JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 10833
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
January 12, 2016, 12:02:35 PM |
|
My inner bull isn´t happy with this price action. It makes me think in an incoming dumpage.
I think we just jumped over $450 too quickly for psychological reasons. Our run up to this price was usually $10 at a time for the most part. So $440s is good. With relatively shrinking trade volume in recent weeks, it does kind of make a person wonder what's going on in the background, and are we being set up for some kind of downward correction or is this just "natural" market movement? When the volume shrinks for so long then the feeling begins to become price acceptance? I'm just trying to figure out if there could be some kind of trickery happening in the background? Or am I inviting trolls?
|
|
|
|
Elwar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
|
January 12, 2016, 12:09:26 PM |
|
My inner bull isn´t happy with this price action. It makes me think in an incoming dumpage.
I think we just jumped over $450 too quickly for psychological reasons. Our run up to this price was usually $10 at a time for the most part. So $440s is good. With relatively shrinking trade volume in recent weeks, it does kind of make a person wonder what's going on in the background, and are we being set up for some kind of downward correction or is this just "natural" market movement? When the volume shrinks for so long then the feeling begins to become price acceptance? I'm just trying to figure out if there could be some kind of trickery happening in the background? Or am I inviting trolls? The $430 price held strong for several weeks. There's no reason to believe that the price would go below that.
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
January 12, 2016, 12:11:20 PM |
|
i had to reindex the blockchain.. it took more than 48 hours for my pc:
64G memory intel 6-core i7-3960x extreme edition Asus rampage motherboard ssd boot drive three disk striped <<<<<<<<<<<< blockchain lives here
ridiculous my pc takes that long to index blockchain . yeah bitcoin is uba... i have recorded this bullshiat.
i have not even fired up armoury.. it has to go through its index bullshiat too.. i'm gonna record it.
It happened to me last week, my PC froze & I had to turn it off at the socket. Thought I'd lost all the bitcoin's I have stored in Core. Balance reset to 0, thought my life was over After literally 2.5 days of reindexing balance was restored to correct amount. They really need to sort this shit in one of the next updates. Both of you need to stop using a bitcoin node as a wallet. Use electrum, copay or a trezor for that. This is safe, light and easy, just the opposite of what a node is. Bitcoin-qt is intended to be used as a desktop wallet otherwise there would be no gui or wallet functionality.
|
|
|
|
flagpara
|
|
January 12, 2016, 12:11:26 PM |
|
I see a lot of chaos coming and this strange stability always puts me on alarm mode. My deepest concern is how things move damn fast in the bitcoin trading world: I don't want to ask myself the question "Where did it all go wrong?"
I fucking agree! People are always here claiming "it's going to the moon" but the truth is nobody understand a thing about btc trading, too many people have too much influence on it. It's totally unpredictable. I sold at 450 just because I can't stand the idea of btc going back to the 300; without a reason. And people saying "it's not possible" are just idiots, is there any reason why the price suddenly skyrocketed at 450? No, well it can crash without any more reason! Hahahaha More of your amorphous attempts at FUD spreading Yeah. There's no reason bitcoin prices went up to mid $400s and just floating in this price territory for a couple of months. Just amazingly without any reason whatsoever. 😳😳😳🤓🤓🤓 You know there is no difference between "no reason" and "not having a clue about the reason". From a personnal perspective it is the same result. Now if you have the reasons, please go on and spread your knowledge. I tried to open a topic about this question but the thread was invaded by people like you insulting me and going on a rempage "you're just saying shit about bitcoin". Lots of people who invested in btc are not even able to discuss about its legitimicy, cause you don't have the right to suggest that btc has flaws or that maybe the price isn't right and should be a bit lower, no you only praise for a rise. That's all what you have the right to do If there is a reason, then go on and give it, I would really like to read it and if you're convincing I'll even buy btc again. But the only thing i found was people like you, claiming FUD and insulting. Btc community in fact... Insults and scams, what a charming currency.
|
|
|
|
Andre#
|
|
January 12, 2016, 12:24:22 PM |
|
It happened to me last week, my PC froze & I had to turn it off at the socket. Thought I'd lost all the bitcoin's I have stored in Core. Balance reset to 0, thought my life was over After literally 2.5 days of reindexing balance was restored to correct amount. They really need to sort this shit in one of the next updates. There are no bitcoins on your computer, only keys. And you really should have backups of those keys.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 10833
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
January 12, 2016, 12:27:05 PM |
|
I see a lot of chaos coming and this strange stability always puts me on alarm mode. My deepest concern is how things move damn fast in the bitcoin trading world: I don't want to ask myself the question "Where did it all go wrong?"
I fucking agree! People are always here claiming "it's going to the moon" but the truth is nobody understand a thing about btc trading, too many people have too much influence on it. It's totally unpredictable. I sold at 450 just because I can't stand the idea of btc going back to the 300; without a reason. And people saying "it's not possible" are just idiots, is there any reason why the price suddenly skyrocketed at 450? No, well it can crash without any more reason! Hahahaha More of your amorphous attempts at FUD spreading Yeah. There's no reason bitcoin prices went up to mid $400s and just floating in this price territory for a couple of months. Just amazingly without any reason whatsoever. 😳😳😳🤓🤓🤓 You know there is no difference between "no reason" and "not having a clue about the reason". From a personnal perspective it is the same result. Now if you have the reasons, please go on and spread your knowledge. I tried to open a topic about this question but the thread was invaded by people like you insulting me and going on a rempage "you're just saying shit about bitcoin". Lots of people who invested in btc are not even able to discuss about its legitimicy, cause you don't have the right to suggest that btc has flaws or that maybe the price isn't right and should be a bit lower, no you only praise for a rise. That's all what you have the right to do If there is a reason, then go on and give it, I would really like to read it and if you're convincing I'll even buy btc again. But the only thing i found was people like you, claiming FUD and insulting. Btc community in fact... Insults and scams, what a charming currency. Don't be more of a goofball than you already are by engaging in further shittalk. There is a difference between no reason for something and not knowing a reason. The burden is not on me to respond to your bullshit vagueness, but instead for you to make your assertions more meaningful and less vague. When you open up a topic and make assertions, the burden is on you to substantiate and/or explain what you are saying not on others who point out your vague bullshit. Regarding the remainder of your moaning and complaining about me, you seem to be getting off topic, and instead you should probably consider taking responsibility over the contents of your posts rather than attempting to blame others for being "too mean" to you and disallowing your free expression, blah, blah, blah.
|
|
|
|
madmat
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 12, 2016, 12:32:17 PM |
|
i had to reindex the blockchain.. it took more than 48 hours for my pc:
64G memory intel 6-core i7-3960x extreme edition Asus rampage motherboard ssd boot drive three disk striped <<<<<<<<<<<< blockchain lives here
ridiculous my pc takes that long to index blockchain . yeah bitcoin is uba... i have recorded this bullshiat.
i have not even fired up armoury.. it has to go through its index bullshiat too.. i'm gonna record it.
It happened to me last week, my PC froze & I had to turn it off at the socket. Thought I'd lost all the bitcoin's I have stored in Core. Balance reset to 0, thought my life was over After literally 2.5 days of reindexing balance was restored to correct amount. They really need to sort this shit in one of the next updates. Both of you need to stop using a bitcoin node as a wallet. Use electrum, copay or a trezor for that. This is safe, light and easy, just the opposite of what a node is. Bitcoin-qt is was intended to be used as a desktop wallet otherwise there would be no gui or wallet functionality. Fixed it for you. That was true in 2010.
|
|
|
|
flagpara
|
|
January 12, 2016, 12:41:17 PM |
|
Don't be more of a goofball than you already are by engaging in further shittalk. There is a difference between no reason for something and not knowing a reason. The burden is not on me to respond to your bullshit vagueness, but instead for you to make your assertions more meaningful and less vague. When you open up a topic and make assertions, the burden is on you to substantiate and/or explain what you are saying not on others who point out your vague bullshit. Regarding the remainder of your moaning and complaining about me, you seem to be getting off topic, and instead you should probably consider taking responsibility over the contents of your posts rather than attempting to blame others for being "too mean" to you and disallowing your free expression, blah, blah, blah. Dude, where did you see me crying for help and freedom? Just explaining that your post is not only useless but also insulting, which makes you a pure and noble asshole And if you don't want to give reason for this price rise then... What is the point of your post? You're here only to say "ahahah you're shitalking"? Well go on if you want, I just tried to give you the opportunity to actually SAY something. But if you don't mind being totally useless in a debate, feel free to continue
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 12, 2016, 01:01:56 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
rebuilder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1615
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 12, 2016, 01:59:45 PM |
|
I don't see that in the article linked, and certainly not in the businessinsider source they link to. All it says is: "RBS is bearish on everything", which somehow is twisted into meaning they're "indirectly" advising investors to buy BTC. Does "indirectly" now mean "not at all" or did I miss something?
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 12, 2016, 02:01:56 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
|
January 12, 2016, 02:27:37 PM |
|
I don't see that in the article linked, and certainly not in the businessinsider source they link to. All it says is: "RBS is bearish on everything", which somehow is twisted into meaning they're "indirectly" advising investors to buy BTC. Does "indirectly" now mean "not at all" or did I miss something?
You must be new here. If a bank teller in Mali decides they don't like their mother in law's parrot any more it can only mean BUY COINS.
|
|
|
|
aztecminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 12, 2016, 02:50:34 PM |
|
i had to reindex the blockchain.. it took more than 48 hours for my pc:
64G memory intel 6-core i7-3960x extreme edition Asus rampage motherboard ssd boot drive three disk striped <<<<<<<<<<<< blockchain lives here
ridiculous my pc takes that long to index blockchain . yeah bitcoin is uba... i have recorded this bullshiat.
i have not even fired up armoury.. it has to go through its index bullshiat too.. i'm gonna record it.
It happened to me last week, my PC froze & I had to turn it off at the socket. Thought I'd lost all the bitcoin's I have stored in Core. Balance reset to 0, thought my life was over After literally 2.5 days of reindexing balance was restored to correct amount. They really need to sort this shit in one of the next updates. Both of you need to stop using a bitcoin node as a wallet. Use electrum, copay or a trezor for that. This is safe, light and easy, just the opposite of what a node is. Bitcoin-qt is intended to be used as a desktop wallet otherwise there would be no gui or wallet functionality. as far as i am concerned, it is a back end my wallet uses to communicate to blockchain .. i wouldn't keep bitcoins in bitcoin-qt.
|
|
|
|
Paashaas
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3520
Merit: 4566
|
|
January 12, 2016, 02:56:14 PM |
|
I don't see that in the article linked, and certainly not in the businessinsider source they link to. All it says is: "RBS is bearish on everything", which somehow is twisted into meaning they're "indirectly" advising investors to buy BTC. Does "indirectly" now mean "not at all" or did I miss something?
Read better, i'll give you a little help. At the end of the article it starts with; Bitcoin Provides Something Unique & Less Volatile.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 12, 2016, 03:01:56 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
blunderer
|
|
January 12, 2016, 03:05:08 PM |
|
I don't see that in the article linked, and certainly not in the businessinsider source they link to. All it says is: "RBS is bearish on everything", which somehow is twisted into meaning they're "indirectly" advising investors to buy BTC. Does "indirectly" now mean "not at all" or did I miss something?
Read better, i'll give you a little help. At the end of the article it starts with; Bitcoin Provides Something Unique & Less Volatile. ZOMG, an article on Bitcoin.com praises Bitcoin! What next, Zerohedge advising us to buy gold?
|
|
|
|
LMGTFY
|
|
January 12, 2016, 03:06:26 PM |
|
I don't see that in the article linked, and certainly not in the businessinsider source they link to. All it says is: "RBS is bearish on everything", which somehow is twisted into meaning they're "indirectly" advising investors to buy BTC. Does "indirectly" now mean "not at all" or did I miss something?
Read better, i'll give you a little help. At the end of the article it starts with; Bitcoin Provides Something Unique & Less Volatile. Right, but that's the article's author saying that, not RBS. RBS are saying "sell everything" - bitcoin.com is saying "Bitcoin Provides Something Unique & Less Volatile." The complaint here is that the article doesn't seem to be accurately reflecting what RBS has said.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
January 12, 2016, 03:13:19 PM |
|
Interesting conversation between Charles Lee and Brian Armstrong and Thermos: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40cm78/coinbase_still_delisted_from_bitcoinorg_as_github/cyufpix?context=3Look, I've been with Bitcoin very nearly since its beginning, and almost all of my work is pro bono. My primary concern in all of my roles is Bitcoin's long-term survival and usefulness. So while I admit that I'm not the most diplomatic person around, I'm not just randomly being a jerk when I say this stuff. It's definitely possible for reasonable people to disagree with me and my actions, but I can tell that you're just deeply misinformed about how Bitcoin does work and should work. So please, have a long conversation with Wladimir or someone else who actually knows what they're talking about. Even your own coblee seems to be pretty well-informed, but you're clearly not listening to him, since there's no way he'd say something like "Coinbase will always support the longest chain in bitcoin" and expect to get a good response from experts.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 12, 2016, 04:01:59 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|