The average Bitcoin Core or Electrum user can just use Coin Control and do his own mixing (or non-mixing) or just bouncing it off a bunch of addresses, and that's without sending them to exchanges.
While this is true, full blocks make this very time consuming and very expensive. Of course, mixing is a poor substitute for actual anonymity. But perhaps workable in practice for noninteresting transactions.
Also, the development team is a bunch of very well known and reputable folk in the coding community, with ties to the British MI6 mind you! I'm very reassured now...
Isn't it obvious from the silhouette who it is? It's
Conan O'Brien!
... ... ...
Well, r0ach, what you don't seem to get is...
oh hell forget it - it's like talking to a wall. It ain't worth the time.
If Bitcoin Diamond has more proof of work than Bcash, then Bitcoin Diamond will become the real Bcash.
I don't see how that position is defensible, what with the mining algo change, the 210 M inflation, the segwit trojan, ...
Of course, their website is a scrape and cut'n'paste of the Bitcoin Cash website - is that what you were trying to convey?
(I think you forgot a /sarc)
An experienced user that should be difficult to fish/trick, but through economic incentives, was persuaded to adopt the idea that there can be many different bitcoins all at the same time or that it can just randomly change from one thing to another.
Well, no. But thanks for playing.
OTOH, 'experienced financiers' can be tricked into accepting different things as gold, such as paper, IOUs, or ledger entries from their broker.
Real "money" can't morph or change from one thing to another because then it would not be fungible, hence bitcoin gold isn't and never was "money" in the first place.
Except we know that gold
has served as money. So your argument that bitcoin is not falls on its face. Nevermind that your initial postulate fails from a terminal misunderstanding of the nature of Bitcoin.
So how's that wampum doing for ya, r0ach?
Poll
