keewee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1025
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 21, 2016, 05:21:38 AM |
|
Hmmm. Well potentially they already have the necessary infrastructure for their new coin if they decide to repurpose it away from Bitcoin... It wont work Explain? I can't think why it wouldn't work. A bitcoin miner will mine any SHA256 coin, but is there something I'm missing?
|
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
January 21, 2016, 05:28:42 AM |
|
It's the FULLBLOCALYPSETMHere's what going to happen. Fees will go up. A little. A tremendous amount of stupid spam and crap transactions will be forced off the chain. People who actually have a reason to use it will pay a bit more. Over time, improvements will be made in capacity and throughput, allowing for further growth. The sky will stay up there. You can put the umbrella down now.
|
|
|
|
|
Cconvert2G36
|
|
January 21, 2016, 05:42:21 AM |
|
The sky will stay up there. You can put the umbrella down now.
I keep trying to tell him. Kid has rocks in his head or something. -snip- THEREFOR: We will hit the limit and have a network congestion failure. The price will crash. It is almost inevitable now. The only question is when. My best guess is two months.
THEREFOR we are fucked.
Hitting the cap and negating use cases for the network isn't a fireworks explosion, we've been over this. It's a slow bleed away of utility. Some "store of value because reasons™ people", some illicit commerce, some off chain speculation, will all still be around to a degree... It may take years to fully squander the first mover advantage to other alternatives. Blockstream may hope that alternative is them, and they need Bitcoin to still function as a settlement layer... See, it's not as bad as it could be. If you still have any concerns, please consult the roadmap. Moderators are standing by to assist you.
|
|
|
|
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
|
|
January 21, 2016, 05:45:37 AM |
|
It's the FULLBLOCALYPSETMHere's what going to happen. Fees will go up. A little. A tremendous amount of stupid spam and crap transactions will be forced off the chain. People who actually have a reason to use it will pay a bit more. Over time, improvements will be made in capacity and throughput, allowing for further growth. The sky will stay up there. You can put the umbrella down now. The sky may stay there, but it will become toxic with all the alternate blockchains sucking out all the oxygen value.
|
|
|
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
January 21, 2016, 05:51:38 AM |
|
It's the FULLBLOCALYPSETMHere's what going to happen. Fees will go up. A little. A tremendous amount of stupid spam and crap transactions will be forced off the chain. People who actually have a reason to use it will pay a bit more. Over time, improvements will be made in capacity and throughput, allowing for further growth. The sky will stay up there. You can put the umbrella down now. The sky may stay there, but it will become toxic with all the alternate blockchains sucking out all the oxygen value. Eventually yes, that would happen. Not right away because there is a lot of headroom of spam, crap, and low-value uses that will be forced off, ensuring that capacity is available, allowing ample time for improvements in capacity and throughput.
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
January 21, 2016, 05:56:30 AM |
|
It's the FULLBLOCALYPSETMHere's what going to happen. Fees will go up. A little. A tremendous amount of stupid spam and crap transactions will be forced off the chain. People who actually have a reason to use it will pay a bit more. Over time, improvements will be made in capacity and throughput, allowing for further growth. The sky will stay up there. You can put the umbrella down now. The sky may stay there, but it will become toxic with all the alternate blockchains sucking out all the oxygen value. Eventually yes, that would happen. Not right away because there is a lot of headroom of spam, crap, and low-value uses that will be forced off, ensuring that capacity is available, allowing ample time for improvements in capacity and throughput. Most importantly new business models that provide profitable long term solutions to capacity will then become obvious and get built out in the confidence that they wont be undermined by capricious and arbitrary consensus code changes. It is the long term economic model of a blockchain secured by fees that the ecosystem needs to observe and learn about, sooner rather later.
|
|
|
|
Cconvert2G36
|
|
January 21, 2016, 05:58:46 AM |
|
-snip- It is the long term economic model of a blockchain secured by fees that the ecosystem needs to observe and learn about, sooner rather later.
Yup, and I can't imagine a better time to do it than with 25 BTC reward blocks.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 21, 2016, 06:02:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
January 21, 2016, 06:09:50 AM |
|
-snip- It is the long term economic model of a blockchain secured by fees that the ecosystem needs to observe and learn about, sooner rather later.
Yup, and I can't imagine a better time to do it than with 25 BTC reward blocks. ... not so much the rewards regime but such that it is before businesses get entrenched with feeless business models ... who would be screaming and shilling at much higher noise level than you witness today. Sorry to say but it seems quite a lot of VCs have blown investments building on a prototype protocol not the production version, which has always been in the planning and on the drawing board so it is their own failure.
|
|
|
|
|
Peter R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1007
|
|
January 21, 2016, 06:33:11 AM |
|
-snip- It is the long term economic model of a blockchain secured by fees that the ecosystem needs to observe and learn about, sooner rather later.
Yup, and I can't imagine a better time to do it than with 25 BTC reward blocks. ... not so much the rewards regime but such that it is before businesses get entrenched with feeless business models ... who would be screaming and shilling at much higher noise level than you witness today. Sorry to say but it seems quite a lot of VCs have blown investments building on a prototype protocol not the production version, which has always been in the planning and on the drawing board so it is their own failure. Ten years from now, will the average fee paid for a typical bitcoin transaction be "greater than," "less than," or "equal to" the average fee paid today? A. measured in BTC B. measured in $
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2316
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
January 21, 2016, 06:36:40 AM Last edit: January 21, 2016, 06:47:06 AM by Richy_T |
|
Eventually yes, that would happen. Not right away because there is a lot of headroom of spam, crap, and low-value uses that will be forced off, ensuring that capacity is available, allowing ample time for improvements in capacity and throughput.
Fees rise, transactions stall, businesses, suddenly providing poor user experience go into reverse adoption. Nothing happens for months and months since there is no room for growth and then the halving happens, miners switch off and our transaction volume drops to 1/3 or less because you can't compensate for slower blocks by increasing the transactions per block and difficulty moves out to 30 days and then longer as declining value causes more miners to switch off. This is the scenario without 1MB blocks and some complicated fix slated for 2017 (an eternity in internet time). I'm confident a fix will be applied but it's now too late to avoid a lot of people being hurt. This is not an argument for bigger blocks any more, it's a straight-up prediction. Buckle up.
|
|
|
|
sAt0sHiFanClub
|
|
January 21, 2016, 06:37:21 AM Last edit: January 21, 2016, 06:57:23 AM by sAt0sHiFanClub |
|
You don't seem to understand. Bigblockers will win if we crash the price far enough to persuade the miners to switch. If we fail in that, it's because the price is going up and they have no reason to listen to us. (if it ain't broke, don't fix it). So it's simple. Just keep pumping until we go away. That's how you'll get us to capitulate.
Did you miss the bit when it's been tried & failed a number of times now? We just have to be lucky once....
|
|
|
|
sAt0sHiFanClub
|
|
January 21, 2016, 06:37:48 AM |
|
That article says nothing of the sort. Read it again. Its a tacit approval for the concept of Classic if anything. But maybe thats just me!!
|
|
|
|
sAt0sHiFanClub
|
|
January 21, 2016, 06:38:52 AM |
|
@BjA If the PBoC gets out of line we can send LukeJr. in to change the algo on 'em. SHa69. Pit paff piffy. Inniit?
If the crytpos are united?
|
|
|
|
sAt0sHiFanClub
|
|
January 21, 2016, 06:41:16 AM |
|
since when it is not en vogue to drop some acid within the IT scene? ever heard of steve jobs?
Hell yeah! It was even tax deductible in my day....
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 21, 2016, 07:02:20 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|