I turned off my rigs a day ago.  Next project is top secret Wink

Found out all my 10 risers are missing a part, so I cannot yet start putting the rigs into their wooden cases.
Meh. But the ebay seller will send me the missing x1 pieces (those that plug into the PC mainboard).



I dont like to turn it off now.
Do you think jumping back to groestl is better?
Thanks for both your work. You should stay on Heavy instead of Groestl. Nothing looking attractive at the moment. Nothing breaking the 0.02BTC daily intake benchmark.

I ran my calculations report on the coins and here are the results.

How are you pulling those numbers? With 8 750Ti's?

███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██▀       ▀█       ▀████████████        ▀█         █▀       ▀██
██   ▀██▄▄▄█   ██   ████████████   ███   ████   ████   ▀██▄▄▄██
███▄     ▀██       ▄████████████       ▄█████   █████▄     ▀███
██▀▀▀██▄   █   █████████████████   █▄  ▀█████   ████▀▀▀██▄   ██
██▄       ▄█   █████████████████   ██▄  ▀████   ████▄       ▄██
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██       ██▀      ▀█████████████    ▀██   █████████████████████
████   ███   ▄██▄   ████████████     ▀█   █████████████████████
████   ███   ████████   ████   █   ▄  ▀   █████████████████████
████   ███   ▀██▀   █   ████   █   █▄     █████████████████████
██       ██▄      ▄███        ██   ██▄    █████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████                                                             ████████████████████████████████████████████████
.
.
.

████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████          ████████████████                                 ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████████████
███████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████
███████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
███████
►►  Powered by
BOUNTY
DETECTIVE
cvax
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 31, 2014, 01:28:09 AM
 #10213

In your calculations your solo mining. Are you actually solo mining or pool mining?
That is just a theoretical amount of time it would take per block if I were to solo mine. I usually pool mine, but sometimes I solo mine if the solo time is exceptionally low. For example fugue had a 15min solo mine time yesterday.

@Christian:
HVC Difficulty growing. Youre still mining it too?
Whats the next Project?

I turned off my rigs a day ago.  Next project is top secret Wink

Found out all my 10 risers are missing a part, so I cannot yet start putting the rigs into their wooden cases.
Meh. But the ebay seller will send me the missing x1 pieces (those that plug into the PC mainboard).



I dont like to turn it off now.
Do you think jumping back to groestl is better?
Thanks for both your work. You should stay on Heavy instead of Groestl. Nothing looking attractive at the moment. Nothing breaking the 0.02BTC daily intake benchmark.

I ran my calculations report on the coins and here are the results.

How are you pulling those numbers? With 8 750Ti's?
Forgot to mention. Yes, 8x 750Ti's.

BTC: 15HAePieDjYge6LTG2HFRZEJseRYJJqmta    |     YAC: YMvBp1SpY2sZ8nUZgKFLTEx7neuUZ7APuM
8x 750Ti's, AsRock 970 Extreme 4, Athlon II 170u
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
March 31, 2014, 01:45:06 AM
 #10214

with your hashing power, they are other coins which are more profitable... (exe for example... which beat all the coins you have on that list)

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 31, 2014, 02:24:49 AM
 #10215

with your hashing power, they are other coins which are more profitable... (exe for example... which beat all the coins you have on that list)


http://www.whatmine.com/?search=1&hashRates%5B13%5D=14&hashRates%5B12%5D=638&hashRates%5B14%5D=10200&algoAdapter=on&hashRates%5B1%5D=3.2&hashRates%5B2%5D=2550&hashRates%5B4%5D=1275&hashRates%5B5%5D=446&hashRates%5B3%5D=1479&power_consumption=0&power_cost=0&oreDiff=21600&volumeType=total&volumeMin_BTC=-1&wm_currency=USD&exchangers%5B%5D=4&exchangers%5B%5D=6&exchangers%5B%5D=7&exchangers%5B%5D=1&exchangers%5B%5D=8&orderBy=0
sin242
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 31, 2014, 02:28:09 AM
 #10216

with your hashing power, they are other coins which are more profitable... (exe for example... which beat all the coins you have on that list)



I've gone back to exe.  Hoping it decides to do a VTC impersonation

Dark:  Xk9BoVerBd41JCjWQEhnxoowP7YNUK439z
BTC:  1JzPN2h8WGSi7kQeY5wuP4PjVD2hxkHJQM
Napping
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 31, 2014, 02:30:29 AM
 #10217

hey, any plans on making cudaminer x11 algorithm compatible? I've started mining Clear Water Coin today and there are talks of switching to x11 from scrypt, and most my rigs are running on cudaminer atm.. I never even heard of x11 until today.
cvax
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 31, 2014, 03:02:40 AM
Last edit: March 31, 2014, 04:03:41 AM by cvax
 #10218

with your hashing power, they are other coins which are more profitable... (exe for example... which beat all the coins you have on that list)
I'll add exe to my calculations and see how it stacks based on what I can actually squeeze out of it. Do you have any other suggestions? Thanks.

Edit: Hmm. EXE doesn't look profitable to me at this point in time.


This probably shouldn't show XSV at the top. It shows last trade which isn't useful when someone gets filled way out of the normal range. I base my calculations off the best buy order sitting at the exchange and not the last trade. For XSV the discrepancy is an exchange rate of 0.00078481 vs 0.00034.

BTC: 15HAePieDjYge6LTG2HFRZEJseRYJJqmta    |     YAC: YMvBp1SpY2sZ8nUZgKFLTEx7neuUZ7APuM
8x 750Ti's, AsRock 970 Extreme 4, Athlon II 170u
subotai
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 31, 2014, 05:32:33 AM
 #10219

The only drawback to it right now is that it runs 10x better on ati hardware.
And 10x more OpenCL developers Smiley , some of which seem to have a full-time to make miners Cheesy
christian1980
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 31, 2014, 05:58:28 AM
 #10220

I think we have to return to the good old Cudaminer...

@Christian
Here's my tentative roadmap for continued development. Note the lack of a time table Wink

1) fix the issue with PCIe bandwidth, so people with 1x risers are more happy. CUDA can do all the
    hash evaluation so we save a LOT of bus bandwidth.


2) Add blake256 for blakecoin and related coins.

3) look at implementing some failover options

4) see if I can get a monitoring API included

Any news, especially @1) ?
Pages: « 1 ... 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 [511] 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!