BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
December 18, 2017, 12:30:35 AM |
|
You said that not everything has a cause a few posts ago, what is it? Does everything have a cause or not, quit contradicting yourself.
When you read it in context, there is no contradiction. Science has never answered the question of whether the universe is deterministic or not, stop fucking lying or show me the evidence.
You haven't explained what determinism has to do with the things that I have said. Quantum this and that is theory. Theory has not been proven to be fact, because opposing theory can be proposed. Again, God is the one Who maintains the free will of mankind. ''There isn't any proof that radioactive decay is not an effect of a cause.'' There isn't any proof that it is an effect of a cause either.
The proof for radioactive decay is that there is no radioactive decay for an element that doesn't exist. Then, some scientists and engineers build equipment that makes a radioactive element - using C&E, by the way - that didn't exist a moment ago. Then the new element decays because of its radioactivity, and is gone, often in less than a second. Scientists are the cause. The new element and its radioactivity are the effect. Furthermore. If you don't think that C&E is all-inclusive in the face of all the billions of operations that exist that show it to exist, why would you even begin to think that evolution exists when scientists have barely produced anything that they can feel even reasonably sure that it is evolution? Since you doubt that overwhelmingly massive evidence of C&E, why would you even focus on the one or two things that might show evolution as a possibility, to say nothing about acknowledging them, and then to state for a fact that they exist? You are a bit backwards in this. Evolution is a big fat hoax, and you are helping to prove it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in
Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it
will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3073
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
December 18, 2017, 05:16:02 AM |
|
Evolution is a big fat hoax, and you are helping to prove it.
Imagine if you could prove evolution was a hoax. You would be generally considered the next Einstein. Is this you BD? Is there a giant ticker tape parade in your head as millions chant your name?
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
mongkie
|
|
December 18, 2017, 05:21:29 AM |
|
we are cousins and our ancestors separate ways when we humans fully addopt to the environment and develop skills that other apes dont get. the creator may do some identical touch on human and apes because we share the same creator
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
December 18, 2017, 09:26:24 AM |
|
Evolution is a big fat hoax, and you are helping to prove it.
Imagine if you could prove evolution was a hoax. You would be generally considered the next Einstein. Is this you BD? Is there a giant ticker tape parade in your head as millions chant your name? What about you? Do you have a political science ticker tape in your future? Obviously, you don't qualify to have any other kind of science ticker tape parade.
|
|
|
|
Aming amirudin
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 10
|
|
December 18, 2017, 09:57:53 AM |
|
I agree evolution is a mere trick is still a theory and research that there is no scientific evidence of one creature created for one species no homosapian turned into a monkey and then a human
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
December 18, 2017, 10:24:07 AM |
|
I agree evolution is a mere trick is still a theory and research that there is no scientific evidence of one creature created for one species no homosapian turned into a monkey and then a human
Seems to me that people who think that monkeys could turn into people, are simply making monkeys of themselves. In this one way, alone, evolution is proven not to exist. After all, it is monkeys who think that evolution exists... not people.
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
December 18, 2017, 10:50:46 AM |
|
You said that not everything has a cause a few posts ago, what is it? Does everything have a cause or not, quit contradicting yourself.
When you read it in context, there is no contradiction. Science has never answered the question of whether the universe is deterministic or not, stop fucking lying or show me the evidence.
You haven't explained what determinism has to do with the things that I have said. Quantum this and that is theory. Theory has not been proven to be fact, because opposing theory can be proposed. Again, God is the one Who maintains the free will of mankind. ''There isn't any proof that radioactive decay is not an effect of a cause.'' There isn't any proof that it is an effect of a cause either.
The proof for radioactive decay is that there is no radioactive decay for an element that doesn't exist. Then, some scientists and engineers build equipment that makes a radioactive element - using C&E, by the way - that didn't exist a moment ago. Then the new element decays because of its radioactivity, and is gone, often in less than a second. Scientists are the cause. The new element and its radioactivity are the effect. Furthermore. If you don't think that C&E is all-inclusive in the face of all the billions of operations that exist that show it to exist, why would you even begin to think that evolution exists when scientists have barely produced anything that they can feel even reasonably sure that it is evolution? Since you doubt that overwhelmingly massive evidence of C&E, why would you even focus on the one or two things that might show evolution as a possibility, to say nothing about acknowledging them, and then to state for a fact that they exist? You are a bit backwards in this. Evolution is a big fat hoax, and you are helping to prove it. You still haven't explained anything and still haven't proved that everything has a cause. You keep saying the same thing. Where is the proof that everything has a cause? That's also not known to be a fact and no one claims it's a fact but you. Do you have evidence that everything has a cause? In what context you can say that everything has a cause but there is something without a cause? ''Again, God is the one Who maintains the free will of mankind.'' How lol if everything has a cause, there is no free will. ''The proof for radioactive decay is that there is no radioactive decay for an element that doesn't exist.'' What? You are not a scientist and you are not a physicist yet you talk about these things like you know it all, it just shows how deluded you are. IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE THAT EVERYTHING HAS A CAUSE, IMPOSSIBLE. If you don't know what a deterministic universe means it just shows that you don't even know what you are talking about. Some philosophers think the universe is deterministic (nothing is ever random) and some don't. There is no answer to this, no one knows and you don't know either.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
December 18, 2017, 11:06:21 AM |
|
You said that not everything has a cause a few posts ago, what is it? Does everything have a cause or not, quit contradicting yourself.
When you read it in context, there is no contradiction. Science has never answered the question of whether the universe is deterministic or not, stop fucking lying or show me the evidence.
You haven't explained what determinism has to do with the things that I have said. Quantum this and that is theory. Theory has not been proven to be fact, because opposing theory can be proposed. Again, God is the one Who maintains the free will of mankind. ''There isn't any proof that radioactive decay is not an effect of a cause.'' There isn't any proof that it is an effect of a cause either.
The proof for radioactive decay is that there is no radioactive decay for an element that doesn't exist. Then, some scientists and engineers build equipment that makes a radioactive element - using C&E, by the way - that didn't exist a moment ago. Then the new element decays because of its radioactivity, and is gone, often in less than a second. Scientists are the cause. The new element and its radioactivity are the effect. Furthermore. If you don't think that C&E is all-inclusive in the face of all the billions of operations that exist that show it to exist, why would you even begin to think that evolution exists when scientists have barely produced anything that they can feel even reasonably sure that it is evolution? Since you doubt that overwhelmingly massive evidence of C&E, why would you even focus on the one or two things that might show evolution as a possibility, to say nothing about acknowledging them, and then to state for a fact that they exist? You are a bit backwards in this. Evolution is a big fat hoax, and you are helping to prove it. You still haven't explained anything and still haven't proved that everything has a cause. You keep saying the same thing. Where is the proof that everything has a cause? That's also not known to be a fact and no one claims it's a fact but you. Do you have evidence that everything has a cause? In what context you can say that everything has a cause but there is something without a cause? ''Again, God is the one Who maintains the free will of mankind.'' How lol if everything has a cause, there is no free will. ''The proof for radioactive decay is that there is no radioactive decay for an element that doesn't exist.'' What? You are not a scientist and you are not a physicist yet you talk about these things like you know it all, it just shows how deluded you are. IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE THAT EVERYTHING HAS A CAUSE, IMPOSSIBLE. If you don't know what a deterministic universe means it just shows that you don't even know what you are talking about. Some philosophers think the universe is deterministic (nothing is ever random) and some don't. There is no answer to this, no one knows and you don't know either. You're just jealous that you can't explain anything, and that you now see that evolution is a hoax. I would feel bad if my pet ideas turned out to be nothing, just like yours are for you.
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
December 18, 2017, 11:26:49 AM |
|
You said that not everything has a cause a few posts ago, what is it? Does everything have a cause or not, quit contradicting yourself.
When you read it in context, there is no contradiction. Science has never answered the question of whether the universe is deterministic or not, stop fucking lying or show me the evidence.
You haven't explained what determinism has to do with the things that I have said. Quantum this and that is theory. Theory has not been proven to be fact, because opposing theory can be proposed. Again, God is the one Who maintains the free will of mankind. ''There isn't any proof that radioactive decay is not an effect of a cause.'' There isn't any proof that it is an effect of a cause either.
The proof for radioactive decay is that there is no radioactive decay for an element that doesn't exist. Then, some scientists and engineers build equipment that makes a radioactive element - using C&E, by the way - that didn't exist a moment ago. Then the new element decays because of its radioactivity, and is gone, often in less than a second. Scientists are the cause. The new element and its radioactivity are the effect. Furthermore. If you don't think that C&E is all-inclusive in the face of all the billions of operations that exist that show it to exist, why would you even begin to think that evolution exists when scientists have barely produced anything that they can feel even reasonably sure that it is evolution? Since you doubt that overwhelmingly massive evidence of C&E, why would you even focus on the one or two things that might show evolution as a possibility, to say nothing about acknowledging them, and then to state for a fact that they exist? You are a bit backwards in this. Evolution is a big fat hoax, and you are helping to prove it. You still haven't explained anything and still haven't proved that everything has a cause. You keep saying the same thing. Where is the proof that everything has a cause? That's also not known to be a fact and no one claims it's a fact but you. Do you have evidence that everything has a cause? In what context you can say that everything has a cause but there is something without a cause? ''Again, God is the one Who maintains the free will of mankind.'' How lol if everything has a cause, there is no free will. ''The proof for radioactive decay is that there is no radioactive decay for an element that doesn't exist.'' What? You are not a scientist and you are not a physicist yet you talk about these things like you know it all, it just shows how deluded you are. IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE THAT EVERYTHING HAS A CAUSE, IMPOSSIBLE. If you don't know what a deterministic universe means it just shows that you don't even know what you are talking about. Some philosophers think the universe is deterministic (nothing is ever random) and some don't. There is no answer to this, no one knows and you don't know either. You're just jealous that you can't explain anything, and that you now see that evolution is a hoax. I would feel bad if my pet ideas turned out to be nothing, just like yours are for you. When you prove that everything has a cause and then that something doesn't have a cause at the same time, I will agree with you and I will call evolution not true, meanwhile, since you can't prove any of that (no one can) I will still defend evolution.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
December 18, 2017, 11:37:59 AM |
|
You said that not everything has a cause a few posts ago, what is it? Does everything have a cause or not, quit contradicting yourself.
When you read it in context, there is no contradiction. Science has never answered the question of whether the universe is deterministic or not, stop fucking lying or show me the evidence.
You haven't explained what determinism has to do with the things that I have said. Quantum this and that is theory. Theory has not been proven to be fact, because opposing theory can be proposed. Again, God is the one Who maintains the free will of mankind. ''There isn't any proof that radioactive decay is not an effect of a cause.'' There isn't any proof that it is an effect of a cause either.
The proof for radioactive decay is that there is no radioactive decay for an element that doesn't exist. Then, some scientists and engineers build equipment that makes a radioactive element - using C&E, by the way - that didn't exist a moment ago. Then the new element decays because of its radioactivity, and is gone, often in less than a second. Scientists are the cause. The new element and its radioactivity are the effect. Furthermore. If you don't think that C&E is all-inclusive in the face of all the billions of operations that exist that show it to exist, why would you even begin to think that evolution exists when scientists have barely produced anything that they can feel even reasonably sure that it is evolution? Since you doubt that overwhelmingly massive evidence of C&E, why would you even focus on the one or two things that might show evolution as a possibility, to say nothing about acknowledging them, and then to state for a fact that they exist? You are a bit backwards in this. Evolution is a big fat hoax, and you are helping to prove it. You still haven't explained anything and still haven't proved that everything has a cause. You keep saying the same thing. Where is the proof that everything has a cause? That's also not known to be a fact and no one claims it's a fact but you. Do you have evidence that everything has a cause? In what context you can say that everything has a cause but there is something without a cause? ''Again, God is the one Who maintains the free will of mankind.'' How lol if everything has a cause, there is no free will. ''The proof for radioactive decay is that there is no radioactive decay for an element that doesn't exist.'' What? You are not a scientist and you are not a physicist yet you talk about these things like you know it all, it just shows how deluded you are. IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE THAT EVERYTHING HAS A CAUSE, IMPOSSIBLE. If you don't know what a deterministic universe means it just shows that you don't even know what you are talking about. Some philosophers think the universe is deterministic (nothing is ever random) and some don't. There is no answer to this, no one knows and you don't know either. You're just jealous that you can't explain anything, and that you now see that evolution is a hoax. I would feel bad if my pet ideas turned out to be nothing, just like yours are for you. When you prove that everything has a cause and then that something doesn't have a cause at the same time, I will agree with you and I will call evolution not true, meanwhile, since you can't prove any of that (no one can) I will still defend evolution. This is no different than anyone else who supports and defends his religion. Evolution is a hoax by its own science.
|
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
December 18, 2017, 11:41:49 AM |
|
You said that not everything has a cause a few posts ago, what is it? Does everything have a cause or not, quit contradicting yourself.
When you read it in context, there is no contradiction. Science has never answered the question of whether the universe is deterministic or not, stop fucking lying or show me the evidence.
You haven't explained what determinism has to do with the things that I have said. Quantum this and that is theory. Theory has not been proven to be fact, because opposing theory can be proposed. Again, God is the one Who maintains the free will of mankind. ''There isn't any proof that radioactive decay is not an effect of a cause.'' There isn't any proof that it is an effect of a cause either.
The proof for radioactive decay is that there is no radioactive decay for an element that doesn't exist. Then, some scientists and engineers build equipment that makes a radioactive element - using C&E, by the way - that didn't exist a moment ago. Then the new element decays because of its radioactivity, and is gone, often in less than a second. Scientists are the cause. The new element and its radioactivity are the effect. Furthermore. If you don't think that C&E is all-inclusive in the face of all the billions of operations that exist that show it to exist, why would you even begin to think that evolution exists when scientists have barely produced anything that they can feel even reasonably sure that it is evolution? Since you doubt that overwhelmingly massive evidence of C&E, why would you even focus on the one or two things that might show evolution as a possibility, to say nothing about acknowledging them, and then to state for a fact that they exist? You are a bit backwards in this. Evolution is a big fat hoax, and you are helping to prove it. You still haven't explained anything and still haven't proved that everything has a cause. You keep saying the same thing. Where is the proof that everything has a cause? That's also not known to be a fact and no one claims it's a fact but you. Do you have evidence that everything has a cause? In what context you can say that everything has a cause but there is something without a cause? ''Again, God is the one Who maintains the free will of mankind.'' How lol if everything has a cause, there is no free will. ''The proof for radioactive decay is that there is no radioactive decay for an element that doesn't exist.'' What? You are not a scientist and you are not a physicist yet you talk about these things like you know it all, it just shows how deluded you are. IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE THAT EVERYTHING HAS A CAUSE, IMPOSSIBLE. If you don't know what a deterministic universe means it just shows that you don't even know what you are talking about. Some philosophers think the universe is deterministic (nothing is ever random) and some don't. There is no answer to this, no one knows and you don't know either. You're just jealous that you can't explain anything, and that you now see that evolution is a hoax. I would feel bad if my pet ideas turned out to be nothing, just like yours are for you. When you prove that everything has a cause and then that something doesn't have a cause at the same time, I will agree with you and I will call evolution not true, meanwhile, since you can't prove any of that (no one can) I will still defend evolution. This is no different than anyone else who supports and defends his religion. Evolution is a hoax by its own science. You are dodging the question, though.
|
|
|
|
Eraldo Coil
Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 10
|
|
December 18, 2017, 01:02:27 PM |
|
First of all we really still don't know where all life forms started. We still don't have enough evidence to prove all of these. Asking where the existence of monkey came from is like asking where humans came from.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3073
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
December 18, 2017, 03:07:57 PM |
|
You are dodging the question, though.
I ask him outright questions. He simply parrots them back to me with a couple words changed. How can he answer such questions without proving once and for all his is a liar and troll?
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
Astargath
|
|
December 18, 2017, 05:48:38 PM |
|
You are dodging the question, though.
I ask him outright questions. He simply parrots them back to me with a couple words changed. How can he answer such questions without proving once and for all his is a liar and troll? I know he wont ever accept the truth, he will keep lying to himself to further feed his delusion. At this point I'm convinced he is delusional past the ''normal'' point.
|
|
|
|
Justin Biebers
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
December 18, 2017, 06:33:04 PM |
|
You are dodging the question, though.
I ask him outright questions. He simply parrots them back to me with a couple words changed. How can he answer such questions without proving once and for all his is a liar and troll? Says Vod
|
|
|
|
SatoshíNackamoto
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
December 18, 2017, 07:01:51 PM |
|
Why are people still dumb enough to believe in fairytales.
I dont really get why people have to believe in religion. No proof of anything at all.. "Look at this book... Its real.."
Yes, and written by some dude who got bored or was mentally ill.
|
|
|
|
Factor2018+
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
December 19, 2017, 10:03:31 AM |
|
Humans did not evolve from apes, gorillas or chimps. We are all modern species that have followed different evolutionary paths, though humans share a common ancestor with some primates, such as the African ape
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
December 23, 2017, 04:45:34 AM |
|
You said that not everything has a cause a few posts ago, what is it? Does everything have a cause or not, quit contradicting yourself.
When you read it in context, there is no contradiction. Science has never answered the question of whether the universe is deterministic or not, stop fucking lying or show me the evidence.
You haven't explained what determinism has to do with the things that I have said. Quantum this and that is theory. Theory has not been proven to be fact, because opposing theory can be proposed. Again, God is the one Who maintains the free will of mankind. ''There isn't any proof that radioactive decay is not an effect of a cause.'' There isn't any proof that it is an effect of a cause either.
The proof for radioactive decay is that there is no radioactive decay for an element that doesn't exist. Then, some scientists and engineers build equipment that makes a radioactive element - using C&E, by the way - that didn't exist a moment ago. Then the new element decays because of its radioactivity, and is gone, often in less than a second. Scientists are the cause. The new element and its radioactivity are the effect. Furthermore. If you don't think that C&E is all-inclusive in the face of all the billions of operations that exist that show it to exist, why would you even begin to think that evolution exists when scientists have barely produced anything that they can feel even reasonably sure that it is evolution? Since you doubt that overwhelmingly massive evidence of C&E, why would you even focus on the one or two things that might show evolution as a possibility, to say nothing about acknowledging them, and then to state for a fact that they exist? You are a bit backwards in this. Evolution is a big fat hoax, and you are helping to prove it. You still haven't explained anything and still haven't proved that everything has a cause. You keep saying the same thing. Where is the proof that everything has a cause? That's also not known to be a fact and no one claims it's a fact but you. Do you have evidence that everything has a cause? In what context you can say that everything has a cause but there is something without a cause? ''Again, God is the one Who maintains the free will of mankind.'' How lol if everything has a cause, there is no free will. ''The proof for radioactive decay is that there is no radioactive decay for an element that doesn't exist.'' What? You are not a scientist and you are not a physicist yet you talk about these things like you know it all, it just shows how deluded you are. IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE THAT EVERYTHING HAS A CAUSE, IMPOSSIBLE. If you don't know what a deterministic universe means it just shows that you don't even know what you are talking about. Some philosophers think the universe is deterministic (nothing is ever random) and some don't. There is no answer to this, no one knows and you don't know either. You're just jealous that you can't explain anything, and that you now see that evolution is a hoax. I would feel bad if my pet ideas turned out to be nothing, just like yours are for you. When you prove that everything has a cause and then that something doesn't have a cause at the same time, I will agree with you and I will call evolution not true, meanwhile, since you can't prove any of that (no one can) I will still defend evolution. This is no different than anyone else who supports and defends his religion. Evolution is a hoax by its own science. You are dodging the question, though. But not nearly as much as you are dodging the answer.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
December 23, 2017, 04:47:58 AM |
|
Why are people still dumb enough to believe in fairytales.
I dont really get why people have to believe in religion. No proof of anything at all.. "Look at this book... Its real.."
Yes, and written by some dude who got bored or was mentally ill.
Scientists who study the Bible and its history, find more truth there than in any other science studies.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
December 23, 2017, 04:54:01 AM |
|
Humans did not evolve from apes, gorillas or chimps. We are all modern species that have followed different evolutionary paths, though humans share a common ancestor with some primates, such as the African ape
However, that is just guesswork. There were many more species in the past. They have died off. Some of the fossils look like they might have been missing links. But they were simply different species. Fossils show that in the distant past there were 2 or 3 times as many species as are in existence today. Consider this. Of all the animals and plants, there are really only a handful that are domesticated. Most animals and plants are wild. But what if they all were domesticated in the distant past. And something is causing most of them to become wild. The point is, you could make a theory of devolution much easier than you could make a theory of evolution. And nobody would know for sure. Evolution is a hoax.
|
|
|
|
|