Bitcoin Forum
October 16, 2018, 11:30:36 AM *
News: Make sure you are not using versions of Bitcoin Core other than 0.17.0 [Torrent], 0.16.3, 0.15.2, or 0.14.3. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Oct. 16 Closing Price:
<$5,000 - 18 (13%)
$5000-$5,500 - 7 (5.1%)
$5,500-$6,000 - 6 (4.3%)
$6,000-$6,500 - 22 (15.9%)
$6,500-$7,000 - 34 (24.6%)
$7,000-$7,500 - 17 (12.3%)
$7,500-$8,000 - 7 (5.1%)
$8,000-$8,500 - 4 (2.9%)
>$8,500 - 23 (16.7%)
Total Voters: 138

Pages: « 1 ... 18122 18123 18124 18125 18126 18127 18128 18129 18130 18131 18132 18133 18134 18135 18136 18137 18138 18139 18140 18141 18142 18143 18144 18145 18146 18147 18148 18149 18150 18151 18152 18153 18154 18155 18156 18157 18158 18159 18160 18161 18162 18163 18164 18165 18166 18167 18168 18169 18170 18171 [18172] 18173 18174 18175 18176 18177 18178 18179 18180 18181 18182 18183 18184 18185 18186 18187 18188 18189 18190 18191 18192 18193 18194 18195 18196 18197 18198 18199 18200 18201 18202 18203 18204 18205 18206 18207 18208 18209 18210 18211 18212 18213 18214 18215 18216 18217 18218 18219 18220 18221 18222 ... 21410 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 20596760 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064


Bitcoin is antisemitic


View Profile
November 07, 2017, 09:59:54 PM

But still, 3rd biggest market cap isn't too shabby.

no, if it's not mostly wash trading.
1539689436
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1539689436

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1539689436
Reply with quote  #2

1539689436
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1539689436
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1539689436

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1539689436
Reply with quote  #2

1539689436
Report to moderator
1539689436
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1539689436

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1539689436
Reply with quote  #2

1539689436
Report to moderator
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1389


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
November 07, 2017, 10:10:29 PM

Looks like there are not many B2X supporters in this thread.
To be honest, I dont understand why should ordinary bitcoin users (not big miners) support it over BTC

Why should there be very many B2x supporters in this thread or any thread that has actual bitcoin holders?  

B2x is an attack on bitcoin, and it seems to be an attempt to dilute bitcoin, cause confusion and potentially undermine value of the golden goose....

A large number of us in this thread have bought into bitcoin, and even likely for many years, and even perhaps just in the past year the value of bitcoin has gone up a lot, so incumbent holders of bitcoin should not appreciate sabotage attempts, right?
vroom
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 177


bit2cat.eu ambassador


View Profile WWW
November 07, 2017, 10:13:07 PM

... such as Donald Trump, he will fix everything...

hahahahahaha   Roll Eyes     go figure.

let's make bitcoin great again!
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1389


How much alt coin diversification is needed? 0%?


View Profile
November 07, 2017, 10:33:57 PM

[edited out]

I'm a bit suprised by the venom in your response Jay. No offense was intended. Only to make a point that the segwit branch is just as much a fork as so called 'altcash' or 'bcash' (see what I did there). If there was such a consensus as you describe then bitcoin cash would not exist. Yet it does.  In your face.


As I already stated, I simply disagree with your attempt to describe some kind of rhetorical equality. 

There are attacks on the true and real bitcoin and anyhow, I already said what I had meant to say, so I doubt that there is anything further that is necessary from my end, because whatever you said does not help your case, including your supposed "in your face" retort that has NOT actually retorted anything of any substantial or material significance.   Roll Eyes
FractalUniverse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 511



View Profile
November 07, 2017, 10:36:23 PM

Looks like there are not many B2X supporters in this thread.
To be honest, I dont understand why should ordinary bitcoin users (not big miners) support it over BTC
...
so incumbent holders of bitcoin should not appreciate sabotage attempts, right?
yeah. Thats what i dont understand. Someone is pushing hard for b2x , but there are actually very few bitcoiners supporting it. And I have noticed lack of people promoting it, compared to BCH and BTG. I smell rats
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 924
Merit: 1372


Be a bank


View Profile
November 07, 2017, 10:36:46 PM

https://www.coindesk.com/cme-groups-leo-melamed-well-tame-bitcoin/
"We will regulate, make bitcoin not wild, nor wilder. We'll tame it into a regular type instrument of trade with rules."
Disclosure: CME Group is an investor in Digital Currency Group, CoinDesk's parent company.
someone's gonna get rekt

I'm going to need stronger popcorn

They've released the specs for their futures
http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/bitcoin-futures.html
... Special price fluctuation limits equal to 7% above and below prior settlement price and 13% above and below prior settlement price and a price limit of 20% above or below the previous settlement price. Trading will not be permitted outside the 20% above and below prior settlement price. ...

xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1397



View Profile
November 07, 2017, 11:05:14 PM

https://www.coindesk.com/cme-groups-leo-melamed-well-tame-bitcoin/
"We will regulate, make bitcoin not wild, nor wilder. We'll tame it into a regular type instrument of trade with rules."
Disclosure: CME Group is an investor in Digital Currency Group, CoinDesk's parent company.
someone's gonna get rekt

I'm going to need stronger popcorn

They've released the specs for their futures
http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/bitcoin-futures.html
... Special price fluctuation limits equal to 7% above and below prior settlement price and 13% above and below prior settlement price and a price limit of 20% above or below the previous settlement price. Trading will not be permitted outside the 20% above and below prior settlement price. ...



 Love the picture!
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1396



View Profile
November 07, 2017, 11:14:23 PM

Looks like there are not many B2X supporters in this thread.
To be honest, I dont understand why should ordinary bitcoin users (not big miners) support it over BTC
...
so incumbent holders of bitcoin should not appreciate sabotage attempts, right?
yeah. Thats what i dont understand. Someone is pushing hard for b2x , but there are actually very few bitcoiners supporting it. And I have noticed lack of people promoting it, compared to BCH and BTG. I smell rats

So the real question is this. At what point in Bitcoin's history do people start to realize that all these contentious, unwanted, and unwarranted forks are simply FUD attacks? None of these forks are majority user-driven or majority user-supported. None of the users asked for them and none of them care.

Bitcoin is not a stock. In the stock market, the made up enemies of a company's stock are like quarterly earnings rumors, worries about competitors, corporate takeover threats, internal shakeups, etc. The FUDsters and shorters use this 'false' FUD to create volatility around certain stocks, but at the end of the day it's all pretty much short term made up bullshit.

Bitcoin is not a company, has no CEO or employees, and has no quarterly earnings. So for the whale FUDsters to create volatility, they need to "create" threats out of thin air, so thus we get unwanted contentious forks, govt banning threats, negative MSM articles, miner hostile activity, glitzy shitcoin ponzi scams (distraction), worry about alts taking away market share (distraction), etc. They used to hack exchanges to create this volatility, but that threat is pretty much over now.

Otherwise Bitcoin would have no enemies and no worries. Zero. Just bullish sentiment and everyone in the industry would be behind it 100%. But this does not work for the establishment. They can't have that, won't allow a feeling of positivity and contentment around Bitcoin. They must create new FUD and attacks every month it is alive.
Ludwig Von
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 275


View Profile
November 07, 2017, 11:44:53 PM

In support for BTC and very much how I think about it. And confirming what most users think about all the forks and other fuzz to solve "Des maladies imaginaires".

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-07/bitcoin-digital-gold
Whtwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 432
Merit: 257



View Profile
November 07, 2017, 11:53:14 PM

Looks like there are not many B2X supporters in this thread.
To be honest, I dont understand why should ordinary bitcoin users (not big miners) support it over BTC
...
so incumbent holders of bitcoin should not appreciate sabotage attempts, right?
yeah. Thats what i dont understand. Someone is pushing hard for b2x , but there are actually very few bitcoiners supporting it. And I have noticed lack of people promoting it, compared to BCH and BTG. I smell rats

So the real question is this. At what point in Bitcoin's history do people start to realize that all these contentious, unwanted, and unwarranted forks are simply FUD attacks? None of these forks are majority user-driven or majority user-supported. None of the users asked for them and none of them care.

Bitcoin is not a stock. In the stock market, the made up enemies of a company's stock are like quarterly earnings rumors, worries about competitors, corporate takeover threats, internal shakeups, etc. The FUDsters and shorters use this 'false' FUD to create volatility around certain stocks, but at the end of the day it's all pretty much short term made up bullshit.

Bitcoin is not a company, has no CEO or employees, and has no quarterly earnings. So for the whale FUDsters to create volatility, they need to "create" threats out of thin air, so thus we get unwanted contentious forks, govt banning threats, negative MSM articles, miner hostile activity, glitzy shitcoin ponzi scams (distraction), worry about alts taking away market share (distraction), etc. They used to hack exchanges to create this volatility, but that threat is pretty much over now.

Otherwise Bitcoin would have no enemies and no worries. Zero. Just bullish sentiment and everyone in the industry would be behind it 100%. But this does not work for the establishment. They can't have that, won't allow a feeling of positivity and contentment around Bitcoin. They must create new FUD and attacks every month it is alive.

Sounds a bit like "they" want to make "order out of chaos" (for them of course)
smartcomet
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 87
Merit: 12


View Profile
November 08, 2017, 12:07:58 AM



Yeah, it's sometimes hard to have that vision into the future that others do not. To have an analyst mind and extrapolate current events forward in time and say "Well if things keep going as they are now [wrt something], then in 15-20 yrs it's gonna be pretty much like this..."

And then plan accordingly.

Right, vision is very important.
afbitcoins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1029



View Profile WWW
November 08, 2017, 12:09:14 AM

You can fuck off with your "bitcoin segwit" bullshit, and your attempt to suggest that there is some other bitcoin, currently.

I'm a bit suprised by the venom in your response Jay. No offense was intended. Only to make a point that the segwit branch is just as much a fork as so called 'altcash' or 'bcash' (see what I did there). If there was such a consensus as you describe then bitcoin cash would not exist. Yet it does.  In your face.


As I already stated, I simply disagree with your attempt to describe some kind of rhetorical equality.  

There are attacks on the true and real bitcoin and anyhow, I already said what I had meant to say, so I doubt that there is anything further that is necessary from my end, because whatever you said does not help your case, including your supposed "in your face" retort that has NOT actually retorted anything of any substantial or material significance.   Roll Eyes

You simply disagree but in a rude and aggressive manner. But thats OK I'm not particularly bothered about your vulgar language, I sometimes use expletives myself. My in your face retort punctuated the fact that you have no rebuttal to my assertion that the mere existence of bitcoin cash proves you wrong when you state there was full consensus to implement segwit. I suppose I could have said fuck you or something like that though, might have been easier. But still you have no rebuttal.
Odalv
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 12:09:42 AM

looking at the 2 hour optimism chart it very clear to me that we're going up again an should hit $7300 in the next few hours(also go litecoin go)

$8k USD/BTC by end of November.

$12k will not surprise me
arklan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1002



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 12:14:31 AM

looking at the 2 hour optimism chart it very clear to me that we're going up again an should hit $7300 in the next few hours(also go litecoin go)

$8k USD/BTC by end of November.

$12k will not surprise me


12k in 23 (ish) days, with a major holiday in the US interrupting money wires? that's 5k away. i mean it's possible, we've seen steeper climbs i think. but i, for one, would find anything about 8k pretty surprising, given the expected dip from the fork.
Rosewater Foundation
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 364
Merit: 230



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 12:33:05 AM

derp really is cyclical.
Some mustard-head just accidentally locked $180m in ETH in a buggy Parity multi-sig wallet.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7bdlv6/a_kid_just_accidentally_nuked_180m_poking_around/
AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1025



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 12:36:04 AM

derp really is cyclical.
Some mustard-head just accidentally locked $180m in ETH in a buggy Parity multi-sig wallet.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/7bdlv6/a_kid_just_accidentally_nuked_180m_poking_around/

Comment a bit below Cheesy

Quote
07/Nov/2017 @VitalikButerin on brink of second bailout for dumb contracts

Rosewater Foundation
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 364
Merit: 230



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 12:40:51 AM

From Parity developer Jutta Steiner:

Quote
It was the wallet library contract that suicided. Not the wallets themselves where the funds sit. So, wallets lost the info how they should operate, in particular how funds can be withdrawn.

sounds like a hoot
Rosewater Foundation
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 364
Merit: 230



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 12:48:32 AM

From Kurt Vonnegut:

Quote
We are trapped in the amber of the moment. There is no why.

and so it goes
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1396



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 12:51:59 AM

From Parity developer Jutta Steiner:

Quote
It was the wallet library contract that suicided. Not the wallets themselves where the funds sit. So, wallets lost the info how they should operate, in particular how funds can be withdrawn.

sounds like a hoot

Ethereum is like the Rube Goldberg machine of cryptographic solutions designed to solve a problem that doesn't exist and no one really cares to solve anyway. Outside of providing fuel to pump ICO and MLM Ponzi scams, I'm not even sure why it exists at all.
Rosewater Foundation
Full Member
***
Online Online

Activity: 364
Merit: 230



View Profile
November 08, 2017, 12:55:25 AM

From Parity developer Jutta Steiner:

Quote
It was the wallet library contract that suicided. Not the wallets themselves where the funds sit. So, wallets lost the info how they should operate, in particular how funds can be withdrawn.

sounds like a hoot

Ethereum is like the Rube Goldberg machine of cryptographic solutions looking for a problem that doesn't exist.

"Because it was defined as a contract, it had an uninitialized owner variable. Someone initialized that variable as themselves and killed the contract. This contract contained underlying code for the actual multisig wallets. Killing this basically killed the functionality for these wallets."

srsly wtf are they doing over there with their money??
Pages: « 1 ... 18122 18123 18124 18125 18126 18127 18128 18129 18130 18131 18132 18133 18134 18135 18136 18137 18138 18139 18140 18141 18142 18143 18144 18145 18146 18147 18148 18149 18150 18151 18152 18153 18154 18155 18156 18157 18158 18159 18160 18161 18162 18163 18164 18165 18166 18167 18168 18169 18170 18171 [18172] 18173 18174 18175 18176 18177 18178 18179 18180 18181 18182 18183 18184 18185 18186 18187 18188 18189 18190 18191 18192 18193 18194 18195 18196 18197 18198 18199 18200 18201 18202 18203 18204 18205 18206 18207 18208 18209 18210 18211 18212 18213 18214 18215 18216 18217 18218 18219 18220 18221 18222 ... 21410 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!