[ANN][PASL]-[PASCAL Lite]-[The Future is Almost Here]

[MrJaekin]

We just had our first trade at 0.00260000 BTC

You first one to send coins to exchange. you sell first. dev bad move i think. Lol. good price. hope it stay long time.

No i wasnt the who sold at that price.

Ok. I will beleive what you say. 

wasn't adaseb... it was me.

[ulfsaar]

We just had our first trade at 0.00260000 BTC

You first one to send coins to exchange. you sell first. dev bad move i think. Lol. good price. hope it stay long time.

No i wasnt the who sold at that price.

Ok. I will beleive what you say. 

wasn't adaseb... it was me.

Good people. 

Let work on listing this again on another exchange? maybe bittrex? or c-cex or kraken or nova exchange?

[fittsy]

wasn't adaseb... it was me.

Good people. 

Let work on listing this again on another exchange? maybe bittrex? or c-cex or kraken or nova exchange?

Congrats @MrJaekin!  I tried but I had dinner plans and wasn't able to get my coins up as fast.

No. Let's not rush to more exchanges. Let's take our time. Let's get some support on Cryptopia first.  We've had one trade for a total of 0.02282271 BTC.  Let's build this thing right.

We now have some buy orders online. Starting at .00001

[ulfsaar]

@cryptopia @Lafu @6436346346 @xiphon

for Cryptopia, if in case, this good coin get listed on another exchange maybe you can issue a "HOW TO" for other exchange to adopt to the deposit system you use. The payload length and how to generate payload so the problem you had with the original coin of doing manually the incompatible can be avoided. That way you can save precious manhour and other exchanges are in the same tune with you.

Just a suggestion.Thank you for listing this coin. We love you.  

to our good dev xiphon

like what adaseb said. this can resolve any type of bad deposit made by newbies like me.

Look, if you cant figure it out we can refund the listing fee.

There is no need for that.

Xiphon said on slack

If they stiil do not support encrypted payloads i can change daemon's code and all they will need is just update the daemon after the patch

This is an easy fix.

[ulfsaar]

wasn't adaseb... it was me.

Good people. 

Let work on listing this again on another exchange? maybe bittrex? or c-cex or kraken or nova exchange?

Congrats @MrJaekin!  I tried but I had dinner plans and wasn't able to get my coins up as fast.

No. Let's not rush to more exchanges. Let's take our time. Let's get some support on Cryptopia first.  We've had one trade for a total of 0.02282271 BTC.  Let's build this thing right.

We now have some buy orders online. Starting at .00001

Today we do not need it but in the succeeding weeks month we will, alongside our growth. If we have only 1 exchange, a drop of adazebs' coins then its all back to the bottom. LOL. just a thought.

[Slava_K]

New pools for PASL?

[Amph]

well i was right, correct initial value is 1000 satoshi, but this has 50 coins per block should go higher though

[Slava_K]

well i was right, correct initial value is 1000 satoshi, but this has 50 coins per block should go higher though

Min 1500 max 2000 opt 1700 sat.

[code_honesty]

well i was right, correct initial value is 1000 satoshi, but this has 50 coins per block should go higher though

Min 1500 max 2000 opt 1700 sat.

I doubt that's the price. Have faith. Believe in the hardwork of our developers. 

[adaseb]

The fix has been made and now you are able to send deposits into Cryptopia with ENCRYPTED PAYLOADS!

Enjoy!

[nightraven]

I'm new to crypto currency. I expected that it all was bases on p2p. But I can't see much p2p in connection with the mining. Only some few pools make all the coins.

The first versions of PascalCoin had a build in CPU miner so all the running wallets was mining. It was actually p2p. I really wonder why this feature first was disabled and later removed completely. I don't know if Pascal Lite ever had this miner

I think it would be much better to let the common users do the mining and to keep the pools out. That's of course just my opinion. But I really don't like that a lot of money and electricity is wasted  on pool mining. Could we somehow change the Proof of Work to something more equal and lesser wastefull?

Pascal coin had miners because no pools would take it. it was only after poloniex add pools got involved. decentalization people can do what they want, look at nanopool it's taken over majority of hashrate on some coins nothing can be done, it's their choice

survival of the fittest and nanopool and plenty of muscle just hope they don't point hash here. would be great if ocminer opened a pool for us.

If we want I am quite sure it is possible to change the mining so the pools can't do as they please. I think we can make limits e.g. how often a miner is allowed to mine a block. Or the proof of work could be replaced with something else.

[nightraven]

I'm new to crypto currency. I expected that it all was bases on p2p. But I can't see much p2p in connection with the mining. Only some few pools make all the coins.

The first versions of PascalCoin had a build in CPU miner so all the running wallets was mining. It was actually p2p. I really wonder why this feature first was disabled and later removed completely. I don't know if Pascal Lite ever had this miner

I think it would be much better to let the common users do the mining and to keep the pools out. That's of course just my opinion. But I really don't like that a lot of money and electricity is wasted  on pool mining. Could we somehow change the Proof of Work to something more equal and lesser wastefull?

Cpu mining is usually only a viable option at the very beginning of a coin . Gpuminers will be build and they are often dozens of times more powerful than cpumining. Gpu miners weren´t probably programmed/ready in the beginning of Pascalcoin but they were when PascalLite was launched, naturally.

The advantage of pools is that it reduces ones variance. If you were to mine with just one gpu for example a coin with a high global hashrate, you´d have to be very lucky to find a block and to make any coins at all. Lets say that with one gpu you´d find 1 block/week on average. It would be very possible for you to mine for a couple of months without getting rewarded at all as you might not find a block. When you mine with a pool you get some coins all the time as the pools high hashrate finds blocks a plenty and the rewards are shared among the miners.

If you want to earn coins without spending alot of electricity you might be interested in looking into staking, where you stake coins to make more coins. Ethereum is moving to proof-of-stake for example...

---------------------------

Great to check Cryptopia soon by the way!

Thanks for the suggestion. I will look into proof-of-stake and other alternative solutions.

[ulfsaar]

well i was right, correct initial value is 1000 satoshi, but this has 50 coins per block should go higher though

Min 1500 max 2000 opt 1700 sat.

Olorin your 12k coins is very scary to be on front of battle. 

[Slava_K]

well i was right, correct initial value is 1000 satoshi, but this has 50 coins per block should go higher though

Min 1500 max 2000 opt 1700 sat.

Olorin your 12k coins is very scary to be on front of battle. 

Yesss... 

[lockepi]

I'm new to crypto currency. I expected that it all was bases on p2p. But I can't see much p2p in connection with the mining. Only some few pools make all the coins.

The first versions of PascalCoin had a build in CPU miner so all the running wallets was mining. It was actually p2p. I really wonder why this feature first was disabled and later removed completely. I don't know if Pascal Lite ever had this miner

I think it would be much better to let the common users do the mining and to keep the pools out. That's of course just my opinion. But I really don't like that a lot of money and electricity is wasted  on pool mining. Could we somehow change the Proof of Work to something more equal and lesser wastefull?

Cpu mining is usually only a viable option at the very beginning of a coin . Gpuminers will be build and they are often dozens of times more powerful than cpumining. Gpu miners weren´t probably programmed/ready in the beginning of Pascalcoin but they were when PascalLite was launched, naturally.

The advantage of pools is that it reduces ones variance. If you were to mine with just one gpu for example a coin with a high global hashrate, you´d have to be very lucky to find a block and to make any coins at all. Lets say that with one gpu you´d find 1 block/week on average. It would be very possible for you to mine for a couple of months without getting rewarded at all as you might not find a block. When you mine with a pool you get some coins all the time as the pools high hashrate finds blocks a plenty and the rewards are shared among the miners.

If you want to earn coins without spending alot of electricity you might be interested in looking into staking, where you stake coins to make more coins. Ethereum is moving to proof-of-stake for example...

---------------------------

Great to check Cryptopia soon by the way!

Thanks for the suggestion. I will look into proof-of-stake and other alternative solutions.

I think another option could be masternodes

[hannusolo]

Price looks quite promising now!

What we need is bigger hashpower as well as at least one more pool, and in time more exchange will come for sure.

[cyberhacker]

i would like to buy some accounts. plz PM me.

[dedmaroz]

i would like to buy some accounts. plz PM me.

i send you 5 accounts free for you, send me your public key

[cyberhacker]

i would like to buy some accounts. plz PM me.

i send you 5 accounts free for you, send me your public key

 very nice of you!

my public key is

3GhhborCK6hBmU9QhJ2tEnTmXtwsk6is1Fn2stRAuYkuPs2QF4aM4MYVyxcorpRUrLJSp9vGsrhWFuW x3zSwjtrz4QaiB962P2da7n


thanks again.

[Slava_K]

On fairpool in pool stats periodically jumping to huge numbers (line 2TH, 500GH). Is it normal?