Bitcoin Forum
May 18, 2024, 11:52:31 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 3478 3479 3480 3481 3482 3483 3484 3485 3486 3487 3488 3489 3490 3491 3492 3493 3494 3495 3496 3497 3498 3499 3500 3501 3502 3503 3504 3505 3506 3507 3508 3509 3510 3511 3512 3513 3514 3515 3516 3517 3518 3519 3520 3521 3522 3523 3524 3525 3526 3527 [3528] 3529 3530 3531 3532 3533 3534 3535 3536 3537 3538 3539 3540 3541 3542 3543 3544 3545 3546 3547 3548 3549 3550 3551 3552 3553 3554 3555 3556 3557 3558 3559 3560 3561 3562 3563 3564 3565 3566 3567 3568 3569 3570 3571 3572 3573 3574 3575 3576 3577 3578 ... 33359 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26384675 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
virtualfaqs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
December 31, 2013, 04:51:30 AM
 #70541

 It [fraud] also requires the deception to be practiced "in order to secure unfair or unlawful gain."  This second half is one thing that makes it different from a "hoax."
Of course this merely pushes the question back a square:  What is unfair?

Yes, exactly!  The Wikipedia definition requires the arbitror to not only conclude that the deception was deliberate, but that the gain that resulted from it was "unfair."  So we are back a square, indeed.  If a whale places a 3000 BTC ask wall to scare the small fish into selling, does that qualify as "deception"?  A larger whale could eat his wall in a single bite.  And even if one concludes that this is deliberate deception, is this also "unfair"?  The market participants are playing by the same rules, some of them just happen to hold more capital.  Lastly, I'm not even convinced that profitable manipulation is even possible over the long term. 

One reason that I'm excited about bitcoin and the power of the blockchain is that I believe it will allow us to write more exact contracts and motivate de-ambiguity or our legal system.  

I think this is happening right now. 1100 BTC volume in the last hour and we barely moved.
shmadz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000


@theshmadz


View Profile
December 31, 2013, 05:04:13 AM
 #70542

 It [fraud] also requires the deception to be practiced "in order to secure unfair or unlawful gain."  This second half is one thing that makes it different from a "hoax."
Of course this merely pushes the question back a square:  What is unfair?

Yes, exactly!  The Wikipedia definition requires the arbitror to not only conclude that the deception was deliberate, but that the gain that resulted from it was "unfair."  So we are back a square, indeed.  If a whale places a 3000 BTC ask wall to scare the small fish into selling, does that qualify as "deception"?  A larger whale could eat his wall in a single bite.  And even if one concludes that this is deliberate deception, is this also "unfair"?  The market participants are playing by the same rules, some of them just happen to hold more capital.  Lastly, I'm not even convinced that profitable manipulation is even possible over the long term. 

One reason that I'm excited about bitcoin and the power of the blockchain is that I believe it will allow us to write more exact contracts and motivate de-ambiguity or our legal system.  



After reading through that list earlier of all the shady moves that can be pulled by manipulators, isn't it precisely the regulations that make all that shit possible?

The regulating body makes a set of rules, then decides how and when to enforce those rules.  

Manipulation is a time-honoured tradition of the legacy financial system, and the regulators seem quite accustomed to looking the other way.

I say gloves off, anything goes, let bitcoin regulate itself.
NewLiberty
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002


Gresham's Lawyer


View Profile WWW
December 31, 2013, 05:10:06 AM
 #70543

ok the china deadline is tomorrow

why is the market not reacting?

Tomorrow? It was the Chinese New Year, not? So, the deadline should be the 30.1.14.
Yup, it was Chinese new year, so we still have another month to go.
oh the deadline it on the 30th of next month.

shit

i thought it was tomorrow

There is a different deadline tomorrow:  Swiss Banking and USA Foreign Account Disclosure Compliance and taxation.
Swiss banks have a deadline of tomorrow to sign up for compliance.  Some are doing so:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/27/us-tax-switzerland-lombardodier-idUSBRE9BQ03T20131227

Everyone I know pays their taxes, and usually end up overpaying to be conservative...  But I imagine there might be some folks in the USA that have used Swiss accounts to hide money.  They might want to do something else with that money.

windjc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070


View Profile
December 31, 2013, 05:18:00 AM
 #70544

715 becomes important support now for Gox. Can it hold until January the 6th. Will be interesting to see.
RandyMagnum
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 662
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 31, 2013, 05:18:47 AM
 #70545

Regarding US capital gains changes, I doubt many hodlers are looking to trade in dramatic fashion tomorrow to avoid the 2014 hike, but I'm not Nostradamus.

edit: spelling error - holders to hodlers
mellowyellow
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 31, 2013, 05:20:07 AM
 #70546

Regarding US capital gains changes, I doubt many holders are looking to trade in dramatic fashion tomorrow to avoid the 2014 hike, but I'm not Nostradamus.

How much of a hike?
RandyMagnum
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 662
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 31, 2013, 05:26:51 AM
Last edit: December 31, 2013, 05:40:11 AM by RandyMagnum
 #70547

How much of a hike?

The back n' forth here covers it pretty well:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1tx6u0/in_us_preserve_2013_bitcoin_gains_before_2014/

I'm positive that it is in fact a year late and was either ignorance, or an attempt at FUD.  As I believe that is the case, forgive me for even mentioning it in the first place.
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
December 31, 2013, 05:44:20 AM
 #70548

715 becomes important support now for Gox. Can it hold until January the 6th. Will be interesting to see.

*shake*
outlook not so good
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
December 31, 2013, 05:46:40 AM
 #70549


After reading through that list earlier of all the shady moves that can be pulled by manipulators, isn't it precisely the regulations that make all that shit possible?

The regulating body makes a set of rules, then decides how and when to enforce those rules.  


Someone (wisely) said:  All human systems will be gamed.

I am not often robbed, but when I am, I prefer for it not to be under color of law.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1777


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 31, 2013, 06:02:26 AM
 #70550

deadfi$h
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 125
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 31, 2013, 06:12:46 AM
 #70551

Less than 5 coin traded on stamp in the last 20 minutes! About the same on Gox. This sucks... I'm sitting on a quick short trade.
Davyd05
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 31, 2013, 06:32:59 AM
 #70552

http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/new-bitcoin-ira-offered-by-broad-financial-1865581.htm

go go IRAs
TERA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 31, 2013, 06:38:09 AM
 #70553

Regarding US capital gains changes, I doubt many hodlers are looking to trade in dramatic fashion tomorrow to avoid the 2014 hike, but I'm not Nostradamus.

edit: spelling error - holders to hodlers
I am under the impression that day tarders cannot possibly reduce taxes anyway by opening a new position and/or transferring coins offline. Is this correct?
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1777


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 31, 2013, 07:02:29 AM
 #70554

solex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002


100 satoshis -> ISO code


View Profile
December 31, 2013, 07:11:59 AM
 #70555

Regarding US capital gains changes, I doubt many hodlers are looking to trade in dramatic fashion tomorrow to avoid the 2014 hike, but I'm not Nostradamus.

edit: spelling error - holders to hodlers
I am under the impression that day tarders cannot possibly reduce taxes anyway by opening a new position and/or transferring coins offline. Is this correct?

The US capital gains changes took effect Jan 1st 2013, so it is 2014 which is the first return year. If CGT is to be saved then bitcoins would have to have been sold in 2012.
Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193


View Profile
December 31, 2013, 07:28:28 AM
 #70556


+1

http://www.broadfinancial.com/bitcoin
RandyMagnum
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 662
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 31, 2013, 07:30:06 AM
 #70557

Regarding US capital gains changes, I doubt many hodlers are looking to trade in dramatic fashion tomorrow to avoid the 2014 hike, but I'm not Nostradamus.

edit: spelling error - holders to hodlers
I am under the impression that day tarders cannot possibly reduce taxes anyway by opening a new position and/or transferring coins offline. Is this correct?

The US capital gains changes took effect Jan 1st 2013, so it is 2014 which is the first return year. If CGT is to be saved then bitcoins would have to have been sold in 2012.


This is correct.  Again, I was too slack in posting that to begin with.
Ashitank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 31, 2013, 07:32:18 AM
 #70558

I guess the slow decline phase has started as it was predicted earlier.
MikeH
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 31, 2013, 07:39:07 AM
 #70559

I guess the slow decline phase has started as it was predicted earlier.

what you saying? we in a bubble?  you're a bubble!
OldGeek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250

Blitz:The price affects the perception of the news


View Profile
December 31, 2013, 07:47:59 AM
 #70560

Interesting discussions these last few hours.

Let me ask you, who are smarter than I, what do you think would be the effect on the western markets if, say Huobi, crashed to zero in the next 24 hours?
Pages: « 1 ... 3478 3479 3480 3481 3482 3483 3484 3485 3486 3487 3488 3489 3490 3491 3492 3493 3494 3495 3496 3497 3498 3499 3500 3501 3502 3503 3504 3505 3506 3507 3508 3509 3510 3511 3512 3513 3514 3515 3516 3517 3518 3519 3520 3521 3522 3523 3524 3525 3526 3527 [3528] 3529 3530 3531 3532 3533 3534 3535 3536 3537 3538 3539 3540 3541 3542 3543 3544 3545 3546 3547 3548 3549 3550 3551 3552 3553 3554 3555 3556 3557 3558 3559 3560 3561 3562 3563 3564 3565 3566 3567 3568 3569 3570 3571 3572 3573 3574 3575 3576 3577 3578 ... 33359 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!