....we are human, so we’re bound to make mistakes, regardless of our intentions.
Exactly. Some "we-wee"s make more mistakes than other "we-wee"s.
Yes... another way of suggesting that one of us suffers from delusions of grandeur.
Let’s put that to the test, shall we?
"Let's" not and say that we did.
Hashrate follows price. Not the other way around.
I expected nothing less of your handler.
Your sponsor gawds [AKA Bitcoin whales], cannot have the average Joe thinking otherwise.
Uie-pooie can think whatevers yous would likie to thinkie, even if it is retarded.
No skin off my back.
Sorry that I have to be the one to inform you of such news.
No worries, it’s not news, it’s utter bullshit.
Ok. Do what you like then. Think what you like. Last time I checked, its a free country...
wait... Well, if you are looking at the matter from the wrong direction, then it is going to seem confusing...
I’ll look in any direction I damn well like, okay?
You do you, and keep staring at the cave.
That's right.. you are free to choose your directions..
that's right.
that's riiiiiiiiiiiiggggggggght.
and yeah, even though hashrate follows price, the hashrate can get ahead of the matter, and there are other games going on with hashrate too.. so in the end hashrate is only one of the factors, anyhow.
Repeating yourself does not work on me, you should know that by now.
Ok. We've exhausted the topic. I was merely responding to uie-pooie..
Gosh..
bite my head off.
BTC price is affected by all kinds of matters, and the miners are playing their own little games.. and for sure, a lot of miners had a very good year on 2021, so they are kind of paying for that now, in terms of some of them overextended themselves and ended up gambling on the BTC price not going down as far as it did.. but that does not stop other miners (more efficient ones) from forcing out the less efficient ones.. including that some of the equipment that they bought went online during a downward move in BTC price.
What a crack of diverting bullshit.
So what you’re essentially saying, is that the mining “ban” on China in the summer of 2021, did not affect the price.
Okay. Hahahahaha.
I did not say that, and I am not saying that. The China mining ban is 2021 is an interesting point though in regards to a lot of bitcoin-related matters - but such "ban" did seems to temporarily affect the hashrate in a negative way with a near halvening of the hashrate that largely sprung back within about 4-6 months (and largely sprung back way more quickly than a lot of folks had expected).. .it also seemed to contribute towards already existing miners to have become extremely profitable and inspired a lot of new mining entrance - and perhaps overly leveraging.. and we see some of the fall out from that overleveraging and perhaps even overbuilding today.. ...and it seemed to inspire greater geographical diversity.. .. so yeah of course, BTC price was not unaffected by some of those matters.. but it would likely lead many folks to wrongedly assessments to attempt to hitch whatever various relationships of BTC price to hashrate during that period as if BTC prices were following hashrate.. but hey, believe whatevers you would like.. those are your choices.
There could be some relation in terms of purging out as many of the inefficient miners as possible.. but there are other things going on, so you are likely going to end up with wrong conclusions (just like Philipma) when you get too obsessed with putting too much weight into the wrong factors - such as ideas of hashrate affecting price.
If the internet were to go down tomorrow, resulting in miners not being able to mine, you’re saying that it would NOT affect the price.
Muahahahahaha, whatever.
Yes.. BTC price would be affected by the internet going down.
You are like the plato allegory of the cave dwellers in the cave watching shadows on the wall and striving to assigning significance to mumbo jumbo.
You - just don’t - go Greek on me, you’re not - in the slightest - qualified.
Aren't you Mr. Wonderful and such a genius too?
Go figure.
For a person that has been right on the scamdemic, since day one, don’t you think it’s an unfair quote?
Who cares whether you were right or not about the "scamdemic?" For argument sake, let's assume that you were right about the "scamedemic from day one", as you put it. You are trying to argue that if you happen to be right about one topic, then all of a sudden you are right (or an expert) on all topics. That makes a lot of sense.
I read somewhere that ChatGPT has an IQ of around 80.
Of course I don’t abide with that opinion, and think that my dog is orders of magnitude smarter than you.
Is your dog friendly? Or mean like you?
Yes... you can buy the dip instead of DCA.
Gee, I’m glad we have your permission.
That was not a statement giving permission... I retract all semblance of permission from that earlier statement, if any "permission" had previously existed therein.
Have you been following the 'vices of Cryptotourist?
It’s my obligation to tell you that you’re starting to see ghosts.
Understandable, but do
snap out of it for the sake of others.
For the sake of which others? Are you now speaking on behalf of readers of the WO?
Did Cryptotourist get another one of you?
We are all Cryptotourist.
LOL
- except "Cryptotourist."
“The greatest knowledge, is knowing how to remove ignorance”
Antisthenes
Get out of the cave people.
Now you are talking.
Poll
