Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 01:08:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
$65,000 - 59 (86.8%)
$48,000 - 9 (13.2%)
Total Voters: 68

Pages: « 1 ... 22055 22056 22057 22058 22059 22060 22061 22062 22063 22064 22065 22066 22067 22068 22069 22070 22071 22072 22073 22074 22075 22076 22077 22078 22079 22080 22081 22082 22083 22084 22085 22086 22087 22088 22089 22090 22091 22092 22093 22094 22095 22096 22097 22098 22099 22100 22101 22102 22103 22104 [22105] 22106 22107 22108 22109 22110 22111 22112 22113 22114 22115 22116 22117 22118 22119 22120 22121 22122 22123 22124 22125 22126 22127 22128 22129 22130 22131 22132 22133 22134 22135 22136 22137 22138 22139 22140 22141 22142 22143 22144 22145 22146 22147 22148 22149 22150 22151 22152 22153 22154 22155 ... 33206 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26337004 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (170 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 11778


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:22:33 PM

@infofront please delete alevlaslo

the smell of fried, am I a threat to bitcoin?

better bitter truth than sweet lie

Only read few last post
And already detected a FOOL in the BTC narratives, let him be here and join us with his bitternes in a foreseeable future
1711717693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711717693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711717693
Reply with quote  #2

1711717693
Report to moderator
1711717693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711717693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711717693
Reply with quote  #2

1711717693
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711717693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711717693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711717693
Reply with quote  #2

1711717693
Report to moderator
1711717693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711717693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711717693
Reply with quote  #2

1711717693
Report to moderator
1711717693
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711717693

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711717693
Reply with quote  #2

1711717693
Report to moderator
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3528
Merit: 5033



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:26:54 PM

Oooh, all the regular trolls are back in force, along with a few new ones.

Guess we're going up soon.  Wink
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:28:45 PM


2) species loss ... ok maybe this is an issue, it's subjective and depends on your feelings though. Massive extinction events have happened regularly in the Earth's past from various means. How much species diversity is exactly the right amount? do you feel like playing god to determine that? humans have cultivated huge quantities of biomass in the form of crops, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, there are probably more animals alive on the planet today than at any time in the past, let's celebrate mammalian abundance husbanded by humans! ... are they just not the "right" animals for your liking? my liking? his liking? should we all be living in teepees and hunting the roaming meager herds of buffalo in competition with wolves and large cats? Who really knows what is the right balance for number of species and quantities of each species that should be alive on earth at any particular time? It's just an excessively complicated question to believe anyone who claims to know the answer, they are just bullshitting you to gain an advantage over you somehow.


Very much the crux of the matter as I see it.  Yes, as I have consistently maintained, my preference for the complex and diverse arrangement of forms out of which human intelligence arose is largely aesthetic.

You have demonstrated yourself not to be willfully ignorant.  You must understand that your preference for a subdued planet brought wholly under the reign of humanity is also aesthetic, a selfish and misguided aesthetic in my view but there it is.

I do not demand that you share my aesthetic values, though I will resist the conversion of wildness to commodity to the end.

We need natural habitats because it is where we, humans, will at some time spend all of our time in the absence of meaningful high intelligence requiring jobs.
With machines already on the verge of doing very complicated tasks much better than us and getting true insight into the nature of things (that they would be probably incapable of conveying back to us-see my other post), we would need nature more than ever.
Just one example: a machine is capable of reading X-rays 150 times faster than radiologist (making 250-300K/year) and giving a better diagnosis.
How you are going to compete with it? You can't, basically, unless you implement some luddite laws, but then you lose productivity.
While I quite appreciate nature I don't see why it would be needed (at the place in time that you are describing). Nature is just one among an uncountable amount of things to keep yourself entertained with.
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3528
Merit: 5033



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:28:50 PM

We had an explosion of whizbangery a decade ago. We had not come close to riding that to its natural conclusion before wizards that thought they knew better perverted the system.

Oh well, devs gotta dev.

I thought you were a dev.

Nah he's just a fucking hack.  Wink
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:32:54 PM

I've actually been thinking about how viable a salmon or whatever pond/lake/farm on private property could be. I looked into it but found hardly anything useful beyond a basic confirmation that it's possible. Do you happen to have any idea as to how small scaled fish-farming could be made and how economical/costly it would be or have any reading pointers otherwise? Basically trying to figure out if it's mostly initial fixed costs or if it'll cost a fortune in sustaining. Would love a fucking salmon farm on my property.

I'm not sure salmon, being anadromous, can be reared in ponds, perhaps.

The salmon farms around here occupy valuable estuary areas and are severely infested with some sort of aquatic lice which then attack the young wild salmon as they come down to the salt water.

Same as it ever was.
Not sure what the source was, but I found something about small artificial lakes with salmon. Those shouldn't run into the lice problem, at least not for the wild ones as there would be none. Been wondering if I could get enough shrimp to simultaneously make the salmon delicious and sustainable though (e.g. without having to throw tons of shrimps into the lake every so often). Is it even possible to artificially balance an eco-system that doesn't have either population die?
alevlaslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988
Merit: 593


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:34:49 PM


2) species loss ... ok maybe this is an issue, it's subjective and depends on your feelings though. Massive extinction events have happened regularly in the Earth's past from various means. How much species diversity is exactly the right amount? do you feel like playing god to determine that? humans have cultivated huge quantities of biomass in the form of crops, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, there are probably more animals alive on the planet today than at any time in the past, let's celebrate mammalian abundance husbanded by humans! ... are they just not the "right" animals for your liking? my liking? his liking? should we all be living in teepees and hunting the roaming meager herds of buffalo in competition with wolves and large cats? Who really knows what is the right balance for number of species and quantities of each species that should be alive on earth at any particular time? It's just an excessively complicated question to believe anyone who claims to know the answer, they are just bullshitting you to gain an advantage over you somehow.


Very much the crux of the matter as I see it.  Yes, as I have consistently maintained, my preference for the complex and diverse arrangement of forms out of which human intelligence arose is largely aesthetic.

You have demonstrated yourself not to be willfully ignorant.  You must understand that your preference for a subdued planet brought wholly under the reign of humanity is also aesthetic, a selfish and misguided aesthetic in my view but there it is.

I do not demand that you share my aesthetic values, though I will resist the conversion of wildness to commodity to the end.

We need natural habitats because it is where we, humans, will at some time spend all of our time in the absence of meaningful high intelligence requiring jobs.
With machines already on the verge of doing very complicated tasks much better than us and getting true insight into the nature of things (that they would be probably incapable of conveying back to us-see my other post), we would need nature more than ever.
Just one example: a machine is capable of reading X-rays 150 times faster than radiologist (making 250-300K/year) and giving a better diagnosis.
How you are going to compete with it? You can't, basically, unless you implement some luddite laws, but then you lose productivity.
While I quite appreciate nature I don't see why it would be needed (at the place in time that you are describing). Nature is just one among an uncountable amount of things to keep yourself entertained with.

I know the balance is governed by mortality, death exists to make room. If you do not give birth, aging and death will disappear
alevlaslo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988
Merit: 593


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:36:14 PM

that's not enough

But 128MB blocks are the solution, right ?

Yes
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:37:16 PM

My limited experience with raising fish in ponds:

1.  Dig a deep hole, as deep as possible.  We have rock 2 meters down.  Line with fish pond liner (like heavy duty black garbage bags)

2.  Add some rocks from the garden onto the liner.  

3.  Fill with water or wait for it to rain.

4. Research fish native to the area

5.  Buy some pond plants the fish like to eat, put in pond and wait a couple of months for them to become established. Add lilies for shade.  

6.  Buy some baby fish and dump them in the pond.

7.  Ignore for a year and let them be fish.  Don’t feed them.

8. Be continually surprised at how big the bastards are.  

Total set up costs: about $2k, mostly labour for hole digging, lining the pond and materials.  Total running costs:  $0.  

If I was to do it again, I would plan for more comprehensive shade to reduce algae growth.  Overhanging trees would be good but we have space restrictions with current pond location.

Main thing for me is keeping an eye on water levels.  We tend to lose more to evaporation than we get in rain due to dry climate, so we have to supplement some times.  Deeper pond with more shade would help here.
This is pretty much what I've been looking for. Do you have any idea if it's possible to balance out multiple types of fish/shrimp in a way that doesn't have either population dwindle to zero? And to what extent do you have to worry about how many you can eat, or is your pond strictly decorative?


+2 WOsMerit
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 11778


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:39:10 PM
Merited by Globb0 (2)

I do find it strange that this threads participation and viewership rises considerably when such off topic posts are made however...  I am sure it is just a coincidence.
Screw global warming, let's talk more about the chick with the shovel.

OK why did they linger filming the shovel at the beginning of the full clip?   



its like in every action hero movie scene.... the big object filming @the start of the scene is the one thats gonna save the day
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:41:40 PM

Whew, a Keto Health Coach. Better listen to the guy.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1454


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:47:19 PM


Someone has potentially trashed his opsec somewhere around there..... Unless it is intentional, of course.
Bitcoinaire
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 695
Merit: 439



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:48:46 PM

Going down, just like all of 2018. Ho hum...
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 11778


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:52:00 PM



Icygreen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1463
Merit: 1135



View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:52:13 PM

Da fuk happened in here?
JJG finally takes a break and ya'll encouraging r0ach to fill the gap?  Whoa.. Roll Eyes  However due to the engagement,  I'm finally understanding how his mind works and why he persists here.  And I thought it was just trolling all along.  

Yeah JJG is long time, probably to busy @the holliday dayzzz, if he has the same amount of Words to spread @ the family table, or when one asking him “how is that BTC thing?”
Yeah than the party isn’t over yet haha
Grin

he was being a monumental prick that last night he was here, perhaps an epic hangover?

Ya, finally earned himself an ignore and ironically I'm reading roach posts. Haha
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392


Be a bank


View Profile
December 29, 2018, 11:57:32 PM

dickhead whale-herons
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
December 30, 2018, 12:00:51 AM


Someone has potentially trashed his opsec somewhere around there..... Unless it is intentional, of course.
He's a Mensa Member. He doesn't need opsec.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1454


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
December 30, 2018, 12:01:39 AM


Someone has potentially trashed his opsec somewhere around there..... Unless it is intentional, of course.
He's a Mensa Member. He doesn't need opsec.

Not that one....
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3122
Merit: 4271


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
December 30, 2018, 12:02:44 AM

hmmm, little debart doesn't seem to have it to break 3650
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 3802



View Profile
December 30, 2018, 12:02:52 AM

If you do not give birth, aging and death will disappear

Spoken like a bot....

I start to suspect several posters not to be actual typing humans.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 11778


BTC + Crossfit, living life.


View Profile
December 30, 2018, 12:02:58 AM

Pages: « 1 ... 22055 22056 22057 22058 22059 22060 22061 22062 22063 22064 22065 22066 22067 22068 22069 22070 22071 22072 22073 22074 22075 22076 22077 22078 22079 22080 22081 22082 22083 22084 22085 22086 22087 22088 22089 22090 22091 22092 22093 22094 22095 22096 22097 22098 22099 22100 22101 22102 22103 22104 [22105] 22106 22107 22108 22109 22110 22111 22112 22113 22114 22115 22116 22117 22118 22119 22120 22121 22122 22123 22124 22125 22126 22127 22128 22129 22130 22131 22132 22133 22134 22135 22136 22137 22138 22139 22140 22141 22142 22143 22144 22145 22146 22147 22148 22149 22150 22151 22152 22153 22154 22155 ... 33206 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!