Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 02:43:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ... 225 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] Denarius [D] - First "Tribus" PoW/PoS Hybrid Masternodes, Ring Sigs  (Read 504215 times)
enkayz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 100

hashbag.cc


View Profile WWW
September 06, 2017, 05:24:17 AM
 #1661

Im not sure if im the only one getting this error when building the linux wallet, but i cant seam to get it working (the pre-compiled windows wallet works great tho)

Code:
g++ -c -O2  -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wno-ignored-qualifiers -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/obj -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/json -DIS_ARCH_64 -DUSE_UPNP=1 -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/leveldb/include -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -MMD -MF obj/txdb-leveldb.d -o obj/txdb-leveldb.o txdb-leveldb.cpp
txdb-leveldb.cpp:26:10: error: ‘DB’ in namespace ‘leveldb’ does not name a type
 leveldb::DB *txdb; // global pointer for LevelDB object instance
          ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:28:17: error: ‘Options’ in namespace ‘leveldb’ does not name a type
 static leveldb::Options GetOptions() {
                 ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:31: error: variable or field ‘init_blockindex’ declared void
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                               ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:22: error: ‘Options’ is not a member of ‘leveldb’
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                      ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:40: error: ‘options’ was not declared in this scope
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                                        ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:49: error: expected primary-expression before ‘bool’
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                                                 ^
makefile.unix:182: recipe for target 'obj/txdb-leveldb.o' failed
make: *** [obj/txdb-leveldb.o] Error 1


I tried with these two commands but got the same issue
Code:
make -f makefile.unix
make -f makefile.unix USE_LEVELDB=1



Did anyone else encounter this issue?
Let me know if you need more info to debug


Make sure you have chmod a+x on src/leveldb/build_detect_platform - that is the most common issue of building the txdb-leveldb.o file.

hashbag.cc - where do you put your hash? region based stratums available now: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2044808.new
1714704200
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714704200

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714704200
Reply with quote  #2

1714704200
Report to moderator
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714704200
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714704200

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714704200
Reply with quote  #2

1714704200
Report to moderator
kingcarsen (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 369



View Profile WWW
September 06, 2017, 05:32:18 AM
Last edit: September 06, 2017, 05:51:07 AM by kingcarsen
 #1662

Im not sure if im the only one getting this error when building the linux wallet, but i cant seam to get it working (the pre-compiled windows wallet works great tho)

Code:
g++ -c -O2  -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wno-ignored-qualifiers -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/obj -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/json -DIS_ARCH_64 -DUSE_UPNP=1 -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/leveldb/include -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -MMD -MF obj/txdb-leveldb.d -o obj/txdb-leveldb.o txdb-leveldb.cpp
txdb-leveldb.cpp:26:10: error: ‘DB’ in namespace ‘leveldb’ does not name a type
 leveldb::DB *txdb; // global pointer for LevelDB object instance
          ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:28:17: error: ‘Options’ in namespace ‘leveldb’ does not name a type
 static leveldb::Options GetOptions() {
                 ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:31: error: variable or field ‘init_blockindex’ declared void
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                               ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:22: error: ‘Options’ is not a member of ‘leveldb’
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                      ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:40: error: ‘options’ was not declared in this scope
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                                        ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:49: error: expected primary-expression before ‘bool’
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                                                 ^
makefile.unix:182: recipe for target 'obj/txdb-leveldb.o' failed
make: *** [obj/txdb-leveldb.o] Error 1


I tried with these two commands but got the same issue
Code:
make -f makefile.unix
make -f makefile.unix USE_LEVELDB=1



Did anyone else encounter this issue?
Let me know if you need more info to debug


Hey I do apologize, I changed some under the hood workings of LEVELDB vs BDB. I realized I forgot a commit, which I just added: https://github.com/carsenk/denarius/commit/2291d5c50e9166fff2cb3ba8de2407a7f85bcc4d

Go ahead and pull the github again, you should now be able to build no problem with make -f makefile.unix Cool You do not have to use the USE_LEVELDB=1 command now as well only for building the QT.
enkayz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 100

hashbag.cc


View Profile WWW
September 06, 2017, 08:21:55 AM
 #1663

New version of ccminer - 2.2.1cuda9rc includes hashing improvements to Tribus.

My 1080ti gets around 105MH/sec on tribus, so it's quite the improvement. Version with hashbag urls in the batch files available here:

https://hashbag.cc/ccminer-x64-2.2.1-cuda9rc.zip

hashbag.cc - where do you put your hash? region based stratums available now: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2044808.new
AngryWhiteWolf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 06, 2017, 09:28:49 AM
 #1664

New version of ccminer - 2.2.1cuda9rc includes hashing improvements to Tribus.

My 1080ti gets around 105MH/sec on tribus, so it's quite the improvement. Version with hashbag urls in the batch files available here:

https://hashbag.cc/ccminer-x64-2.2.1-cuda9rc.zip

I made a quick test with my old brick - GTX 970. At intensity 19 (because is not properly cooled) I was getting with the old version ~ 20MH/s
With 2.2.1 using exactly the same command line getting over 28MH/s.
Power consumption more or less the same. Big difference, think I will update all the other GPUs to this version.
Thank you for the hint!
hackmyl1fe
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 06, 2017, 01:23:34 PM
 #1665

Im not sure if im the only one getting this error when building the linux wallet, but i cant seam to get it working (the pre-compiled windows wallet works great tho)

Code:
g++ -c -O2  -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wno-ignored-qualifiers -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/obj -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/json -DIS_ARCH_64 -DUSE_UPNP=1 -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/leveldb/include -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -MMD -MF obj/txdb-leveldb.d -o obj/txdb-leveldb.o txdb-leveldb.cpp
txdb-leveldb.cpp:26:10: error: ‘DB’ in namespace ‘leveldb’ does not name a type
 leveldb::DB *txdb; // global pointer for LevelDB object instance
          ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:28:17: error: ‘Options’ in namespace ‘leveldb’ does not name a type
 static leveldb::Options GetOptions() {
                 ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:31: error: variable or field ‘init_blockindex’ declared void
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                               ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:22: error: ‘Options’ is not a member of ‘leveldb’
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                      ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:40: error: ‘options’ was not declared in this scope
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                                        ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:49: error: expected primary-expression before ‘bool’
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                                                 ^
makefile.unix:182: recipe for target 'obj/txdb-leveldb.o' failed
make: *** [obj/txdb-leveldb.o] Error 1


I tried with these two commands but got the same issue
Code:
make -f makefile.unix
make -f makefile.unix USE_LEVELDB=1



Did anyone else encounter this issue?
Let me know if you need more info to debug


Hey I do apologize, I changed some under the hood workings of LEVELDB vs BDB. I realized I forgot a commit, which I just added: https://github.com/carsenk/denarius/commit/2291d5c50e9166fff2cb3ba8de2407a7f85bcc4d

Go ahead and pull the github again, you should now be able to build no problem with make -f makefile.unix Cool You do not have to use the USE_LEVELDB=1 command now as well only for building the QT.


Thanks for the quick fix. It worked and now its up and running Smiley
bitmagic1984
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 06, 2017, 06:38:51 PM
 #1666

Is this good to invest in denarius now ?
kingcarsen (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 369



View Profile WWW
September 06, 2017, 08:09:09 PM
 #1667

Im not sure if im the only one getting this error when building the linux wallet, but i cant seam to get it working (the pre-compiled windows wallet works great tho)

Code:
g++ -c -O2  -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wno-ignored-qualifiers -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/obj -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/json -DIS_ARCH_64 -DUSE_UPNP=1 -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/leveldb/include -I/home/pool/wallets/denarius/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -MMD -MF obj/txdb-leveldb.d -o obj/txdb-leveldb.o txdb-leveldb.cpp
txdb-leveldb.cpp:26:10: error: ‘DB’ in namespace ‘leveldb’ does not name a type
 leveldb::DB *txdb; // global pointer for LevelDB object instance
          ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:28:17: error: ‘Options’ in namespace ‘leveldb’ does not name a type
 static leveldb::Options GetOptions() {
                 ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:31: error: variable or field ‘init_blockindex’ declared void
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                               ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:22: error: ‘Options’ is not a member of ‘leveldb’
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                      ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:40: error: ‘options’ was not declared in this scope
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                                        ^
txdb-leveldb.cpp:36:49: error: expected primary-expression before ‘bool’
 void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = false) {
                                                 ^
makefile.unix:182: recipe for target 'obj/txdb-leveldb.o' failed
make: *** [obj/txdb-leveldb.o] Error 1


I tried with these two commands but got the same issue
Code:
make -f makefile.unix
make -f makefile.unix USE_LEVELDB=1



Did anyone else encounter this issue?
Let me know if you need more info to debug


Hey I do apologize, I changed some under the hood workings of LEVELDB vs BDB. I realized I forgot a commit, which I just added: https://github.com/carsenk/denarius/commit/2291d5c50e9166fff2cb3ba8de2407a7f85bcc4d

Go ahead and pull the github again, you should now be able to build no problem with make -f makefile.unix Cool You do not have to use the USE_LEVELDB=1 command now as well only for building the QT.


Thanks for the quick fix. It worked and now its up and running Smiley

Perfect!!!  Cool Cool
buzzkillb
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1021
Merit: 324


View Profile
September 06, 2017, 08:11:03 PM
 #1668

Is this good to invest in denarius now ?

Yes, but buy in small amounts, like 100DNR, and watch how cryptopia trades through a day, mainly the price of the sells.
enkayz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 100

hashbag.cc


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2017, 06:17:27 AM
 #1669

I feel like DNR is still under the radar; it's a great coin and looks like a fair bit of steam got taken away with the launch of some other 'new algo' coins which are looking more like PnDs as time goes on. DNR hasn't felt like that ever - the slow & steady block reward structure is going to give it long legs for mining. Even at the current price a 4 reward would make the coin reasonably profitable, let alone if the price goes up!

hashbag.cc - where do you put your hash? region based stratums available now: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2044808.new
tinchopf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157
Merit: 100


ARweY484XkBSRCaPMATy9PCfrKJkgqWF6T


View Profile
September 07, 2017, 10:11:30 AM
 #1670

I like how I can mine and still do other stuff at the same time. Algo is gentle on the gpu

Supercoiner111
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 07, 2017, 10:15:36 AM
 #1671

I like how I can mine and still do other stuff at the same time. Algo is gentle on the gpu

Tribus is so light compared to other algo and with the new ccminer 2.2.1 update getting at least min 21 dnr/day <--- profit right there!!!

Nippel66
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 258
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 07, 2017, 10:44:38 AM
 #1672

Dette nettstedet er ikke tilgjengelig

yiimp.ccminer.org brukte for lang tid på å svare.

Wtf is wrong with the pool? all my miners are down!

kingcarsen (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 369



View Profile WWW
September 07, 2017, 10:58:56 AM
 #1673

Dette nettstedet er ikke tilgjengelig

yiimp.ccminer.org brukte for lang tid på å svare.

Wtf is wrong with the pool? all my miners are down!

It looks to be offline atm, I am sure tpruvot will have it back online soon enough, it's a pretty big pool. For the interim, swap over to hashbag.cc or unimining.net or any of the other available pools  Cool
ldrvolga
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 07, 2017, 06:45:00 PM
 #1674

New version of ccminer - 2.2.1cuda9rc includes hashing improvements to Tribus.

My 1080ti gets around 105MH/sec on tribus, so it's quite the improvement. Version with hashbag urls in the batch files available here:

https://hashbag.cc/ccminer-x64-2.2.1-cuda9rc.zip

friend, thank you!
now my old lady digging faster  Grin
970 = 37MH/sec Roll Eyes
980ti = 55MH/sec Roll Eyes
felix18yu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 156
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 07, 2017, 08:17:55 PM
 #1675

somebody know what is with yiimp pool, I was mine there,but all day have some problem...

can somebody recommend good DNR pool?

thanks

▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ▶▶▶▶ Get Your Free Tokens Now ◀◀◀◀  First PoS Smart Contract Token
    PoSToken       Free Airdrop ●  No-ICO ●  100% Annual Interest First Year
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓    ANN ●  WebSite  ●  Twitter  ●  Slack  ●  Whitepaper
jimlite
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848
Merit: 1018


View Profile WWW
September 07, 2017, 08:35:28 PM
 #1676

I like how I can mine and still do other stuff at the same time. Algo is gentle on the gpu

Tribus is so light compared to other algo and with the new ccminer 2.2.1 update getting at least min 21 dnr/day <--- profit right there!!!

21 DNR a day? How many gpus?

Binance, hottest/largest alt exchange, 2BTC daily no verification. https://www.binance.com/?ref=13309371
NEED TO RENT A RIG? All algos at http://www.miningrigrentals.com/register?ref=627


  ✵ Super FAST block times      ✵ Block Explorer right in the wallet!     ✵ Stealth Addresses     ✵ PoW/PoS hybrid  
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
Ancient Money
for a New World
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
Join the conversation!
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██

                 ▄████▄▄    ▄
██             ████████████▀
████▄         █████████████▀
▀████████▄▄   █████████████
▄▄█████████████████████████
██████████████████████████
  ▀██████████████████████
   █████████████████████
    ▀█████████████████▀
      ▄█████████████▀
▄▄███████████████▀
   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

TWITTER


kingcarsen (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 369



View Profile WWW
September 07, 2017, 08:36:06 PM
Last edit: September 07, 2017, 09:40:57 PM by kingcarsen
 #1677

somebody know what is with yiimp pool, I was mine there,but all day have some problem...

can somebody recommend good DNR pool?

thanks

Hey Felix, see my post from above, there is also more pools listed in the OP here.

Dette nettstedet er ikke tilgjengelig

yiimp.ccminer.org brukte for lang tid på å svare.

Wtf is wrong with the pool? all my miners are down!

It looks to be offline atm, I am sure tpruvot will have it back online soon enough, it's a pretty big pool. For the interim, swap over to hashbag.cc or unimining.net or any of the other available pools  Cool

EDIT: yiimp.ccminer.org seems to be back online, he is having DNS issues, he is stating to use http://yiimp.eu/ until he gets DNS backup.
Nippel66
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 258
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 08, 2017, 01:43:13 AM
 #1678

Dette nettstedet er ikke tilgjengelig

yiimp.ccminer.org brukte for lang tid på å svare.

Wtf is wrong with the pool? all my miners are down!

It looks to be offline atm, I am sure tpruvot will have it back online soon enough, it's a pretty big pool. For the interim, swap over to hashbag.cc or unimining.net or any of the other available pools  Cool


He hasent paid for the domain as far as i can see!

vella85
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 590



View Profile WWW
September 08, 2017, 06:02:40 AM
 #1679

I feel like DNR is still under the radar; it's a great coin and looks like a fair bit of steam got taken away with the launch of some other 'new algo' coins which are looking more like PnDs as time goes on. DNR hasn't felt like that ever - the slow & steady block reward structure is going to give it long legs for mining. Even at the current price a 4 reward would make the coin reasonably profitable, let alone if the price goes up!

I feel the same way about DNR my friend even though it seems to be traded a lot on the exchanges. I don't see many people talking about this coin which is okay for me as it gives us more time to accumulate a lot more before people start waking up and seeing what this coin has to offer. We have a great dev and community here and I know that DNR will one day soon be a top 100 coin in crypto.

@Dev, Maybe we can have some promotions to get the word out there about this great coin? I know there were promotions when it was first launched but maybe now could be a good time to start them up again.

I can promote your project on X to my 100k+ followers for a reasonable price. Just DM me for prices.
iluvbitcoins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1150


Freedom&Honor


View Profile
September 08, 2017, 06:48:28 AM
 #1680

Round 10 payments for the signature campaign have been sent out!
I have rewarded puwaha with 1 extra DNR from my own pocket for his activity Smiley
A couple of inactive participants have been removed from the campaign!
Feel free to join if you wish Smiley

Looking for a signature campaign.
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ... 225 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!