Evolution is a hoax

[Vod]

What else you got?

I proved your god was a hoax.

What else do I need?

[BADecker]

''
Except that I showed the proof of it, that cause and effect is universal in everything. I'll say it again.'' Where have you shown this???
''Everything has motion. Even if absolute zero were found somewhere, everything has motion in its subatomic particles or wave (electromagnetic) movement. Can there even be a logical theory for something without motion?'' But  what you have to prove is that all the motion has a cause and you can't, why are you repeating the same stuff again? You can't prove that everything has a cause, period.

Again, I don't have to prove that all motion has a cause. Newton did it in his 3rd Law. You might have to think about it to understand it, but a good, simple explanation is listed here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg26961799#msg26961799. You even quoted it, above. Didn't you read it?

I'm starting to believe that you are trolling me now. Newton did not prove or said that everything has a cause, motion =/= cause. Where does it say that everything has a cause, quote it, give me the evidence or just shut the fuck up already.

As I said. Newton said "action" and "reaction." Show me some action or reaction that isn't motion of some kind. Show me something that doesn't have motion. All motion is reaction with at least one action that caused it. All motion is effect caused by at least one caused.

However, even big bang that you believe in is purportedly the cause of everything. So the whole universe is a cause and effect operation, according to what you believe.

Why do you attempt to contradict yourself like this?

[BADecker]

What else you got?

I proved your god was a hoax.

What else do I need?

To prove that what you proved isn't a proof given to you by God because you asked for it (from Him), even though you didn't realize you were asking from Him.

[BADecker]

''
Except that I showed the proof of it, that cause and effect is universal in everything. I'll say it again.'' Where have you shown this???
''Everything has motion. Even if absolute zero were found somewhere, everything has motion in its subatomic particles or wave (electromagnetic) movement. Can there even be a logical theory for something without motion?'' But  what you have to prove is that all the motion has a cause and you can't, why are you repeating the same stuff again? You can't prove that everything has a cause, period.

Again, I don't have to prove that all motion has a cause. Newton did it in his 3rd Law. You might have to think about it to understand it, but a good, simple explanation is listed here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg26961799#msg26961799. You even quoted it, above. Didn't you read it?

I'm starting to believe that you are trolling me now. Newton did not prove or said that everything has a cause, motion =/= cause. Where does it say that everything has a cause, quote it, give me the evidence or just shut the fuck up already.

I can't believe you're still debating with that guy. I actually blocked him as his stupidity was annoying me.

Since I show the proof in science for what I am saying, you blocked me because of your religious belief. There is no shame in that. It is only logical. If you don't want to stray from your religion, don't listen to the religious contradictions from others.

[Vod]

To prove that what you proved isn't a proof given to you by God because you asked for it (from Him), even though you didn't realize you were asking from Him.

We proved your god was a hoax.  So your argument has no basis.  :/

[BADecker]

To prove that what you proved isn't a proof given to you by God because you asked for it (from Him), even though you didn't realize you were asking from Him.

We proved your god was a hoax.  So your argument has no basis.  :/

God listened to your request, and gave you the proof, so you stand rebutted.

[Vod]

God listened to your request, and gave you the proof, so you stand rebutted.

Again, we proved your god was a hoax, so he couldn't listen to anything.

[BADecker]

God listened to your request, and gave you the proof, so you stand rebutted.

Again, we proved your god was a hoax, so he couldn't listen to anything.

You didn't prove God was a hoax, because He is the only place you could have gotten any proof against Him from.

[Vod]

You didn't prove God was a hoax, because He is the only place you could have gotten any proof against Him from.

"He" doesn't exist, as we proved he is a hoax.  :/

[BADecker]

You didn't prove God was a hoax, because He is the only place you could have gotten any proof against Him from.

"He" doesn't exist, as we proved he is a hoax.  :/

Since you don't have a logical enough mind to be able to state the things that your so-called debunking entails, with understanding, you don't know that there was any debunking of proof for God.

You are talking religion in a science thread, because you simply believe without knowledge or understanding.

[Vod]

you don't know that there was any debunking of proof for God.

There is no god - we debunked him yesterday.  You were there. 

[Vod]

I can't believe you're still debating with that guy. I actually blocked him as his stupidity was annoying me.

The key is when to debate with brainwashed people.

Try to approach them Friday or Saturday, when they have gone the longest without brainwashing.

If you try to talk to them on a Monday, or Vod forbid Boxing Day, you will get an idiot fresh off the gullibility train.  :/

[Astargath]

''
Except that I showed the proof of it, that cause and effect is universal in everything. I'll say it again.'' Where have you shown this???
''Everything has motion. Even if absolute zero were found somewhere, everything has motion in its subatomic particles or wave (electromagnetic) movement. Can there even be a logical theory for something without motion?'' But  what you have to prove is that all the motion has a cause and you can't, why are you repeating the same stuff again? You can't prove that everything has a cause, period.

Again, I don't have to prove that all motion has a cause. Newton did it in his 3rd Law. You might have to think about it to understand it, but a good, simple explanation is listed here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg26961799#msg26961799. You even quoted it, above. Didn't you read it?

I'm starting to believe that you are trolling me now. Newton did not prove or said that everything has a cause, motion =/= cause. Where does it say that everything has a cause, quote it, give me the evidence or just shut the fuck up already.

As I said. Newton said "action" and "reaction." Show me some action or reaction that isn't motion of some kind. Show me something that doesn't have motion. All motion is reaction with at least one action that caused it. All motion is effect caused by at least one caused.

However, even big bang that you believe in is purportedly the cause of everything. So the whole universe is a cause and effect operation, according to what you believe.

Why do you attempt to contradict yourself like this?

No, he said, for every action, meaning that if there is an action there is a reaction. What does motion have to do with cause? I already told you quantum processes which are motions seem to have no cause, maybe they do but right now the consensus is that they don't. Do you realize you keep saying the same thing? Newton's 3rd law does not prove that everything has a cause, period.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg26997067#msg26997067

[AnnaCepesh]

Oh almighty Hanuman!
When I imagined life on BTC forums it was like cybernetic posthuman future and what I found is disbelief in evolution and shaming woman for wearing short skirts. Well, logically there should be some altcoin for white supremacist, is there any?

[bkbirge]

Well, logically there should be some altcoin for white supremacist, is there any?

The guys who started the flat Earth thread could probably tell you. If not then it's just a matter of time before Chinese crypto hype bots pump one. "Goebbels Coin! Air drop soon!"

[BADecker]

''
Except that I showed the proof of it, that cause and effect is universal in everything. I'll say it again.'' Where have you shown this???
''Everything has motion. Even if absolute zero were found somewhere, everything has motion in its subatomic particles or wave (electromagnetic) movement. Can there even be a logical theory for something without motion?'' But  what you have to prove is that all the motion has a cause and you can't, why are you repeating the same stuff again? You can't prove that everything has a cause, period.

Again, I don't have to prove that all motion has a cause. Newton did it in his 3rd Law. You might have to think about it to understand it, but a good, simple explanation is listed here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg26961799#msg26961799. You even quoted it, above. Didn't you read it?

I'm starting to believe that you are trolling me now. Newton did not prove or said that everything has a cause, motion =/= cause. Where does it say that everything has a cause, quote it, give me the evidence or just shut the fuck up already.

As I said. Newton said "action" and "reaction." Show me some action or reaction that isn't motion of some kind. Show me something that doesn't have motion. All motion is reaction with at least one action that caused it. All motion is effect caused by at least one caused.

However, even big bang that you believe in is purportedly the cause of everything. So the whole universe is a cause and effect operation, according to what you believe.

Why do you attempt to contradict yourself like this?

No, he said, for every action, meaning that if there is an action there is a reaction. What does motion have to do with cause? I already told you quantum processes which are motions seem to have no cause, maybe they do but right now the consensus is that they don't. Do you realize you keep saying the same thing? Newton's 3rd law does not prove that everything has a cause, period.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg26997067#msg26997067

And action is the cause of the reaction, which is the effect of the action. You are picking at straws. You are using semantics.

Motions, actions, and causes are all related. Sometimes they are similar. Sometimes they are exactly the same. But never do they fall outside of each other entirely. Look them up in the dictionaries and encyclopedias.

Notice that you said, "I already told you quantum processes which are motions seem to have no cause." You show a lot of things that are your own shows, only. The basic, standard understanding of "quantum mechanics" has to do with the uncertainty principle. That's probability. In other words it is guestimations, if not downright guesses. In other words, it is not known to be factual.

Newton's 3rd Law might not say that everything has a cause, but there is nothing that doesn't have a cause. Didn't I already tell you that as you believe in Big Bang Theory, you are actually believing that everything has, at least, the BB cause?... if not many other causes?

If there were a chance that some part of evolution theory could fall into the category of evolution reality, it would be so small as to be outside of anything that science would accept as a possibility.

[BADecker]

Oh almighty Hanuman!
When I imagined life on BTC forums it was like cybernetic posthuman future and what I found is disbelief in evolution and shaming woman for wearing short skirts. Well, logically there should be some altcoin for white supremacist, is there any?

Nobody is disrespecting you for having an evolution religion. Not even God will do that, until the judgment, anyway. But even then, He will probably only give you what you are asking for.

[Vod]

Not even God will do that

He can't do that, because we proved he doesn't exist.

Evolution is the only possible explanation for how life happened. 

[Astargath]

''
Except that I showed the proof of it, that cause and effect is universal in everything. I'll say it again.'' Where have you shown this???
''Everything has motion. Even if absolute zero were found somewhere, everything has motion in its subatomic particles or wave (electromagnetic) movement. Can there even be a logical theory for something without motion?'' But  what you have to prove is that all the motion has a cause and you can't, why are you repeating the same stuff again? You can't prove that everything has a cause, period.

Again, I don't have to prove that all motion has a cause. Newton did it in his 3rd Law. You might have to think about it to understand it, but a good, simple explanation is listed here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1917510.msg26961799#msg26961799. You even quoted it, above. Didn't you read it?

I'm starting to believe that you are trolling me now. Newton did not prove or said that everything has a cause, motion =/= cause. Where does it say that everything has a cause, quote it, give me the evidence or just shut the fuck up already.

As I said. Newton said "action" and "reaction." Show me some action or reaction that isn't motion of some kind. Show me something that doesn't have motion. All motion is reaction with at least one action that caused it. All motion is effect caused by at least one caused.

However, even big bang that you believe in is purportedly the cause of everything. So the whole universe is a cause and effect operation, according to what you believe.

Why do you attempt to contradict yourself like this?

No, he said, for every action, meaning that if there is an action there is a reaction. What does motion have to do with cause? I already told you quantum processes which are motions seem to have no cause, maybe they do but right now the consensus is that they don't. Do you realize you keep saying the same thing? Newton's 3rd law does not prove that everything has a cause, period.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg26997067#msg26997067

And action is the cause of the reaction, which is the effect of the action. You are picking at straws. You are using semantics.

Motions, actions, and causes are all related. Sometimes they are similar. Sometimes they are exactly the same. But never do they fall outside of each other entirely. Look them up in the dictionaries and encyclopedias.

Notice that you said, "I already told you quantum processes which are motions seem to have no cause." You show a lot of things that are your own shows, only. The basic, standard understanding of "quantum mechanics" has to do with the uncertainty principle. That's probability. In other words it is guestimations, if not downright guesses. In other words, it is not known to be factual.

Newton's 3rd Law might not say that everything has a cause, but there is nothing that doesn't have a cause. Didn't I already tell you that as you believe in Big Bang Theory, you are actually believing that everything has, at least, the BB cause?... if not many other causes?

If there were a chance that some part of evolution theory could fall into the category of evolution reality, it would be so small as to be outside of anything that science would accept as a possibility.

''Newton's 3rd Law might not say that everything has a cause, but there is nothing that doesn't have a cause.'' Good, we got rid of newton's 3rd law, I'm making progress. Now how do you know that there isn't something that doesn't have a cause? Do you know the cause of all the things in the universe? No, you don't, you are just claiming for no reason that everything has a cause which is a debate among scientists, philosophers and many more, no one really knows and yet you are still here claiming that you do, why are you doing this?

[Vod]

Now how do you know that there isn't something that doesn't have a cause?

Badecker already admitted his god does not have a cause.  Therefore it's a hoax according to his logic.