Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 05:04:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 20211 20212 20213 20214 20215 20216 20217 20218 20219 20220 20221 20222 20223 20224 20225 20226 20227 20228 20229 20230 20231 20232 20233 20234 20235 20236 20237 20238 20239 20240 20241 20242 20243 20244 20245 20246 20247 20248 20249 20250 20251 20252 20253 20254 20255 20256 20257 20258 20259 20260 [20261] 20262 20263 20264 20265 20266 20267 20268 20269 20270 20271 20272 20273 20274 20275 20276 20277 20278 20279 20280 20281 20282 20283 20284 20285 20286 20287 20288 20289 20290 20291 20292 20293 20294 20295 20296 20297 20298 20299 20300 20301 20302 20303 20304 20305 20306 20307 20308 20309 20310 20311 ... 33302 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26368033 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2384


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
May 04, 2018, 10:47:14 AM

Stats provided by NOAA part of the US govt.

So? NASA is funded by US govt too. Yet they manage to land a few rovers of Mars.

Can't do that with crappy science.

Did the government want the end result to be a rover on Mars?

Does the government want the end result of climate change studies to show the public that they need more government?
1714107869
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714107869

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714107869
Reply with quote  #2

1714107869
Report to moderator
1714107869
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714107869

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714107869
Reply with quote  #2

1714107869
Report to moderator
1714107869
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714107869

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714107869
Reply with quote  #2

1714107869
Report to moderator
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714107869
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714107869

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714107869
Reply with quote  #2

1714107869
Report to moderator
1714107869
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714107869

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714107869
Reply with quote  #2

1714107869
Report to moderator
1714107869
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714107869

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714107869
Reply with quote  #2

1714107869
Report to moderator
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3822
Merit: 7968



View Profile
May 04, 2018, 10:48:12 AM
Last edit: May 04, 2018, 12:08:03 PM by xhomerx10



people believe in terraforming but climate change is a myth?

 For the sake of science, I terraformed an orange once.


Arriemoller
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282
Merit: 1767


Cлaвa Укpaїнi!


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 10:49:56 AM

It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?

I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.

We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8
afbitcoins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1061



View Profile WWW
May 04, 2018, 10:50:35 AM

Stats provided by NOAA part of the US govt.

So? NASA is funded by US govt too. Yet they manage to land a few rovers of Mars.

Can't do that with crappy science.

There are interesting theories going around about NASA

For example you could fake it, say in greenland, add a red tint to the 'mars' photos. And keep the rest of the budget for other purposes, know what I mean  Wink You know like with the moon landings.
afbitcoins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1061



View Profile WWW
May 04, 2018, 10:54:22 AM

It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?

I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.

We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8

Great idea comrades. The global government can enforce that along with the global carbon tax.
Phil_S
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2090
Merit: 1461


We choose to go to the moon


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 11:04:57 AM

And keep the rest of the budget for other purposes, know what I mean  Wink You know like with the moon landings.

Budget, right... What's the point, considering the most expensive part is the big-ass rocket? And since you can't fake a rocket launch, you might as well send it somewhere interesting. Now you'll tell me Saturn V were made of cardboard, right? Smiley
Arriemoller
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282
Merit: 1767


Cлaвa Укpaїнi!


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 11:08:50 AM

Nonsense. The climate is always changing. The assertion that humans are the main driving force behind it, however, that is bullshit.

+1 on that

Exactly.  Just because 98% of the worlds scientific community agrees on it doesn’t make it true.  Science is just made up numbers. They even admit to having imaginary numbers, which just proves they are making it up.  It’s time to fight back. We can start with that Galileo guy. 

Didn't 98% of the scientific community at the time agree that Galileo was wrong?
In science it doesn't matter how many agrees with you, it only matters if you are right. If a hypothesis will become a theory or not is not decided by majority vote, but by if you can prove your hypothesis or not.
And so far the IPCC haven't been able to prove the hypothesis, quite the opposite, every model so far has been wrong.
ivomm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1850
Merit: 2829


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 11:19:58 AM

2 more pages on ignore. enviroment, politics, bla, bla, bla. So many sick people around here. It's time for infofront to take some action Smiley delete, ban, delete, ban.
supertee
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 689
Merit: 260



View Profile WWW
May 04, 2018, 11:23:32 AM

Usually, when mfi breaks through the lower bollinger band, a rise follows. I would say we see 10345 this weekend, as the breakthrough just happened.



B1tUnl0ck3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 277

liife threw a tempest at you? be a coconut !


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 11:25:47 AM

The price is nice and steady around $9,650. Just waiting for the next pump  Cool

it may be a fart  Embarrassed

It is a ripper Wink

all rocket launch start with what apprears to be a fart at first... and then ....

What do we think of the Georgia Guidestones?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

Whoever conceived this crap should  put their money where their mouths are and start by ending their own cancerous existence.
What are your specific objections?

This:
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

If we're talking Logan's Run type culling bullshit, then good luck with that.



you should read all the others 10 objectives. 9 have are almost fullfilled in the west and usa. However the language one... doesn't work apparently.



What do we think of the Georgia Guidestones?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

Whoever conceived this crap should  put their money where their mouths are and start by ending their own cancerous existence.
What are your specific objections?

This:
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

If we're talking Logan's Run type culling bullshit, then good luck with that.
It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?

Balance with Nature

We act more like a virus than a natural inhabitant

Remember we are running out of resources too many people

As they keep telling us

The most precious resource water we are running out of




ROFL

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170412-is-the-world-running-out-of-fresh-water

Where does fresh water come from. sometimes you need a gun...
Drinking water comes from human labor today. We can't drink directly from the local creek like we used to.

And one thing we really are running out of is fish. If the descriptions of early american explorers and settlers are to be believed, we have maybe 1% of 1% of what used to live in the sea. If we go much further then most of it is not coming back.


Agree, not to say any of these things are not happening, actually the opposite, they are happening by design

Ecology, sustainability and environment issues were well known over 50 years ago, even 50000 years ago

Do you think anybody has actually done anything?





...."What do we think of the Georgia Guidestones?"....


It is being fully implemented and it is not what the stone says that will be implemented but a New World Order that will create what the stone says.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_Foreign_Relations

Remember in the Western world you do not get to vote on foreign policy, only domestic





all western ruling class are about raping physically or looting... nothing else. they are only round eyes.

in the western world you are nothing. try to jail hillary and you will see... even the potus is too afraid...

the west has fallen, reequilibrate and laugh and enjoy their demise... because one day those protecting hillary will die, and then chelsea and her offspring will be fair game... and lot of suffering for many logged kids... that will have grown up... war, is an endless process.

and as the round eyes know nothing else, they will perish by it. so is life, so is destiny.

2 more pages on ignore. enviroment, politics, bla, bla, bla. So many sick people around here. It's time for infofront to take some action Smiley delete, ban, delete, ban.

go back to provide liquidity.
sirazimuth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3346
Merit: 3484


born once atheist


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 11:26:07 AM

Stats provided by NOAA part of the US govt.

So? NASA is funded by US govt too. Yet they manage to land a few rovers of Mars.

Can't do that with crappy science.

There are interesting theories going around about NASA

For example you could fake it, say in greenland, add a red tint to the 'mars' photos. And keep the rest of the budget for other purposes, know what I mean  Wink You know like with the moon landings.

Yeah those moon landings were all faked.
The earth is flat.
There’s a space alien being kept at Area 51 and the government is keeping it secret.
There’s a bunch of You Tube vids about it so it must be true.

And there’s a big invisible sky fairy too....
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
May 04, 2018, 11:36:08 AM

Stats provided by NOAA part of the US govt.

So? NASA is funded by US govt too. Yet they manage to land a few rovers of Mars.

Can't do that with crappy science.
They also claim that co2 is the primary driver of global climate change.

Nothing state sponsored is trustworthy.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
May 04, 2018, 11:37:35 AM

It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?

I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.

We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8
We have been below replacement rate since the 80s in the west. We are literally dying.
Arriemoller
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2282
Merit: 1767


Cлaвa Укpaїнi!


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 11:42:54 AM

It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?

I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.

We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8
We have been below replacement rate since the 80s in the west. We are literally dying.

Well, in some parts of the west. Sweden is stable. We had 8 million ethnic swedes in 1980, and we still have 8 million ethnic Swedes.
But now we also have 2 million immigrants.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
May 04, 2018, 11:48:00 AM

It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?

I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.

We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8
We have been below replacement rate since the 80s in the west. We are literally dying.

Well, in some parts of the west. Sweden is stable. We had 8 million ethnic swedes in 1980, and we still have 8 million ethnic Swedes.
But now we also have 2 million immigrants.
https://www.google.com/search?q=fertility+rate+sweden

Birth rate, not population. And even then it's only because they count the immigrants, actual swedish birth rate is much lower than this.
B1tUnl0ck3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 277

liife threw a tempest at you? be a coconut !


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 11:52:34 AM

It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?

I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.

We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8
We have been below replacement rate since the 80s in the west. We are literally dying.

exactly, how the feminist agenda should work. brainless things, unable to be mothers or wives, pretending to be men, while having none of the courage, strengh or determination, to foster the centralization of defense for them to rape impunitly.

100% by design.

It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?

I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.

We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8
We have been below replacement rate since the 80s in the west. We are literally dying.

Well, in some parts of the west. Sweden is stable. We had 8 million ethnic swedes in 1980, and we still have 8 million ethnic Swedes.
But now we also have 2 million immigrants.

by design, remember the first rule... in startrek... bring unvicilized that didn't yet did their homework to evolve, to ensure the destruction of all safety nets, and the heritage fought over centuries against the feudalist order.

voting rights to women will be remember as the biggest mistake of all time.

nothing disgust me more than "western liberated females"... those are the plague, that will end the west for a long time...

how many females own bitcoin? how many females provide liquidity with their own money? lol... they can't compete in anything against men... they aren't design for that... from chess to asic design...

look at all those females ceo? appart wetting before musk they are useless bioids destroying what generations of men build before them.

listen to the ex wife of alex jones if you want to have an idea...

conformism is in their dnas.

It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?

I don't disagree. Let's start with the 2-child-max-per-couple rule and enforce that first.

We basically already have two children per family globally, more in some countries and less in some.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Vog3uZ47O8
We have been below replacement rate since the 80s in the west. We are literally dying.

Well, in some parts of the west. Sweden is stable. We had 8 million ethnic swedes in 1980, and we still have 8 million ethnic Swedes.
But now we also have 2 million immigrants.
https://www.google.com/search?q=fertility+rate+sweden

Birth rate, not population. And even then it's only because they count the immigrants, actual swedish birth rate is much lower than this.

when you own state purse a demographic strategy to defeat the natives, what can the natives do? fight? lol, the cops and others law enforcement agencies in the west have been brainwashed and contaminated in believing in the female utopia...

female marines... LoL...

himmlers and co are still laughing in their tombs at the idea... stoping the wehrmacht with girls? hehehee... we saw how it worked in the street of berlin against the russian males Smiley.
erre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1205



View Profile
May 04, 2018, 12:22:32 PM


Didn't 98% of the scientific community at the time agree that Galileo was wrong?
In science it doesn't matter how many agrees with you, it only matters if you are right. If a hypothesis will become a theory or not is not decided by majority vote, but by if you can prove your hypothesis or not.
And so far the IPCC haven't been able to prove the hypothesis, quite the opposite, every model so far has been wrong.

Galileo invented the scientific method, so there were no "scientists" before him, just "men of science".
Scientifically, I think ipcc isn't performing so bad ( https://www.google.it/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/oct/01/ipcc-global-warming-projections-accurate), I don't know any alternative model or better explanation, and of course you cannot "prove" a model, just test it, but you can make a lot of experiments (I.e. adding co2 to a simulated ecosystem), and as far as I know they are all confirming the mainstream theory. That could be false, right, but it's the best theory out there
bitcoinPsycho
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 2066


$120000 in 2024 Confirmed


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:04:20 PM

Stats provided by NOAA part of the US govt.

So? NASA is funded by US govt too. Yet they manage to land a few rovers of Mars.

Can't do that with crappy science.

There are interesting theories going around about NASA

For example you could fake it, say in greenland, add a red tint to the 'mars' photos. And keep the rest of the budget for other purposes, know what I mean  Wink You know like with the moon landings.

Yeah those moon landings were all faked.
The earth is flat.
There’s a space alien being kept at Area 51 and the government is keeping it secret.
There’s a bunch of You Tube vids about it so it must be true.

And there’s a big invisible sky fairy too....
dont forget that the moon is hollow and bcash is the real bitcoin
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3542
Merit: 5039



View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:04:35 PM
Last edit: May 04, 2018, 01:28:28 PM by Torque
Merited by Ibian (1)

We have been below replacement rate since the 80s in the west. We are literally dying.

If you believe the data/outcome of the Calhoun's rats experiment can also apply to humans, then the reason for the dropping reproduction rate starts to make sense.

But it's more than just available space, or the amount comfortable space, that one lives in. The rats didn't have to "purchase" their real estate, they just laid claim to it. However, humans do. Also the rats didn't have to "work" for any resources. Humans do.

Too many offspring are not just a drain on their parents comfort of life level, but also their available resources/wealth. Thus too many offspring now pose a risk to the parent's longevity through a chance at comfortable retirement.

Notice how the wealthy elite still seem happy and healthy while having a boat load of children? Yeah there's a reason for that.

"Don't have more children than you can afford (either while married or through divorce)" is now becoming a major thing. And in the West it'll only get worse when people are more overworked and underpaid, taxes and inflation continue to increase, income levels peak, debt levels peak, and large, comfortable homes become astronomically unaffordable for most couples. Actually we are already there.
B1tUnl0ck3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 277

liife threw a tempest at you? be a coconut !


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:04:52 PM


Didn't 98% of the scientific community at the time agree that Galileo was wrong?
In science it doesn't matter how many agrees with you, it only matters if you are right. If a hypothesis will become a theory or not is not decided by majority vote, but by if you can prove your hypothesis or not.
And so far the IPCC haven't been able to prove the hypothesis, quite the opposite, every model so far has been wrong.

Galileo invented the scientific method, so there were no "scientists" before him, just "men of science".
Scientifically, I think ipcc isn't performing so bad ( https://www.google.it/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/oct/01/ipcc-global-warming-projections-accurate), I don't know any alternative model or better explanation, and of course you cannot "prove" a model, just test it, but you can make a lot of experiments (I.e. adding co2 to a simulated ecosystem), and as far as I know they are all confirming the mainstream theory. That could be false, right, but it's the best theory out there

don't confuse science and the religion of science. there is no majority in science.  If all the members of the ipcc killed their families first, I would believe them... otherwise, less urgent than killing hillary and obama and their agents.

Stats provided by NOAA part of the US govt.

So? NASA is funded by US govt too. Yet they manage to land a few rovers of Mars.

Can't do that with crappy science.

There are interesting theories going around about NASA

For example you could fake it, say in greenland, add a red tint to the 'mars' photos. And keep the rest of the budget for other purposes, know what I mean  Wink You know like with the moon landings.

Yeah those moon landings were all faked.
The earth is flat.
There’s a space alien being kept at Area 51 and the government is keeping it secret.
There’s a bunch of You Tube vids about it so it must be true.

And there’s a big invisible sky fairy too....
dont forget that the moon is hollow and bcash is the real bitcoin

everyone knows that the big btc farms are on the moon... so noobs to not know it Smiley.
Pages: « 1 ... 20211 20212 20213 20214 20215 20216 20217 20218 20219 20220 20221 20222 20223 20224 20225 20226 20227 20228 20229 20230 20231 20232 20233 20234 20235 20236 20237 20238 20239 20240 20241 20242 20243 20244 20245 20246 20247 20248 20249 20250 20251 20252 20253 20254 20255 20256 20257 20258 20259 20260 [20261] 20262 20263 20264 20265 20266 20267 20268 20269 20270 20271 20272 20273 20274 20275 20276 20277 20278 20279 20280 20281 20282 20283 20284 20285 20286 20287 20288 20289 20290 20291 20292 20293 20294 20295 20296 20297 20298 20299 20300 20301 20302 20303 20304 20305 20306 20307 20308 20309 20310 20311 ... 33302 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!