Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2019, 04:08:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Closing BTC Price June 17:
$0 - 2 (1.6%)
<$6,500 - 7 (5.5%)
$6,500-$6,750 - 1 (0.8%)
$6,751-$7,000 - 2 (1.6%)
$7,001-$7,250 - 3 (2.4%)
$7,251-$7,500 - 6 (4.7%)
$7,501-$7,750 - 4 (3.1%)
$7,751-$8,000 - 12 (9.4%)
$8,001-$8,250 - 13 (10.2%)
$8,251-$8,500 - 7 (5.5%)
$8,501-$8,750 - 6 (4.7%)
$8,751-$9,000 - 11 (8.7%)
$9,001,$9,250 - 12 (9.4%)
$9,251-$9,500 - 16 (12.6%)
>$9,500 - 16 (12.6%)
$20,000 - 9 (7.1%)
Total Voters: 127

Pages: « 1 ... 23035 23036 23037 23038 23039 23040 23041 23042 23043 23044 23045 23046 23047 23048 23049 23050 23051 23052 23053 23054 23055 23056 23057 23058 23059 23060 23061 23062 23063 23064 23065 23066 23067 23068 23069 23070 23071 23072 23073 23074 23075 23076 23077 23078 23079 23080 23081 23082 23083 23084 [23085] 23086 23087 23088 23089 23090 23091 23092 23093 23094 23095 23096 23097 23098 23099 23100 23101 23102 23103 23104 23105 23106 23107 23108 23109 23110 23111 23112 23113 23114 23115 23116 23117 23118 23119 23120 23121 23122 23123 23124 23125 23126 23127 23128 23129 23130 23131 23132 23133 23134 23135 ... 24218 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 21225011 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (64 posts by 15 users deleted.)
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 2206


Be a bank.


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 03:47:27 PM


https://twitter.com/thegrugq/status/1105440265664290816
Bitcoin Poker 3.0
The Largest Bitcoin Poker Site
Bad Beat Jackpot Available
No Limit Texas Hold'em Cash Games And Tournaments
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1560787716
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560787716

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560787716
Reply with quote  #2

1560787716
Report to moderator
1560787716
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560787716

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560787716
Reply with quote  #2

1560787716
Report to moderator
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2044
Merit: 2172


It's over 9000!


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 03:55:28 PM

What are the odds that the police had the app designed/produced specifically to entrap marijuana users?
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 2206


Be a bank.


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 04:19:54 PM

Yup almost everything's a hangout nowadays.
ivomm
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Activity: 701
Merit: 305


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 04:23:41 PM

Which site gives the accurate volume of all traded bitcoins (not USD but only BTC's, including Binance and excluding China's fake volume)?
Ibian
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1181



View Profile
March 13, 2019, 04:39:01 PM

What are the odds that the police had the app designed/produced specifically to entrap marijuana users?
Pretty fucking high?
jojo69
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1414
Merit: 1758


no FOMO


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 05:06:52 PM

What are the odds that the police had the app designed/produced specifically to entrap marijuana users?

I'd put that in the 90th percentile.

Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1220



View Profile
March 13, 2019, 05:13:21 PM
Last edit: March 13, 2019, 05:59:44 PM by Biodom

House in Australia-being auctioned in crypto:
https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-casuarina-129081390

Not sure if any dolphins would qualify, but whales would do, probably  Grin

On a separate issue:

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1341


UNLEASH THE FURY!


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 05:52:21 PM

Interesting the word "Bitcoin" was never in it...
bitcoinPsycho
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 686
Merit: 220


$100,000 BTC in one hour🍄💊


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 05:54:09 PM

No, I likely wouldn't. To the extent that it may mean what you are implying*, it would mean I have failed as a father. For not instilling a foundation upon which she might lead a happy, fulfilling, and helpful life.

Relevance to my observation that dishonest and dishonorable opponents are once again using falsehoods to try to taint a coin by association? None.


Your relentless defensiveness and apologism for creepy people and aspects of things you have no influence over is really bleedin' weird.
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 978


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 06:00:34 PM
Merited by Biodom (1), JayJuanGee (1)

House in Australia-being auctioned in crypto:
https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-casuarina-129081390

Not sure if any dolphins would qualify, but whales would do, probably  Grin

On a separate issue:

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant  bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.

I would have to say 86.89% unlikely, 10.11% possible; but not likely and 3% likely. I would further add that I think after this cycle ends there is a good chance the next cycle will be much shorter as in the 2013-2014 run up/dip/run up.
W

#stronghands'19
VB1001
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 596


"Four Wheel Drive"


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 06:32:04 PM

House Lawmakers Pass Bill Targeting Bitcoin and Crypto Asset Use by Terrorists

New legislation affecting Bitcoin and crypto just passed the US House of Representatives. The FinCen Improvement Act, introduced on February 27 by representative Jennifer Wexton (D-VA), passed the House on Monday and was received in the Senate on Tuesday.

https://dailyhodl.com/2019/03/13/house-lawmakers-pass-bill-targeting-bitcoin-and-crypto-asset-use-by-terrorists/

They do not know what to do to have more control in BTC.

This rabble shop and sell with undeclared fiat money, not with Bitcoin.
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 978


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 06:44:33 PM

Good afternoon all.

Increasing support has developed around the 0.382 fib seeming to indicate we might try another run at the $4k resistance level. #dyor
1h


Slow sideways ladder until the end of the month.
4


For all of you waiting for a lower low...scheduling a -20%+ drop between now and the end of the year is becoming increasingly difficult in my mind. I am not saying it cant happen, just that it is becoming less probable each day.
D

#strongerhands'19
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 2206


Be a bank.


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 06:51:00 PM
Merited by Raja_MBZ (1)

https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/bcause-the-worlds-first-fullstack-cryptocurrency-ecosystem-to-launch-on-nasdaq-market-technology-20190313-00218
-more people from away
-stock up now!
JohnUser
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 708


View Profile WWW
March 13, 2019, 07:02:53 PM


Our way isn't to move them off ?
AlcoHoDL
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 550
Merit: 156


Addicted to HoDLing!


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 07:16:31 PM
Merited by GrosWesh (1), nanobtc (1)

I didn't even know Calvin Ayre before viewing his photo with the underage girls... What a sick f*ck!

I quickly browsed through his Twitter account. There are literally dozens of similar photos of him with little girls, mostly of Asian and African origin. In some of these photos you can also see Craig Wright, Roger Ver and other members of the BCash / BCH and BSV teams. Wright & Ver are also featured in several other posts.

Calvin Ayre is clearly associated with, and heavily promotes BSV/BCH.

It just goes to show what sick minds are behind those shitcoins...
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1791


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 07:30:27 PM

House in Australia-being auctioned in crypto:
https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-casuarina-129081390

Not sure if any dolphins would qualify, but whales would do, probably  Grin

On a separate issue:

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.


Certainly, I am NOT opposed to attempting to figure out longer term waves of BTC price and assigning probabilities to various scenarios, and to me there seems to b almost no great chance that anyone (even whales) can predict exact BTC price waves or even manipulate the price to such an extent to actually cause the wave that they would like to happen, so in that regard, a scenario in which BTC price approaches ATH but only gets within a 10% to 25% range of it and does not breach it remains decently likely, perhaps within a 30% or so arena. 

Of course, the overall sentiment remains that when momentum bring BTC within a 10% to 20% range of the previous ATH, then momentum is going to bring it over such previous ATH, and likely surpass such previous ATH by at least 50%, and that common sentiment drives what actually ends up happening and causes any alternative scenario to be really capitally intensive to carry out, so that is why I suggest 30% as the highest of such probability, but likely, a realistic probability would be below 15%.

So, even though the odds are against breaking back down after getting so close to the previous ATH, there is going to b a whole hell of a lot of FUD spreading and misinformation that actually describes such low probability scenario as if it is much more likely to happen than it is.. and that is likely to be a dominant narrative that tries (and will be somewhat successful) to trick HODLers out of some or all of their coins.
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 978


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 07:48:54 PM

-snip-
On a separate issue:

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.


Certainly, I am NOT opposed to attempting to figure out longer term waves of BTC price and assigning probabilities to various scenarios, and to me there seems to b almost no great chance that anyone (even whales) can predict exact BTC price waves or even manipulate the price to such an extent to actually cause the wave that they would like to happen, so in that regard, a scenario in which BTC price approaches ATH but only gets within a 10% to 25% range of it and does not breach it remains decently likely, perhaps within a 30% or so arena. 

Of course, the overall sentiment remains that when momentum bring BTC within a 10% to 20% range of the previous ATH, then momentum is going to bring it over such previous ATH, and likely surpass such previous ATH by at least 50%, and that common sentiment drives what actually ends up happening and causes any alternative scenario to be really capitally intensive to carry out, so that is why I suggest 30% as the highest of such probability, but likely, a realistic probability would be below 15%.

So, even though the odds are against breaking back down after getting so close to the previous ATH, there is going to b a whole hell of a lot of FUD spreading and misinformation that actually describes such low probability scenario as if it is much more likely to happen than it is.. and that is likely to be a dominant narrative that tries (and will be somewhat successful) to trick HODLers out of some or all of their coins.

So you would describe the possibility as somewhere between 15% and 3% of a pull back from the breaching the next ATH? or between 30% and 15%?  or between 30% and 3%? You might be able to deduce why I am asking for something more specific. The ranges you postulate are fairly broad imho and I would really like to put you more on the spot with posting such a prediction.   Smiley
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1220



View Profile
March 13, 2019, 07:49:00 PM

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant  bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.

I would have to say 86.89% unlikely, 10.11% possible; but not likely and 3% likely. I would further add that I think after this cycle ends there is a good chance the next cycle will be much shorter as in the 2013-2014 run up/dip/run up.
W

#stronghands'19

Does the intercept of the exponent and logarithmic regression curves represents the likely future peak (at around 80K)?
jbreher
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2408
Merit: 1275


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 07:53:02 PM

No, I likely wouldn't. To the extent that it may mean what you are implying*, it would mean I have failed as a father. For not instilling a foundation upon which she might lead a happy, fulfilling, and helpful life.

Relevance to my observation that dishonest and dishonorable opponents are once again using falsehoods to try to taint a coin by association? None.


Your relentless defensiveness and apologism for creepy people and aspects of things you have no influence over is really bleedin' weird.

If you had a point you wished to make, it did not make it into your post.
Toxic2040
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 978


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 08:07:31 PM

Does the intercept of the exponent and logarithmic regression curves represents the likely future peak (at around 80K)?

That is how I am interpreting the data though I would like to note that I tend to be very conservative in most of my projections. I am a firm believer in the hope for the best, prepare for the worst mentality.
Pages: « 1 ... 23035 23036 23037 23038 23039 23040 23041 23042 23043 23044 23045 23046 23047 23048 23049 23050 23051 23052 23053 23054 23055 23056 23057 23058 23059 23060 23061 23062 23063 23064 23065 23066 23067 23068 23069 23070 23071 23072 23073 23074 23075 23076 23077 23078 23079 23080 23081 23082 23083 23084 [23085] 23086 23087 23088 23089 23090 23091 23092 23093 23094 23095 23096 23097 23098 23099 23100 23101 23102 23103 23104 23105 23106 23107 23108 23109 23110 23111 23112 23113 23114 23115 23116 23117 23118 23119 23120 23121 23122 23123 23124 23125 23126 23127 23128 23129 23130 23131 23132 23133 23134 23135 ... 24218 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!