[ANN] xxxxx

[hamnchess]

mmm. I thought meteor were more popular. but is true its shitty framework, never liked it.

[JoshuaT]

@favdesu. Read the thread. They're just switching escrow. You've done nothing but post misinformation and FUD here. Please stop.

What's happened isn't how escrow works.  Thus, no, they're not 'just switching escrow'. 

[hamnchess]

@joshuaT what? I mean this was confirmed by the escrow himself...

[JoshuaT]

@joshuaT what? I mean this was confirmed by the escrow himself...

If Fran gave funds back to WCX, it was never an escrow, as that's not how escrow works.

If Fran returned funds directly to presale investors, that's how escrow works.

If Fran put funds directly into another escrow (that WCX set up and had agreements with to keep funds safely out of WCX hands) and if funds were never returned to WCX, then that's escrow as that's how escrow functions.


Related to that, WCX has made conflicting statements, stating that they are returning funds, AND they've said some presale funds went into a new escrow and some into an old escrow (Fran) AND they've said that they're now setting up a new escrow. 

[hamnchess]

Escrow is multisig wallet by definition so both parties access the wallet and need to sign off for a transaction to be made... see I told you you don't understand how escrow works lol @joshuaT

[JoshuaT]

Escrow is multisig wallet by definition so both parties access the wallet and need to sign off for a transaction to be made... see I told you you don't understand how escrow works lol @joshuaT

Are you really going to argue that if presale funds were returned to WCX control that structure qualified as as escrow?

[hamnchess]

Escrow is multisig wallet by definition so both parties access the wallet and need to sign off for a transaction to be made... see I told you you don't understand how escrow works lol @joshuaT

Are you really going to argue that if presale funds were returned to WCX control that structure qualified as as escrow?

Returned to WCX? where the hell did you invent that now. You're just trying to salvage your shit argument now that I told you how escrow works lol

[JoshuaT]

Escrow is multisig wallet by definition so both parties access the wallet and need to sign off for a transaction to be made... see I told you you don't understand how escrow works lol @joshuaT

Are you really going to argue that if presale funds were returned to WCX control that structure qualified as as escrow?

Returned to WCX? where the hell did you invent that now. You're just trying to salvage your shit argument now that I told you how escrow works lol

Answer the question.

[hamnchess]

Just read up on how escrow works man. stops posting BS trying to drum up FUD

[bytcoin]

Hamnchess. Are you part of the team or have you invested in the presale

[metgohan]

FWIW, I agree with hamnchess and the others for rational, on-topic conversations. There's been a lot of speculation and some "FUD" and negative talk, but the way I see it WCX has pretty much done everything they said they were going to do so far.

We'll see moving forward but the fact that they delivered *on-time* with their product (very few ICOs can lay claim to this) and have been really responsive to customer support gives me a big confidence boost in the project.

[Kuluv]

i hope it'll success

[JoshuaT]

Just read up on how escrow works man. stops posting BS trying to drum up FUD

LOL.  Ok.

[identifyuser]

i hope it'll success

the main thing that it was not a Scam!
Although it seems that the project is really worthy

[favdesu]

Hamnchess. Are you part of the team or have you invested in the presale

paid shill or part of the team. it's best to click ignore

[easyrimka]

any news about the ICO dev's ?

[PlayerInVN]

i hope it'll success

I'm, too. I like WCX's web. It's simple and easy to understand. I hope it's not a scam.

[ZanderKiel]

Wcex is providing a much needed service.

Beta tester here.

[MrLitex]

The number of users has exceeded the mark of 400 000 people, it's great.

[flattail]

I was the one who posted the email I received that said my BTC investment would be returned:
"We recently switched escrow managers and the payment you made during the presale was actually sent to the old escrow manager address. This happened to a few folks who bought during the presale while the old escrow address was displayed on the site. Do you have a refund address we can use to send you . . ."

I am just posting to let everyone know that my full investment WAS refunded to the BTC address I provided.

"You can resend those at a later date to our new escrow address. The WCXT tokens in your balance will remain intact."

I have not heard back from them at this point with a new address, but it is true that my WXCT token balance has remained intact (I'm sure if I do not reinvest they will disappear). Although I would like more transparency regarding team members and the company overall, to this point they have done as they said they would do. Since my funds were returned I have to consider whether to trust them a second time. It really comes down to whether or not I think they can reach their goal of becoming the leading exchange. That is a very lofty goal. I do like the profit-sharing program--that gives token holders a huge incentive to help the exchange be a success. If they are truly customer-centric and have the expertise to build according to customer wants, then I think they have a decent chance of success. Of course, there are a lot of unknown variables, including the recent regulatory moves by the Chinese government.