Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 06:57:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 15734 15735 15736 15737 15738 15739 15740 15741 15742 15743 15744 15745 15746 15747 15748 15749 15750 15751 15752 15753 15754 15755 15756 15757 15758 15759 15760 15761 15762 15763 15764 15765 15766 15767 15768 15769 15770 15771 15772 15773 15774 15775 15776 15777 15778 15779 15780 15781 15782 15783 [15784] 15785 15786 15787 15788 15789 15790 15791 15792 15793 15794 15795 15796 15797 15798 15799 15800 15801 15802 15803 15804 15805 15806 15807 15808 15809 15810 15811 15812 15813 15814 15815 15816 15817 15818 15819 15820 15821 15822 15823 15824 15825 15826 15827 15828 15829 15830 15831 15832 15833 15834 ... 33385 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26390633 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
GOLD Dev
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 12:53:57 PM

Bitcoin is still holding up quite nicely after that 119k BTC theft...

Wondering where those coins are too, maybe dumped allready?
European Central Bank
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087



View Profile
August 05, 2016, 01:00:37 PM

I ain't so sure any exchange is gonna accept coins originating from a known hack address. and mixing that amount is borderline impossible. it'll take a long time for someone to launder those coins. anyway they're probably safe in some bitfinex employee's wallet.
lemmyK
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 293
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 01:05:39 PM

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4w71cx/why_did_bitgo_allow_120000_btc_to_be_withdrawn/

you're naive. There is no one who would oversee the 24/7 and take turns to 3 working shifts. I see it in real life. most rich companies, government agencies and banks is so bogus(judas) pay some  employee 24/7 supervision . such examples as bitfinex are millions worldwide. and they gamble money from people because they are unpunished. for what happened in bitfinex someone ceos/bosses should get life in prison or bullets to the head,.
But the US government knows how to carve right at intimidation. as Ulbricht closed for life  :'(as an exemplary case. While no one not begin to liquidate CEO and bosses so they'll abusing customers.
WAKE UP we  living in corporate fascism protected by the state police and the courts.
AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
August 05, 2016, 01:11:01 PM

Bitcoin is still holding up quite nicely after that 119k BTC theft...

The market overreacted and, at peak, we got ~1/3 of the marketcap wiped out. You can't have a 60mn theft taking billions of the marketcap - it's irrational.

The DAO "hack" was larger and Ethereum lost a couple hundred millions at most in marketcap - despite the fact that percentage-wise the DAO was very big compared to the ETH marketcap.

So, as I see it, the over-reaction is due for mid-term upwards correction. The amount stolen was not that big anyway (~0.7%). Although the air must be cleared first with the coins and funds at finex before the upwards trend resumes. Once that is done, it might trigger a race to frontrun the other buyers towards 600+.
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3013


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 01:39:00 PM


The market overreacted and, at peak, we got ~1/3 of the marketcap wiped out. You can't have a 60mn theft taking billions of the marketcap - it's irrational.


I don't believe market cap is a rational way to get the measure of anything, especially something as thinly traded as Bitcoin, let alone alts.
Paashaas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3434
Merit: 4368



View Profile
August 05, 2016, 01:44:04 PM

Kim Dotcom says he has the answer to bitcoin’s ‘civil war’ and will soon give it to the world.

I'm getting very exited about Kim's ''scaling'' solution what he calls; Bitcache for his Megaupload 2.0.

He also thinks that the price wil rocket to $2000 in 2017, which i think he is right even without his groundbreaking innovation.

http://qz.com/751533/kim-dotcom-says-he-has-the-answer-to-bitcoins-civil-war-and-will-soon-give-it-to-the-world/
AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
August 05, 2016, 01:55:10 PM


The market overreacted and, at peak, we got ~1/3 of the marketcap wiped out. You can't have a 60mn theft taking billions of the marketcap - it's irrational.


I don't believe market cap is a rational way to get the measure of anything, especially something as thinly traded as Bitcoin, let alone alts.

The marketcap may not make sense for small players, but it does for large players as it creates internal hedges within the market.
Dafar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


dafar consulting


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 02:08:46 PM
Last edit: August 05, 2016, 02:19:53 PM by Dafar

Kim Dotcom says he has the answer to bitcoin’s ‘civil war’ and will soon give it to the world.

I'm getting very exited about Kim's ''scaling'' solution what he calls; Bitcache for his Megaupload 2.0.

He also thinks that the price wil rocket to $2000 in 2017, which i think he is right even without his groundbreaking innovation.

http://qz.com/751533/kim-dotcom-says-he-has-the-answer-to-bitcoins-civil-war-and-will-soon-give-it-to-the-world/




Fucking lol... this guy is straight from a movie.


So he has his own scaling solution huh? That's cool, I was wondering how he hopes to include micro transactions in btc for all file transfers






BASED KIM DOT COM!
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3013


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 02:25:36 PM

ALL blockchain limitations? What does an enormous German file magnate know that others don't? Does he employ anyone to work on this type of thing? If so, why haven't we heard any squeaks before?

savetherainforest
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 609


Plant 1xTree for each Satoshi earned!


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 02:30:58 PM

ALL blockchain limitations? What does an enormous German file magnate know that others don't? Does he employ anyone to work on this type of thing? If so, why haven't we heard any squeaks before?



There was Vice episode made specially for him in New Zealand where he was on house arrest on his estate that had a golf course and all that sh!t.. that place was huge!!! ... sigh... "house arrest"  Wink Wink


And  he is the kind of guy that puts others to do stuff for him... he doesn't seem to do much on his own... maybe eat and exercise... and pay hookers to F' him!... He's so fat he can't even move his ass properly.
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3013


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 02:34:51 PM


And  he is the kind of guy that puts others to do stuff for him... he doesn't seem to do much on his own... maybe eat and exercise... and pay hookers to F' him!... He's so fat he can't even move his ass properly.

I saw that too. I suspect that his employees put him on his feet for the filmed segments and pulled him around with invisible fishing lines. As soon as the cameras stopped rolling he was slipped back into his anti gravity harness. I doubt he can feed himself either. Still, he would make for a fun neighbour.
Dafar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


dafar consulting


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 02:41:46 PM

Resorting to fat-shaming now? Are we jealous of his riches?


I'm pretty sure the dude is a talented coder and created megaupload himself
foggyb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1006


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 02:51:52 PM

Resorting to fat-shaming now? Are we jealous of his riches?


I'm pretty sure the dude is a talented coder and created megaupload himself

All I see is: this user is ignored.
infofront (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2632
Merit: 2780


Shitcoin Minimalist


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 03:11:10 PM

It'll be interesting to see how that pans out. He's often full of bluster, but also brilliant and eccentric.
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3013


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 03:17:48 PM

Resorting to fat-shaming now? Are we jealous of his riches?


I'm pretty sure the dude is a talented coder and created megaupload himself

Hey, I'm sure he's got far more intellect, let alone finances, than my modest self. I still think he could afford to pack more tastiness into less calories. I'm intrigued to see what he comes up with.
savetherainforest
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 609


Plant 1xTree for each Satoshi earned!


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 03:54:18 PM

Resorting to fat-shaming now? Are we jealous of his riches?


I'm pretty sure the dude is a talented coder and created megaupload himself

All I see is: this user is ignored.


HaHa ... you feeling his jew power??... or what??




He said the word "german", his instinct was to send you straight to nazi germany...  Cheesy

But I guess the feeling is mutual for both of you...

TooDumbForBitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001



View Profile
August 05, 2016, 03:59:14 PM

Resorting to fat-shaming now? Are we jealous of his riches?



No, we are envious of people who post better fat-shaming posts than we do.

Guy clearly doesn't have self-esteem or body image problems - he put "mega" in his brand.

(on a more pr0n/hooker tangent, perhaps there's something else to the "mega upload" nickname)
JimboToronto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4018
Merit: 4526


You're never too old to think young.


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 04:56:47 PM

Good morning Bitcoinland.

Seems we're going sideways again but at much lower volumes.

We're almost exactly where we were at this time yesterday.

I think many people are still digesting the Finex hack and waiting to see how things turn out.

As I said yesterday, we're about where we probably would have ended up without the hack, considering that the price had been going down for a few days anyway.

Bitcoinaverage is still hovering around $580.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3724
Merit: 10318


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 05:05:53 PM

https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/4vtv1m/bitfinex_down_due_to_bitcoin_security_breach/d64ow17

socialized losses for bitcoin and loans to btc/usd positions. guess we'll know the full facts in a few hours.


Thanks for that link ECB...    The post pretty much states that Bitfinex is going to make a more official update tomorrow, but in the meantime, like you said, Bitfinex is considering a way to socialize losses amongst Bitfinex BTC holders.

 I don't really have a problem with socialized loss in the sense that Bitfinex would later pay back those "losers"... yet, I believe that they are not considering paying back the "losers"...

 I think that it is a bit irresponsible to cause the users to hold the bag... and even though we are finding out some details, we still have to wait for more specifics, which seems to be scheduled to come out tomorrow.

Really the best option for everyone. Other option is to go belly up and then after 4yrs and a bunch of attorney fees you might see some distributions (see Gox). Assuming there'd be a full investigation and it wasn't internal job etc...


We are likely a bit too much speculation regarding various details at the moment because Bitfinex has only provided a rough outline of their intentions - and they also provided one side of the balance sheet without providing some kind of indication of the other side of the balance sheet, which would likely be disclosed in more detail later today.

I guess part of what I am saying, here, is that in order to attempt to achieve more confidence from current account holders and future account holders, they have to disclose enough details in order to inspire some confidence that they are being reasonable. 

I don't think that we can come to any kind of conclusion regarding what is best if we do not have some more disclosure, and likely, since they are not a public company, they are going to be somewhat sparse with the level of their disclosure... in other words, they will be disclosing mostly from an attempt to retain business rather than any kind of actual obligation to disclose.

One last point, Bitfinex is already somewhat known for being a bit shady; however, so far (at least up until this latest incident), their shadiness had not prevented them from accumulating a lot of bitcoins in their trust and to build a large volume of USD/BTC trade.  Maybe some of that trade is fake, but it is likely a lot more representative of reality than some of the other chinese exchanges (Ok coin and Huobi, for example).  So, their known shadiness causes me to speculate that they are continue to be less than fully transparent, and so no matter what there are going to continue to be theories and speculation regarding whether some of this is an inside job, and perhaps if they do not propose some kind of publicly acceptable plan forward with sufficient details, their history along with this latest incident and perhaps inadequate plan will contribute towards their demise.  I remain with my proposition that the most likely appropriate plan forward is to at least attempt to show that they are coming really close to fully compensating all affected users - otherwise they will lose credibility from the big investors.  They don't actually have to carry out such plan, merely just put forth such plan to create such an impression that they plan to fully compensate (or close to fully compensate) everyone who was negatively affected.
BitofaN1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 177
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 05, 2016, 05:32:10 PM

Since Bitfinex knows all of the attacker's addresses, couldn't they try to convince the top pool's operators to blacklist them? Wouldn't that be one of the "advantages" of ultra centralized mining?
Pages: « 1 ... 15734 15735 15736 15737 15738 15739 15740 15741 15742 15743 15744 15745 15746 15747 15748 15749 15750 15751 15752 15753 15754 15755 15756 15757 15758 15759 15760 15761 15762 15763 15764 15765 15766 15767 15768 15769 15770 15771 15772 15773 15774 15775 15776 15777 15778 15779 15780 15781 15782 15783 [15784] 15785 15786 15787 15788 15789 15790 15791 15792 15793 15794 15795 15796 15797 15798 15799 15800 15801 15802 15803 15804 15805 15806 15807 15808 15809 15810 15811 15812 15813 15814 15815 15816 15817 15818 15819 15820 15821 15822 15823 15824 15825 15826 15827 15828 15829 15830 15831 15832 15833 15834 ... 33385 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!