Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[adamstgBit]

In any case, the next price movement gets very clear to us based on the in depth analysis. And without bragging..: the outperformance vs. buy and hold tells the story well http://bullbearanalytics.com/bullbear-analytics/

not hard to beat buy and hold during a bear market.
still 1500% is impressive
probably much better than following my free bitmovements thread, you get what you pay for!

Bitcoin Price Goes Parabolic, But Why?
http://bullbearanalytics.com/2015/11/06/bitcoin-price-goes-parabolic/

...

Lastly, Gavin and Mike are back at it once again using scare tactics and fear mongering as a last gasp for the survival of their ill-fated BitcoinXT project. Ignore this noise, they are acting like spoiled children that didn’t get their way. Too bad, kids, you have already lost.

I like that  Gavin and Mike chose to take a proactive role in the block size debate, and i also like the way they went about circumventing the dev's power structure with this Forked software.

I would totally be behind them, was it not for the extremest left side implementation they went for, also throwing in shit tons of other "enchantments" while trying to gain support of their radical blocksizelimit position killed them IMO.

and yes at this point them pressing the issue feels like the whining of 5 year olds.

[adamstgBit]

In any case, the next price movement gets very clear to us based on the in depth analysis. And without bragging..: the outperformance vs. buy and hold tells the story well http://bullbearanalytics.com/bullbear-analytics/

wait, dont tell me ... up?

Don't worry, he's not going to tell you...unless you pay him at least $29.95.

its gata be down

you need to be a little nutty to think further up is sustainable in the short term.

altho 380 does sound about right considering 250-500

[ChartBuddy]

Coin

Explanation

[ImI]

if blocksize gets an issue it will be solved in 24h

its not a big deal, more a question of details

[adamstgBit]

if blocksize gets an issue it will be solved in 24h

its not a big deal, more a question of details

ideialy there wouldnt be this "blocksize" issue in the first place

but there is

so how do we deal with it

dealing with it by ignoring it until it actually start to mess shit up and then saying " that's fine! bitcoin was meant to be slow and costly, using the holly ledger is a privilege! " is wrong.

on ther other hand gavins proposal is equally ridiculous to the other extream.

i'm confident devs will implement a happy middle ground

[ynef]

like a clockwork

330$ is looming 

Although we did create a slightly calmer tunnel.

[mr angry]

In any case, the next price movement gets very clear to us based on the in depth analysis. And without bragging..: the outperformance vs. buy and hold tells the story well http://bullbearanalytics.com/bullbear-analytics/

wait, dont tell me ... up?

Don't worry, he's not going to tell you...unless you pay him at least $29.95.

Why does he want $29.95 off people if he's so good at making money trading Bitcoin? Anyone that good's time would be so valuable they would make more money trading than wasting any of their time running an analytics website. Maybe he's charging $29.95 out of altruism.

Another question, why is he charging $29.95 instead of $30.05?

[AmazonStuff]

In any case, the next price movement gets very clear to us based on the in depth analysis. And without bragging..: the outperformance vs. buy and hold tells the story well http://bullbearanalytics.com/bullbear-analytics/

wait, dont tell me ... up?

Don't worry, he's not going to tell you...unless you pay him at least $29.95.

its gata be down

you need to be a little nutty to think further up is sustainable in the short term.

altho 380 does sound about right considering 250-500

I agree, for example this micro-rally volume was 2x smaller than needed in order for growth to be sustainable. Actually I can freely say that even that volume spike, we would not pass $250 if there was no OkCoin manipulation.

[bButtercup]

i'm confident devs will implement a happy middle ground

As long as they keep the NSA backdoor and doomsday code, who cares what happens to the block size?

[adamstgBit]

In any case, the next price movement gets very clear to us based on the in depth analysis. And without bragging..: the outperformance vs. buy and hold tells the story well http://bullbearanalytics.com/bullbear-analytics/

wait, dont tell me ... up?

Don't worry, he's not going to tell you...unless you pay him at least $29.95.

Why does he want $29.95 off people if he's so good at making money trading Bitcoin? Anyone that good's time would be so valuable they would make more money trading than wasting any of their time running an analytics website. Maybe he's charging $29.95 out of altruism.

Another question, why is he charging $29.95 instead of $30.05?

someone's gotta do it.
what the world wants the world gets

[ssmc2]

If we don't bounce off 360 looks like we're headed to 320-330. Hopefully that provides final support.

[Hyperjacked]

like a clockwork

330$ is looming 

Although we did create a slightly calmer tunnel.

PPL have targets that are always too low or too high and does not reach the level 95% of the time!

It's a game of inches after the volatility is over until we consolidate,trade sideways and meet the vwap on the zeroblock! Barring any insane btc news it will be onward and upward or a quick death spiral into the hall of shame!

And you didn't have to pay anything for that...

[bButtercup]

If we don't bounce off 360 looks like we're headed to 320-330. Hopefully that provides final support.

Down down down. As if someone knew something...

[SnokkomBTC]

3 more hours and the USMS will notify the winning bidder that his bid has been selected.

including the price per bitcoin?

[hdbuck]

if blocksize gets an issue it will be solved in 24h

its not a big deal, more a question of details

ideialy there wouldnt be this "blocksize" issue in the first place

but there is

so how do we deal with it

dealing with it by ignoring it until it actually start to mess shit up and then saying " that's fine! bitcoin was meant to be slow and costly, using the holly ledger is a privilege! " is wrong.

on ther other hand gavins proposal is equally ridiculous to the other extream.

i'm confident devs will implement a happy middle ground

blocksize is not ignored, i think now everybody is aware there is a blocksize.. have you check tx/s ?! only 7!!    

anyway, whether blocksize being an 'issue' to deal with (now?) is on the other hand far from being justified, quantified.

however, im confident active (and everybody is free to join, if technically talented - and not so much of a reddit guru otoh would be a plus) core devs are researching it, analysing data, and studying effective 'scalability' solutions to be tested and implemented in due time and hopefully without tearing apart the fundamental properties that makes bitcoin special (secure&trustless&permissionless).

now if only the chief-scientist - whatever this means - and his google acolyte could fork off, like definitely, so grown ups could focus on making bitcoin stronger, not fancier.

[fonsie]

3 more hours and the USMS will notify the winning bidder that his bid has been selected.

including the price per bitcoin?

I think the winning bidder has quite a good idea what his bid was, no need for the USMS to remind him.

[adamstgBit]

In any case, the next price movement gets very clear to us based on the in depth analysis. And without bragging..: the outperformance vs. buy and hold tells the story well http://bullbearanalytics.com/bullbear-analytics/

wait, dont tell me ... up?

Don't worry, he's not going to tell you...unless you pay him at least $29.95.

its gata be down

you need to be a little nutty to think further up is sustainable in the short term.

altho 380 does sound about right considering 250-500

I agree, for example this micro-rally volume was 2x smaller than needed in order for growth to be sustainable. Actually I can freely say that even that volume spike, we would not pass $250 if there was no OkCoin manipulation.

volume looks good, altho i do think we will dive lower ( testing 299 kinda likely ), I do expect we'll come out of this above 260 probably above 360 and in a bull market.
also note that there was a big sustained volume increases all of sept. and oct.

things are looking gr8, but ya spiking to 500 was just nutty and obviously manipulation played a role.

[Tzupy]

I swear I didn't know, actually had plans with a long up to 410$, but when it run out of steam I closed it at 390$.
Still I believed there was time to go out and buy some snacks and juice, when I got back the market was already crashing, without usual warnings.
So I did what a bear has got to do, shorted at 382$, now waiting for 340$.

[ynef]

3 more hours and the USMS will notify the winning bidder that his bid has been selected.

including the price per bitcoin?

I think the winning bidder has quite a good idea what his bid was, no need for the USMS to remind him.

11 people were bidders and nobody knows (unless the bidders work together secretly)

[fonsie]

3 more hours and the USMS will notify the winning bidder that his bid has been selected.

including the price per bitcoin?

I think the winning bidder has quite a good idea what his bid was, no need for the USMS to remind him.

11 people were bidders and nobody knows (unless the bidders work together secretly)

I mean that he knows the price of his bid, so if he wins, he knows the winning price, so no need for the USMS to tell him what the winning price is.

including the price per bitcoin?