Heater
|
|
November 09, 2017, 03:24:40 AM |
|
Sent from my Space Ship lol
|
|
|
|
micalith
|
|
November 09, 2017, 03:28:00 AM |
|
nice wee ascending triangle there
|
|
|
|
mymenace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061
Smile
|
|
November 09, 2017, 03:38:33 AM |
|
Based on the evidence that I have right now, it seems that they were engaged in pretty evil conduct... but maybe I am missing a few details, and I doubt it is really worth a battle to go down this path, right?
we get to trust the math but not necessarily the various people?
mathematically someone evil and hidden is trying to destroy bitcoin - this is true and correct bitcoin is mathematical trust and transparent - this is true and correct mathematically then to change the trust and transparency you expose the evil intentions against bitcoin but not the person funding it, only the players being funded can do that 1. If they do know they wont 2. If they realize they being duped, they may be too scared
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11155
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
November 09, 2017, 03:53:48 AM |
|
[edited out]
........Really, fuckface* ...... * stated in the most loving manner. Well, the most deserving of someone who randomly asserts false crap about me. Fuckface. Hahahahaha.. you said it twice, and I really have some difficulties understanding how "fuckface" deserves a descriptive footnote, and at the end of the descriptive footnote, it is either signed by you as "fuckface" or you just cannot help to repeat "lovingly" calling it to Paashaas one more time? I thought that I was using "fuck" a lot, but fuckface does not even seem to fit very well into any kind of descriptive context, even if used in a "most loving manner" Rather disingenuous for you to quote the invective, while not quoting the substance. One portion thereof to wit: 'Copy pasting'? I challenge you to find a handful of sentences I have copy pasted. Really, fuckface* - find the evidence and post it.
...which, of course, in response to an accusation by Paashass that I merely copy-paste my replies. In other words, a false assertion on his/her part, for which I am fully entitled to refute directly. The careful reader will note that no such evidence has been proffered to support the specious accusation. O.k.. thou dost protest too muchie. How could I be disingenuous when I am not even talking substantively about the argument between you and paashaas, whether he actually merits the "fuckface" descriptor or not, and I was just having a little fun with you in regards to your choice of fuckface rather than some other kind of potentially better discriptor. You disgruntled fat picnic food eating bear, you. Have a little fun!!!! I understand that your grumpy ass bear is likely feeling worse because your potentially newly spouted attack vector (namely segwit2x) has seemingly been put on a kind of tentative HODL status.. and even cancelled completely - yet I doubt that either you or your other nutjobber BIG blockers are going to give up on your whining about core, blah blah blah.. but I do recognize that it probably has not been a good day for you hoo. So, to the extent that there is any genuiness in your BIG blocker nutjob position, which I highly doubt, I would therefore hypothetically have some sympathy to the extent that possibly, maybe and perhaps there could on the out chance be some actual kind of semblance of genuineness there.... so DONT be using my "genuiness" word against me, especially when it doesn't even seem to apply to this particular situation.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11155
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
November 09, 2017, 04:04:00 AM |
|
Based on the evidence that I have right now, it seems that they were engaged in pretty evil conduct... but maybe I am missing a few details, and I doubt it is really worth a battle to go down this path, right?
we get to trust the math but not necessarily the various people?
mathematically someone evil and hidden is trying to destroy bitcoin - this is true and correct bitcoin is mathematical trust and transparent - this is true and correct mathematically then to change the trust and transparency you expose the evil intentions against bitcoin but not the person funding it, only the players being funded can do that 1. If they do know they wont 2. If they realize they being duped, they may be too scared I think that we are on the same page here, mymenace... Some posters here, seem to think that you just accept that these fucking attackers have been acting in good faith in order to "improve" bitcoin, which should be obvious, for the most part, that they are not acting in good faith because otherwise they would work within the system to make robust proposals and to argue them to death and provide evidence and attempt to garner support through those kinds of means, rather than engaging in what seems fairly obvious as destructive measures and lucky for us, there is a smart enough community of bitcoinners that recognize the bullshit of the attackers and a large number of strong (and seemingly smart) core developers to also develop robust code and strategies that protect capital punishment type death to bitcoin, which kind of seems to make bitcoin stronger - lucky for us BTC HODLers and accumulators.
|
|
|
|
eXpl0sive
|
|
November 09, 2017, 04:45:14 AM |
|
Just think of all the Idiots, who traded that shit on Hitbtc... That Butt must hurt...
Why is this thing still being traded at 350 USD? Makes no sense? Who the fuck is buying?
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
November 09, 2017, 04:50:06 AM |
|
Just think of all the Idiots, who traded that shit on Hitbtc... That Butt must hurt...
Why is this thing still being traded at 350 USD? Makes no sense? Who the fuck is buying? rogue miners can still run the software, it could still happen https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/928308564208373761_Not_ a guarantee that 2X won't happen - Belshe can't stop miners from running that software - but it's much less likely.
|
|
|
|
Heater
|
|
November 09, 2017, 05:01:38 AM |
|
Are we ready for takeoff?? Everyone is onboard the Bitcoin plane! The pilot taxis to the very end of the runway, turns the plan around on a dime, adjusts his sunglasses and throttles up the engines. It's a heavy load, the tanks are full of fuel - the cargo bay is full of champagne, gold bars and lambos - we will need every inch of the runway. Fasten your seat belts - we are going up goddammit! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZGXwbPfwQs
|
|
|
|
RoomBot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1130
|
|
November 09, 2017, 05:11:01 AM |
|
Hilarious. I think that was the BCH Launch
|
|
|
|
mymenace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061
Smile
|
|
November 09, 2017, 05:40:08 AM Last edit: November 09, 2017, 06:06:50 AM by mymenace |
|
Based on the evidence that I have right now, it seems that they were engaged in pretty evil conduct... but maybe I am missing a few details, and I doubt it is really worth a battle to go down this path, right?
we get to trust the math but not necessarily the various people?
mathematically someone evil and hidden is trying to destroy bitcoin - this is true and correct bitcoin is mathematical trust and transparent - this is true and correct mathematically then to change the trust and transparency you expose the evil intentions against bitcoin but not the person funding it, only the players being funded can do that 1. If they do know they wont 2. If they realize they being duped, they may be too scared I think that we are on the same page here, mymenace... Some posters here, seem to think that you just accept that these fucking attackers have been acting in good faith in order to "improve" bitcoin, which should be obvious, for the most part, that they are not acting in good faith because otherwise they would work within the system to make robust proposals and to argue them to death and provide evidence and attempt to garner support through those kinds of means, rather than engaging in what seems fairly obvious as destructive measures and lucky for us, there is a smart enough community of bitcoinners that recognize the bullshit of the attackers and a large number of strong (and seemingly smart) core developers to also develop robust code and strategies that protect capital punishment type death to bitcoin, which kind of seems to make bitcoin stronger - lucky for us BTC HODLers and accumulators. right on the amount of crap thrown at bitcoin over the last 12 months is phenomenal yet the next week price goes boom again luvin it side note: if they have no answer, purposely refuse not to see their point of view, if then they become abusive or violent - you found a piece in the puzzle to all thats #happening at #aliceinwonderland just follow the #breadcrumbs +++
|
|
|
|
Searing
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1465
Clueless!
|
|
November 09, 2017, 06:21:27 AM |
|
They don't need to run btc1. It's just a simple patch to core code.
They don't need to keep signaling anymore. If they keep doing it, it needs to be interpreted as their intention to follow on with the agreement. In this case with the 2x part of it.
It's not because they "signaled" it... it is because the keep signaling it now.
What other interpretation would be possible for their signaling now?
Trying to play chicken with the Core team to get them to agree to Segwit2x agreement even if no one from the Core team was there to be party to the agreement. I think the big blockers will be the ones to pull off to the side come early November. So glad that I was right. Big blockers pulled away. ditto...still trying to get my head around this complete jump from insanity...to sanity...it is an ASIC MIRACLE...... (we should put up a shrine to this) hope it is 'catching' who'd a thunk it? not me ...I thought they might augur the whole works into the ground...
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 4754
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
|
November 09, 2017, 07:07:04 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
DaRude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2905
Merit: 1919
In order to dump coins one must have coins
|
|
November 09, 2017, 07:42:00 AM |
|
WTF no 20% airdrop?? This game sux
|
|
|
|
Bdstar
|
|
November 09, 2017, 07:52:39 AM |
|
price is too cheap $10k by 2018?
|
|
|
|
sgk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1002
!! HODL !!
|
|
November 09, 2017, 07:53:11 AM |
|
WTF no 20% airdrop?? This game sux
Thank you for reaching out the Bitcoin Inc HQ. We are sorry for your loss. To compensate for this, we will credit your original Bitcoins with 20% more value in coming days. Hope this addresses your concern. We value your relationship with Bitcoin and hope to see you again. Thanks for giving us the opportunity to serve you.
|
|
|
|
TheFlynn49
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
November 09, 2017, 07:58:42 AM |
|
Does this mean eventually that McAffe will do on TV what he said he'd do on TV ?
|
|
|
|
eXpl0sive
|
|
November 09, 2017, 08:06:37 AM |
|
Does this mean eventually that McAffe will do on TV what he said he'd do on TV ? If Bitcoin is not worth $500,000 in 3 years. Right now in my opinion, he is winning.
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
|
November 09, 2017, 08:27:30 AM |
|
What's going on?
Anything happend?
|
|
|
|
eXpl0sive
|
|
November 09, 2017, 08:30:48 AM |
|
What's going on?
Anything happend?
Looks like start of the correction after epic rise to 7800. Guess what will be the bottom support this time?
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
November 09, 2017, 08:31:27 AM |
|
Whale money is shuffling into alt coins again. To teach us all a very valuable lesson, you see?
|
|
|
|
|