Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[fillippone]

Stock to flow is irrelevant for LTC.

You people are the most dishonest, retarded, fucking scammers I've ever seen in my entire life.  

<...>

Forced to reply as you are calling me in a way I don't like.

If only you would use some of your time to actually read about the model (plenty of places to do that, one of those being here), instead of repeating the same old story, you would understand why this model is not applicable to Litecoin.

[goldkingcoiner]

Lauda, while you're here, since you provide the invaluable resource of angry, cat lady demographic, could you give us your viewpoint on the following subject?  A civilization is incapable of functioning with divorce rates at what they are, and women initiate 70% of them, while - here's the kicker - COLLEGE educated women initiate 90% of divorces.  Isn't this proof that educating women is completely pointless and causes nothing but instability?  

One might attempt to correlate this number with the hypergamous nature of women, and that giving them a way to accumulate wealth and power leaves them with no viable way to practice hypergamy since they have no viable hypergamous mate to marry up to, thus giving women no reason to exist.

Do you know about the mouse utopia experiment of John B. Calhoun? What happens to mice in a closed space with all the food they could want? As population grows, birthrate starts falling to almost 0. Same thing can be applied to humans, with Earth as our closed off space.

Evolutionary traits are kicking in to stop overpopulation. All natural. Might drive us to extinction, might not.

[realr0ach]

Stock to flow is irrelevant for LTC.

You people are the most dishonest, retarded, fucking scammers I've ever seen in my entire life.  It's not possible for this 'stock to flow' nonsense to be completely invalid for Litecoin and every other coin and work ONLY for Bitcoin. They're all the same 'asset' class - I use the term "asset" extremely loosely because imaginary timestamps are not an asset - so it either has to work for all of them or none of them.  It obviously works for none of them because a stock to flow model only works on physical commodity resources humans actually need with some type of inelastic demand.

Forced to reply as you are calling me in a way I don't like.

If only you would use some of your time to actually read about the model (plenty of places to do that, one of those being here), instead of repeating the same old story, you would understand why this model is not applicable to Litecoin.

No, you're parroting a talking point that you did not create yourself and have no idea how this talking point is even supposed to work because you think pushing this propaganda will be beneficial to your bottom line when there's no rationale whatsoever behind it.  You, Micgoossens, and several other cavemen in the thread do this, constantly parroting bogus shit from Twitter pump and dump scammers.

What is your rationale for why 'stock to flow' would work on Bitcoin when it doesn't work on ANY other digital crapcoin?  You don't have one.  You're either required to be a dishonest scammer or negro-level IQ to not be able to realize scarcity in vacuum for scarcity's sake is meaningless.  The idea of stock to flow requires pairing scarcity with inelastic demand.  To have inelastic demand requires being an actual physical resource humans need, not an IMAGINARY timestamp.  TIMESTAMPS are not in short supply ANYWHERE.

Stock to flow doesn't work on things like Garbage Pail Kid trading cards or digital shitcoins because as the price rises, there is no inelastic demand forcing the item to still be bought; demand has an inverse correlation to price in the case of these instruments.  Digital shitcoins are not the unit of account of anything, nor are they resources.

[Lauda]

-snip-

The conclusion from that is: The existence of men is pointless and will soon not be necessary. Our future AI overlords will realize this, and shall start exterminating males as soon as the tables turn. Don't try creating arguments mr. r0ach when your IQ is even challenged by early monkey specimen.

[realr0ach]

Lauda, while you're here, since you provide the invaluable resource of angry, cat lady demographic, could you give us your viewpoint on the following subject?  A civilization is incapable of functioning with divorce rates at what they are, and women initiate 70% of them, while - here's the kicker - COLLEGE educated women initiate 90% of divorces.  Isn't this proof that educating women is completely pointless and causes nothing but instability?

One might attempt to correlate this number with the hypergamous nature of women, and that giving them a way to accumulate wealth and power leaves them with no viable way to practice hypergamy since they have no viable hypergamous mate to marry up to, thus giving women no reason to exist.

The conclusion from that is: The existence of men is pointless and will soon not be necessary. Our future AI overlords will realize this, and shall start exterminating males as soon as the tables turn. Don't try creating arguments mr. r0ach when your IQ is even challenged by early monkey specimen.

Your statement overlooks the inconvenient fact that traditionally the main reason women seek out men and marriage in general is entirely an insurance policy/safety net.  The man was replaced by big government as that safety net, hence women's now instant flight to divorce at the first sign of minor inconvenience or non-asymmetrical benefit in their favor.  

For this paradigm to remain true, big government (which women always selfishly vote for in their own interest) would need to not only continue in current form, but get even larger due to women as a whole being a net negative contributor to a nation over the course of their lives.  In other words, if the man is not footing the bill, the woman's net negative economic contribution to the nation would attempt to be extracted from an ever-expanding state.  But this ignores the fact no matter what taxes are set to, the state only ever manages to pull out 20% from it's serfs.  So you're already at 'peak-state' and 'peak-women'.

[_javi_]

It has been accepted that 2017 bullrun was cancelled by CME and co, with their shorting tools.

Then, all the parabolas using that 2017 peak should be invalidated.
It could have been way higher..
And "they" could cancel next bullrun.. or not.

Funny interpolations.. trying to predict such an emotional market.


To be honest, nobody knows what the honey badger is doing next, neither when nor how high it could climb ...

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Looks like we might dip below $9,000. I don’t have any spare fiat left so not going to buy the dip if we go below. Planning to buy 0.25BTC next week, let’s see where the price goes  

[realr0ach]

It has been accepted that 2017 bullrun was cancelled by CME and co, with their shorting tools.

Then, all the parabolas using that 2017 peak should be invalidated.

You base your premise on numerous false assumptions and pretend the same people weren't working both sides of the trade.  Goldman Sachs and other traditional scam entities were deep into the digital shitcoin market around six months to a year before the Ethereum pump and dump scam launch, which Goldman Sachs bought most of the premine for.  So the Jewish scam financiers were one of the reasons the price went up in the first place.  They were pumping the garbage they owned trying to dump it on people at higher prices.  

After dumping all their garbage they might have taken some shorts out, I have no idea.  But unless those shorts were taken out on an exchange that actually settles in Bitcoin instead of dollars, it would have no actual effect on real Bitcoin prices without also attempting to manipulate the underlying market.  So, no, "Donald Trump" is not the cause of Bitcoin imploding.  But entities like Goldman Sachs were the cause of the rise and fall.

[_javi_]

Looks like we might dip below $9,000. I don’t have any spare fiat left so not going to buy the dip if we go below. Planning to buy 0.25BTC next week, let’s see where the price goes 

So far we are bouncing nicely on 9k.. until some beartard unloads big.

Aaaanything could happen!

go BTC go!!

[ssmc2]

Let's get this CME gap coverage over with then get back in bull mode.

[realr0ach]

Bitcoin is looking to overthrow women as the biggest form of malinvestment.  Trollgoossens and LFC_Bitcoin have decided to all-in on both to make sure they don't miss out on whoever the winner is.

[jojo69]

Well, The Bruce is home, sans testicles, and the great wheel of human feline relations continues.

He is doing quite well.

[goldkingcoiner]

Looks like we might dip below $9,000. I don’t have any spare fiat left so not going to buy the dip if we go below. Planning to buy 0.25BTC next week, let’s see where the price goes  

I am going to buy a little bit

My buyzone is 8.8-8.5k

[lightfoot]

Do you know about the mouse utopia experiment of John B. Calhoun? What happens to mice in a closed space with all the food they could want? As population grows, birthrate starts falling to almost 0. Same thing can be applied to humans, with Earth as our closed off space.

Evolutionary traits are kicking in to stop overpopulation. All natural. Might drive us to extinction, might not.

Just took a trip through North Dakota and Montana: There is so much open space in the US that overcrowding will not be a problem. I sem to recall the drop in birth rate is natural when one's kids stop dying in childhood.

[realr0ach]

Just took a trip through North Dakota and Montana: There is so much open space in the US that overcrowding will not be a problem.

#1)  The entire planet isn't supposed to be a parking lot

#2)  Free space is useless unless you can prevent the dindus from following you there

[Elwar]

Price always drops at the end of the month. We just need to survive a few more days of low prices.

[Elwar]

Do you know about the mouse utopia experiment of John B. Calhoun? What happens to mice in a closed space with all the food they could want? As population grows, birthrate starts falling to almost 0. Same thing can be applied to humans, with Earth as our closed off space.

Evolutionary traits are kicking in to stop overpopulation. All natural. Might drive us to extinction, might not.

Just took a trip through North Dakota and Montana: There is so much open space in the US that overcrowding will not be a problem. I sem to recall the drop in birth rate is natural when one's kids stop dying in childhood.

There is also 3 times more hurricane free ocean than all habitable land in the world.

We have quite the space to expand.

Before space.

[realr0ach]

We have quite the space to expand.

Since any normal white person can look around and notice the government, media, educational, banking, and judicial system are completely criminal (occupied by Jews), and civilization is imploding due to this, none of them are expanding anywhere.  Why have a bunch of kids that will just be slaves for Jewish psychopaths?  The only people expanding are 60 IQ negroes, 80 IQ Mexicans, and single mother criminal factories.  

That's one indirect reason civilizations thought the institution of marriage was important in the past.  If you force people to get married to have kids, it limits how much the bad genes can reproduce, since the good, K-selection genes don't have many kids, otherwise you are overwhelmed with trash who attempt to externalize the cost of the kids to society to reproduce out of control.  Without a stable 1:1 institution of marriage, you have things happening like one woman having 5 kids from different fathers who all turn out to be felons, or one guy with crap genes marrying four women with crap genes and having 17 kids with crap genes flooding the world with garbage:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1721666/

[lightfoot]

We have quite the space to expand.

Before space.

Well, we shouldn't rule out space. Roach can go to space. He can colonize Uranus.

[jojo69]

I hear this shit all the time.  You guys are smarter than this.

It is not about having enough space to warehouse the humans.  It is not even about having enough resources to keep them fed and docile in their boxes.

It is about having enough un-fucked-up, non-human biosphere out there to make it worth living.