Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 08:38:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 18079 18080 18081 18082 18083 18084 18085 18086 18087 18088 18089 18090 18091 18092 18093 18094 18095 18096 18097 18098 18099 18100 18101 18102 18103 18104 18105 18106 18107 18108 18109 18110 18111 18112 18113 18114 18115 18116 18117 18118 18119 18120 18121 18122 18123 18124 18125 18126 18127 18128 [18129] 18130 18131 18132 18133 18134 18135 18136 18137 18138 18139 18140 18141 18142 18143 18144 18145 18146 18147 18148 18149 18150 18151 18152 18153 18154 18155 18156 18157 18158 18159 18160 18161 18162 18163 18164 18165 18166 18167 18168 18169 18170 18171 18172 18173 18174 18175 18176 18177 18178 18179 ... 33332 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26373814 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
November 09, 2017, 01:23:40 AM

TALKY MAN TALK TOO MUCH
1715157534
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715157534

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715157534
Reply with quote  #2

1715157534
Report to moderator
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 10221


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
November 09, 2017, 01:24:57 AM


Finally, seems that we agree!!!! 


Besitos a ti, tambièn.
bones261
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1827



View Profile
November 09, 2017, 01:28:55 AM

Now it has settled and we are back to where we started before all the 2x getting cancelled news.

Can we finally get back to getting to $8k already? Huh

Someone is still buying futures, the miners are still signalling. Seems premature..
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
November 09, 2017, 01:31:48 AM

Now it has settled and we are back to where we started before all the 2x getting cancelled news.

Can we finally get back to getting to $8k already? Huh

Someone is still buying futures, the miners are still signalling. Seems premature..


the futures have gone from $186 to $220 while we've dropped. does this mean nothing?
bones261
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1827



View Profile
November 09, 2017, 01:35:17 AM
Last edit: November 09, 2017, 03:46:37 AM by bones261


They don't need to run btc1. It's just a simple patch to core code.

They don't need to keep signaling anymore. If they keep doing it, it needs to be interpreted as their intention to follow on with the agreement. In this case with the 2x part of it.

It's not because they "signaled" it... it is because the keep signaling it now.

What other interpretation would be possible for their signaling now?



Trying to play chicken with the Core team to get them to agree to Segwit2x agreement even if no one from the Core team was there to be party to the agreement. I think the big blockers will be the ones to pull off to the side come early November.


So glad that I was right. Big blockers pulled away.  Cool
LewisPirenne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 09, 2017, 02:18:08 AM

Actually that Quantum Computing article against Bitcoin can't even get its fact straight.  "Most mining is done by application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) made by companies such as Nvidia". 

Nvidia doesn't even have fabs and they miss the timeline by 5 years if they think that mining is still being done by GPUs.  It would be more correct to say that both Bitmain and Nvidia uses TSMC's foundry services (and so are most of FPGA/CPLD made back when it was still profitable to mine with them, before ASIC came along). 

Lastly, my condolence to the "SegWit by Miner Activated Soft-Fork with a 2MB Blocksize Increase DCG Consensus Agreement of 2017" dude who died in vain.  The S2X cabal now has innocent blood on their hand.


Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
November 09, 2017, 02:21:15 AM

Now it has settled and we are back to where we started before all the 2x getting cancelled news.

Can we finally get back to getting to $8k already? Huh

Someone is still buying futures, the miners are still signalling. Seems premature..


the futures have gone from $186 to $220 while we've dropped. does this mean nothing?


Yeah, futures are now $340. Still no idea what's going on.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
November 09, 2017, 02:27:35 AM

[edited out]

........Really, fuckface* ......

* stated in the most loving manner. Well, the most deserving of someone who randomly asserts false crap about me. Fuckface.

Hahahahaha.. you said it twice, and I really have some difficulties understanding how "fuckface" deserves a descriptive footnote, and at the end of the descriptive footnote, it is either signed by you as "fuckface" or you just cannot help to repeat "lovingly" calling it to Paashaas one more time?

I thought that I was using "fuck" a lot, but fuckface does not even seem to fit very well into any kind of descriptive context, even if used in a "most loving manner"   Tongue

Rather disingenuous for you to quote the invective, while not quoting the substance. One portion thereof to wit:

Quote
'Copy pasting'? I challenge you to find a handful of sentences I have copy pasted. Really, fuckface* - find the evidence and post it.

...which, of course, in response to an accusation by Paashass that I merely copy-paste my replies. In other words, a false assertion on his/her part, for which I am fully entitled to refute directly.

The careful reader will note that no such evidence has been proffered to support the specious accusation.
Vin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1166
Merit: 1015


View Profile
November 09, 2017, 02:34:22 AM



Great one.

When does ist starts?  Tongue
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 5127


Whimsical Pants


View Profile
November 09, 2017, 02:39:36 AM

TALKY MAN TALK TOO MUCH
Even though I have him on ignore I can still kind of hear the chatter from a distance.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
November 09, 2017, 02:41:28 AM
Last edit: November 09, 2017, 03:13:00 AM by BlindMayorBitcorn




Call off the party.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-segwit2x/2017-November/000689.html
Heater
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 403
Merit: 360


View Profile
November 09, 2017, 03:24:40 AM


Quote
Sent from my Space Ship

lol
micalith
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 894
Merit: 501



View Profile
November 09, 2017, 03:28:00 AM

nice wee ascending triangle there
mymenace
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061


Smile


View Profile
November 09, 2017, 03:38:33 AM

Based on the evidence that I have right now, it seems that they were engaged in pretty evil conduct... but maybe I am missing a few details, and I doubt it is really worth a battle to go down this path, right?

we get to trust the math but not necessarily the various people?  


mathematically someone evil and hidden is trying to destroy bitcoin - this is true and correct

bitcoin is mathematical trust and transparent - this is true and correct

mathematically then to change the trust and transparency you expose the evil intentions against bitcoin

but not the person funding it, only the players being funded can do that

1. If they do know they wont 2. If they realize they being duped, they may be too scared

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 10221


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
November 09, 2017, 03:53:48 AM

[edited out]

........Really, fuckface* ......

* stated in the most loving manner. Well, the most deserving of someone who randomly asserts false crap about me. Fuckface.

Hahahahaha.. you said it twice, and I really have some difficulties understanding how "fuckface" deserves a descriptive footnote, and at the end of the descriptive footnote, it is either signed by you as "fuckface" or you just cannot help to repeat "lovingly" calling it to Paashaas one more time?

I thought that I was using "fuck" a lot, but fuckface does not even seem to fit very well into any kind of descriptive context, even if used in a "most loving manner"   Tongue

Rather disingenuous for you to quote the invective, while not quoting the substance. One portion thereof to wit:

Quote
'Copy pasting'? I challenge you to find a handful of sentences I have copy pasted. Really, fuckface* - find the evidence and post it.

...which, of course, in response to an accusation by Paashass that I merely copy-paste my replies. In other words, a false assertion on his/her part, for which I am fully entitled to refute directly.

The careful reader will note that no such evidence has been proffered to support the specious accusation.


O.k.. thou dost protest too muchie.

How could I be disingenuous when I am not even talking substantively about the argument between you and paashaas, whether he actually merits the "fuckface" descriptor or not, and I was just having a little fun with you in regards to your choice of fuckface rather than some other kind of potentially better discriptor.  You disgruntled fat picnic food eating bear, you.

Have a little fun!!!!  I understand that your grumpy ass bear is likely feeling worse because your potentially newly spouted attack vector (namely segwit2x) has seemingly been put on a kind of tentative HODL status.. and even cancelled completely - yet I doubt that either you or your other nutjobber BIG blockers are going to give up on your whining about core, blah blah blah.. but I do recognize that it probably has not been a good day for you hoo.  So, to the extent that there is any genuiness in your BIG blocker nutjob position, which I highly doubt, I would therefore hypothetically have some sympathy to the extent that possibly, maybe and perhaps there could on the out chance be some actual kind of semblance of genuineness there.... so DONT  Angry be using my "genuiness" word against me, especially when it doesn't even seem to apply to this particular situation. Tongue
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 10221


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
November 09, 2017, 04:04:00 AM

Based on the evidence that I have right now, it seems that they were engaged in pretty evil conduct... but maybe I am missing a few details, and I doubt it is really worth a battle to go down this path, right?

we get to trust the math but not necessarily the various people?  


mathematically someone evil and hidden is trying to destroy bitcoin - this is true and correct

bitcoin is mathematical trust and transparent - this is true and correct

mathematically then to change the trust and transparency you expose the evil intentions against bitcoin

but not the person funding it, only the players being funded can do that

1. If they do know they wont 2. If they realize they being duped, they may be too scared


I think that we are on the same page here, mymenace...   Some posters here, seem to think that you just accept that these fucking attackers have been acting in good faith in order to "improve" bitcoin, which should be obvious, for the most part, that they are not acting in good faith because otherwise they would work within the system to make robust proposals and to argue them to death and provide evidence and attempt to garner support through those kinds of means, rather than engaging in what seems fairly obvious as destructive measures and lucky for us, there is a smart enough community of bitcoinners that recognize the bullshit of the attackers and a large number of strong (and seemingly smart) core developers to also develop robust code and strategies that protect capital punishment type death to bitcoin, which kind of seems to make bitcoin stronger - lucky for us BTC HODLers and accumulators.
eXpl0sive
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 502


waiting to explode


View Profile
November 09, 2017, 04:45:14 AM

Just think of all the Idiots, who traded that shit on Hitbtc...
That Butt must hurt...

Why is this thing still being traded at 350 USD? Makes no sense? Who the fuck is buying?
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
November 09, 2017, 04:50:06 AM

Just think of all the Idiots, who traded that shit on Hitbtc...
That Butt must hurt...

Why is this thing still being traded at 350 USD? Makes no sense? Who the fuck is buying?

rogue miners can still run the software, it could still happen

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/928308564208373761
Quote from: PeterTodd
_Not_ a guarantee that 2X won't happen - Belshe can't stop miners from running that software - but it's much less likely.
Heater
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 403
Merit: 360


View Profile
November 09, 2017, 05:01:38 AM

Are we ready for takeoff??

Everyone is onboard the Bitcoin plane! The pilot taxis to the very end of the runway, turns the plan around on a dime, adjusts his sunglasses and throttles up the engines.

It's a heavy load, the tanks are full of fuel - the cargo bay is full of champagne, gold bars and lambos - we will need every inch of the runway. Fasten your seat belts - we are going up goddammit!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZGXwbPfwQs

RoomBot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1123



View Profile
November 09, 2017, 05:11:01 AM

Hilarious.

I think that was the BCH Launch  Wink
Pages: « 1 ... 18079 18080 18081 18082 18083 18084 18085 18086 18087 18088 18089 18090 18091 18092 18093 18094 18095 18096 18097 18098 18099 18100 18101 18102 18103 18104 18105 18106 18107 18108 18109 18110 18111 18112 18113 18114 18115 18116 18117 18118 18119 18120 18121 18122 18123 18124 18125 18126 18127 18128 [18129] 18130 18131 18132 18133 18134 18135 18136 18137 18138 18139 18140 18141 18142 18143 18144 18145 18146 18147 18148 18149 18150 18151 18152 18153 18154 18155 18156 18157 18158 18159 18160 18161 18162 18163 18164 18165 18166 18167 18168 18169 18170 18171 18172 18173 18174 18175 18176 18177 18178 18179 ... 33332 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!