infofront (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 2793
Shitcoin Minimalist
|
|
February 18, 2021, 06:22:37 PM |
|
New poll incoming. Old Poll:
|
|
|
|
lightfoot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 2258
I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)
|
|
February 18, 2021, 06:29:26 PM |
|
FULL DISCLOSURE: A sell order has been placed at a price target. Looking to officially take some profit to give us liquidity to start building on the land ASAP.
Well, you sold at 16.5k to free your love from slavery and the price since then has.... blown sky high. I fully support your selling again :-)
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 5286
|
|
February 18, 2021, 06:39:19 PM |
|
do you remember on this worldwide COVID-19 crisis in 2020 and onwards? there is a strong evidence from an research of an scientist of the University of Hamburg that the source is the Wuhan laboratory. +++ 17:31 Hamburg researchers: there are indications that coronavirus comes from the laboratory +++ The Hamburg nanoscientist Roland Wiesendanger compiled various findings from scientific studies, articles, reports in social media and other sources in the period from January to December of last year and comes to the conclusion: The pathogen Sars-CoV-2 is not of natural origin, but comes from a laboratory in Wuhan. The physicist cites the following points as evidence for these theories: - To date, no so-called intermediate host has been identified that proves according to the "zoonosis theory" that the coronaviruses were transmitted from bats to humans.
- A research group at the virological institute in the city of Wuhan has carried out genetic manipulations on coronaviruses for many years with the aim of making them more contagious, dangerous and deadly for humans.
- There were significant safety deficiencies in the virological institute in the city of Wuhan even before the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, which are documented.
- Against the background of these and other factors, Wiesendanger writes: "In summary, it can be said that there are very many indications that a laboratory accident at the 'Wuhan Institute of Virology' appears to be by far the most likely cause of the corona pandemic."
You can read more about this shortly on ntv.de. it took a whole year to collect all points for evidence: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349302406_Studie_zum_Ursprung_der_Coronavirus-PandemiePeer reviewed, no? not yet. it's brand new and not all is translated to English. give the scientific community some time and that will be the bomb for something we cannot imagine yet i guess. EDIT: there was some evidence from other sources in the past too but I was cautious with my conclusion and confident the truth will come to the light sometimes in the future. You mean that it didn't just randomly emerge from the outdoor bat-soup stand in the wet market down the street from the lab, that's been operating for decades? What a shocker! /s File this one into the trash bin marked "things that the masses will shove their heads in the sand and won't give a shit about investigating"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 5286
|
|
February 18, 2021, 06:44:04 PM |
|
There's also another type of analysis that includes logic and common sense, something the public sorely lacks. It's called "Occam's Razor".
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3864
Merit: 10962
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
It is a virtuous feedback loop. And it is digital... so it is frictionless.
People are just starting to realize what this means.
It took me quite a while to understand "buy the dip".
I really think that easy game is almost over...
What plenty of people do not realize or believe or can even imagine, is that bitcoin has a path going to $10m USD and beyond. It may take several years or decades, but it will get there. Two more cycles or less after the termination of this cycle is surely not unreasonable, which puts 10 years the outside of the range.. so decades is not so likely to be plural, if it even were to take an actual decade. not saying that I know anything.. Let's play it out... if this cycle ends anywhere in the kind of modest expectations between $150k and $400k, then the next cycle would have decent chances of ending somewhere in the $1million to $5million range, which then cause the cycle after that to end somewhere in the $10million to $30million.. .. Of course, all of the numbers become more and more tangential because they depend, in part, upon where the earlier stages had gone in terms of tops and bottoms.. but I still believe that there is some safety in presuming that the percentage of increases of BTC prices would likely not be as high as earlier cycles.. and likely the correction level of BTC prices might be a little bit less extreme but still have potential for decent levels that feel extreme to anyone actually holding coins ..
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4270
Merit: 8667
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
February 18, 2021, 06:46:38 PM |
|
It is a virtuous feedback loop. And it is digital... so it is frictionless.
People are just starting to realize what this means.
It took me quite a while to understand "buy the dip".
I really think that easy game is almost over...
What plenty of people do not realize or believe or can even imagine, is that bitcoin has a path going to $10m USD and beyond. It may take several years or decades, but it will get there. it can replace gold as a wealth storage which means 8 to 12 x its current price over the next few years.
|
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
|
February 18, 2021, 06:56:26 PM |
|
There's also another type of analysis that includes logic and common sense, something the public sorely lacks. It's called "Occam's Razor". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razorinteresting! this must be the thing Vitalik described as Signaling Theory with his Asperger mind. https://youtu.be/2qLI3VIHuKU
|
|
|
|
Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
|
|
February 18, 2021, 06:59:30 PM |
|
For corn price, my naive calculations put it around the 6th halving cycle or around 2028 about $3m and 2032 will then be closer to $10m.
For some of you guys, you're all set if you can just wait 10 years, while for some of us, we need to find a way to survive without spending what little we have until that escape velocity is reached.
As for gold, I may just get a bar ... just because. I already got a physical bitcoin token (no funding value, just a physical coin)... gold plated copper coin.
|
|
|
|
Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
|
|
February 18, 2021, 07:13:44 PM |
|
Oooh. Nice. BTCC-B and BTCC-U (CAD and USD respectively) BTCC.B ETF (CAD) Non-FX Hedged Shares per BTC: 6,637.6312 BTC per Share: 0.00015066
BTCC.U ETF (USD) Shares per BTC: 5,227.922 BTC per Share: 0.00019128 And it currently has about 85.34569077 bitcorns. So cute! Watch this, it's going to explode. Read more about it here: https://www.purposeinvest.com/funds/purpose-bitcoin-etfThey are known for their cash, or high interest savings ETFs, but those things yield only 0.62%
|
|
|
|
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3682
Merit: 10325
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
|
|
|
eddie13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
|
|
February 18, 2021, 07:37:20 PM |
|
We have a long way to go.. 2017 is still visible without a magnifying glass..
|
|
|
|
d_eddie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 3527
|
|
February 18, 2021, 07:46:21 PM |
|
Linear charts are not recommended in case of a heart condition. Please delete, we've got some elderly people here ffs!
|
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
|
February 18, 2021, 07:47:36 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Sayeds56
Copper Member
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 741
Buzz App - Spin wheel, farm rewards
|
|
February 18, 2021, 07:51:10 PM |
|
For corn price, my naive calculations put it around the 6th halving cycle or around 2028 about $3m and 2032 will then be closer to $10m.
For some of you guys, you're all set if you can just wait 10 years, while for some of us, we need to find a way to survive without spending what little we have until that escape velocity is reached.
As for gold, I may just get a bar ... just because. I already got a physical bitcoin token (no funding value, just a physical coin)... gold plated copper coin.
Congratulations. How lucky you are to own BTC gold plated coin.
|
|
|
|
erre
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1205
|
|
February 18, 2021, 07:51:37 PM |
|
We have a long way to go.. 2017 is still visible without a magnifying glass.. This. We are not in a bubble, still. Every bubble was astonishing and surprising even to us, I'm not amused like now. We need to reach 6 digits in a couple months or less for a proper bubble to happen, fuck we could even get there with a single week of constant 10% growth. Please bitcoin, do something!
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3864
Merit: 10962
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
We have a long way to go.. 2017 is still visible without a magnifying glass.. This. We are not in a bubble, still. Every bubble was astonishing and surprising even to us, I'm not amused like now. We need to reach 6 digits in a couple months or less for a proper bubble to happen, fuck we could even get there with a single week of constant 10% growth. Please bitcoin, do something! We are currently "stalled." Didn't you get the memo, erre? By the way.. in the above chart, see the lil blip above the 2014? That was the late 2013 bubble.
|
|
|
|
lightfoot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 2258
I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)
|
|
February 18, 2021, 08:10:12 PM |
|
By the way.. in the above chart, see the lil blip above the 2014? That was the late 2013 bubble.
Oh my God, wasn't that when it went from $67 or so to $1000? It seems so small now... Also: Were those Cassicus coins ever hacked or anything? They seemed neat, but I always wondered if a second copy of the keys weren't kept somewhere....
|
|
|
|
bkbirge
|
|
February 18, 2021, 08:10:43 PM |
|
do you remember on this worldwide COVID-19 crisis in 2020 and onwards? there is a strong evidence from an research of an scientist of the University of Hamburg that the source is the Wuhan laboratory. +++ 17:31 Hamburg researchers: there are indications that coronavirus comes from the laboratory +++ The Hamburg nanoscientist Roland Wiesendanger compiled various findings from scientific studies, articles, reports in social media and other sources in the period from January to December of last year and comes to the conclusion: The pathogen Sars-CoV-2 is not of natural origin, but comes from a laboratory in Wuhan. The physicist cites the following points as evidence for these theories: - To date, no so-called intermediate host has been identified that proves according to the "zoonosis theory" that the coronaviruses were transmitted from bats to humans.
- A research group at the virological institute in the city of Wuhan has carried out genetic manipulations on coronaviruses for many years with the aim of making them more contagious, dangerous and deadly for humans.
- There were significant safety deficiencies in the virological institute in the city of Wuhan even before the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, which are documented.
- Against the background of these and other factors, Wiesendanger writes: "In summary, it can be said that there are very many indications that a laboratory accident at the 'Wuhan Institute of Virology' appears to be by far the most likely cause of the corona pandemic."
You can read more about this shortly on ntv.de. it took a whole year to collect all points for evidence: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349302406_Studie_zum_Ursprung_der_Coronavirus-PandemiePeer reviewed, no? not yet. it's brand new and not all is translated to English. give the scientific community some time and that will be the bomb for something we cannot imagine yet i guess. EDIT: there was some evidence from other sources in the past too but I was cautious with my conclusion and confident the truth will come to the light sometimes in the future. If it was peer reviewed it would have been vetted and reviewed BEFORE publishing. That's the point of peer review, to keep from publishing wonky science, not address it after it gets published.
|
|
|
|
|