ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2016, 07:01:27 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2016, 08:01:27 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2016, 09:01:51 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2016, 10:01:36 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
January 31, 2016, 10:15:16 AM |
|
There's really only two outcomes without a higher or removed max block size: stagnation or network congestion failure.
Like you don't need a gun to kill an ant, you don't need bitcoin to buy your damned coffee. Bitcoin is for gentlemen's transactions. Capisc? As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
rebuilder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1615
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 31, 2016, 10:31:20 AM |
|
As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin.
Of course, no true gentleman would go around discussing things as crass as money in the first place.
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
January 31, 2016, 10:42:46 AM |
|
As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin.
Of course, no true gentleman would go around discussing things as crass as money in the first place. Money is crass, taking a look at the low-lifes that showed up around here as soon as bitcoin become worth more than nothing is all the evidence you need.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2016, 11:01:27 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1010
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
|
|
January 31, 2016, 11:24:53 AM |
|
As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin.
Of course, no true gentleman would go around discussing things as crass as money in the first place. Money is crass, taking a look at the low-lifes that showed up around here as soon as bitcoin become worth more than nothing is all the evidence you need. Bitcoin users are the lowest form of life with their drugs and porn and alpaca socks. True Gentlemen would not associate themselves with such nonsense.
|
|
|
|
pleaseexplainagain
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
January 31, 2016, 11:36:36 AM |
|
As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin.
Of course, no true gentleman would go around discussing things as crass as money in the first place. Money is crass, taking a look at the low-lifes that showed up around here as soon as bitcoin become worth more than nothing is all the evidence you need. Bitcoin users are the lowest form of life with their drugs and porn and alpaca socks. True Gentlemen would not associate themselves with such nonsense. I have experienced drugs and porn but have never owned or worn alpaca socks. Since you used "and" between the three items can I assume 2 out of 3 lets me off the hook ie I remain a gentleman and a bitcoin user. (disclaimer - I have woollen socks from sheep and a 50;50 wool/possum blend but I see alpaca as a bridge too far)
|
|
|
|
LMGTFY
|
|
January 31, 2016, 11:50:03 AM |
|
There's really only two outcomes without a higher or removed max block size: stagnation or network congestion failure.
Like you don't need a gun to kill an ant, you don't need bitcoin to buy your damned coffee. Bitcoin is for gentlemen's transactions. Capisc? As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin. I assumed we all had our butlers manage our day-to-day financial affairs. Dear god, did you people think I actually dirtied my hands with 1s and 0s? These silk gloves are white for a reason. Hence my lack of participation in the block size debate: it's frightfully dull, I would need to associate with the hoi polloi, and if BTC goes south I'll simply sack my butler. (Sorry, Woodhouse).
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2016, 12:01:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 31, 2016, 12:25:01 PM |
|
There's really only two outcomes without a higher or removed max block size: stagnation or network congestion failure.
Like you don't need a gun to kill an ant, you don't need bitcoin to buy your damned coffee. Bitcoin is for gentlemen's transactions. Capisc? As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin. I assumed we all had our butlers manage our day-to-day financial affairs. Dear god, did you people think I actually dirtied my hands with 1s and 0s? These silk gloves are white for a reason. Hence my lack of participation in the block size debate: it's frightfully dull, I would need to associate with the hoi polloi, and if BTC goes south I'll simply sack my butler. (Sorry, Woodhouse). when in debate, don't. translated into bitcoin code is status quo.
|
|
|
|
oldm8
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
January 31, 2016, 12:26:45 PM |
|
There's really only two outcomes without a higher or removed max block size: stagnation or network congestion failure.
Like you don't need a gun to kill an ant, you don't need bitcoin to buy your damned coffee. Bitcoin is for gentlemen's transactions. Capisc? As this block size debate clearly shows: gentlemen don't use Bitcoin. I assumed we all had our butlers manage our day-to-day financial affairs. Dear god, did you people think I actually dirtied my hands with 1s and 0s? These silk gloves are white for a reason. Hence my lack of participation in the block size debate: it's frightfully dull, I would need to associate with the hoi polloi, and if BTC goes south I'll simply sack my butler. (Sorry, Woodhouse). Think you a chap. Find out here for a tongue in cheek review of gentlemen http://thechap.co.uk/category/am-i-chap/
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
January 31, 2016, 01:02:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
CuntChocula
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
January 31, 2016, 01:16:12 PM |
|
There's really only two outcomes without a higher or removed max block size: stagnation or network congestion failure.
Like you don't need a gun to kill an ant, you don't need bitcoin to buy your damned coffee. Bitcoin is for gentlemen's transactions. Capisc? Don't tell me what I need. It's that kind of arrogance that is going to make Bitcoin an asterisk in the history of cryptocurrencies. Businesses that dictate to their customers what they should want are gonna have a bad time. Bitcoin is not a business, it is a protocol. Is "ZOMG BITCOIN IS GOING TO DIE BECAUSE ARROGANCE" really your position? ... And Assburgers. Must not forget Assburgers.
|
|
|
|
|
LMGTFY
|
|
January 31, 2016, 01:32:59 PM |
|
Huh, that's sad. It would, however, explain the $5 between the Eurovision-area exchanges (e.g. BTC-e) and the non-Eurovision exchanges (Stamp, Finex). It looks like Tel has a lot of fans in China, too.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
January 31, 2016, 01:34:36 PM |
|
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.
But for this to work it has to be tethered to the BTC chain...and there we'll have our Bitcoin world war II
In fact, I foresee considerable opposition to implement sidechain hooks in Bitcoin Core. But sidechains can add so much value to Bitcoin that the change is likely to be implemented. If not, Bitcoin might soon become obsolete and give way to an equivalent network that implements extensibility via sidechains. I wonder what happens when the regulators realize that sidechains can put privacy and anonymity back ;-) I think this is a really good question. How centralized does development have to become before it becomes liable? What exactly can Blockstream be held accountable for if CT sidechain is implemented? Just wondering out loud...
|
|
|
|
CuntChocula
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
January 31, 2016, 01:37:08 PM |
|
Refuse to believe that's a real language. "død♌ efter ♑t kort s♎keleie, 77 år ga♋mel"?! Really? You guys are too much @BMB: Now we see the violence inherent in the system!
|
|
|
|
|