Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
January 21, 2019, 11:50:33 PM |
|
Mrs V told me to delete a post. Sorry if I offended anyone.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 2279
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
January 21, 2019, 11:55:07 PM |
|
Please repost it so I can be offended
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
January 21, 2019, 11:57:39 PM |
|
Please repost it so I can be offended
@ChristianJMay 3 hours ago (yes a right-wing weirdo guy, I'd guess) https://twitter.com/ChristianJMay/status/1087453385975087105Brexit undoubtedly creating a headache for many firms, but amid the gloom: - Majority of UK CEOs expect to boost headcount in 2019 - Record rise in number of graduate jobs on offer in 2019 - London office take-up at 4 year high - Commercial property investment at 4 year high counter: quite funny thread https://twitter.com/mac_puck/status/1087360379691380736Brace for mega thread on "ALL THEM RULES INNIT" There is a type of of brexiter who is motivated not by xenophobia, or Empire nostalgia, or buccaneering trade fantasies, but instead by "all them EU rules". Sadly they can never name a single one. So I have done some research... edit: more interesting different subject https://twitter.com/Douglas9162/status/1087483324782784512My notes “Let my people go Surfing” by Yvon Chouinard (founder of Patagonia), ~25 things
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 11176
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
January 21, 2019, 11:58:37 PM |
|
Did somebody previously post a graph or a chart detailing what happens to the price every January (we usually slump every Jan?).
Any way, curious to know people’s thoughts that if we stay over $3,200 as we enter February - Have we definitely seen the bottom of this cycle?
Thoughts?
Bitcoin is not seasonal. Remember the proclamation that we go up every November? That did not work too well in November 2018. I think that the pressure (lack of support) for down is greater than the pressure (too much resistance) for up. Does not mean that the price is going down. Does not mean that I hope the price will go up. Does not mean that I am selling any. Does not mean that I am not going to buy more BTC if the price goes down. Does not mean that my stash of BTC is NOT big enough for me to be prepared for UP. In other words, I have hardly no fucking clue, beyond a coin toss with the use of a coin that is slightly skewed towards down.
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
January 22, 2019, 12:11:54 AM |
|
counter: quite funny thread https://twitter.com/mac_puck/status/1087360379691380736Brace for mega thread on "ALL THEM RULES INNIT" There is a type of of brexiter who is motivated not by xenophobia, or Empire nostalgia, or buccaneering trade fantasies, but instead by "all them EU rules". Sadly they can never name a single one. So I have done some research... I notice the giant faggot in the link sees no problem with being ruled over by unelected bureaucrats (authoritarianism), therefore, I proclaim myself as your new ruler and none of you should technically have any problem with that. Hell, for all you know I'm already typing this from Brussels.
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 4460
|
|
January 22, 2019, 12:14:05 AM |
|
Did somebody previously post a graph or a chart detailing what happens to the price every January (we usually slump every Jan?).
Any way, curious to know people’s thoughts that if we stay over $3,200 as we enter February - Have we definitely seen the bottom of this cycle?
Thoughts?
You probably refer to a chart here: https://bitcoinist.com/january-crypto-crash-nothing-new/A drop in Jan 2015, 2016 and 2017, a little in 2018, most centered on Jan 12-Jan 18. Timeline-wise we passed it already, which means nothing, of course. Personally, I still think that we had our "January" effect in December.
|
|
|
|
BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
|
January 22, 2019, 12:37:34 AM |
|
and there's no such thing as lack of upward mobility.
I agree that each individual case mostly depends on someone's effort, however, there is some evidence that upward mobility has declined (for some reason, especially in the Midwest, less in NY, Massachusetts and Montana): http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6336/398You can argue why it happaned, but not whether it happened or not, according to the authors. Lack of real upward mobility does not imply the lack of opportunity for such. There are all kinds of reasons not to move upwards. Tribes exist that specifically avoid all contact with anything outside of their world, by choice.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 11176
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
January 22, 2019, 12:50:54 AM |
|
For the analog to be meaningful it should be LN/BTC ~~ TCP/IP (TCP is stacked on top of IP, the lower layer) ... just saying. For sure. Would not want to confuse anyone.
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4004
Merit: 5446
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
January 22, 2019, 12:57:40 AM |
|
Damn, I pretty patient when it comes to long term shit but this is getting ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1428
Merit: 2279
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
January 22, 2019, 01:16:01 AM |
|
Sadly I am not offended
|
|
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
|
January 22, 2019, 01:41:54 AM |
|
Damn, I pretty patient when it comes to long term shit but this is getting ridiculous.
Really? Compared to what? I think you are probably not as patient as you think.
|
|
|
|
Icygreen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1463
Merit: 1135
|
|
January 22, 2019, 01:49:57 AM |
|
@ roach, you really have nothing in your arguments regarding BTC fungibility vs PM's. Your claims are pure speculation that certain addresses will be blacklisted where miners won't touch it. That has not happened and it's not even close. Until an address or transaction is muted on the main chain or LN you're just spouting your own conspiracy theory Armageddon fears. Regarding middlemen/ transaction validators: I've personally been taxed many times after arriving in airports carrying non personal PM's. If I try to hide them or refuse to pay the tax, my physical PM's get confiscated. It's not possible to carry significant amounts of PM's abroad unless you figure out how to smuggle them in. There's just one example of a realized middleman for your physical PM's. Today's commerce largely does not happen face to face with physical exchange and if I'm willing to travel to the merchant who is in another country, how will I avoid such middlemen. Do you suppose I should simply pay the tax on my PM's every time I fly? Dystopia is believing we will all go back to carrying chunks of metal in our pockets again. Since you want to fight this "war" and you seem capable enough to articulate, please tell, what future would you have for money if it were to unfold to your liking?
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
January 22, 2019, 02:37:56 AM |
|
@ roach, you really have nothing in your arguments regarding BTC fungibility vs PM's. Your claims are pure speculation that certain addresses will be blacklisted where miners won't touch it. WHAT Bitcoin fungibility? There never has been any and there never will be. All Lightning Network does is decrease fungibility even further where you go from non-fungible and barely functioning acceptance, to needing to ask permission to a bank for every single transaction. The base bitcoin network is completely useless except for settlement between large financial entities. This is not new news. Hal Finney talked about this years ago. For bitcoin to be anything but a useless niche product, you'd be using the complete dystopia known as Lightning network as I describe here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg49357146#msg49357146I'm not even addressing this other complete nonsense about you complaining it's too hard to smuggle physical metals through an airport. Percentage-wise, barely any of the general population even flies on airplanes, especially on a regular basis. If for some absurd reason you think it's mandatory you have the ability to constantly smuggle around tons of gold to and fro on airplanes, then buy your own private jet like any important person would have that flies a lot.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3346
Merit: 4657
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
January 22, 2019, 03:20:02 AM |
|
UBI should not be regarded as communism. Job automation will eventually result in too few jobs for all people. Companies will have to pay some kind of machine tax to finance the UBI. Work is a fundamental right, everyone should have the right to work. If there is no work, people needs alternatives to survive.
oh man I fear that you, my friend, are in for a very rude awakening.
|
|
|
|
realr0ach
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
|
|
January 22, 2019, 03:37:56 AM |
|
UBI should not be regarded as communism
There's no such thing as "UBI". It's a made up bullshit word identical to communism. They just wish to call it something else because communism has too much of a negative stigma. It's like me renaming Nazism to GRFJ - Get Rid of the Fucking Jews, and claiming it's something else. The economic system didn't fail due to capitalism either, it failed because we already have communism. A central bank is one of the main tenets of communism. And of course "UBI" is communism. One man's free shit is another man's indentured servitude. The only way this doesn't apply is if everything is done by robots. When's the last time you went to a robot dentist? A robot plumber? A robot car mechanic? Not even simple tasks like making a pizza are done by robots. Probably never will be because the machine would cost as much as the store itself and still have to be staffed by people anyway. Anything involving robotic food preparation is going to be nothing more than a conveyor belt to automate some of the process, but not all. All you'd really be doing in the end is making it so your minimum wage employee has to do less work while still paying him the same amount. You'd still need him there regardless. You're basically setting money on fire. Then when your pizza machine breaks down every single day, you get to call in the $200 an hour robot specialist to work on it.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 11176
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
January 22, 2019, 03:50:20 AM |
|
Did somebody previously post a graph or a chart detailing what happens to the price every January (we usually slump every Jan?).
Any way, curious to know people’s thoughts that if we stay over $3,200 as we enter February - Have we definitely seen the bottom of this cycle?
Thoughts?
Bitcoin is not seasonal. Remember the proclamation that we go up every November? That did not work too well in November 2018. I think that the pressure (lack of support) for down is greater than the pressure (too much resistance) for up. Does not mean that the price is going down. Does not mean that I hope the price will go up. Does not mean that I am selling any. Does not mean that I am not going to buy more BTC if the price goes down. Does not mean that my stash of BTC is NOT big enough for me to be prepared for UP. In other words, I have hardly no fucking clue, beyond a coin toss with the use of a coin that is slightly skewed towards down. Yeah people are too excited to jump on what they see as trends and seasons, people were talking about the November and December pumps since July when the price continued a downtrend. I am not sure if I would call it "continues a downward trend," even though the price has so far gone downwards during those recent periods, and sure if we zoom out, we see the BTC price has gone down since about December 2017.... Will it continue to go down is the million dollar question that we should not presume to already have happened, when it has not happened, yet. So, yeah, there was a bit of a problem, when BTC ranged in the flat for a considerable amount of time above $6k until mid November, and yeah the BTC price had visited $6k-ish - at least 4 times prior to breaking through (without breaking through), and then once the BTC price pierced blow that $6k level, then we came down to another so far plateau level. I would not assume more down, even though the odds for down are greater than the odds for up, especially after we broke below $6k. Furthermore, there is a lot of resistance to get back up. I would NOT grasp at straws to make some kind of "seasonal" call because there is a lot more going on in bitcoin besides what supposedly happens at certain times of the year. What is currently happening in BTC is that bears, bear whales and manipulators are going to continue to attempt to suck out as much as they can and for as long as they can in order to get the BTC price to go down. Even though the odds are slightly in their favor, they have not succeeded to push the price down below $3,140, so I am not going to assume that they are going to continue to be successful to push the price down further, even if the odds are slightly in their favor.
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4004
Merit: 5446
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
January 22, 2019, 04:41:20 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|