ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:00:45 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ShroomsKit
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:01:11 PM |
|
Wall removed. He'll probably put it back lower though. Why stop here.
|
|
|
|
kodtycoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:01:20 PM |
|
I can't believe there are still people here who don't think this is because of the auction. "Just normal market behaviour".
I believe it is because of the auction. You need to stop thinking people are rational, they are stupid! This is why auction has so much influence on price. Here's the really stupid thing. The SR auction is about BITCOINS, and bitcoins only. Yet altcoins like Litecoin and other alts are being forced down by the whales too, causing people to panic for their beloved alts as well. Even Dogecoin is being sold off, which has absolutely nothing to do with the SR auction. This is why I referred to the community as pathetic. My choice of adjective remains, until I observe otherwise. I guess I'll be waiting a decade or more. nem and nxt havnt budged! lol perhaps not all of the crypto community is pathetic
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:02:34 PM |
|
I can't believe there are still people here who don't think this is because of the auction. "Just normal market behaviour".
I believe it is because of the auction. You need to stop thinking people are rational, they are stupid! This is why auction has so much influence on price. Here's the really stupid thing. The SR auction is about BITCOINS, and bitcoins only. Yet altcoins like Litecoin and other alts are being forced down by the whales too, causing people to panic for their beloved alts as well. Even Dodgecoin is being sold off, which has absolutely nothing to do with the SR auction. I don't think this decrease has anything to do with the auction. I think it is actually about the Chinese news about a continued Chinese crackdown, which was released about the same time. This would account for the alt decrease as well. Bad news that just happens to coincide with other bad news on the exact same day? That's so strange, but yet so natural! Fabricated FUD never follows that pattern. /s My point is that the Chinese probably have about 10x more influence over Bitcoin than this auction as they still trump the entire 'west' in volume on EACH of their exchanges.
|
|
|
|
N12
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:03:35 PM |
|
My point is that the Chinese probably have about 10x more influence over Bitcoin than this auction as they still trump the entire 'west' in volume on EACH of their exchanges.
How real is volume that is generated by 0% fees? We have to account for that. Personally, I've only observed Bitstamp leading and Huobi following it reluctantly. I don't know why some perceive the opposite.
|
|
|
|
Tzupy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1094
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:06:44 PM |
|
Not that stupid if you consider that altcoins draw their source of dollars from Bitcoin almost exclusively. If Bitcoin shrinks, so do they.
Altcoin holders when seeing the value of 'x-coin' dropping against BTC and BTC also in a downtrend are more likely to sell their x-coin for BTC and then BTC for fiat, increasing the seller pressure.
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:08:50 PM |
|
My point is that the Chinese probably have about 10x more influence over Bitcoin than this auction as they still trump the entire 'west' in volume on EACH of their exchanges.
How real is volume that is generated by 0% fees? We have to account for that. Personally, I've only observed Bitstamp leading and Huobi following it reluctantly. I don't know why some perceive the opposite. I'm guessing enough of it is real to be significant - perhaps 20-50%. Even at just 20% it is still equal to the west, which makes it highly significant. Also, there are frequently several 500-1000 BTC walls moving around the order book - those can't be faked, meaning that there are in fact players with millions of dollars (worth of btc or yuan) playing on these exchanges, which leads to belief in at least some legitimacy in the volume.
|
|
|
|
empowering
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:09:25 PM |
|
Little to no feeling about this.
|
|
|
|
MatTheCat
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:09:47 PM |
|
My point is that the Chinese probably have about 10x more influence over Bitcoin than this auction as they still trump the entire 'west' in volume on EACH of their exchanges.
How real is volume that is generated by 0% fees? We have to account for that. Personally, I've only observed Bitstamp leading and Huobi following it reluctantly. I don't know why some perceive the opposite. Agreed. During the rise, Huobi would take the lead almost every single time. But when we got to the top of the market and Huobi kept wanting to break out, Bitstamp didn't follow. This was that odd period when Bitstamp had the lowest spot price of all exchanges. Even less than BTC-e. Huobi might be the barky dog of Bitcoin exchanges, but Bistamp is the master. The other exchanges can do what they like but it is only if Bitstamp moves, will Bitcoin move. For all the inflated volume of the exchanges that offer leveraged trading, Bitstamp still has by far the greatest liquidity and is the whale's exchange of choice.
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:14:41 PM |
|
OK let me rephrase this: The largest populated country in the world with 20% of the entire world's population, the largest financial shadow currency trading enterprise in the world where wealthy investors swap trillions of dollars to gamble on a regular basis, and half of the world's bitcoin exchanges being potentially taken out of the game completely by their government is much more important than 0.22% of bitcoins being sold at an auction. I tire of people constantly dismissing China as 'FUD' without comprehending the full extent of what it actually is, and it is NOT over until the exchanges are actually closed.
|
|
|
|
bangersdad
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:16:20 PM |
|
nem and nxt havnt budged! lol perhaps not all of the crypto community is pathetic and VRC went up 300% in the last 3 days...although correcting this morning to just a 200% gain.
|
|
|
|
N12
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:16:38 PM |
|
OK let me rephrase this: The largest populated country in the world with 20% of the entire world's population, the largest financial shadow currency trading enterprise in the world, and half of the world's bitcoin exchanges being potentially taken out of the game completely by their government is much more important than 0.22% of bitcoins being sold at an auction.
I won't disagree. Thing is, we have already known for quite a while now that "4th party" funding channels for exchanges were going to be taken out. Or is there anything new?
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:19:06 PM |
|
OK let me rephrase this: The largest populated country in the world with 20% of the entire world's population, the largest financial shadow currency trading enterprise in the world, and half of the world's bitcoin exchanges being potentially taken out of the game completely by their government is much more important than 0.22% of bitcoins being sold at an auction.
I won't disagree. Thing is, we have already known for quite a while now that "4th party" funding channels for exchanges were going to be taken out. Or is there anything new? Well it never actually happened, and when we were up at $660, a new PR came out from the central bankers of a plan they had just developed to efficiently identify and track the accounts being used and to shut them down, and prevent new ones.
|
|
|
|
magicmexican
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:22:21 PM |
|
Tripple'ish bottom maybe?
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:24:59 PM |
|
Do you want to know why we bounced at $340 on Apr 13, why we bounced at $420 on May 5, and thus why this 'trendline' has held thus far? Both bounce events occured immediately when either China or the Chinese exchanges released some counter-FUD article leading us to believe some major change had occured in China and everything was going to be ok there.
|
|
|
|
empowering
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:26:12 PM |
|
Tripple'ish bottom maybe?
Bouncy (oh and the asses too)
|
|
|
|
tarmi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:26:50 PM |
|
chinese reluctant to sell.
too much new generation hardware waiting to be sold.
give them time.
|
|
|
|
kodtycoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:27:30 PM |
|
nem and nxt havnt budged! lol perhaps not all of the crypto community is pathetic and VRC went up 300% in the last 3 days...although correcting this morning to just a 200% gain. and was there any cause for this? many coins have gone through pumps like that and faded away again. nem is 22/23 place on market cap. with out even having released any software what so ever.! its also valued a 1/4 of the real value as its down as only having 1000 stakes when 4000 stakes are priced into the market.
|
|
|
|
magicmexican
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:27:36 PM |
|
Do you want to know why we bounced at $340 on Apr 13, why we bounced at $420 on May 5, and thus why this 'trendline' has held thus far? Both bounce events occured immediately when either China or the Chinese exchanges released some counter-FUD article leading us to believe some major change had occured in China and everything was going to be ok there.
I've been told countless of times that news are secondary to the market movements, or does it only apply to the dumps?
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
|
June 25, 2014, 12:36:07 PM |
|
Do you want to know why we bounced at $340 on Apr 13, why we bounced at $420 on May 5, and thus why this 'trendline' has held thus far? Both bounce events occured immediately when either China or the Chinese exchanges released some counter-FUD article leading us to believe some major change had occured in China and everything was going to be ok there.
I've been told countless of times that news are secondary to the market movements, or does it only apply to the dumps? I think Chinese events are more significant than just 'news' - they imply half of Bitcoin's trading power suddenly moving in and out, panicking and thinking that now they have to stop trading bitcoin, or now they can trade bitcoin again - there is a lot of raw force behind it.
|
|
|
|
|