Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
 |
March 06, 2017, 04:49:51 PM |
|
This thread got plagued by this guy, please watch the video before taking anything he says seriously  Maybe you should go create your own thread and keep posting your nonsense BS instead of infesting this thread with your friends! Nice deflection... Thanks, I will not buy any coins by Bruno then. But then again most issues raised by him are too significant. So much red flags are coming out of QTUM. Maybe it's time to re-organize the people involved and disassociate yourselves from the known scammers. Not one solid rebuttal from the QTUM team. And no, we won't take your word for it. Please don't say "believe me." Some accusations by the trolls here are so ridiculous, they are not even worth saying anything. It's pure surreal BS. For the legitimate concerns, I would like to hear more from the team as well! No, let's hear more from the trolls, for they're more entertaining. Team Qtum only comes here to deflect the entertainment via comments like "they are twins" when previously "they are father and son". Please continue with the character assassination of myself because such makes my dick hard, especially when you guys quote Leroy Fodor quoting Joshua Zipkin. That's a gas! Bruno: Why did Neil Sakr change his name to Neil Mahi? Sockpuppets: Don't trust Bruno's questions because he's a lyin' troll. Qtum: Guys, we can handle it. Because they're twins. The AMT miners you said in the above video were good products, and you need to "do more selling" of them turned out to be a huge fiasco and people got scammed, so no one will trust you, that and all the other despicable accusations all over the place including some very, very dark stuff. As to who is the brother/son of who or why did that guy change his name, I don't think it's relevant to the project itself and does not make it a scam. As said before you are trying to make a big deal of nonsense. that's how you work. I still think this project is a very good one, with support from big investors and media. I don't think you are smarter than all these big names trusting this project, especially when looking at your history of a world famous paid troll and watching the above video! I also jackoff to porn, ergo more reason to not believe anything I say or uncover. To be Leroy Fodor honest, I aspire to be a saint one day like the venerable cocksuckeroverflow. Oh don't worry, no one will take you seriously after watching that video Glebby so go ahead, do your worst! OUCH!, or: http://coinjournal.net/ver-backed-qtum-started-bitbay-dai/ AND why Qtum's ICO was delisted: https://medium.com/@icocountdown/due-diligence-pack-for-qtum-7369ef48917b#.mbmr83pvd, both based off my investigations because that's what venerable entities do - pen shit based only on a person's (me) opinion not based on fact, thus shouldn't be taken seriously. In case you missed it, cocksuckeroverflow, Qtum is in serious damage control over and beyond what I've penned, I just adding more fuel to the fire because I wanna be cozy warm here in camp with my buds while you're in your camp smokin' up all the bud given that that has to be the case given your recent postings. Stay tuned. More to come and cum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stackoverflow
|
|
March 06, 2017, 04:56:34 PM |
|
This thread got plagued by this guy, please watch the video before taking anything he says seriously Maybe you should go create your own thread and keep posting your nonsense BS instead of infesting this thread with your friends! Nice deflection... Thanks, I will not buy any coins by Bruno then. But then again most issues raised by him are too significant. So much red flags are coming out of QTUM. Maybe it's time to re-organize the people involved and disassociate yourselves from the known scammers. Not one solid rebuttal from the QTUM team. And no, we won't take your word for it. Please don't say "believe me." Some accusations by the trolls here are so ridiculous, they are not even worth saying anything. It's pure surreal BS. For the legitimate concerns, I would like to hear more from the team as well! No, let's hear more from the trolls, for they're more entertaining. Team Qtum only comes here to deflect the entertainment via comments like "they are twins" when previously "they are father and son". Please continue with the character assassination of myself because such makes my dick hard, especially when you guys quote Leroy Fodor quoting Joshua Zipkin. That's a gas! Bruno: Why did Neil Sakr change his name to Neil Mahi? Sockpuppets: Don't trust Bruno's questions because he's a lyin' troll. Qtum: Guys, we can handle it. Because they're twins. The AMT miners you said in the above video were good products, and you need to "do more selling" of them turned out to be a huge fiasco and people got scammed, so no one will trust you, that and all the other despicable accusations all over the place including some very, very dark stuff. As to who is the brother/son of who or why did that guy change his name, I don't think it's relevant to the project itself and does not make it a scam. As said before you are trying to make a big deal of nonsense. that's how you work. I still think this project is a very good one, with support from big investors and media. I don't think you are smarter than all these big names trusting this project, especially when looking at your history of a world famous paid troll and watching the above video! I also jackoff to porn, ergo more reason to not believe anything I say or uncover. To be Leroy Fodor honest, I aspire to be a saint one day like the venerable cocksuckeroverflow. Oh don't worry, no one will take you seriously after watching that video Glebby so go ahead, do your worst! OUCH!, or: http://coinjournal.net/ver-backed-qtum-started-bitbay-dai/ AND why Qtum's ICO was delisted: https://medium.com/@icocountdown/due-diligence-pack-for-qtum-7369ef48917b#.mbmr83pvd, both based off my investigations because that's what venerable entities do - pen shit based only on a person's (me) opinion not based on fact, thus shouldn't be taken seriously. In case you missed it, cocksuckeroverflow, Qtum is in serious damage control over and beyond what I've penned, I just adding more fuel to the fire because I wanna be cozy warm here in camp with my buds while you're in your camp smokin' up all the bud given that that has to be the case given your recent postings. Stay tuned. More to come and cum. I wonder why you quote one paid for article and one known scammer (as yourself) article, and ignore the multitude of other articles from the most famous media outlets. Oh wait that's how you work, you willingly ignore any good points about the project and try to focus on the things you and your "handlers" came up with or paid for. You are obviously willingly biased when dealing with this, and that's obvious! |
|
|
|
|
MofoMF
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 320
Merit: 101
Mai bine mort,decat asa de viu! *TM
|
|
March 06, 2017, 05:09:20 PM |
|
When i`ll be able to upload funds on qtum.org for crowdsale ?
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
March 06, 2017, 05:12:36 PM |
|
I wonder why you quote one paid for article and one known scammer (as yourself) article, and ignore the multitude of other articles from the most famous media outlets. Oh wait that's how you work, you willingly ignore any good points about the project and try to focus on the things you and your "handlers" came up with or paid for.
You are obviously willingly biased when dealing with this, and that's obvious!
Actually, the question is why you're so adamant in citing articles about Qtum put forth from ... wait for it ... Team Qtum themselves? Don't forget, once you or anybody else on the planet presents definitive proof that I get, or have ever gotten paid for my investigations, theymos has my permission to ban me from this forum for life. Here's the thread up since September 1, 2015, that's not locked or self-moderated -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1168431.0. Since you want folks here to believe that you're a straight-up guy that doesn't lie et al., since you've claimed on now myriad occasions that I'm a paid shill, surely you have definitive proof of such, else you wouldn't put your venerable brand at risk, ergo here's your chance to truly shine by presenting said proof to theymos and me's be gone forever. If I'm still here tomorrow, then it's safe to say that it's you who's lyin' their motherfuckin ass off, cocksuckeroverflow. Matter in fact, today is tomorrow, for it was yesterday when I first brought this to your attention, and as everybody can clearly see, me's still here and that you're a fuckin liar. When i`ll be able to upload funds on qtum.org for crowdsale ?
Do it now. Here's their address -> https://blockchain.info/address/1qtum1H39JbLjkBZGg4HVsrt9KD6FMS3g |
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
March 06, 2017, 05:49:54 PM |
|
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/d38da05c72761402?page=2 ^^^ On November 28, 2016, Qtum had exactly 830 BTC in their coffer equating to ~$610,880 at the then current exchange rate. https://www.walletexplorer.com/txid/51f9c3a755299425a38e119c068f3997f08fe3c60caab53cfbbea7b9dfd8c66a ^^^ On January 1, 2017, Qtum transferred to Star Xu's OKCoin exactly 500 BTC equating to ~$491,465 at the then current exchange rate as depicted below: https://blockchain.info/tx/51f9c3a755299425a38e119c068f3997f08fe3c60caab53cfbbea7b9dfd8c66a 10 days later on January 11, 2017, Qtum secures seed funding of $1M from 4 investors, one of which is Star Xu of OKCoin: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/qtum#/entity On the very same day (1-11-17), Pete Rizzo of CoinDesk published the announcement, of which includes the following: http://www.coindesk.com/blockchain-angels-invest-1-million-bitcoin-ethereum-hybrid-qtum/Patrick Dai, founder of the Qtum Foundation, indicated that the $1m will now help his team to prepare the infrastructure necessary to sell the tokens in a public initial coin offering (ICO), or a public sale of unique cryptographic tokens to investors.
Dai told CoinDesk:
"We raised the money to prove that our approach is right. We used the money to do the minimum viable product. The testnet is live now, but it is private, it is already working."
Dai said that the Qtum Foundation could seek to raise up to $10m in the token offering. Don't you find it odd that in 9 days back in November 2016, Qtum was able to amass over $600K worth of bitcoins from who-knows-where, then a month later covert 500 BTC to cash via OKCoin, to only 10 days later receiving a million dollars in Angle seed funding from the very dude, among others, Qtum just handed over $491K+ to? Or am I mistaken, the 1qtum1H39JbLjkBZGg4HVsrt9KD6FMS3g BWA belongs to Qtum's twin brother, Qtime?  "Bruno thinks that we shovel up the elephant shit in our office, when in fact we just let it pile up, pretending it doesn't exist. To have more room, we simply used some the million dollars donated to us by Angel investors to knock out a few walls so to extend our office in accommodating more elephants and piles of shit."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
muleroaa
|
|
March 06, 2017, 06:18:18 PM |
|
Have the devs explained yet why only 51% gets sold in the crowdfunding and the rest gets split over themselves and angel backers?
Even if they try to dismiss everything as FUD and want the crowdsale go on, they at least should explain the reasoning of the coin distribution.
I have asked them 3 times since beginning of February, they said they would reply within 24 hours but still haven't given an explanation.
Hi, the answer to this is in the Qtum Economy Whitepaper ( https://qtum.org/en/white-papers) We will release the Crowd Sale details on the 9th of March, and then discuss them in more detail. We will also be hosting a technical Q&A session at our Slack on Tuesday, 8pm Beijing Time (7am EST) No, that is not the answer. Ofcourse I have read the white paper and in my initial 3 enquiries you said you would give a further explanation on why the funds get allocated this way. You would give an answer within 24 hours, this was on the 10th of February, 1 month ago. Now you say the 9th of March. The crowdsale is ment to fund your project. This means that there should not be separate allocations for business development and research etc etc, these allocations should be funded from the crowdsale. So, it would seem most logical to distribute 80% in the crowdsale and the remaining 20% to the initial backers. What does the money raised in the 51% crowdsale even get used for? I would assume business development and research. No need to allocate more tokens to yourselves... |
|
|
|
|
|
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████████ █████████████████
█████████████████████████ █████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████ █████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████ █████████████████████████████████
████████████▀ ▀███████████▓███████████████████████████████████
████████████▄▄███████████▄▄█████████▓▓▓███████████████████████████████████
▐██████████████▀ ▀██████████▓▓▓▓████████████████████████████████████
██████████████▄▄█████████▄▄█████████▓▓▓▓▓████████████████████████████████████
▐█████████████████▀ ▀██████████▓▓▓▓▓▓████████████████████████████████████▌
▐████████████████▄▄██████▄▄█████████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓███████████████████████████████████▌
▐██████████████████ ███████████▓▓▓▓▓▓▓███████████████████████████████████▌
▐██████████████████ ████ ████████████▓▓▓▓▓████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████ ████ ████████████▓▓▓▓▓███████████████ ████████████████
█████████████████ ████ █████████████▓▓▓████████████████ █████████████ █
████████████████ ██████████████▓█████████████████ ███████████
██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████ ████████
███████████████████████████████ █████████████████
███████████████████████████ █████████████████▓
████████████████████ ███████████████████▓
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ | | | │ | | │ | | .
JOIN OUR
TELEGRAM |
|
|
|
|
cerejobastos
|
|
March 06, 2017, 07:13:50 PM |
|
ok im not gonna follow this thread and project no more.
close to no trust in the whole thing.
how can I stop following a thread here in btc?
|
|
|
|
|
Bemerand
|
|
March 06, 2017, 07:33:26 PM |
|
All the trust is gone. Lead dev goes by multiple aliases, already scamed many people and now no one will trust this project.
#ALLFACTS
|
88.36255237114% of all ICO's are SCAMS
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
March 06, 2017, 08:47:17 PM |
|
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/d38da05c72761402?page=2^^^ On November 28, 2016 (all times GMT depicted above), Qtum had exactly 830 BTC in their coffer, equating to ~$610,880 at the then current exchange rate. On November 28, 2017, Qtum registered its non-profit charter in Singapore, evident below: https://www.sgpbusiness.com/company/Qtum-Foundation-Ltd It's safe to assume that according to all the above, Qtum had yet garnered Angel investment funding prior to the 28th of November, with all the above bitcoin transfers to their coffer prior to, and inclusive of said date stemming from other sources because it would've been unwise for deep-pocket investors to collectively invest at least a million dollars into an entity that had yet registered as a business whether non-profit or not. On January 1, 2017, at 16:40:39 GMT, a principal of Qtum, most likely Patrick Dai, transferred 500 BTC to Star Xu's OKCoin, the transaction being registered in Block #446154 at 17:28:48 GMT (follow the link). January 1, 2017, 17:28:48 GMT equates to January 2, 2017, 1:28:48 AM [Eastern] China or Singapore time, as evident below, an odd time indeed to be transferring $461K+ worth of bitcoins to whomever, in this case Star Xu's OKCoin (Star Xu is an Angel investor of Qtum):  If Qtum did receive Angel investment funding prior to November 28, 2016, they would've most likely shout such at the tops of their lungs prior to January 11, 2017, when the announcement first starting making the rounds prior to the release of their first white paper, for Qtum shouts all else up to and including when an elephant farts in its office (allegorous, yet a truism nonetheless). By Andrew Quentson on 8/28/2016: https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/blockchain-projects-gear-up-for-the-biggest-blockchain-competition-of-the-year/James Gong, the founder of ChainB, a rising Chinese media outlet focusing on blockchain developments and hosts of Demo Day, told CCN that nearly one hundred projects had applied to attend, with thirty selected to present, making it the biggest demonstration of live blockchain projects so far. Gong stated:
“With Demo Day, 30 Blockchain oriented startups and projects, with their respective field of applications, will be able to present their progress and development to major investors and innovators, and to explore potential entrepreneurship opportunity in China. For investment institutions and individual investors, Demo Day brings them closer to the latest endeavors in the Blockchain industry.”
Among the projects is BitSE which signed a “joined business relationship” with PwC China to bring blockchain tech to the Asian Pacific Market. They will demo Qtum, an operating system for blockchain development combined with a modularized basic chain which “absorbs the advantages of numerous public chains like Bitcoin and Ethereum.”
|
|
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4326
Merit: 3536
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
|
March 06, 2017, 08:57:13 PM |
|
how can I stop following a thread here in btc?
click "unwatch" |
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
March 06, 2017, 09:07:18 PM |
|
Have the devs explained yet why only 51% gets sold in the crowdfunding and the rest gets split over themselves and angel backers?
Even if they try to dismiss everything as FUD and want the crowdsale go on, they at least should explain the reasoning of the coin distribution.
I have asked them 3 times since beginning of February, they said they would reply within 24 hours but still haven't given an explanation.
Hi, the answer to this is in the Qtum Economy Whitepaper ( https://qtum.org/en/white-papers) We will release the Crowd Sale details on the 9th of March, and then discuss them in more detail. We will also be hosting a technical Q&A session at our Slack on Tuesday, 8pm Beijing Time (7am EST) No, that is not the answer. Ofcourse I have read the white paper and in my initial 3 enquiries you said you would give a further explanation on why the funds get allocated this way. You would give an answer within 24 hours, this was on the 10th of February, 1 month ago. Now you say the 9th of March. The crowdsale is ment to fund your project. This means that there should not be separate allocations for business development and research etc etc, these allocations should be funded from the crowdsale. So, it would seem most logical to distribute 80% in the crowdsale and the remaining 20% to the initial backers. What does the money raised in the 51% crowdsale even get used for? I would assume business development and research. No need to allocate more tokens to yourselves... Where are you now, cocksuckeroverflow? Why you no diss muleroaa's post above? Surely, he's in the same camp as I, both of us getting paid to troll this thread according to your genius insight, eh? cocksuckeroverflow, I have a great idea. Let's meetup in person where I can plow my face into your fist, mmmkay? |
|
|
|
|
Lunyr
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 120
Merit: 100
LUNYR.com - Decentralized World Knowledge Base
|
|
March 06, 2017, 09:10:47 PM |
|
Looks like an exciting project. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
March 06, 2017, 09:22:45 PM |
|
Looks like an exciting project. Good luck!
I'm definitely biased since I cofounded an Ethereum dapp startup. And that's because I believe in the long term future of Ethereum.
Hey, since Qtum is so exciting, follow them on Twitter: https://twitter.com/LunyrInc/following |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
March 07, 2017, 12:05:45 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
axrhuls
|
|
March 07, 2017, 12:19:17 AM |
|
20% for business development? Come on, it seems like bribery money, or the huge payment to those useless PR websites right? Free money to them. Immoral to make money for promoting a scam project.
|
|
|
|
|
Gleb Gamow
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
|
|
March 07, 2017, 12:42:03 AM |
|
20% for business development? Come on, it seems like bribery money, or the huge payment to those useless PR websites right? Free money to them. Immoral to make money for promoting a scam project.
The founder gets more. Qtum's founder is Patrick Dai or Steven Dai, depending on what day it is. He's the lead elephant in the room. Jordan is his handler. Caspal solves Rubik's Cube with his feet. Neil Sakr or Neil Mahi (depending on what day it is) is the professional poker player on staff. Time Markov and Toni Markov are father and son or twins, again, depending on what day it is. Star Xu of OKCoin is backing Qtum after OKCoin coin got an influx of bitcoins from Qtum to the tune of $641K+ USD stemming from Qtum's coffer amassed prior to registering its non-profit in Singapore where their charter is, restricted by law in obtaining over $5M SGD in revenue in spite of Qtum publicly declaring that they're projecting a $10M+ USD windfall during their ICO. Yes, the Qtum & DaiLi Quagmire Circus is currently on tour, soon coming to a city near you. There'll be plenty of elephants but no shovels to scoop up their shit because Team Qtum needs every shovel they can muster so to continue digging themselves a deeper hole, currently at DepthCom Twins, aiming for the MahiSakr Strata by the end of the week. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
