|
Coiner_
|
 |
September 06, 2017, 09:50:06 AM |
|
@WCXofficial
With hardly anybody on the exchange, what is setting/controlling the prices?
Related question, because volume is so low can one big order come in to rocket the price up or down?
You get invited? Yep. Vid in next reply. Kinda ironic huh? Really great but can you use a service that didn't have to show this:  That aside, it was a nice "review". I appreciate the fact that you actually spoke, makes it more human than the previous one that was posted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JoshuaT
Member
 Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
September 06, 2017, 10:03:45 AM |
|
Kinda ironic huh?
Why would it be ironic? Really great but can you use a service that didn't have to show this: Sorry, I didn't know that was a thing. Having said that, doesn't everybody have flash? (obviousy everybody doesn't, never mind) |
|
|
|
|
|
Retired
|
|
September 06, 2017, 12:15:10 PM |
|
Why don't they use HTML5 instead of flash?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coiner_
|
|
September 06, 2017, 12:36:06 PM |
|
Kinda ironic huh?
Why would it be ironic? Oh I don't know, perhaps because virtually all your posts in the last month on this thread had a "more likely a scam than not" vibe to it yet you get invited and end up using said "most likely a scam" product while, AFAIK, polkacoin whose posts had a "this is definitely legit" vibe didn't. Although the biggest irony would be mangaroooo who seems to call everything that doesn't fit him exactly a scam, getting invited to use it. Really great but can you use a service that didn't have to show this: Sorry, I didn't know that was a thing. Having said that, doesn't everybody have flash? (obviousy everybody doesn't, never mind) Shouldn't the question in the current year be "Who is still using flash?"? That aside, ask Google, specifically the Chrome team why they are dumping all that is flash. |
|
|
|
|
JoshuaT
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
September 06, 2017, 02:07:02 PM |
|
Oh I don't know, perhaps because virtually all your posts in the last month on this thread had a "more likely a scam than not" vibe to it yet you get invited and end up using said "most likely a scam" product while, AFAIK, polkacoin whose posts had a "this is definitely legit" vibe didn't.
Although the biggest irony would be mangaroooo who seems to call everything that doesn't fit him exactly a scam, getting invited to use it.
LOL. I call bullshit on that. Again. For the hundredth time. I ONLY ever asked questions that I want answers to before I'll happily invest. And not having gotten anything close to those questions answered, ever, I certainly didn't invest $25k+ in the pre-sale. I can see how you would think Mangarooo getting in being ironic. But then again, you don't need to get in to see it, do you, as you already trust and you believe and you don't need various important questions answered. Wcex doesn't need the believers in, it needs the non-believers and the questioners in to assess the platform with a critical eye. Polkacoin was as bad as the 'this is a scam for sure!' people, just on the other side of the coin. And I doubt wcex went through and picked people out to be accepted or not. Having said all that, it sucks you didn't get in. Everybody ideally should be able to see the product before the ICO happens. For all the same reasons that the answers to my questions should have been made available. So people can get the information they need to make informed choices. |
|
|
|
|
|
Coiner_
|
|
September 06, 2017, 02:26:53 PM |
|
Oh I don't know, perhaps because virtually all your posts in the last month on this thread had a "more likely a scam than not" vibe to it yet you get invited and end up using said "most likely a scam" product while, AFAIK, polkacoin whose posts had a "this is definitely legit" vibe didn't.
Although the biggest irony would be mangaroooo who seems to call everything that doesn't fit him exactly a scam, getting invited to use it.
LOL. I call bullshit on that. Again. For the hundredth time. Did you even read my post? I ONLY ever asked questions that I want answers to before I'll happily invest. And not having gotten anything close to those questions answered, ever, I certainly didn't invest $25k+ in the pre-sale. This doesn't affect my post one bit and I really couldn't care less if you paid $25K. I can see how you would think Mangarooo getting in being ironic. Based on this post, no, no you wouldn't. But then again, you don't need to get in to see it, do you, as you already trust and you believe and you don't need various important questions answered. That explains why I got in contact with Fran Strajnar before anyone else in this forum.  Are you done with your exceedingly inane assumptions or should I expect more? Wcex doesn't need the believers in, it needs the non-believers and the questioners in to assess the platform with a critical eye. It actually doesn't. It needs people who can look at things with a critical eye, whether they be believers or not. It's clear you fancy yourself a "non-believer with a critical eye" which would explain that flub. Having said all that, it sucks you didn't get in. Everybody ideally should be able to see the product before the ICO happens. For all the same reasons that the answers to my questions should have been made available. So people can get the information they need to make informed choices. For the second time, did you even read my post? |
|
|
|
|
JoshuaT
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
September 06, 2017, 02:45:48 PM |
|
Oh I don't know, perhaps because virtually all your posts in the last month on this thread had a "more likely a scam than not" vibe to it yet you get invited and end up using said "most likely a scam" product while, AFAIK, polkacoin whose posts had a "this is definitely legit" vibe didn't.
Although the biggest irony would be mangaroooo who seems to call everything that doesn't fit him exactly a scam, getting invited to use it.
LOL. I call bullshit on that. Again. For the hundredth time. Did you even read my post? Yes I read your post. Thus I responded as I responded. I'm calling bullshit on you thinking all my posts the last month had a 'more like a scam than not" vibe. That is what you said, isn't it? I'm obviously not calling bullshit on that I got in and Polkacoin didn't (on the assumption that you're correct that she didn't). Did I miss something? Please elaborate. |
|
|
|
|
JoshuaT
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
September 06, 2017, 02:48:40 PM |
|
For the second time, did you even read my post?
My apologies, you never said whether you got in or not. I take it back, it doesn't suck that you didn't get in, as either you did, or you deny that I think it sucks that you didn't get in. |
|
|
|
|
|
Coiner_
|
|
September 06, 2017, 03:16:29 PM |
|
Oh I don't know, perhaps because virtually all your posts in the last month on this thread had a "more likely a scam than not" vibe to it yet you get invited and end up using said "most likely a scam" product while, AFAIK, polkacoin whose posts had a "this is definitely legit" vibe didn't.
Although the biggest irony would be mangaroooo who seems to call everything that doesn't fit him exactly a scam, getting invited to use it.
LOL. I call bullshit on that. Again. For the hundredth time. Did you even read my post? Yes I read your post. Not quite. Thus I responded as I responded. I'm calling bullshit on you thinking all my posts the last month had a 'more like a scam than not" vibe. You can but it doesn't change the fact it did. That is what you said, isn't it? I said "more likely a scam than not". Did I miss something? Please elaborate. I elaborated well enough in the reply you quoted and you've clearly already started seeing it.
For the second time, did you even read my post?
My apologies, you never said whether you got in or not. I take it back, it doesn't suck that you didn't get in, as either you did, or you deny that I think it sucks that you didn't get in.My intentions for applying has already been met with your video so whether I got in or not has little to no effect. |
|
|
|
|
JoshuaT
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
September 06, 2017, 03:27:48 PM |
|
My intentions for applying has already been met with your video so whether I got in or not has little to no effect.
Glad I could help. |
|
|
|
|
doctorilla
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
September 06, 2017, 06:24:22 PM |
|
I just tried to login to see how many referrals I have gotten so far and it says my account does not exist. wtf?
the same shit...(( did they answer? |
|
|
|
|
|
sud
|
|
September 06, 2017, 07:23:05 PM |
|
Anyone who tested the beta think that it feels and looks like GDAX but with better (tradingview like) charts? I think it is dangerously similar.
|
|
|
|
|
hamnchess
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
September 06, 2017, 07:31:33 PM |
|
Anyone who tested the beta think that it feels and looks like GDAX but with better (tradingview like) charts? I think it is dangerously similar.
That's great if better than GDAX already. Dont have invite yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
MrLitex
|
|
September 06, 2017, 07:36:38 PM |
|
Anyone who tested the beta think that it feels and looks like GDAX but with better (tradingview like) charts? I think it is dangerously similar.
 Very good. |
|
|
|
onlytemporary
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 101
I am the original miningteam23
|
|
September 06, 2017, 07:40:59 PM |
|
What do the invitation emails look like? I don't want to miss the email amongst all the crap spam emails I receive. What is the Subject line and who is the Sender?
|
|
|
|
|
MrLitex
|
|
September 06, 2017, 07:43:43 PM |
|
What do the invitation emails look like? I don't want to miss the email amongst all the crap spam emails I receive. What is the Subject line and who is the Sender?
 |
|
|
|
onlytemporary
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 101
I am the original miningteam23
|
|
September 06, 2017, 08:34:16 PM |
|
Thanks for the post MrLitex
|
|
|
|
|
Coiner_
|
|
September 06, 2017, 09:56:38 PM |
|
I just received this email from Fran Strajnar:  Take from it what you will. In case you think this is just FUD, feel free to contact him personally to confirm. |
|
|
|
|
hamnchess
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
September 06, 2017, 10:28:30 PM |
|
Got invite for WCX. Beta is working quite good!
|
|
|
|
|
JoshuaT
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
September 06, 2017, 10:48:42 PM |
|
I just received this email from Fran Strajnar: Take from it what you will. In case you think this is just FUD, feel free to contact him personally to confirm. That sucks. That presumedly also means all the presale money is not in escrow as wcex claimed...and that there was no escrow established despite claims thereof. Thanks for sharing. |
|
|
|
|
|
