[NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner

[manc]

What's the best time to put yourself in ahashpool since I've seen people putting -interval 900 says increase earnings is true so, anyone done that experience?

not needed with this version just leave intervals default

if you want less switching increase -ActiveMinerGainPct 3  

-ActiveMinerGainPct (percent of advantage that active miner has over candidates in term of profit (default 3%)   this is new to v2.4  

Best Regards
Nemo

This is a brilliant add in. Thank you.

[miner14]

Just a quick question regarding the variables we can change

-Currency USD
Is GBP OK?


-Location US
UK, EU, Europe, europe



Having connection issues connecting to coinbase getting exchange rates, so though I'd check first.

[paskevic]

currently testing ver2.4 and can instantly see that reported active time of every algorithm is wrong. says 16s for each 240?sec benchmark. also "exited" time is wrong. edit: benchmarking stopped on phi as it did not have any stratum specified in it command line. sorry but this 2.4 ver should be labeled as alpha at best back to 2.3c beta.

[millsys]

hi nemosminers,

Few days ago I reported about my 6 x gtx 1070 rig crashing and not being stable. I then started with adding and testing with 1 gpu, 2 gpu's, 3 gpus and found that as soon as I add a 4th gpu CPU usage increases a lot and having lower hash-rates then with 3 gpus. During benchmarking it will crash. It doesn't matter which of the 3 remaining gpus I add on any remaining pci slot. Result seems same. I'm using a g3900 CPU and 4gb ram. Could this be the bottleneck?

At home i'm running the same motherboard (msi z270 sli plus) with 6 1080ti's with G4400 cpu and 8gb ram now running fine with currently 5 active gpu's. I actually found that on that motherboard 1 pci slot is corrupt. Will test with m2 adapter tonight to see if it will run with 6

If your cpu usage is going up, check event viewer system log for PCI-E communication errors, could be a bad riser

Hey millsys, thank you for your reply. I have tested with 3 different gpu's having each their own riser. Chance that all 3 are bad is small but will have a look at it

Had same issue, ALL RISERS WERE BAD!!!  Seriously, I've RMAd over 18 risers already.   I've had rigs seem stable for 6 cards, then move those same 6 cards into a 12 card setup and the problem rears its ugly head because you now have 12 cards screaming PCI-E errors instead of just 6 and the system starts to grind to a halt.  Replaced risers with new $6 ebay ones and problem disappeared immediately (cpu usage, event viewer errors, stability).  Ebay auction 302483050496 is the only ones I trust now, have ordered over 100 from this source and they have been rock solid.  Cheap too, saved a few bucks sending back overpriced/bad ones to Amazon/NewEgg after replacement.

Hey millsys, all thought Windows didn't show any pci-e errors I found that while I was running with only 3 cards, 1 of the remaining cards that was not running actually felt really hot and when trying to start mining on it would not work. Had to reboot and found that with that specific card cpu usage increased alot. Replaced the riser and cpu usage lowered to just +-12% instead of 60%+. Now running again with 6 cards to see how it goes, dont want to make any conclusions yet but seems those damn riser caused the issues after all... Will keep the CPU and RAM I have ordered for my next RIG I guess . Thanks again for responding, if it keeps running coming days without crashes will send you some hugs as well

Fantastic!! 

[tarzanbtc]

Any way to integrate XMR-Stak so I can mine using my Ryzen 1700 on Cryptonight?

[miner14]

currently testing ver2.4 and can instantly see that reported active time of every algorithm is wrong. says 16s for each 240?sec benchmark. also "exited" time is wrong. edit: benchmarking stopped on phi as it did not have any stratum specified in it command line. sorry but this 2.4 ver should be labeled as alpha at best back to 2.3c beta.

Active time is def wrong, is that used for anything though?
As for phi, it worked fine for me

https://i.imgur.com/MtWymd6.jpg

[mihej]

Hi, guys! Newb question, but does Nemosminer support claymore or another ethash miner?

[minerx117]

@nemos Dev: did we have to do a new benchmark with the new version or can we copy the stats folder to the new version folder?

new bench

[minerx117]

currently testing ver2.4 and can instantly see that reported active time of every algorithm is wrong. says 16s for each 240?sec benchmark. also "exited" time is wrong. edit: benchmarking stopped on phi as it did not have any stratum specified in it command line. sorry but this 2.4 ver should be labeled as alpha at best back to 2.3c beta.

thanks i know about the "reported active" showing higher results... i will fix that doesn't effect profit or hashing...

im not getting that phi error at all on my rigs... phi is benching and running great..  what pool were you trying?

Best Regards
Nemo

[paskevic]

currently testing ver2.4 and can instantly see that reported active time of every algorithm is wrong. says 16s for each 240?sec benchmark. also "exited" time is wrong. edit: benchmarking stopped on phi as it did not have any stratum specified in it command line. sorry but this 2.4 ver should be labeled as alpha at best back to 2.3c beta.

Active time is def wrong, is that used for anything though?
As for phi, it worked fine for me

https://i.imgur.com/MtWymd6.jpg

active time is for yourself like for example i get up in the morning and i can see for how long which algo has been running talking about phi maybe it isn't working as supposed on hashrefinery only. i always benchmark using hashrefinery as it reaches peak hashrate much faster than ahashpool.

[miner14]

Thanks paskevic.
And yes I was only using ahash

Is it Ok to copy over the hashrates/benchmarks to several identical machines, I'm assuming it will be.

[guytechie]

Thanks paskevic.
And yes I was only using ahash

Is it Ok to copy over the hashrates/benchmarks to several identical machines, I'm assuming it will be.

If everything is identical, I don't see why not.  Especially if you already know performance is exactly the same across the board.

For your earlier question of re-using the old version stats, probably not a good idea.  Different versions of miners, also some miners may have been dropped, maybe name was changed, etc.

It may get you out of the benchmarking hole quicker, but it may not be accurate.

[miner14]

Thanks guytechie,
That Question was from someone else, I'd always rebench if different miners were used or updated.

No my other Q was about currency and location - but meh just left it on usd and us

[minerx117]

Thanks guytechie,
That Question was from someone else, I'd always rebench if different miners were used or updated.

No my other Q was about currency and location - but meh just left it on usd and us

you can change currency to your local currency i live in New Zealand and use -Currency NZD

i have tested GPB NZD AUD USD im sure more will work...

Best Regards
Nemo

[minerx117]

What's the best time to put yourself in ahashpool since I've seen people putting -interval 900 says increase earnings is true so, anyone done that experience?

not needed with this version just leave intervals default

if you want less switching increase -ActiveMinerGainPct 3  

-ActiveMinerGainPct (percent of advantage that active miner has over candidates in term of profit (default 3%)   this is new to v2.4  

Best Regards
Nemo

This is a brilliant add in. Thank you.

No worrys

[StartxPH]

Benchmark result sometimes not consistent....?

Should I benchmark 1 vga or all vga ?

would the result matter?

im having erratic figures....

latest : 5 gtx 1080ti
   Type: NVIDIA

Miner                Algorithm           Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----                ---------           ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerAlexis78      X17            81.29 MH/s    6.052 0.00605  70.152    0.07445 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Phi           161.70 MH/s    5.005 0.00500  58.007    0.03095 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Blake2s        34.03 GH/s    4.906 0.00491  56.870    0.00014 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      C11           142.98 MH/s    4.511 0.00451  52.286    0.03155 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Sib           107.69 MH/s    4.401 0.00440  51.016    0.04087 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Lyra2RE2      346.59 MH/s    4.176 0.00418  48.409    0.01205 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Skunk         260.62 MH/s    3.816 0.00382  44.226    0.01464 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Nist5         404.51 MH/s    3.693 0.00369  42.808    0.00913 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Skein           4.57 GH/s    3.338 0.00334  38.688    0.00073 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Bitcore       122.30 MH/s    3.159 0.00316  36.617    0.02583 ahashpool-
CcminerKlaust        NeoScrypt       7.11 MH/s    2.519 0.00252  29.197    0.35411 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Hsr           101.39 MH/s    2.227 0.00223  25.819    0.02197 ahashpool-
CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan          28.40 MH/s    2.062 0.00206  23.898    0.07260 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Tribus        508.45 MH/s    1.912 0.00191  22.159    0.00376 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Lbry            2.33 GH/s    0.839 0.00084   9.727    0.00036 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      MyriadGroestl 593.35 MH/s    0.255 0.00026   2.957    0.00043 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Timetravel    201.50 MH/s    0.000 0.00000   0.000            -



FROM AHASH site:

neoscrypt   4233   9   CRC   2098   2.9 Gh/s   1%   0.48062
blake2s   5766   3   XVG   361   5.9 Th/s   1%   0.11976
xevan   3739   1   BSD   33   330.2 Mh/s   1%   0.10442
m7m   6033   1   XMG   35   1.5 Mh/s   1%   0.06681

---


Should I go with what is highest on ahash site?

[primo1983]

What's happening with this in red, it seems that our colleague above has the same problem, the hashrate down.
3 GTX 1080ti

ccminerAlexis78      Blake2s        17,28 GH/s    3,418 0,00342  39,756    0,00020 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Skunk         127,99 MH/s    2,525 0,00253  29,369    0,01973 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Lyra2RE2      170,94 MH/s    2,438 0,00244  28,350    0,01426 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Skein           2,32 GH/s    2,115 0,00212  24,600    0,00091 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Tribus        249,80 MH/s    1,993 0,00199  23,184    0,00798 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Hsr            48,31 MH/s    1,771 0,00177  20,602    0,03667 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      C11            67,65 MH/s    1,706 0,00171  19,842    0,02522 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Nist5         185,27 MH/s    1,543 0,00154  17,948    0,00833 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Phi            75,57 MH/s    1,538 0,00154  17,886    0,02035 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Bitcore        61,86 MH/s    1,518 0,00152  17,656    0,02454 ahashpool-
CcminerKlaust        NeoScrypt       3,06 MH/s    1,402 0,00140  16,304    0,45782 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      X17            44,28 MH/s    1,232 0,00123  14,333    0,02783 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Lbry            1,19 GH/s    0,370 0,00037   4,302    0,00031 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Sib            52,07 MH/s    0,356 0,00036   4,142    0,00684 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      MyriadGroestl 270,32 MH/s    0,173 0,00017   2,012    0,00064 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Timetravel    106,77 MH/s    0,00

[primo1983]

Type: NVIDIA

Miner                Algorithm           Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----                ---------           ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerAlexis78      Blake2s        17,28 GH/s    4,129 0,00413  48,310    0,00024 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Skunk         127,99 MH/s    2,519 0,00252  29,470    0,01968 ahashpool


There is something very wrong with this miner, since it always shows from 32 to 42 US $ day, but in fact what comes in is less than 20 US $ because it gets so low as it actually says there? I think there could be a difference but not so much. Please can anyone tell me why? 

[minerx117]

Type: NVIDIA

Miner                Algorithm           Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----                ---------           ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerAlexis78      Blake2s        17,28 GH/s    4,129 0,00413  48,310   0,00024 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Skunk         127,99 MH/s    2,519 0,00252  29,470    0,01968 ahashpool


There is something very wrong with this miner, since it always shows from 32 to 42 US $ day, but in fact what comes in is less than 20 US $ because it gets so low as it actually says there? I think there could be a difference but not so much. Please can anyone tell me why?  

nothing is wrong...

that is because your using startahashpool.bat (uses current estimate and 24hr estimate API too request profit) ...

try the startahashpool24hr.bat (uses last 24hour Actual API too request profit) i made it for this exact reason i did not like the estimates that MuiltipoolMiner,Sniifdog etc use

P.S v2.4.1 is being tested at the moment has been through 6x10603gb rig is currently running/testing on the 6x1080ti rig if all goes well it will be released 2nite...

v2.4.1
update: ccminerAlexis78
faster hashrate for: lyra2v2,skein,blake2s,keccak,lbry,nist,phi,veltor

Best Regards
Nemo

[primo1983]

Type: NVIDIA

Miner                Algorithm           Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----                ---------           ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerAlexis78      Blake2s        17,28 GH/s    4,129 0,00413  48,310    0,00024 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Skunk         127,99 MH/s    2,519 0,00252  29,470    0,01968 ahashpool


There is something very wrong with this miner, since it always shows from 32 to 42 US $ day, but in fact what comes in is less than 20 US $ because it gets so low as it actually says there? I think there could be a difference but not so much. Please can anyone tell me why? 

nothing is wrong at all with this miner...

that is because your using startahashpool.bat (uses current estimate and 24hr estimate API too request profit) ...

try the startahashpool24hr.bat (uses last 24hour Actual API too request profit) i made it for this exact reason i did not like the estimates that MuiltipoolMiner,Sniifdog etc use

P.S v2.4.1 is being tested at the moment has been through 6x10603gb rig is currently running/testing on the 6x1080ti rig if all goes well it will be released 2nite...

v2.4.1
update: ccminerAlexis78
faster hashrate for: lyra2v2,skein,blake2s,keccak,lbry,nist,phi,veltor

Best Regards
Nemo

OK, but the estimates could not be half that, since as I said the estimates are always between $ 32 to $ 42, I think at least I should give $ 25 to $ 27 do you agree? But it's giving 20 and sometimes less.