Bitcoin Forum
July 17, 2019, 01:40:07 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][ICO] WCX – Digital currency exchange built by ex Apple engineers  (Read 174317 times)
Morguk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 571
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 10, 2017, 07:57:35 PM
 #1801

Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.

Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!

If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.
1563370807
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563370807

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563370807
Reply with quote  #2

1563370807
Report to moderator
1563370807
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563370807

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563370807
Reply with quote  #2

1563370807
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1563370807
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563370807

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563370807
Reply with quote  #2

1563370807
Report to moderator
1563370807
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1563370807

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1563370807
Reply with quote  #2

1563370807
Report to moderator
Coiner_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 102


View Profile
September 10, 2017, 08:00:37 PM
 #1802

Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.

Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!

If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.

An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal.
Morguk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 571
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 10, 2017, 08:21:47 PM
 #1803

Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.

Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!

If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.

An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal.

Why would I post a rebuttal to the following..

"they're just anonymous... with names".
"So?".
"That's funny".

Out of interest, you say there is a team, how do you know that? Please provide evidence.

Coiner_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 102


View Profile
September 10, 2017, 09:32:50 PM
Last edit: September 10, 2017, 09:45:40 PM by Coiner_
 #1804

Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.

Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!

If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.

An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal.

Why would I post a rebuttal to the following..

"they're just anonymous... with names".
"So?".
"That's funny".

Then I take it that you accept your "evidence" - "No team", "hiding contact information on domain" and having a beta bypassed - is nonsense. Got it.

Quote
Out of interest, you say there is a team, how do you know that?

I know it because I've spent more time on this thread than the (claimed) 1 hour you needed to post your drive-through scam accusation. You really didn't think about that, huh?

Quote
Please provide evidence.

Apart from the fact that it is you who needs to provide evidence for your list of supposed evidence, I'm not going to spoon-feed you since you clearly don't deserve it. The pagination facility provided by BCT is open to everyone and very easy to use so help yourself out. Start around page 50 and you might just stumble on the post with an email screenshot that had a name and another post that had another name when they decided to lock the thread. Also, use your eyes to view the Trello board you found so interesting and you'll see yet another name.
Morguk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 571
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 10, 2017, 10:29:17 PM
 #1805

Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.

Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!

If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.

An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal.

Why would I post a rebuttal to the following..

"they're just anonymous... with names".
"So?".
"That's funny".

Then I take it that you accept your "evidence" - "No team", "hiding contact information on domain" and having a beta bypassed - is nonsense. Got it.

Quote
Out of interest, you say there is a team, how do you know that?

I know it because I've spent more time on this thread than the (claimed) 1 hour you needed to post your drive-through scam accusation. You really didn't think about that, huh?

Quote
Please provide evidence.

Apart from the fact that it is you who needs to provide evidence for your list of supposed evidence, I'm not going to spoon-feed you since you clearly don't deserve it. The pagination facility provided by BCT is open to everyone and very easy to use so help yourself out. Start around page 50 and you might just stumble on the post with an email screenshot that had a name and another post that had another name when they decided to lock the thread. Also, use your eyes to view the Trello board you found so interesting and you'll see yet another name.

So you're saying I need evidence for saying there is no team, no tos, hidden domain info etc? If so I'll stick with my ad hominem and call you a retard.

Funny how you will take the time to reply, but not show any proof of a team because you don't want to spoon-feed me? Not a fan of Vitalik but his signalling theory quote works well here.
Coiner_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 102


View Profile
September 10, 2017, 10:34:45 PM
 #1806

Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.

Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!

If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.

An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal.

Why would I post a rebuttal to the following..

"they're just anonymous... with names".
"So?".
"That's funny".

Then I take it that you accept your "evidence" - "No team", "hiding contact information on domain" and having a beta bypassed - is nonsense. Got it.

Quote
Out of interest, you say there is a team, how do you know that?

I know it because I've spent more time on this thread than the (claimed) 1 hour you needed to post your drive-through scam accusation. You really didn't think about that, huh?

Quote
Please provide evidence.

Apart from the fact that it is you who needs to provide evidence for your list of supposed evidence, I'm not going to spoon-feed you since you clearly don't deserve it. The pagination facility provided by BCT is open to everyone and very easy to use so help yourself out. Start around page 50 and you might just stumble on the post with an email screenshot that had a name and another post that had another name when they decided to lock the thread. Also, use your eyes to view the Trello board you found so interesting and you'll see yet another name.

So you're saying I need evidence for saying there is no team, no tos, hidden domain info etc? If so I'll stick with my ad hominem and call you a retard.

And seeing as that is not a valid argument, you fail yet again at helping your case. But seeing as you had none to begin with I guess WCX should be thankful you're bumping their thread for free.

Quote
Funny how you will take the time to reply, but not show any proof of a team because you don't want to spoon-feed me? Not a fan of Vitalik but his signalling theory quote works well here.

I've seen better attempts at reverse psychology. This is pathetic at best.
hamnchess
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 11, 2017, 12:33:22 AM
Last edit: September 11, 2017, 01:17:44 AM by hamnchess
 #1807

@Morguk probably shilling another exchange ICO, like the couple other dummies who came in here screaming scam with nothing to back claims.
PlayerInVN
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 11, 2017, 03:04:53 AM
 #1808

Does anyone know the total number of wcx?
Joking313
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 11, 2017, 04:02:30 AM
 #1809

Does anyone know the total number of wcx?

1 Billion
MrLitex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 110



View Profile
September 11, 2017, 04:42:06 AM
 #1810

Does anyone know the total number of wcx?

1 Billion
Not quite right! Not more than 1 billion.

If the project collects $ 50 million at the ICO, it means there will be only 500 million coins.
Less coins, more profitability for investors.


Today I saw that the WCX appeared on Icoalert - this is a good sign.

MyCryptoBank  ――  Legal and Reliable Crypto Bank
Whitepaper  ――  CRYPTOBANK FOR CRYPTOCOMMUNITY  ――  Announce
―― Medium ―― YouTube ―― LinkedIn ―― Telegram ―― Facebook ―― Twitter ――
easyrimka
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 261



View Profile
September 11, 2017, 06:20:43 AM
 #1811

nice find , but im affraid the forum manager have lost hist faith in Bitcointalk lol, he is not posting anymore
alexberezov
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 290



View Profile
September 11, 2017, 06:43:24 AM
 #1812

nice find , but im affraid the forum manager have lost hist faith in Bitcointalk lol, he is not posting anymore
I think the developer is busy with more important matters than to quarrel here with those who do not believe in project WCX Smiley
easyrimka
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 261



View Profile
September 11, 2017, 07:07:03 AM
 #1813

nice find , but im affraid the forum manager have lost hist faith in Bitcointalk lol, he is not posting anymore
I think the developer is busy with more important matters than to quarrel here with those who do not believe in project WCX Smiley

you right, but people who trust WCX need also attention from DEV's , we are supporting the project ..
bapp
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 71
Merit: 31


View Profile
September 11, 2017, 08:23:13 AM
 #1814

Is something fishy here or is everything great or a bit of both? Wink

I'm confused.  what is it really all about? I can't see the Apple team yet.

New Economy Movement (NEM) https://nem.io
The Movement (MVT) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2068554
easyrimka
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 261



View Profile
September 11, 2017, 08:29:45 AM
 #1815

Is something fishy here or is everything great or a bit of both? Wink

I'm confused.  what is it really all about? I can't see the Apple team yet.

lol , nobody know, but at the moment, we have no names at all , only a nice interface and good exchange to test
kld_hp
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 370
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 11, 2017, 08:55:35 AM
 #1816

I can not find the information about the humanness and total coin supply.
nobytes
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 101



View Profile
September 11, 2017, 09:00:17 AM
 #1817

Does anyone know the total number of wcx?

1 Billion
Not quite right! Not more than 1 billion.

If the project collects $ 50 million at the ICO, it means there will be only 500 million coins.
Less coins, more profitability for investors.


Today I saw that the WCX appeared on Icoalert - this is a good sign.


While looking other coins in there, i am not sure if it is any kind of sign.
Morguk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 571
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 11, 2017, 09:34:27 AM
 #1818

Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.

Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!

If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.

An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal.

Why would I post a rebuttal to the following..

"they're just anonymous... with names".
"So?".
"That's funny".

Then I take it that you accept your "evidence" - "No team", "hiding contact information on domain" and having a beta bypassed - is nonsense. Got it.

Quote
Out of interest, you say there is a team, how do you know that?

I know it because I've spent more time on this thread than the (claimed) 1 hour you needed to post your drive-through scam accusation. You really didn't think about that, huh?

Quote
Please provide evidence.

Apart from the fact that it is you who needs to provide evidence for your list of supposed evidence, I'm not going to spoon-feed you since you clearly don't deserve it. The pagination facility provided by BCT is open to everyone and very easy to use so help yourself out. Start around page 50 and you might just stumble on the post with an email screenshot that had a name and another post that had another name when they decided to lock the thread. Also, use your eyes to view the Trello board you found so interesting and you'll see yet another name.

So you're saying I need evidence for saying there is no team, no tos, hidden domain info etc? If so I'll stick with my ad hominem and call you a retard.

And seeing as that is not a valid argument, you fail yet again at helping your case. But seeing as you had none to begin with I guess WCX should be thankful you're bumping their thread for free.

Quote
Funny how you will take the time to reply, but not show any proof of a team because you don't want to spoon-feed me? Not a fan of Vitalik but his signalling theory quote works well here.

I've seen better attempts at reverse psychology. This is pathetic at best.

Again you're providing no proof, just arguing. At least your sig post count is going up though!
PlayerInVN
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 11, 2017, 09:53:46 AM
 #1819

I think I understand.

Suppose WCX AVERAGE DAILY VOLUME = 1 billion USD

Transaction Fee = 0.1% -> 1 month gross profit = 1 billion x 0.1% x 30 = 30 million ($)

Profit divided by WCX owners = 20% x 30 million = 6 million ($)

Look at the estimated table: When WCX AVERAGE DAILY VOLUME = 1B

100 000 WCX --> 600 $
Huh  WCX  --> 6 million $

-> Huh = 6 million x 100 000/600 = 1 billion (WCX)

So we are discussing investment with hidden partners for a 1 billion WCX (EQUIVALENT $ 100 million) project. Am I wrong here?
Coiner_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 102


View Profile
September 11, 2017, 10:00:25 AM
 #1820

Coiner, I find it incredibly interesting how defensive you are about this project.

Any level headed person would say that the combination of the above is very suspicious, especially in this space!

If you are denying it's not suspicious in any way, you are either over invested in this project, a shill or an idiot.

An ad hominem is not a valid argument. Wash your face and come back when you have a rebuttal.

Why would I post a rebuttal to the following..

"they're just anonymous... with names".
"So?".
"That's funny".

Then I take it that you accept your "evidence" - "No team", "hiding contact information on domain" and having a beta bypassed - is nonsense. Got it.

Quote
Out of interest, you say there is a team, how do you know that?

I know it because I've spent more time on this thread than the (claimed) 1 hour you needed to post your drive-through scam accusation. You really didn't think about that, huh?

Quote
Please provide evidence.

Apart from the fact that it is you who needs to provide evidence for your list of supposed evidence, I'm not going to spoon-feed you since you clearly don't deserve it. The pagination facility provided by BCT is open to everyone and very easy to use so help yourself out. Start around page 50 and you might just stumble on the post with an email screenshot that had a name and another post that had another name when they decided to lock the thread. Also, use your eyes to view the Trello board you found so interesting and you'll see yet another name.

So you're saying I need evidence for saying there is no team, no tos, hidden domain info etc? If so I'll stick with my ad hominem and call you a retard.

And seeing as that is not a valid argument, you fail yet again at helping your case. But seeing as you had none to begin with I guess WCX should be thankful you're bumping their thread for free.

Quote
Funny how you will take the time to reply, but not show any proof of a team because you don't want to spoon-feed me? Not a fan of Vitalik but his signalling theory quote works well here.

I've seen better attempts at reverse psychology. This is pathetic at best.

Again you're providing no proof, just arguing. At least your sig post count is going up though!

If you're daft enough to think you can shift the BoP then let me make clear enough for your remaining brain cells: not gonna happen.

And if you're even dafter to think I'm doing this for my sig camp, you should read up on the campaign manager before further embarrassing yourself.
Pages: « 1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 [91] 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!