Evolution is a hoax

[Vod]

How do we know that you are like that and not I? Because I can explain the points I make, but you can't explain your points. Simple as that.

Do I need to explain to anyone else how you can't see reality with your head in the sand?

People don't live like that anymore - but you won't know unless you come up for a bit...

[1715548459]

1715548459

[1715548459]

1715548459

[1715548459]

1715548459

[BADecker]

Why DID the pope suddenly start believing in evolution?

Someone showed him the big picture book of dogs - all different breeds evolved by the hand of man over the last few hundred years.

The only trick is - you can't see the pretty pictures until you pull your head out of the sand. 

You can't prove what the pope believes. You can, at best, only find out what he said.

[Vod]

You can't prove what the pope believes. You can, at best, only find out what he said.

You may think the pope is a liar, but I believe he has realized fairy tales are best left for children. 

[BADecker]

How do we know that you are like that and not I? Because I can explain the points I make, but you can't explain your points. Simple as that.

Do I need to explain to anyone else how you can't see reality with your head in the sand?

You couldn't. Why not? Because I could always prove you wrong by explaining C&E with regard to evolution idea. But you could rebut anything that I explained with an on-point explanation of your own. The most you could do is say that I am wrong with nothing to back up why.

[BADecker]

You can't prove what the pope believes. You can, at best, only find out what he said.

You may think the pope is a liar, but I believe he has realized fairy tales are best left for children. 

Okay. so now you believe in the pope. Religious after all.     

[BADecker]

Oh, you and your trolling propaganda. Do they pay you enough to sit there and blab without presenting any evidence? Are they afraid that when people find out that evolution is false, that their little world will come crashing down on them?

People cannot find out evolution is false, any more than they can uncook an egg. 

You will understand this one day when you pull your head out of the sand.

Talk, talk, talk. I have shown you the proof that evolution is false, over and aver. All you can do is say evolution is true, with nothing to back it up. Makes you look more and more like a troll all the time.

All you've done is shown the world how retarded you are, over and over.

But you have proven that very thing about yourself.   

[Vod]

You can't prove what the pope believes. You can, at best, only find out what he said.

You may think the pope is a liar, but I believe he has realized fairy tales are best left for children. 

Okay. so now you believe in the pope. Religious after all.     

Why wouldn't I believe in the pope?  I have my head out of the sand - I can see reality.  

If confirming the pope exists makes me religious in your world, then to you I'm religious.

No one with their head out of the sand would think that though.  

[Vod]

Oh, you and your trolling propaganda. Do they pay you enough to sit there and blab without presenting any evidence? Are they afraid that when people find out that evolution is false, that their little world will come crashing down on them?

People cannot find out evolution is false, any more than they can uncook an egg. 

You will understand this one day when you pull your head out of the sand.

Talk, talk, talk. I have shown you the proof that evolution is false, over and aver. All you can do is say evolution is true, with nothing to back it up. Makes you look more and more like a troll all the time.

All you've done is shown the world how retarded you are, over and over.

But you have proven that very thing about yourself.   

Actually, as an independent third person, Badecker, it is YOU that look like the retard.

I see bluefirecorp_ trying to help you pull your head out of the sand, and you are inviting him to stick his head in.  :/

[BADecker]

Oh, you and your trolling propaganda. Do they pay you enough to sit there and blab without presenting any evidence? Are they afraid that when people find out that evolution is false, that their little world will come crashing down on them?

People cannot find out evolution is false, any more than they can uncook an egg. 

You will understand this one day when you pull your head out of the sand.

Talk, talk, talk. I have shown you the proof that evolution is false, over and aver. All you can do is say evolution is true, with nothing to back it up. Makes you look more and more like a troll all the time.

All you've done is shown the world how retarded you are, over and over.

But you have proven that very thing about yourself.   

Actually, as an independent third person, Badecker, it is YOU that look like the retard.

I see bluefirecorp_ trying to help you pull your head out of the sand, and you are inviting him to stick his head in.  :/

When you guys are upside down in the sand like you are, you can't see anything. It's all your imagination.

Come on, if you can. Rebut the scientific fact of the existence of C&E, and how it proves that evolution doesn't exist. Show that you have more than just hot air down there under the sand.

[Vod]

When you guys are upside down in the sand like you are, you can't see anything. It's all your imagination.

Can I ask how you can see where we are when your head is in the sand?

To observe reality, you need to pull it out.  :/

[Astargath]

Well, I'm going to have to say it again but evolution does not violate any of the scientific laws badecker. You are saying that god programmed evolution, which still doesn't disprove evolution.

[Vod]

I wish Badecker would not come on here crying for help, and then leave when people start to help him. 

But I guess he was getting tired - you can tell this when he starts copying your arguments because he can no longer debate.

He will see reality eventually - the entire world is throwing off ignorance... he has to hear the rumors of sunshine even with his head buried deep in the sand.  :/

[spongegar]

I don't think it is a hoax. If your premise is that there still monkeys if there are still humans. Then why are there still single celled organisms? Why are still there fishes? Why is there still reptiles and there are birds? How you actually explain bones dating back millions of years? Even now, there species of tortoises that evolved to have longer necks to survive their environment. A specie is very much dependent on its environment

[Astargath]

Let me give another insight on the cause and effect argument since that's his only argument, all the others have been dismissed already. ''everything has a cause'' is not a factual statement and it is not known to be factual. Badecker only likes things that are factual, right? He keeps saying evolution theory is a theory not a fact. ''Everything has a cause'' is not a fact either and you can't prove everything has a cause, in fact some physicists would argue that some things may not have a cause. There are also arguments that show something that has an infinite cause because the effect is the cause. Either way, we do not know whether everything has a cause or not so that's wrong.

[BADecker]

Let me give another insight on the cause and effect argument since that's his only argument, all the others have been dismissed already. ''everything has a cause'' is not a factual statement and it is not known to be factual. Badecker only likes things that are factual, right? He keeps saying evolution theory is a theory not a fact. ''Everything has a cause'' is not a fact either and you can't prove everything has a cause, in fact some physicists would argue that some things may not have a cause. There are also arguments that show something that has an infinite cause because the effect is the cause. Either way, we do not know whether everything has a cause or not so that's wrong.

Let me give a little insight on cause and effect vs. evolution.

C&E is found in millions or billions or trillions of operations that we know of. If there is an operation wherein we haven't found C&E, nothing else has been found in that operation, either. This means that it's C&E, or we don't know, but the gigantically overwhelming evidence is for C&E.

Evolution is exactly the opposite. Close to 100% of the operations attributed to evolution have never been factually/actually observed as part of the evolution process. There is all kinds of circumstantial evidence that is loudly proclaimed. But there is only a tiny amount of actually-been-seen evidence. This means that the few observed operations that have been attributed to evolution, are little islands of evolution, which makes them far more liable to be part of some operation other than evolution.

This all means that a little, teensy-eensy evolution idea, is bucking overwhelming humongous C&E that says that evolution is something entirely different than evolutionists suggest. To put this into perspective, the odds that evolution could exist would be like a goldfish swimming up Victoria Falls in Zambia. It would like having a standard lottery drawing of millions of entries, with all the participants full winners.

Close to 100% of evolution is simply a science fiction story. All of the 100% of C&E that has been observed is humongous. The little bit of evolution that seems to truly be evolution, still has C&E behind it, making it to be something entirely different than the evolution that evolutionists are proclaiming.

In addition, no other points against evolution have been dismissed. Volumes have been filled with real reasons why evolution is false. Let's get to the point, and dismiss evolution as the science fiction that it is. But since the science fiction known as evolution is being touted as fact by those who know otherwise, evolution is a big, fat hoax.

[synapsisxxx]

Its not a hoax! Evolution is just a fancy word for some fine ass, flawless and rule bound programming written by someone. For real, the way everything in this world works, including the biology of all organisms, it just seems so.... programmed. Coded. A little too perfectly.

[Vod]

Dogs are proof of evolution and how quickly it can change things.   

Pull your head out of the sand and go to a dog park someday.  All these breeds were crafted by humans to enhance desired traits within our recorded history.

[BADecker]

Dogs are proof of evolution and how quickly it can change things.   

Pull your head out of the sand and go to a dog park someday.  All these breeds were crafted by humans to enhance desired traits within our recorded history.

Dogs are proof of change, not evolution in the sense of evolution theory. Dive deeper into the sand.

[BADecker]

Its not a hoax! Evolution is just a fancy word for some fine ass, flawless and rule bound programming written by someone. For real, the way everything in this world works, including the biology of all organisms, it just seems so.... programmed. Coded. A little too perfectly.

However, science regarding cause and effect is not incorrect. Everything is programmed. Perhaps we will find it is not someday. But so far science has found nothing that is not C&E derived and affected. Point it out if you know of it.

This means that even evolution theory has been programmed to have happened. The scientists and others who have made and upheld evolution theory have been programmed to do so by C&E. This in itself shows that the so-called random mutations spoken about in evolution theory, are not random at all. Scientists were simply programmed by C&E, as was their theory of evolution.

Why would "some great programmer of nature" program scientists to think up a theory that says that there was pure random not affected by C&E, especially in the face of this programming, itself, proving evolution theory to be false? Why? To show the evolution scientists (and all of us) that even the things that they (we) are saying are programmed, so that they (we) can see that anything that seems to apply to evolution is programmed, as well, and not random mutations at all.

[Astargath]

Let me give another insight on the cause and effect argument since that's his only argument, all the others have been dismissed already. ''everything has a cause'' is not a factual statement and it is not known to be factual. Badecker only likes things that are factual, right? He keeps saying evolution theory is a theory not a fact. ''Everything has a cause'' is not a fact either and you can't prove everything has a cause, in fact some physicists would argue that some things may not have a cause. There are also arguments that show something that has an infinite cause because the effect is the cause. Either way, we do not know whether everything has a cause or not so that's wrong.

Let me give a little insight on cause and effect vs. evolution.

C&E is found in millions or billions or trillions of operations that we know of. If there is an operation wherein we haven't found C&E, nothing else has been found in that operation, either. This means that it's C&E, or we don't know, but the gigantically overwhelming evidence is for C&E.

Evolution is exactly the opposite. Close to 100% of the operations attributed to evolution have never been factually/actually observed as part of the evolution process. There is all kinds of circumstantial evidence that is loudly proclaimed. But there is only a tiny amount of actually-been-seen evidence. This means that the few observed operations that have been attributed to evolution, are little islands of evolution, which makes them far more liable to be part of some operation other than evolution.

This all means that a little, teensy-eensy evolution idea, is bucking overwhelming humongous C&E that says that evolution is something entirely different than evolutionists suggest. To put this into perspective, the odds that evolution could exist would be like a goldfish swimming up Victoria Falls in Zambia. It would like having a standard lottery drawing of millions of entries, with all the participants full winners.

Close to 100% of evolution is simply a science fiction story. All of the 100% of C&E that has been observed is humongous. The little bit of evolution that seems to truly be evolution, still has C&E behind it, making it to be something entirely different than the evolution that evolutionists are proclaiming.

In addition, no other points against evolution have been dismissed. Volumes have been filled with real reasons why evolution is false. Let's get to the point, and dismiss evolution as the science fiction that it is. But since the science fiction known as evolution is being touted as fact by those who know otherwise, evolution is a big, fat hoax.

No nonooo. ''If there is an operation wherein we haven't found C&E, nothing else has been found in that operation, either. This means that it's C&E, or we don't know'' Fallacy. Again you cannot prove that everything falls down to C&E, specially in the past. Just like you don't to accept carbon dating or other dating methods because and I quote you here ''we can't be sure if they worked like that in the past'' just like we cannot be sure that C&E affects everything or if C&E existed in everything in the past. C&E is not known to be factual therefore you shouldn't use it.